Anon how big is your cock? Are averages online really true?

6'

6.11

File: IMG_2875.jpg (232KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 768x1024px

Mine's this big. Pic is me.

Porn really fucks with your perspective on your dick size.

Seriously, world average is between 5-6 inches or something.

They're bigger in Africa, and smaller in Asia, and average sized in Europe/America.

Just make do with what you have, you can't do anything about it (besides losing weight).

>>736387270
how long is that

>>736387091
mine is avg length, slightly below avg girth, uncut. never heard complaint, never was told i was small. learn to use it, depth isn't key to her pleasure. as long as you're not 2 inches, you'll make her cum if she's not ruined.

8.5 inches long and 6 inches in girth

File: IMG_2876.jpg (172KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1024x768px

>>736387765

Just under 8" on a good day, and about 5.75" around (varies from root to midshaft to head, but yeah).

Another.

>>736387091
>8.5 inches long and 6 inches in girth
17 1/2 cm maximum size about 3 inches flacid.

>>736387091
>Anon how big is your cock?
Not big at all, maybe 6 inches at best.

>Are averages online really true?
No. People lie about the size of their dick quite often. You can safely reduce at least 25% ~ 30% of the size anyone gives you for a more accurate number.

File: IMG_20170205_030450.jpg (549KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 1080x1080px

>>736387772
This is me. I'm also a fatass

File: 0s939qM.png (142KB, 1053x685px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1053x685px

>>736387091
pic related is the most accurate statistical breakdown available.

howlongismyschlongDOTcom

>>736388073
6" is big though

>>736388308
5.5 - 6 is avg
8 is the front end of big

>>736388518
That seems high. Got proof?

File: IMG_20170620_030216709.jpg (674KB, 1944x1933px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 1944x1933px

About 7.5 inches

>>736388654
right here in this thread...
>>736388175

File: IMG_20170620_030358131.jpg (403KB, 1844x1798px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1844x1798px

>>736388697
Got a side view

File: 20161206_065524.jpg (777KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 2560x1440px

>>736387091
Mine...

>>736387091
mine is 4" which is pretty average from all the ones I've seen

>>736388697
this is 4 inches bro

File: mr_deeds.jpg (35KB, 585x327px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 585x327px

>>736388920
Oh I see good eye

>>736388799
how do you live with yourself

File: 20170620_023453.jpg (815KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 2560x1440px

>>736388816
moar of me

Small guys : git gud at eating pussy

>>736389075
No one cares

File: 1493664977491.jpg (75KB, 609x477px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 609x477px

>>736389052
the trick is to get a small asian girlfriend

>>736389137
>eating puss makes up for having a pindick

You need to be over 18 to post here.

>>736387091
5.5

When girls say that you need to know how to use your cock, what does that mean? I have a dick that hangs if that matters at all. Also a virgin.

>>736389346
I'm sure she is a wonderful lady

>>736389456
Don't cum and keep a good rhythm.

>>736389352
Lol call the cyberpolice I dont care

Hard: 6.5"L, 5.5 circumference
soft: 5"L x 4.5" circ

>>736389497
well at least size doesn't matter

>>736389638
But what about the surface area and total mass

File: IMG_0191.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

rate

>>736389591
Just stop spewing shit, virgin.
Women want a big hard penis.

>>736389750
8.5/10 i shaved

>>736389645
Of course size doesn't matter when she's made up

File: 1497476782991.jpg (70KB, 600x535px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x535px

>>736389645
>size doesn't matter

Im a virgin and I'm 8 inches long and 6 inches around. Will I hurt the girl if I decide to bang her? Will I have to settle for washed up MILF pussy?

Curious how anons have above average dicks.

Methinks they're lying.

>>736389779
Damn judging anonymous people on the size of their dicks on a vietnamese basket weaving board you're such a badass. I bet mommy gives you alot of Big Boy points for that.

>>736389975
Looks like you can only do anal. Usually the more experienced guys can take a wide dick like yours

>>736390024
Defensive anon has a small pee pee

File: e5b.jpg (43KB, 600x456px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x456px

>>736390024
>on a vietnamese basket weaving board

Keep trying bro.

>>736390053
I dont want any boipucci.

>>736387091
a beautiful curve is more important than size

>>736390159
>Posting in a thread literally filled with penises

>>736389779
This.
Fucking christ, people...how many women buy dildos and vibrators that resemble 5 to 6" dicks? THEY DON'T.
>women don't want a big dick, they just buy the biggest toys that will possibly fit inside their pussy

>>736389747
total mass is pretty useless, but my hard volume is 15.8in^3, surface area is 42"^2

>>736390104
>>736390150
Keep typing those witty replies, you can do it ! I believe in you ! You can type them alot faster if you stop shaking so much.

