Let's see how smart /b/ is. Solve and justify your solution

>>734728836
none
the droplets coming out of the tap are evaporating before they get to the tanks

They will fill in this order:

>3
>4
>2
>1

>>734728924
Moron

>>734728932
Justify

>>734728836
both 3 and 4 will be full at the exact same time

>>734728836
N°3 because:
-The 1st wont be full because it'll have always that tube putting water on the 2nd.
-Same as the 2nd, but instead, its putting water on the 3rd
-The 4th will be starting to get water when tank 3 is full because of the tube form.

Pleasure sharing my answer. Srry for my English.

>>734728836
3+4 fill at the same time then overflow so 1+2 never fill.

>>734728836
those arent tanks

>>734728932

>>734728932
this

>>734729045
3 won't be filled completely at its borders till 4 reaches same level

>>734728836
The first one obviously.

>>734729045
tank 3 would only be 3/4 full when water would flow into tank 4

>>734728932
3 and 4 at the same time, you moron

File: it.jpg (72KB, 800x598px)

72KB, 800x598px

>>734728932
Correct.

>>734729137
exactly

>>734728836
depends on the flow rate and the viscosity of the fluid

>>734729056
>>734729117
>>734729140
THESE

>>734728836
3 and 4 fill at the same time. then 2 then 1

>>734728975
prove I'm wrong faggot

>>734729117
>>734729137
So then that means that 3 and 4 will fill up almost, if not at the same time.

>>734728836
If it has no pump and the drips are coming out fast enough to not evaporate then 3, obviously.

>>734729198
It's water, you dumb nigger. Stop trying to make this harder than it is.

>>734729198
assuming a drop-by-drop flow rate (then irrelevant viscosity )

>>734728836
Look closely at the water in tank 1. The tank system is obviously being shaken, making the water slosh around.
Under that condition, no tank will ever be totally filled because the water will keep spilling out.

>>734728836
The one that's full first retard, the answrr can't be the one that's full last because then it would not be first.

>>734728932
>>734729045
>>734729109
>>734729071
>>734729135
MORONS

>>734728836
depending on what you consider "full" 3 or 4

>>734728836
3 and 4 will fill at almost the same time, which will be first depends on the flow rate between the 2 tanks

>>734728836
3+4 at the same time. Then 2 then 1

>>734729525
I just corrected myself. Read then comment :v

>>734728836
Fluid mechanics mass conservation faggots
(dm/dt)syst=0 for two consecutive tanks

You need approximate dimensions though

>>734729322
But if the flow rate into #1 is significantly greater than the flow rate into #2, then #1 will fill up before any of the others.

>>734729631
Except there's no "then 2 then 1"!

>>734728836
>Communicating vessels
3&4 at the same time

>>734730125
only A is possible

number 1 because its the first one

>>734730125
So 3&4 it is then

File: thisFIXED.jpg (93KB, 749x909px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 749x909px

>>734730125

>>734730172
yes...fixed>>734730268

>>734728836
depends

tank1 if the inflow is high enough

>>734728836
three and four will overflow at the same time and one and two will never fill

>>734728836
3 first, then 4 very shortly after
In physics there is the law of communicating vessels, stating water levels would be equal in all tanks. There are exceptions though, one of which is when the water is flowing, which is the case in this instance.

1 & 2 will never fill up, because 3 (and possibly 4) will start overflowing

Also, you're all idiots

>OP tries to get anon to do his homework for him.
>calls anon a moron for helping.

>>734730376
correct, but assume a drop by drop flow rate

>>734730497
not all....

File: images (5).jpg (31KB, 500x277px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x277px

You are all retards do any of you know what gravity is? If there is no pressure the water wont go up the last tube. 4 will never fill you wankers.

Is 3 2 an 1 in that order.

>>734730601
when I started typing, you were all idiots :p

>>734728836
Depends on inflow. If high enough, tank one. If low, 4-3-2-1

>>734728932
This

3 will be filled very slightly before 4, they won't fill at the same time because the water needs to pass through 3 before it reaches 4. If you have a faucet at the side, it will be very slightly higher at the side of the faucet.

