[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

People are reproducing faster than they are dying. People are

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 59
Thread images: 7

People are reproducing faster than they are dying. People are using resources faster than they can be restored. Fossil fuels will run out within a matter of decades, severely escalating current crisis. So my question, how can people be pro life? If anything you are killing more total people by having the child instead of killing it. Prove me wrong /b/ protip: you can't.
>>
baby killer
>>
everyone knows that at least 50% of the population should be culled
>>
>>735401853
Africa needs to be nuked, the entire continent. India would be next and finally part of the Middle East. We are allowing undesirable humans to reproduce in masses. Women who have college degree and are middle class are choosing to have 0-2 kids.
>>
>>735403209
That would make many of their resources inaccessible, thus not solving the problem.
>>
>>735401853
Too bad Whites are not reproducing fast enough
>>
File: 1497049964208.jpg (30KB, 600x518px) Image search: [Google]
1497049964208.jpg
30KB, 600x518px
>>735401853
Because if you believe the ends justify the means, you should probably kill yourself to reduce the amount of resources you use.
>>
>>735401853
>People are reproducing faster than they are dying.
That's been the case since basically the beginning of man

>People are using resources faster than they can be restored. Fossil fuels will run out within a matter of decades, severely escalating current crisis.
That's why we're moving away from coal and into electricity. The technology isn't quite there yet, but soon electricity should surpass fossil fuel

>So my question, how can people be pro life?
I'm not, though not because of the weak arguments you have presented
>>
>>735401853
>Fossil fuels will run out within a matter of decades
Fossil fuels have always been 20 years away from running out for the last 120 years.
>>
>>735403930
We get electricity from coal and oil. So how does "switching to electricity fix anything? This is why we can't have a sustainable planet. People like you have children.
>>
>>735401853
Niggers and asians are reproducing faster than they are dying. White people are getting outbreed and will disappear in less than a century.

So sad.
>>
Too many niggers
>>
>>735404046

This. We get smarter at finding fossil fuels.
>>
>>735401853
Tell that to the niggers of America. They breed like cockroaches, on the taxpayer's dime.
They conrtibute nothing but crime and destruction.
>>
>>735404118
I'll take "what is wind power and solar energy" for $500, Alex. Sit down kid.
>>
>>735401853
We give too much away to worthless niggers, spics, muslims, or anyone non white-male. We waste resources on people who contribute fucking nothing to this country other than violence and drugs.

I agree. We need to kill off the worthless
>>
File: 1492205883516.jpg (71KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]
1492205883516.jpg
71KB, 650x650px
>>735401853
No m8 we should just kill all non-whites
>>
>>735404118
>So how does "switching to electricity fix anything?

He probably meant 'switch to renewables'.
>>
>>735404118

You can get it from water, wind, and solar too, dumbshit.
>>
>>735401853
Your position makes no sense: you worry about posterity and want to protect persons yet unborn (i.e., generations in the future), so you will kill posterity and destroy persons yet unborn.
>>
>>735401853
watch the UK series Utopia. it's a brilliant idea, if it could be pulled off.
oh, and the race he chooses to survive is just fucking retarded but it's a TV show.
>>
>>735404417
This is the only rational solution.
>>
>>735404417
>tfw you'll never slot floppies with your mates
>>
>>735404561
Non of which are efficient enough to supply enough energy for the current population of earth. And water power specifically is horribly detrimental to the ecosystem. Really the only solution os a very large killing of humans. Once the population is back under control, then we can worry about things like long term sustainability.
>>
>>735404118
Because only coal can make electricity. Have you never heard of wind, solar, and hydro power? Fucking dumbass
>>
>>735405574
See my previous point about lack of total energy production.
>>
>>735401853
Doesnt matter. In God's eyes all life is equal and worthy of experiencing the gods gift, which is life. By aborting you are denying someone the ultimate gift. Even if they live a bad life, they still shouldn't be kept from knowing what it's like to love God.
>>
>>735401853
Reduce the surplus population: support your local wars and famines.
>>
>>735405517
Did you miss my point about how "The technology isn't quite there yet, but soon electricity should surpass fossil fuel?" Renewable energy will be much more useful than fossil fuels sooner than later. Sorry that your edgy desire to do a culling of humanity isn't necessary or feasible
>>
didn't we already go through this shit in the 70's? if soylent green was in the cards for humanity it would've happened already. we don't even use like 50% of the food we produce in the USA so theres not a reason to advocate baby killing. Also populations don't just infinitely grow exponentially, vid with explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsBT5EQt348
>>
>>735401853