>>736390320
Plenty of petite girls who can barely fit a 5" though

>>736387091
looks nice but what are the dots in the tip?
10/10 would succ

My dick is 5' and I don't give a fuck at all. I didn't choose the size. Anyone who let's the size of the dick bother them is pussy beta. Deal with it.

>>736387091
I've been told mine's pretty big. after an hour or so of stimulation i can achieve erections of around 9 centimeters long and between 7 and 9 centimeters around at the base.

>>736390206
Because it rides the inner front wall better, where the nerve clusters are.

>>736390357
>gets called out for being master trole
>keeps pretending no one knows

You retarded brah?

File: 12.jpg (731KB, 1936x2592px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 1936x2592px

>tfw you have a small dick

>>736389914
Hey when you're under 5 inches you have to tell yourself that

6.5'

mine is 8 inch

>>736390570
Almost there buddy, you should say something about my weight too that would really rattle my cage.

>>736390320
>Fucking christ, people...how many women buy dildos and vibrators that resemble 5 to 6" dicks? THEY DON'T.
Most girls don't buy dildos at all, they buy vibrators, penetrative sex doesn't do much for them on its own.

>>736390594
Don't beat yourself up about it, I'm 6" and and too miserable to achieve a full erection.

>>736390673
K you're fat and it makes your small dick disappear

File: 1497633765291.jpg (58KB, 1063x799px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1063x799px

>>736390673
Keep going man, I'm really interested.

You pathetic enough to consider this an "argument?"

>>736390577
atleast you got dubs!

>>736390577
I'd want that inside of me

>>736387091
Too dark for me but perfect shape

>>736390953
Aw well thank you, I'd love to put it inside of you!

>>736390816
True im a bit overweight i should work on that, but you know procastination and stuff
>>736390827
I dont really consider it an argument, I mean we're doing this in a penis size thread you be the judge of that, also im bored as fuck

>>736388157
One of the best looking cocks I've ever seen

shouldn't all the smalled dicked dudes have to pay some kind of tribute to the big dick guys?
something like wash their cars or mow their lawns

>>736387091
How about a before pic

>>736391148
Thank you. I've been complimented on its curve for hitting the right spots. You a femanon?

>>736391119
Good girl.
I was just saying, for chicks there is no substitute for a large penis.
Sorry if that hurt your feelings boi <3

>>736391154
yes, especially if they have jew dick.

>>736391154
I'd rather just have my dick laughed at by girls

>>736391313
Awh shucks youre making me blush, no hurt feelings here hun <3

File: 20170620_182603.jpg (1MB, 2160x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x2160px

Idk man I'm rocking this pin dick of mine

>>736391154
But we already marry and financially support the whore women they're fucking...

>>736391493
Are you afraid to break it

>>736391447
luckily you dont get to choose.

File: 27e7136d926fef44678fab43a6813115c841e7d2.gif (2MB, 442x204px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 442x204px

>>736391313
Anyway faggots I'm off, enjoy your "trolling" and "edgy memes for edgy teens"

>>736391527
Incredibly

>>736391493
That's more like an extra wide sharpie than a pin.

File: 5372347247.jpg (297KB, 1686x1295px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1686x1295px

just over 7 inches and 6 around but never seems that way in pics.

>>736391572
I hope you have a nice day anon

Remember positive things happen to positive people !

>>736391493
Truly a pencil dick. I've actually never seen one that long and thin before.

Could be worse. At least it's not short and thin.

>>736391547
Jokes on you I get girls to laugh at my dick with little to no effort

>>736391788
It's not actually THAT thin and long in person. The head in the photo is being pointed down. It's still pretty thin tho

>>736391493
What girth is that ?

File: 001.jpg (30KB, 892x669px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 892x669px

I have a chode

File: 20160709_223252~2.jpg (612KB, 2006x3238px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 2006x3238px

9x6

>>736392507
That looks shooped

>>736387091
Mine is about 7 maybe 7.5+ on a good day and tbh avg. Now a days is like 5inches hard lol..

>>736392634
for sure. Besides, I'm over 8 inches and I don't look nearly that long. He fucked up on his scale.

>>736392634
Thanks, I guess.

>>736392378
I'm not actually sure. I don't really know/never really tried measuring girth

File: 50718149.jpg (438KB, 670x1024px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 670x1024px

>>736390694
this

>>736392440
If it work for her it's good

>>736392880
Is that you? Then post another angle..