>>734730647
If high enough, tank one >correct
If low, 4-3-2-1 >false

>>734730711
false

>>734730739
faggot

>>734730647
4 will only be filled once 3 is already full.
The pipe left of 3 will fill at the same time as 3.
but only when 3 is full, it will overflow.
So 3 is first to be full.

>>734730812
homo

>>734730744
im a fucking idiot

>>734728836
4 if you disagree you deserve to be shot and killed

>>734730647
>>734730739
>>734730824
>>734730891
>>734730892
study morons
>>734730268

>>734730928
That's assuming there's no flow you dipshit. It's literally impossible for water to reach number 4 and number 3 at the same time.

File: itsatie.jpg (78KB, 645x363px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 645x363px

>>734728836
First, 3 would fill up partly and then it would reach the spout and being to fill up 4. When then 4 is almost full, it will start to give back water to 3 and they will fill up at the same time.

I PUT THE TAP ON FULL BLAST AND 1 WILL BE FULL FIRST. INFACT IT WILL FLOW OVER.

>>734730639
Shouldn't it be then 3-4-2-1? When the water in 3 surpasses the tube level in 4, the water level will start to fill container 4. It's not like there is a trap door and the water level of 3 other containers should be enough to go up that tube, you moron

>>734728836
Ryzza Mae Dizon

>>734731002
kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYWbu7_d5xg

>>734731024
finally, correct

File: 1474939394916.jpg (85KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1280x720px

>>734731218
Thanks for proving my point? The right tube is (very slightly) higher than the ones left of it.

>>734731355
Link?

>>734731416
No, that's not Link.

File: filled.jpg (141KB, 749x909px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 749x909px

>>734731124

>>734731355
holy shit, ameritard detected

>>734731522
Why?

File: 1414005207509.jpg (8KB, 224x213px)

8KB, 224x213px

>>734728932
wrong, siphon effect will drain 3 before it gets full
its 4,3,2 (1 will never get full because the the container overflow)

>>734731355
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bINTrKspWQg

>>734728836

4.

>>734731555
look at this
>>734731639

>>734729198
The best answer
>>734729322
Dumbass

File: 1493374745083.jpg (80KB, 1920x1080px)

80KB, 1920x1080px

>>734731639
>>734731670
Okay, again, 3 before 4.

>>734731728
i give up, but i recommend to learn physics

>>734731728
watch the gif
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicating_vessels

>>734731889
Kek, just look at it mate. Flow means that the right side is slightly higher than the left side. You only consider static environments, which is wrong. If you look at the state after each drop and turn the faucet off then, then it rises perfectly equally.

>>734731965
That's a worse example than the simulation mate.

>>734731522
...shouldn't you be having a van slam into a group of you before getting stabbed to death?

>>734728836
Insufficient information to answer the question, we don't know the rate of the water flow, nor do we know the air pressure in the tanks.

>>734728932
Wrong

File: bernoulliprinciple_clip_image001[1].gif (11KB, 430x225px)

11KB, 430x225px

>>734731488
if it has to be 100% filled, nothing but 3 will ever be full. 4 will barely be full but but the pressure is to low to push the water upwards on the same level as 3 and 3 will overflow

>>734728836
If full is defined as filled to the brim to the point of almost overflowing then 1

>>734731965
> when the liquid settles
Which is not the situation I'm talking about, or the situation that the OP asks, considering time is a factor.

3 4 same time , 1 2 never

File: 1496086456884.png (480KB, 719x1000px)

480KB, 719x1000px

>>734728836
Depends on how fast the water is flowing and how thick the pipes connecting each tank, if the water is gushing out like a fucking waterfall and the pipes connecting the tanks are as thin as straws 1 if the water drips slow and pipes are thick enough to support the flow then
>>734728932
Now fuck off with this thread you're wasting space here

>>734731218
What is this wizardry?!
Da fuck is this basic physics shit!?!

You're all faggots...

