i have a GTX 1070 founders edition i have an i7 7700k cpu will

>>736651475
my dick is having bottlenecking issues so give me sauce pls

Running a GTX 1080 and I7 7700K combo here.

No issues relating to bottlenecks so far!

>>736651729
Google serina ruined orgasm.

>>736651729
alexa rydell, love fapping to her

>>736651475
Same OP, but I have a lesser i7. Not had any issues

>>736651475
Her face is so extremely punchable it's insane

File: 1493842243847.jpg (97KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 576x1024px

>>736651475
Make sure to run a 144hz monitor or you will never achieve more than 60fps. I have the 1070 & an i7 6700k, this rig can average 120fps with no overclocking.

>>736652451

>having more FPS than you can actually visualize

genius.

>>736653515
>criticizing an anon pointing out a potential bottleneck in a thread asking anons to point out potential bottlenecks

genius.

>>736653515
>letting your eyes be the bottleneck

>>736651475
You're a fucking idiot.

>>736653749
>>736653777

Checked. No seriously, what is the bottleneck issue? I didnt game for a long time and my current desktop is 9 years old. I ordered a new one on monday but kept the old 1900x1060 screen. Will I have problems?

>>736653972

never reproduce

>>736653515
do you own a 144hz monitor?

>>736653896
why?

>>736654150

How do I know if it is 144hz? It is a 9 year old LG flat screen

>>736654346
yeah it's probably 144hz
most are but obviously it's pointless considering you can't actually see it

>>736654312
Because there's obviously no bottleneck and you're here to jack off thinking about your own specs.

>>736654499

So I bought the following:

> 550W - Corsair Vengeance Series Modular
> 1TB Seagate BarraCuda
> 256GB SanDisk X400
> 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-2400 | 2x 8GB
> NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | EVGA SC Gaming
> MSI Z170A PC MATE | Intel Z170
> Intel Core i5-7600K | 4x 3.80 GHz, 6MB L3-Cache

Will I be able to enjoy newer games with that properly?

>>736654499
Not about seeing increased fps, It's about inputting actions and having your pc input your functions quicker to your screen. I t's a feeling thing not a seeing thing. You're probably playing on a 60hz monitor and never experienced a 144hz monitor. Must feel bad being poor.

>>736651475
Even a 2500k wont bottleneck a 1070, I highly doubt it would even bottleneck a 1080.

CPUs haven't come very far recently.

>>736651475
just picked up a 1080... im running an AMD 8350 lol

>>736654756
why is it obvious? the only info on the cpu and the gpu is a bunch of letters and numbers. how would i know from just a pair of model numbers that they have no compatability issues?

>>736654499
You can perceive more than 60 frames in a second but it's certainly closing in on the asymptote at that point. This is undeniable although the actual peak is ambiguous and of course has diminished return.

>>736654346
If it's 9 years old probably not, go to the advanced display settings (on windows) and find the display adapter properties, then click monitor. It should range from 60hz to 144hz. If it doesn't, you don't have a 144hz monitor. There is a noticeable difference between 60hz and 144hz.

>>736654874
I was mocking people who actually think that
I have one and it hurts my brain when I test 60fps for even a second

>>736655159

How do I do it on linux? I am currently on my browsing only linux mini PC.

Also respond to this please >>736654845

i HOPE HE TROLLING

>>736655439
>>>/g/61028032
these faggot nerds can help you
i think you'd want a 1070 if you're looking to play at 144fps
but i'm sure a 1060 will still do the job
and i'd get a monitor 144hz or not because a 9 year old flatscreen probably has quite a bit of display lag

>>736655788

I am not OP and I do not want to play at 144 fps

>tfw I thought I could avoid going to /g/ 4ever

>>736655439
what games would you be playing on linux lol install windows 10 for games, dingus

>>736654845
remember that the video card comes first. that's your bottleneck here

I'm stuck with an amd 8320 till I can switch my motherboard and buy an I7 and you think an I7 7700k is gunna bottleneck -_-

an i7 7700k BARELY bottlenecks a GTX 1080 Ti at stock... just saying

>>736656043

The pc I am using currently does not even have a graphic card. It is for browsing only.

Like Rising Storm 2 Vietnam, The new Ghost Recon and shit like that is what I want to play with my setup.
The video card of my old PC is a Radeon 5780 lol.

>>736653515
>the can't see more than 60 fps meme
I don't subscribe to your low quality retardation.

>>736654845
Yeah that's a good enough build to run new games on high settings

>>736653972
Most monitors have a 60hz refresh rate. This means the screen can only display the images at 60 frames per second. for a higher price you can get a 144hz monitor. It's typically something you have to specify when searching for the product. A 24" 144hz monitor from ASUS runs $200-$250. Higher refresh rate means you have a higher fps ceiling, meaning you can effectively utilize the potential of your CPU & graphics card (gpu). So if you have a CPU/GPU combo capable of performing above 60fps then the bopttleneck is your monitor, as it can only display a max of 60 frames in a second.