>>736393010
Yup, girth matters more than length ever could. Anything beyond 6-7 inches is a waste.

do jelqs if ur worried kunts

>>736387091
By the experiences my various girlfriends have shared, I would say that online averages are pretty accurate. Somewhere around the 5-6 inch mark. I'm 8 long, and 6.5 in circumference. The universe saw fit to give me a large cock and very good bone and muscle structure in exchange for being 5'8.

>>736393064
I'm a guy, and prefer smaller for sucking (so yours?) . Sorry for fagging this thread.

>>736393064
True girth matters most, but I've been with a few girls who like it really rough, and if you can smash against their cervix they really get wild. Just have a long AND thick cock and be the real MVP

>>736392507
>>736392880

Post another angle...

>>736393018
No

'8.3 here. But i suppose im kinda lucky

File: IMG_1785.jpg (54KB, 712x950px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 712x950px

8 inches long 6 inches girth. USA
Although I'm sure the circumsicion gave that away

File: lol 2013 655.jpg (163KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 640x960px

8x6 1/2 pretty average I think

File: IMG_0455.jpg (1015KB, 3088x2320px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 3088x2320px

7"

>>736389346
Man, I have a small asian girlfriend that just turned 18 and i ripped her pussy with my 7 inch cock so now shes too scared to let me fuck her anymore :(

Small tiny 5'9. Thinking to leave it at that.

>>736396857
haha yeah all she lets me do is finger her but goddamn does she like to fuck my hand

File: IMG_20170617_203142495.jpg (1MB, 2340x4160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2340x4160px

big enough.

>>736387091
>scarring
>>736387270
>non-botched circumcision
>>736387992
>curved erection from uneven skin loss
>>736388793
>curved erection from uneven skin loss
>>736390456
>>736390577
>non-botched circumcision
>>736392507
>tightness of skin from excess skin removal
>>736394759
>>736395071
>non-botched circumcision

Over 30% of circumcisions are botched. Seems that statistic is true in this thread.

>>736387091
16cm.

File: after-00S0S_f1wRGOjP0iN_600x450_1490714817644_1497379468546.jpg (33KB, 590x349px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 590x349px

7.5

7x5 the most unimpressive dick that is "above average" by statistics

I would like a bit more girth tbh

Probably small. never measured out of fear of killing myself if I knew for sure.

>>736399258
Male genital mutilation is a fucking epidemic.

>>736401439
Would definitely suck on that

File: eJwVzMENwyAMAMBdGAATTAzJNoggQhQKwu4r6u5tf_e6R73nrXZ1igzeAY7Kqc9Ds_QZS9al93LnOCrr1BtEkZjOll_CYDeDhEjOB7M4orABWvOzX41znsJKaKG2f3ONoj5fv44hzw.BVKwcX-bd0hF_TfjnSUM3zZPTKE.jpg (32KB, 451x601px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 451x601px

6 in

File: B1B7ds1.gif (2MB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x300px

i'd give anything to have a huge cock instead of my dicklette

>>736401601
Let him out

File: 1497962319949730635408.jpg (1MB, 2160x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x2160px

Rate and guess size

>>736401775
3 inches with fupa

File: 20170317_122328.jpg (732KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 1600x1200px

just this poor little fella, but its ok since not many people have seen it and I doubt ever will

idk about averages but my gay brother says that about 5.5-6 inches is what he sees the most so I guess there is some truth in those stats

File: IMG_6111 copy.jpg (62KB, 640x398px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x398px

>>736401763

>>736390320
Totally agree most of the stimulation come from other areas, voice

>>736401883
8/10
Would choke on

>>736387091
I'm 6.5" long and tried on a standard condom. The thing was about an inch short.I'm pretty sure the online stats are close to accurate.

>>736401913
Would suck and sit on

hey guys, do any of you feel like your dick is smaller than it actually measures? mine measures at 7in on the dot, but when I take pics it kinda looks smaller and I always have to resort to angle tricks. is it because of my height? im not a fatass either

>>736390320
>Being this disconnected with reality

>>736402271

Yeah i get the same, also when standing up and looking down it looks a hell of alot smaller then if you was sitting down.

>>736402271
your dick probably is smaller than you think. either that or you measure it wrong

File: IMG_7139.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

6.5-7"

>>736401986
well thank you anon!

File: G_20170512_10075814.gif (2MB, 556x476px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 556x476px

I am a little over 8x5.5. Feels good

>>736401439
This is what cocks are supposed to look like.

People in the US think it's normal for cocks to "come in different shapes" (curved, uneven girth), but that's just the mutilation >>736399258.

I feel awful for >>736392507. The skin is so tight the girth is uneven. Shaft skin is supposed to be like >>736401439, able to slide up and down the shaft during masturbation. How does >>736392507 even masturbate?