>>734728975
They're smaller and smaller as they go down so there's nothing to say he's wrong and some to say he's right.

>>734732023
Answre with what you have

>>734732256
Kill yourself, please...

>>734732088
wrong example, in your case there is a relevant water flow and a completely different geometry.

>>734732088
no nigger theres nothing about speed how much water comes , at some point 1 molecule h2o will push the shit in both 3 and 4

>>734732317
There is water flow in this example, otherwise there wouldn't be a change.

>>734728836
3.
The water in 3 will not go through the 4 pipe until it is at the same level in 3.

>>734728836
Drink the water
Turn 360 and walk away
Profit

>>734732363
i mean there is a considerable velocity
in the op's post there is a drop by drop flow (velocity about 0)

>>734728836
give me the rate of water leaving each tank as well as the rate of water filling the first tank

>>734728836
3 and 4 will be filled first together.
then 2 will be filled but it will start overfilling since there's no lid and 1 will never be filled.
or in case there are lids, 1 will be filled last.

>>734732488
>i mean there is a considerable velocity
Meaning there's considerable water flow.

>in the op's post there is a drop by drop flow (velocity about 0)
That's an assumption based on what kind of "exposure" was used for this "picture". Obviously it's just an abstract representation to signify that waters falling into 1.

>>734732550
thank god!

>>734732550
1 and 2 will never be filled

>>734732488
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicating_ves>about 0
you mean almost 0

just like 4 is almost 100%

>>734732609
in your case there is a considerable velocity
in the op's one there is not a considerable velocity

>your example is inappropriate

File: Bucketquestion.jpg (880KB, 2277x1466px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 2277x1466px

>>734728836
depends if the buckets are open ore closed...

>>734728836
3 & 4 equally

>>734732899
correct

File: raepfaise.jpg (96KB, 575x779px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 575x779px

>>734728924
Genius answer right here!

>>734732319
>water is not compressable
>water flow is instant
>there is no velocity
>if I pour a glass of water in the ocean the water level will instantly rise everywhere

Why do you retards think 4 would ever fill?
3.
2.
1.
For the other idiots, the only one that CAN overflow is one.

>>734733147
Why doesnt 4 fill?

>>734733123
this 100times

File: 1489917417746.jpg (39KB, 350x708px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 350x708px

>>734728836
Seriously, OP, #3 will fill first, then #4 shortly after that.
#1 & #2 will never fill since #3 & #4 will be constantly spilling over.

>>734732840
>in the op's one there is not a considerable velocity
You just said there was. Anyway, you don't need to define it as "considerable" or not, you can just look at it binary style. Either it's a 0zero value of velocity/flow, or it's a non-zero value of velocity/flow. A zero value of velocity/flow means that you can apply the Communicating vessels rule and that the containers won't fill (e.g. you turn the source off between drops and expect it then), a non-zero value means you can't.
You're assuming there's no considerable velocity based on basically nothing.

>>734728836
None For they are 2 dimensional objects

3 and 4 will fill at the same time. 2 and 1 will never fill because it will spill out of the tops of 3 and 4.

if the water is coming out fast enough. as in much faster than the drainage rate of 1 then 1 will fill up first.

this seriously cannot be that hard. im guessing troll question, with idiot jumpiong on the bandwagon niggers trying to be funny with their idiot bait answers.

>>734731270
Actually, i dont know about that. I think first 3, with a couple of microseconds or something like that. Because of waters viscosoty or however the word is spelled. It takes a liiiiiitle bit of time for it to equalise, just a minimal amount of time, but still... that is what the people who says 3 is argumenting for, and i actually think that that is valid. It is not EXACTLY the same time, but it still very close to exactly the same time.

>>734728836

3 and 4 will fill out completely at the same time.

3 will fill up to where water starts pouring into the 4th container. then container 4 will catch up. then both will fill up completely and the both will spill.

prove me wrong.

protip: you can't

I'm a 12year old plumber. What is this?

>>734733653
Exactly. With a non-zero value of velocity/flow it means that the difference in reaching the "filled state" is also non-zero, i.e. not the same.

