Lost my s/fur folder help me out?
>>735698572
>>735698628
>>735698314
Hiw did you lose it?
>>735698674
>>735698744
>>735698797
>>735698314
I would kms if I lost my art folder 22,953 Files 30% are in artist folders rest is fur/feet/humanwomen and so on 18GB
>>735698850
If anyone has more bunnies to post please do.
>>735698926
>>735698990
Anyone have sauce om this artist?
>>735698926
>>735698314
Howcome S/fur always is "female fur posing".
These threads always have a severe lack of dickings.
>>735699081
<3
>>735699087
If you miss the dicks, then go make a g/fur thread
here ya go
>>735699087
>>735699213
>>735699213
This okay?
>>735699295
>>735699347
Judy is more than ok.
>>735699514
>>735699602
Im out of images. Someone else dump?
>>735699931
moar dickins on the way
>>735699087
I've been asking the same question for over a year now.
Answer: The thread descriptions are designed with the needs of males in mind, and do not take into account the needs of any females that may happen to peruse the threads.
Since I find this incredibly sexist, I am going to dick up the thread as much as possible while still posting s/fur.
>>735699950
would post more but sick of the captcha
>>735700040
There are no girls on the interweb silly
>>735700040
Hope you all don't mind dragonshafts!
>>735700284
>>735700378
So yummy...
>>735700548
And you guys know I have PLENTY of s/fur with dragonshafts in them!
On my phone so out of images
>>735699087
I've always been told there are no dicks cause s/fur means slit fur, not straight fur.
>>735700040
Moar like this please. Am diamonds.
>>735700805
Most of my dragonshaft s/fur is NOT like that, unfortunately.
Oh, look... A dragonshaft WITHOUT a female accompanying it!
>>735700040
>men are more likely statistically to find females attractive than females are
> hur dur sexist
levels of pantd-on-head retarded like this you don't see every day....
Thanks for the help getting my folder up and running again
>>735701301
Not what I mean.
The definition of s/fur is furry pictures that are considered straight to males.
Meaning the picture has at least one female in it.
>>735701508
The problem being that this definition doesn't take female preference into account.
>>735701508
>The definition of s/fur is furry pictures that are considered straight to males.
>>735701641
>The problem being that this definition doesn't take female preference into account.
bruh, heterosexual sex is a male and a female (with additional optional males and females)
That is like complaining that you never get to see furgirls getting creampied in gfur....if that is what you are looking for, you are in the wrong place, and clearly fundamentally misunderstand why we have different kinds of sex, and thus, various fur threads.
Explain to me how a male and female fur fucking is somehow catering to the strait males and NOT serving strait females, because you argument makes no damn sense to me.
>>735702028
Simple.
>>735702032 is also considered s/fur, despite not having any males in it.
If the pic has at least one female in it, it's s/fur, no matter how many males are in it. G/fur threads operate on the same principle.
>>735702397
This pic proves my point. The only reason this is s/fur is because there is clearly a female jerking him off.
>>735702276
Let's try again.
The vaaaaaaaaaaaaaaast majority of users on this site are male. In a straight fur thread, most of those males aren't going to be looking for other solo males. You can whine about equality and blah blah technicality but for fucks sake you're retarded and missing the point entirely.
Does anyone have the gif or we webm of this without the ad's text?
>>735702276
so wait....are you trying to argue that g/fur is sexist to somehow, or that >>735702252
belongs in gfur because lesbians?
face it....the sorting system we have now is fine, everyone knows where to go to find the specific kind of thing they are looking for, and while I'm sure we are all ears if you have some vast, brilliant sorting system for the rainbow of sexual orientations that no one else has been clever enough to come up with yet....but untill then, stop whining that things are sexist because they mildly inconvenience you, given that the alternative is a dozen or so "separate but equal" fur threads for all genders and orientations, which is never guna happen, given that being tolerated as staple threads is a new development of the past couple of years on /b/ for s/g fur. Unless you would prefer anyone who posts any fur being subject to a week long ban like in the old days.
>>735702581
That's not the point. The point is about the fact that there are females that visit these threads, and THEY are the ones interested in solo males!
Doesn't matter how small the number is. All that matters is that females come here too, and we want to see s/fur as well, and for us that means solo males!
>>735702735
Actually, I have been working on a rainbow sorting system... However, I now have a possible solution: A new tag.
Fem!s/fur.
>>735703002
>AKA closet faggot in denial wanting dicks.
Go to the gay thread, fuckboy. Take your neckbeard with you.
>>735703002
Look, i inherently have no problem with a more specific gallery of fur on /b/...
but i don't think it is necessarily the best idea.
/b/ is fickle. they tolerate us a few threads at a tame, but I would bet my next paycheck that if we went to over three threads on the daily, the furhate would start to boil to the surface again, then janitors would start deleting threads again, and we start posting more, and in a month or so, 40k furbashing memes everywhere taking up 80% of fur threads img count. mark mah workds mahboi.
>>735703002
The idea of the tag "Fem!s/fur" is to tell people that the pictures are considered s/fur for females, 'fem' being well-known to stand for female.
Do I expect the idea to work? No, because you guys are the way you guys are. I'm just trying to find a solution!
>>735703304
The idea is to use the tag "Fem!s/fur" in s/fur threads.
Fem!s/dur
>>735702735
Fur threads belong in the trash.
>>735698314
How 'bout some nice Zyklon B to go with it?