(Citation Needed)
>>
>>735406190
One coal plant produces 508 MW of power on average. One wind turbine produces about 3. So you saying that will somehow magically catch up? And at the same time, the land we use for those wind power plants is normally good useable farmland. Meaning it's being produced at the cost of food production. So how does that help a planet with an ever increasing population? We are being limited in multiple ways instead of one. If anything you've compounded the problem.
>>
>>735401853
do you get all your facts from 80's sci-fi movies?
>>
>>735406568
>he thinks wind is a good source of reliable energy
The dam near where I live generates over 1 gigawatt per hour.
>>
>>735407031
And destroys the river it's placed in. Meaning it's not sustainable. Don't know if you are aware but fresh water and animal ecosystems are also necessary for the planet to survive. You're acting like only humans need this planet. If only humans mattered, you might be right. But the whole planet dies if we kill everything else in the name of humanity. Fish populations, algae, and even insects are necessary to make this thing keep going.
>>
Only niggers and Muslims. Even the Mexicans
>>
>>735401853
How can people be for open boarders and our current reckless immigration policies? It is a fact that third world brown people have far, far more children than their host country men.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE[Open]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BCvVv8D1kUc[Open]
>>
File: 1497077424616.png (197KB, 2500x1645px) Image search: [Google]
1497077424616.png
197KB, 2500x1645px
>>
>>735406568
Look, I'm trying really hard not to insult your intelligence right now. You're not making it easy. Renewable energy is more than just wind turbines. Renewable energy includes solar, wind and hydro energy. All of those together will surpass your coal plants and your fossil fuel. Together, all of them combined will soon generate more MW than your coal plant and fossil fuels. And the technology for renewable energy is getting better all the time. And food is not a problem for first world countries. In America we waste enough food to feed some countries. Starving people in America are being limited by politics, not because we dont have enough food to go around
>>
>>735403930
>That's why we're moving away from coal and into electricity.
lmao
>>
>>735406568
>One coal plant produces 508 MW of power on average. One wind turbine produces about 3. So you saying that will somehow magically catch up?

That's the dumbest comparison I've read all week
This thread is a goldmine
>>
File: tumblr_lgy1n1MeYT1qcipwbo1_500.jpg (83KB, 500x339px) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_lgy1n1MeYT1qcipwbo1_500.jpg
83KB, 500x339px
>>735401853
Black genocide.
Seriously when you think about it, that would solve most of this problem.
Africa is full of natural resources, but it's all swarmed by human-ape hybrid. America is infested as well, these things are behind most of violent crimes and just fill up prisons.
Just shoot all niggers and the world will be one step closer to type II civilisation. They slow us down.
>>
>>735408148
Thank you
>>
>>735404046
This, though I didn't know we'd been delusional for that long (thought maybe 50 years).
>>
>>735408551
Elaborate
>>
>>735403725
All of Africa also has less people than china
>>
>>735408551
>>735409648

Yeah, Before there was the end of oil reserves, they were screaming about the end of coal reserves, before that there was the end of charcoal, and before that there was the end of wood.

The fact is that we're getting more efficient every year. We're extracting more energy out of every barrel of oil then ever before. When we first started fractionating crude we were getting about 20% of the crude into gasoline. Now we have cracking technologies that take the heavier hydrocarbon chains and break them apart to make the lighter gasoline molecules. yielding almost 80% of gasoline from a barrel.
>>
>>735409869
>>735409757
Lel this isn't age of empire or some rtsg
>>
>>735409951
>age of empire
If you've studied the energy industry at all this is one theme that is always consistent. The idea that our energy sources are always about 20-50 years away from "running out"
>>
File: 1491950250144.gif (2MB, 340x200px) Image search: [Google]
1491950250144.gif
2MB, 340x200px
>>735410713
mmm hmmmmm
>>
>>735403918
Brilliant thinking
>>
>>735401853
Just because there is overpopulation in third world African countries doesn't mean that the west is overpopulated.
Most western countries have a birth rate of 1.3 children per woman, which in itself has caused huge problems to several countries as the population number is dropping rapidly, the average person is growing older and older, no children in the streets, lack of work force to keep up with capitalistic demands for growth.

All of this has forced western governments to keep an open border policy in order to attract immigrants to their countries to avoid the countries from collapsing, as they can no longer sustain themselves. We need to aim for a birth rate of 2.1
>>
>>735401853
here ya go OP.

As you can see, although the population is increasing, the RATE at which it's increasing is decreasing. This means that our planet's population will continue to increase, but more and more slowly until it levels out. Now this function could change in the future, but you should not be so worried about our CURRENT trajectory. Have a nice day.
>>
>>735411732
Was talking in terms of global economics. If specific populations are more of a problem than others *cough* africa*cough* well, they deserve an equally disproportionate reduction in population.
>>
>>735403209
At least 90% of western countries' population needs to be killed/sterilized.
>>
>>735412081
Of course they do, but telling western women to stop having children to prevent overpopulation when we in reality are in a dire need to increase it doesn't help. Sadly the western world is the main consumer of this propaganda.

Solve the problem where the problem is.
>>
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UOi6v5DD_1M
>>
>>735412037
The reduction, as others have said, is mostly in developed countries though. Indicating the reduction is more to do with education and monetary stability than it does with overpopulation. Poor people still pump out children like rabbits. If anything that would increase the problem. Because there would be fewer intelligent people to create technologies to offset the increasing population in poverty. So...problem escalates.
>>
>>735403209
Nukes, fucking moron.

If you want to kill a bunch of people just figure out a way to make oak trees grow Bt toxin in their pollen.
Thread posts: 59
Thread images: 7


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.