I came to this thread to see if the statistics on botched circumcisions were true, and seeing actual pictures of so many actual anons makes me want to fucking wretch. DO NOT CIRCUMCISE YOUR CHILDREN.

File: IMG_0417.jpg (198KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1280x960px

7

>>736399258
Curved dick is best dick tho.

>>736403864
What about ludicrous tightness and uneven girth from excessive skin removal like >>736390456 and >>736392507?

File: uncutcurve.jpg (167KB, 600x903px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 600x903px

>>736403465
Dicks do come in all shapes and sizes, though. Here is an uncut with a curve.

File: 10.jpg (181KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 540x720px

7 inches

>>736404238
My mistake, though it also comes from uneven skin removal in 16% of circumcised men. Girth variance, though, comes only from excessive skin removal.

The anons in >>736403987 have it the worst, and botches like that happen 27% of the time.

>>736404433
those are some very specific numbers you have for your percentages there

>>736404433
He read it on the internet so it must be true guys come on.

File: 15.jpg (65KB, 432x616px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 432x616px

>>736404433
>>736404433
could i get your opinion on my circumcision?

>>736404488
>>736404544
It's from
>"A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood"
>T. Hammond
>BJU International (83, Suppl. 1), p. 85-92, January, 1999 (British Journal of Urology)
A peer-reviewed medical journal article.

You can read it here:
http://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm

It's the reason I came to this thread.

The relevant passage is:

>Without appropriate research on outcome, presumptions of beneficial or even benign results from childhood circumcision are unjustified. Respondents reported wide-ranging physical consequences from their circumcisions. Among the most significant were prominent scarring (33%), insufficient penile skin for comfortable erection (27%), erectile curvature from uneven skin loss (16%), pain and bleeding upon erection/manipulation (17%), painful skin bridges (12%), other, e.g. beveling deformities of the glans, meatal stenosis, recurrent non-specific urethritis, (20%).

>>736387091
Am I the only one that has never bothered to measure?

File: wuteven.png (598KB, 800x615px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 800x615px

>>736404433
Is there a sauce you're getting all this from?
Here's a weird uncut. I can keep finding pics if you want, though.

>>736404697
so since its written down in that, it must be true

if you think 27% of the guys who are circumcised have "insufficient penile skin for a comfortable erection" or is 16% of cut guys bleed when they get a boner you are dumb as shit

>>736404697
Stopped at "severity of mutilation."
You can always judge an author's biases by the language they choose to use. This author clearly has an agenda to push.
Still might go back in and read methods for the hell of it.

>>736404872
Do you not know what "peer-reviewed medical journal article" means?

>>736405028
>Mutilate (verb): to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts

It's a proper medical use of the term.

The main thing is that the foreskin is not just a piece of skin. The foreskin is an erogenous highly innervated double-layered fold of smooth muscle tissue, blood vessels, neurons, skin, and mucous membrane. Without it, there is less ejaculation control (the frenulum helps regulate ejaculation), less lubrication during sex (the foreskin keeps the woman's fluids in the vagina during intercourse), and the glans keratinizes (callouses), substantially decreasing sensitivity. If my foreskin is retracted when I wear pants, the sensation of my glans rubbing against my underwear is too intense, and I have to go to a restroom to pull up my foreskin. As a double-layer fold of highly innervated smooth muscle tissue, nerves, skin, and mucous membrane, the foreskin is pink and sensitive on the underside and is a tickly sort of erogenous. Mutilating the penis by cutting it off is a disgusting, barbaric practice.

>>736405028
>You can always judge an author's biases by the language they choose to use

How the fuck else cunty bollocks ESP?

>>736405121
ya i know what it means, i just think you are taking a single experiment and applying it as a universal law

haven't you ever heard of the problem of induction?

>>736405170
It's called statistics, anon. One can use statistics to evaluate a confidence interval for a population from a random sample contingent on its size, and part of the peer-review process ensures the study meets the proper criteria for statistical significance.

>>736405443
right but it could always be the case that youre wrong, since statistics rely on probability and not universality or certainty

>>736387091
6.5 in length and 5.5 girth. Never been with a girl where it wasn't nearly too much

File: IMG_0383.jpg (68KB, 583x437px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 583x437px

>>736403722
Another picture of my curve

>>736405121
I never said the word "mutilate" isn't correct. I implied that they intentionally chose that word due to its negative connotations.
Bro, anybody who can read can see that this article is pushing an agenda. You can't see it because you agree with it.
The most reliable articles always go out of their way to stay as neutral as possible. Even just skimming through this, I can see that it probably isn't reliable.
>a synopsis presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Sexual Mutilations
How neutral does that sound to you?
Are there any other, better-written articles that confirm these statistics? Because you can't just pick the one that supports you the best and roll with it.
Also, the article doesn't draw any conclusions on uncut penises. I don't know where the hell you're getting the uncut being straight and normal thing from.

