I have a nude video of LEAHBEE wat do?
post plz
>>735013487
No you don't, lol.
>>735013487
She's dating beneath her level.
>>735013487
no one cares
dunkey is a baller
vidyabro
>>735013487
Op is faggot
>>735013583
I do i've had it for years now, just dont know what to do with it
>>735013625
Arguable
post it
>>735013487
shes ugly as fuck anyway nobody cares if you post
>>735013703
There's literally no way you can benefit from it besides getting props from your /b/ros so just post it
>>735013487
I also know Dunkey's porn account name
>>735013487
>I have a nude video of LEAHBEE wat do?
>tfw OP is still a massive gay lord
wym porn account
>>735013487
Here's a little taste
Post it or fuck off.
You either have it or are begging for attention.
hi jason whens your next video
fucking retards dunkey isnt even real, god you sheeple are so gullible
>>735014221
Different nose nice try faggot
>>735014221
confirmed not her, doesn't have her long ass jew witch nose
>>735013900
>>735013703
If any of this is true that would be epic. She looks like she has a big ass in her videos on her Youtube. Would love to see it.
>>735013625
Nah. She's lucky to have snagged Dunkey.
>>735014221
looks like her to me
Dude fuck leah, get me that video of sky fucking dunkey. I would pay anything for that
>>735014999
Nah. Wouldn't mind seeing the video anyway.
>>735015029
Fag
>>735013487
no you dont lol
>>735013625
Not even close baby. You know he dunks on that pussy every night.
>>735014999
She only looks sort of like her.
only way to know for sure would be the voice
>>735014999
>>735015709
trips don't lie tho
>>735015834
Not in this case. She just doesn't look exactly liker her bro. There are a million or more girls out there that look like that.
>>735015962
Nice theory. You got some trips to back it up with?
>>735014999
Trips for Nips
https://webmshare.com/zN93w
>>735016910
Lemme get a piece of dat.
Looks like it could possibly be a younger her.
>>735017209
I've had that for like 3 years now
tried to reach out to them they didn't seem to care so
>>735013625
Fuck you. Dunkey is a god amongst mortals.
>>735017431
But he's not black.
>No one actually falling for this shit-tier trolling.
>>735017431
Especially because he is one of the few people with the balls to still use language that everyone should have a right to use.
streamable.com/q2e0p
>>735017771
does saying faggot seriously get you banned from twitch? i find this hard to believe
>>735017771
Holy shit, haven't seen that one yet. I fucking love this man. He and Jontron are unbeatable.
>>735018043
Twitch is pretty inconsistent with their rules. People have been banned for nigger and faggot while camwhores get away with figurative murder (driving while camming, scams, tits/snatch flashes, etc).
>>735017771
Everyone can say what they want. The first amendment says the government can't stop you. Youtube can.
>>735018184
And you don't think that's censorship? You don't think that completely goes against the concept of free speech? Fuck out of here with that lamebrain SJW pussy argument.
"hurrr it's okay if we ruin your life its just da gubmint dat can't hinder your free speech durrrr"
>>735014999
I know everyone knows its fake, but she doesnt do her eyebrows. Theres so much pointing to fake.
>>735018307
>hurr durr why wont everyone let me say nigger and faggot whenever i want hurr fucking sjws ruining the world durr
>>735018464
Way to address the issues you worthless cunt. Yes, everyone should be allowed to say faggot or nigger whenever they want and not have their life ruined over it you fucking greentexting simpleton.
>>735018464
You still don't have a decent argument as to why people can't say nigger or faggot.
>>735018674
strawmanning, being underaged
>>735018835
i dont care if people say nigger or faggot, but if a company has a problem with its in their right to censor you if they so wish
explain why they should be forced to tolerate that if they dont want it
>>735019218
>i dont care if people say nigger or faggot, but if a company has a problem with its in their right to censor you if they so wish
explain why they should be forced to tolerate that if they dont want it
That implies a larger problem though. Most of the forms of communication we have available to us today are electronic, and if a form of communication is electronic it tends to be controlled by a corporation. So, if a corporation stops someone from using their platform, you haven't simply denied them a service, you are effectively cutting off someone's right to free speech on a level that was previously thought to be in the domain of government. You don't create a world of polite speech then, you create a world of speech that is controlled by corporations.
Also, some people interpret the right to free speech, in such a way that not only should the government be hands-off in matters of regulating speech, it should be actively protecting the right to free speech in avenues such as this, so that we don't see free speech controlled and censored by other entities.