>>736654845
I would have gone with a R5 1600 as the system would have cost less overall and performed on par/better in almost every application, especially when the tasks or games are multi-threaded. but the rest looks awesome, if you want a good minimalist case the NZXT S340 is a good one

>>736654499
>It is a 9 year old LG flat screen
>yeah it's probably 144hz
No, it is very likely not 144hz.
>>736654346

File: 1496473775980.webm (2MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x600px

since op is fucking posting webms

File: 1497558358810.webm (970KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

970KB, 1080x1080px

>>736657150
isnt*

>>736656923
>>736656676
>>736656915


Case is Corsair - Carbide 270R

I am 24 now and started gaming on a PC at age 13 with World of Warcraft, now I am more into guns and cars but some buddies wanted to play especially the new rising storm so I gave in and just bought a middle class PC like the website suggested.

Paid 1200 bucks for that though including 20% VAT

>>736657111
yeah kid you obviously don't know what you're talking about most monitors have very high refresh rates because it's easy to make them like that and they would have to go out of their way to lower it but nobody can tell because you can't see more than 60hz

Would a 1050Ti go well with a amd a10 5800k?

>>736657320

Forgot to say that the case is also windowed which is a must for me.

>>736651475
sauce

>>736657150
sauce

>>736657224
i really need sauce for this nigga

>>736657325
No dude, you don't know what you're talking about. The refresh rate determines how often the screen needs to draw new data from the input source (input = graphics card + other necessary hardware for rendering, you dipshit). This affects not only fps, but how quickly player actions are displayed on screen from the time they are triggered.
Secondly, your claim that it is easier to make higher refresh rate monitors is completely unsubstantiated. You have provided no source for that claim and the data in terms of monitor sales indicates that you are wrong.
But assuming everything you're saying is true, just for the sake of argument, let's say it is easier to make those monitors. Clearly the manufacturer must be going out of their way to lower the refresh rate, as most PC monitors are 60hz monitors. Why would they do this, if according to your argument, it is detrimental to the company? Because they have now created an artificial novelty in the form of a higher hz monitor, which can be sold for more. So even if your retarded claim that it is easier to produce a higher refresh rate monitor were true (which it isn't as every action past a certain number of actions requires more and more material to support those actions in a device), it is in a company's best interest to produce less of them and to lower the refresh rate of their most popular models because "people can't see it anyway" and they can therefore sell the higher hz models for more creating a higher tier good, a superior product.

tl;dr, you're a retard who seemingly cannot apply critical thought to your ideas. Fuck off.

>>736658486
yeah sorry kid im not reading that i don't talk to idiots sorry :)

File: IMG_0546.jpg (941KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 2560x1440px

>>736657422
Anyone?

>>736657224
Sauce

File: 0dcea43dc12579fb71787a80b47cc7b1d15807d33ebc22b17f566674862a7ef2.png (960KB, 1280x856px) Image search: [Google]

960KB, 1280x856px

>>736658624
Oh boy I hope this is trolling. If you read it you would be proven wrong and know it. And you just can't have that, can you. Leave /b/, you pathetic child. You aren't ready.

>>736658682

Time stamp nigger face.

>>736658886
Yeah I am buddy
I tried hard to make that sound as ridiculous as possible so you would understand that I wasn't serious with the first one
I really hope you didn't spend that much time typing that shit

File: IMG_0547.jpg (1009KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 2560x1440px

>>736659033
Not me sorry

>>736658886
also seriously dude
>sorry kid
>i don't talk to idiots sorry :)
that should have been a dead giveaway

File: 1493908408176.webm (908KB, 856x480px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 856x480px

>>736658682
That looks fine to me, I don't see any real issues besides the possibility that the GPU could have the potential to perform better than the CPU allows it, but I really don't have much experience with AMD processors so do not take my word for it. Do some research my dude

1070? Are you a fucking peasant wtf

>>736659217
True on that the CPU might bottleneck it


Thanks

>>736659072
>>736659186
Don't start something if you aren't willing to finish it.

>>736659319
I usually don't break character I just felt bad for him typing soooooo much

File: 1493574394550.webm (2MB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x400px

>>736659217
fucking thiqq on the left holy fuck

muh

>>736657224
Their feet are so dirty

>>736659512
Wew lawd.

Sauce on that semen demon?

File: 1489711275657.gif (2MB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x360px

this better be fucking bait

File: 894556321232 throatfucking, blowjob, brutal, hot, young girls, young.webm (1MB, 1152x648px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1152x648px

>>736659736
no idea, sorry b

>>736659835
who?

File: 1496637819622.jpg (501KB, 1056x1080px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 1056x1080px

>>736660212
forgot to link it but

>>736659569
this better be fucking bait

>>736659133
That was a glorious morning....

>>736660415
Baiting is what I want to do watching these two women. Where is the sauce?!?