>>736405638
not to mention a single, cherry picked article from 10 years ago doesnt exactly prove anyone's point about anything

we could just as easily pick an article with results that conflict the results of his article

>>736405443
Any statistical study that has less than 1,000 participants is basically shit.

>>736388175
>Tfw 7 inches hard and 3 inches soft
>both in the top and bottom 10percentile
What's wrong with my penor guys?

>>736405776
*2inches soft, typo

>>736405713
You said that a lot more succinctly than I did, kek.
I work in the fucking medical field. Basically half of my undergrad was learning how to spot shit articles. More people need that skill...

>>736405945
i was a philosophy and history major, so it was my responsibility to write shit articles

>>736405513
Then you don't believe in science. We are not 100% confident in the existence of the Higgs Boson, only five sigma (in other words, we are only 99.99997% confident that the Higgs Boson exists). All of science relies on statistics and a theory is verified if experiments confirm it to within an established confidence interval.

>>736405713
>>736405945
>>736405722
Not true. With a random sample of 546 (what the study used), if 27% of respondents reported excessive skin tightness, we can use the β distribution to conclude that we can be 99.996% confident that at least 20% of circumcised men overall experience excessive skin tightness.

99.996% confident.

Here's the math:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(integral+of+x%5E(546*.27)*(1-x)%5E(546*.73)+from+.2+to+1)%2F(integral+of+x%5E(546*.27)*(1-x)%5E(546*.73)+from+0+to+1)

im like 8in so avg I guess

>>736406065
what does "believe in science" mean?

File: Snapchat-2101808435.jpg (204KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 720x1280px

>>736387835
me 2 m8. R8 also?

File: 5b7d2854-a2ab-44e8-b857-40ee184c5c89.jpg (73KB, 615x820px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 615x820px

/thread

File: kek.jpg (441KB, 3500x2940px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 3500x2940px

>>736406011
Thanks for the keks. My sides have left the stratosphere.
You're alright for a philosofag.

>>736399258
Youve got quite a Keen eye for cock anon.

>>736406215
Why the hand is so feminine

File: 1483880232813.jpg (110KB, 1000x847px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1000x847px

>>736406281
Cause it's your mom's

>>736406142
Believe in scientific "facts" verified by experiments, such as that exercise improves memory or that quarks exist.

>>736406065
Alright then, if the stats are accurate, the results should be repeated in another study. Go find it.
>Protip: you can't.

>>736403465
You're not one sucking my dick, so you keep your dick skin morals to yourself faggot, worry about your dick before all these /b/ros

File: wow.jpg (112KB, 432x768px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 432x768px

>>736406315
That is not how you spell mine's, If you'd finished school you would know that..

>>736406373
i think you are confusing "induction" with science

science could not be purely inductive, for then it would be circular, there must be universal laws in science as the foundation, otherwise inductino would support induction, which is circular logic

when i say "all objects have mass" i have mad a universal law, it supercedes induction, because it goes beyond probability and creates a certainty which exists in every single possible scenario

all induction is based upon probability, but induction is not the entirety of science, otherwise we could never get a universal law

16.5cm... cant upload a pic cuz its more than 2mb

File: 1489951602715.webm (686KB, 360x640px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 360x640px

Guess size

>>736406659
Nine?

>>736406659
5 inches

File: 20170517_074919.jpg (2MB, 2196x1944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2196x1944px

Over 7" base girth

>>736387091
13 cm

>>736406463
What I'm telling you is that the thing about peer-reviewed studies is that they establish what they show to within their confidence intervals. We can be 99.996% confident that another study would find that at least 20% of circumcised men experience excessive tightness. [spoiler]And this thread was kind of a mini-study in which I found at least two dicks with this problem >>736403987. If I browse a bunch of these threads, I could make my own statistically significant study. You can do this, too.[/spoiler]

>>736406513
Science never proves anything; it only fails to falsify. It is entirely inductive; science can never prove any universal law. General relativity is but a theory we have yet to falsify. The only universal law is mathematical theorems.

>>736407142
thats one way to look at science, but then we are left with things like you said, we never have any universal laws or certainty about induction

but how can you say "experiments verify the theory" when you also say "science never proves anything"? how can the experiments be verified if no proof has occurred?

and if math is the only universal law, what about statements like "all objects exist within space" or "force equals mass times acceleration"? are those statements not universal laws put into grammatical form?

File: Girugamesh.png (173KB, 630x374px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 630x374px

These threads are awful and you should all kill yourselves

>>736407142
>We can be 99.996% confident that another study would find that at least 20% of circumcised men experience excessive tightness.
Yes. And if this is true, you should be able to find another peer-reviewed study that shows the same results.
But you probably can't because the study is shit.

>>736407142
>Science never proves anything; it only fails to falsify. It is entirely inductive; science can never prove any universal law. General relativity is but a theory we have yet to falsify. The only universal law is mathematical theorems.
>>736407267
This is one of the few things he's actually right about.
Things like F=ma are scientific laws, which basically means "we are really really really sure this is probably how it works, but we could be wrong."

>>736407267
In science, "verify" means either "fail to falsify" or "establish to within the desired confidence interval," which in physics is 5σ (99.99997% confident).

It is true that we are never certain about anything in science: we only have theories we have failed to falsify like GR and QFT and experiments that "verify" their predictions to a 5σ confidence level.

With respect to statements like "all objects exist in space," here's the thing about physics: it consists of mathematical models. That's all we have. We have to specify the mathematical model we're working in, which in the case of GR is a Lorentzian manifold. "Space" means the Lorentzian manifold, and "object" means stress-energy tensors on the Lorentzian manifold.

We can never say anything about actual reality. We can only say things about our mathematical models and say with 5σ confidence that reality behaves the same as our mathematical model with respect to what we have tested.

No universal truths. Only mathematical models and confidence intervals.

>>736407888
>>736407990

so we have no universal laws? then induction is based solely upon induction, and we have no reason to follow it other than custom and convenience. science is merely custom. (this is hume's answer to the problem of induction)

another option is to say "there are certain laws which are completely true and serve as the basis for science, and which save it from circularity. science is not just custom, science is about the world, we can know about the world through universal laws of reason (this is kant's answer to the problem of induction)

>>736402567
One of the prettiest dicks I've ever seen.

Under average. Maybe 5'.

Still gets the job done and I'm lucky enough to be with a wife who cums from PIV

>>736408067
When I said there are no univeral truths, I meant in science.

There are universal truths, and these are called mathematical theorems. "Every odd number greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes" is a universal truth, absolutely 100% true from a priori axiomatic deductive logic.

The fact we have no universal laws is why Gödel said he doesn't believe in natural science. He was a mathematical formalist; I suppose I am too. Mathematics is only realm in which absolute truth exists.

Contingent on the only primitive (circularly defined) term in mathematics: *set*. So even mathematics is circular in a way.

>>736408768
i did too basically

when one talks of "universal laws" one automatically speaks of science. what could a universal law be other than science? (assuming one existed)

you are basically taking hume's position, hume said "math is true based upon the meaning of words, and not matters of fact"

kant said "math is true based upon the world and our relationship with the world"

File: Optimized-20161124_030743.jpg (584KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1200x675px

Here is my cawk

>>736408768
at the end of the day you have to deal with trying to prove how statements like "all objects exist within space" or "every cause must come before its effect" are somehow not universal laws

>>736408891
Then Hume was right (except that the truth in the meaning of the words *is* a matter of fact) and Kant should not have spoken about a subject in which he was not an expert. Mathematics has absolutely nothing to do with the world.

>>736409030
Those are not mathematical statements and thus have no objective meaning.

>>736409138
>>736409138
kant is actually seen as the prevailing victor in that contest lol

kant's argument was that in a statement like 2 +2 = 4 no amount of analysis of 2 will lead you to 4, in other words in the "essence" of 2 you will not find 4, only when you combine the idea with another idea do you get to 4

if 4 can't be found in 2 then it can't be in its meaning, and therefore when we say 2 + 2 = 4 we are talking about things other than just the meaning of words (this is kant's famous "synthetic a priori" a judgement that is about the world, but is before experience)

before kant math was seen as analytic (based upon the meaning of words) but after kant math was seen to be synthetic (based upon the world)

File: New Canvas.jpg (150KB, 1366x716px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1366x716px

>>736387270
It's ok to have a small dick anon

>>736409138
you see what you are left with right?

"math is only about the meaning of words, but only mathematical statements have meaning?"

how can we have "the meaning of words" if only mathematical statements have meaning?

>>736409424
I see what you did there.

>>736408390
thanks

>>736387091
well thats pretty huge if its yours
nice cock :)

if you care that much about dick size youre either a lousy beta or gay

>>736408921
wow thats a handsome frog you got there i really want to put my mouth on it

>>736409446
I cannot understand you because you are not speaking math.

>>736410035
oh sorry, it must be all this english we are throwing around

i wonder how we are speaking if it doesnt actually mean anything?

>>736410133
It doesn't, and "meaning" doesn't mean anything, nor does this sentence. Everything is gibberish except for mathematics.

>>736387091
7'

>>736410389
oh ok, its good that you were able to convey that idea with out having any meaning behind your words

File: 20170608_151632.jpg (2MB, 2042x2722px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2042x2722px

> Be me 350+lbs.
> Soft

File: 20170608_022017.jpg (1MB, 2268x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2268x3024px

>>736410683
> hard

>>736390436
Yeah. What are they

File: 575_1000.jpg (145KB, 1000x589px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1000x589px

avg, better off bending over for bigger better thigs

5.5 inches. Big enough to fuck my wife with, but hitting it from the back can be difficult. That's as much to do with the fat on her ass as it is with the length of my dick.

>>736411340
>>736411340
vomit

File: dic.jpg (1MB, 3024x5376px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x5376px

bang on average

Mine is 5 inches barely.
I tell myself that I'm not insecure but of course everyone wants a big dick. And it doesn't help that I am a grower and uncircumcised, so it looks like an anteater before I get hard. But my gfs never complained and I can do most positions.

>>736388697
That's like...perfect

>>736410494
This is the problem with philosophy that isn't mathematics (mathematics is a type of philosophy). When you do philosophy that isn't mathematics, you run circles with words that do not have a precise meaning and no-one really knows precisely what they're talking about nor can they perfectly communicate. It's all a spectrum of gibberish. Does anyone really understand Hume? Only Hume understands Hume and he wove a tapestry of words like an interpretive dance that others interpret with more words whose meanings are falling out between them. Gibberish is on a spectrum like the interval [0,1], where 0 is schizophasia and this conversation is 0.5 and scientific literature is .99 and mathematics is 1, and only at 1 do words and sentences have perfect, absolute meaning and thus have any meaning at all.

File: IMG_201611455677.jpg (129KB, 730x974px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 730x974px

>>736387091
6.5" girth here. dat 99.9th percentile man

blowjobs and anal are hard work

>>736411418
i dont think thats true at all, when hume says "all ideas are based upon matters of fact" or when he says "there are no innate ideas" i know pretty much exactly what he's talking about

my argument isn't that "philosophy can speak better than math", i just wanted to show the two differing options on the problem

>>736406879
tape measure or it didnt happen lol

>>736411510
i think the reason you think hume wrote a bunch of gibberish is because you just aren't used to reading about philosophy

hume was actually a very clear and precise writer, far more than someone like kant or hegel

>>736411642 for >>736411510
>>736411642
>>736411733
No, you did not understand me, clearly because I was not able to perfectly communicate since this is not mathematics. Hume might be at .99 in the interval [0,1], but he is not at 1, because it is not absolute, objective, perfect, absolute and absolute truth. I apparently cannot even communicate to you what "truth" really means, because that is the nature of the gibberish that is non-mathematics.

>>736411340
Real talk right there

>>736390577

from my slutty class mate at uni (female): "well... smaller dicks are kinda nice too since it's easier to get them down your throat"

Enjoy, anon!

Mine is 5.5 inches. I think it's too small but my wife loves it. So, whatever I guess it doesn't matter.

>>736411891
"truth" itself is just a word that proceeds from a given definition, just like in mathematics

the axioms of mathematics are like the "meanings" of words

assuming we want to talk about qualities of objects and not mere quantities, then we have to rely on something other than math

>>736387091
Your dick looks like a popeye's arm lol

>>736412073
this is a thread about penises....you know that right?

>>736412183
no this thread is about the problem of induction and science, havent you been paying attention?

>>736387298
this lol

>>736388793
Why is your dick sad

File: Photo on 6-20-17 at 9.04 AM.jpg (65KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x426px

mines small enough to fit into these

>>736406879
>>736411725
I'm at work so no base pic but here is a bit higher up.

File: 20170422_204212.jpg (975KB, 1750x1109px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 1750x1109px

>>736411725
>>736406879
>>736413286
Derp.

Anybody from/around vancouver BC want there cock sucked? Kik: supersala840

File: REDEMPTION.jpg (29KB, 480x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x500px

>>736389052
You'd be surprised, I use to feel like having a 4" dick would make girls laugh, but I found out that length isnt as important as the girth of your dick. Im 22 and I have had sex with over 15 girls or so, Only one has ever said my dick was small and that was after I told her I didn't want to date her and she hated me.

>>736413733
Also being attractive helps.

>>736412073
You do not know what mathematics is. Mathematics is the study of the qualities of mathematical objects. Topologies, manifolds, groups, rings, fields, categories, all of these are mathematical objects, and we study their qualities: Does every adjunction create a monad? Does every analytic set have a scale? Are strongly compact cardinals of higher consistency strength than ineffable cardinals?

Anything in which everything is perfectly defined is mathematics, and mathematics is the study of everything that is perfectly defined.

>>736413356
fair play, man thats a fukin thick cock.

im 6.5" girth so i know the issues that go with it haha

>>736413932
Yeah, with good length too. Lots of cowgirl position in my sex life, and not many blowjobs

>>736414239
U lying

>>736415274
Pretty sure the proof is there

>>736407697
This one was difficult enough to find. The problem is that male genital mutilation is a hush-hush topic that people tip-toe around because the barbaric practice is ingrained in the US (but not Europe where many national pediatric institutes condemn it); people have no problem calling female circumcision genital mutilation, but there's this bizarre denial in which somehow male circumcision isn't mutilation even though it literally is by definition.

But again, *again*: one. peer. reviewed. study. is. sufficient. because. that. is. what. being. peer. reviewed. entails.

File: 20170530_181004.jpg (2MB, 1395x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1395x2160px

Guess I'll be the only guy to do this here but my BONE PRESSED size is 7.2".

Not gonna lie its only about 5 and a half but it gets the job done. I dont mean to brag but I think it looks kinda cute. Its all pink at the tip and when im erect the skin makes the the shape of little pinky lips

>>736415721
What do you mean? the only guy to do what?

>>736416000
To give a bone pressed length. It's the medical way of doing it.

>>736391688

>6 around

laughinggirls.jpg

maybe cm. Stop fooling yourself.

Is it impressive if I usually last 30+
minutes of full head stimulation?

>>736390320

you have no idea what you're talking about (even though you probably left the thread). Women do buy dildos that are... perhaps just over 6, but that's so they can hold them. And they're not too thick either.

>>736416092
It's the high end of average. Also the amount of time I lasted when I lost my virginity. Your dick will eventually become desensitized and you'll last longer.

>>736416136
I'm not the guy your mentioning but isn't the most popular dildo size 7" in length?

>>736416136
An ex gf of mine had a 6" vibrator. She bought a bigger one after we were together for a few weeks.

>>736416069
Which is more ridiculous? The claim of 7" long or 6" girth lol

>>736416162
Sucks i kinda felt special

>>736416548
Neither are uncommon tbf. Even if only 1% of the population had these measurements that would mean around 75 million people had this.

>>736416679
Don't mean to put you down but to be deemed 'special' you should last about 2 hours. You'll get better with time.

>>736388175
my 4" girth :(

There's a dark ring around where I was circumcised and upon closer inspection, there's tiny craters and little bumps that have little white clumps if you squeeze them hard enough. It doesn't hurt or anything but I'd like to get rid of it, how fucked am I /b/

>>736416819
I guess so. Ill be honest i get a little too excited just by myself.

>>736416840
Dont worry I dont think women care about girth as much as they do length

>>736416854
Dont know what they are but if they dont hurt they cant be that bad

5 inches erect rip

>>736390320
and exactly how would you know this considering you're a virgin and don't know any girls

>>736402623
Is that a Fraggle

>>736417060
Lol, oh you poor poor virgin, how wrong you are

>>736387091
Just average 6.5. Haven't heard any complaints so far.

Would you guys consider 7.2" x 5.5" big for a maximum size?

>>736417060
They do. Unfortunately I'm right at 6" in length as well. But I've already married and procreated, so done and done. The once-every-six-weeks-or-so I get my dick wet means it doesn't really matter anyway.

>>736417279
Why would they even care about girth if length is what you need to reach that one spot?

>>736417656
That one spot is 3 inches deep inside vag

>>736388175
'includes fat pad'?

How do you include 'fat pad' when taking an accurate measurement? Measure the back of the shaft? Or press the ruler into the fat?

>>736409424
Screw that, lad.

>>736418457
Push the ruler down past your balls, measuring, then "round up" to nearest inch. You now have an internet penis size.

File: VID_20170603_023256.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>736387091
my dick is 5.5" long and 5" around

7.5" x 6.5" but I have big cysts on my balls so I'm basically never fucking anyone again unless they get blackout drunk just like me. Too anxious.

>>736417943
Are you sure?

5.5' here

>>736420027
Yup. Normfag here who is married and had active sex life prior.

From my experience and what I have been told, big can be better to a point. Everyone is different

>>736395956
more like 6.5x5 fatty

>>736420396
I knew two girls who claimed they wanted giant dicks, then couldn't handle me and I'm only 7 x 6.

>>736420899
Dont get me wrong, I've got a big dick. This is how these convos start with these chicks