>>734733354
>You just said there was
i was referring to your example

Anyway, because of my english expression difficulties, ill explain what i mean once again with this video
facebook com/enjoy.science/videos/384658225215394/

3 will fill first then 4 when the water level of 3 is as high as the input of 4 after that 2 will fill until the water level is as high as the opening of 3 and 4 then they overflow keeping 1 and 2 from filling.

ITT retarded people forget about Siphon effect. As soon as that water tilts over the tip of the 3->4 connection, its going to rush drain all of 3 into 4. That's what a siphon does.

That's exactly how your toilet works. It pushes water from the tank into the bowl and goes over the U curve at the bottom... as soon as it goes over, siphon drains the bowl with a quickness.

4 will fill first because as soon as 3 reaches the height of the top of the connection it will immediately drain entirely into 4.

That simulation the guy posted is a shitty rendering fluid sim and doesnt actually take into account pressure/siphon

>>734733123
There is no such thing as instant. NOTHING can surpass the speed of light. If you had a big as tube with water that reaches 1 lightyear away, full of water and you push in one litre of water into it, it would take at least a year for it to come out the other end. That is how it is.

1, I said so suck my dick faggot OP

>>734733920
>i was referring to your example
I never gave an example.

>Anyway, because of my english expression difficulties, ill explain what i mean once again with this video
>facebook com/enjoy.science/videos/384658225215394/
I know what you mean, I'm saying you're wrong. Just like that video. It doesn't take into account flow at all when that definitely has a flow.

>>734728836
This can not be solved as we do not know the rate of the water leaving the faucet. If the PSI in the faucet is high enough, 1 will be the first filled. If it is too low, the watter will dribble through to 2 and 3, at which point it would flow up due to capillary action (we can assume 1 atm air pressure). So fuck off with these dumb threads.

>>734734058
>Retarded people forget about siphon effect.
>Absolutely retarded people who think they are smart while they put others down while actually expressing their ignorance think a siphon effect would occur from free flowing water from 3 to 4.

>>734728836
tank 1 will be never filled.

File: IMG_1158.png (28KB, 480x352px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x352px

Cmon guys, the Romans had this shit figured thousands of years ago.

>>734734410
ok, anon i got it

>>734728836
3 and 4 at the same time nigger

>>734728836
Tank 4 will never be full. It's 3 > 2 > 1

>>734734058
Nope siphon works in toilet because the weight of the water entering the pipe pulls more water in behind it. Only way 3 would siphon into 4 is if the input of 4 came in at the top and went to the bottom.

>>734734811
Nobody asked for that retard

Why do people say 4 will never be full?

>>734735249
Why would #2 not fill in that scenario?

>>734729008

>>734735328
That's halfway in. I just wanted to show that 4 is never going to fill.

>>734735328
Which would raise lvl/pressure and force water up tune into #4

>>734735249
>>734735402
then just remove your fucking fat ass from the pipe between 3 and 4. and then it will.

>>734735249
wrong. the pressure in 3 would push some water into 4

>>734735249
That's retarded, the pipe between 3 and 4 will definitely rise, the containers are open, it's not like there's anything blocking it.

File: 1012702_1724826421072597_1796726075305288743_n.jpg (32KB, 597x959px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 597x959px

>>734734823
That's interesting, did the Siphon aqueduct transfer water uphill? Or is it just two aqueducts meeting at the bottom of a valley?

>>734728836
Obviously 1 will be filled first because it's the first one the water's going into you stupid retard

>>734735508
This anon gets it, then as #2 filled the pressure would increase and #4 would eventually fill.

3 and 4 fill up at the same time

>>734735562
It moved water over hills and through valleys.

>>734728836
3 will fill first
2 will fill next
1 last
4 remains empty as water can't get in

>>734735652
4 would be filled before 2.

>>734735734
Wrong, 3,2,4,1. Ever heard of water pressure?

>>734735535
yes, meaning no pressure, water will rise untill it spills out of nr. 3

File: IMG_1668.gif (494KB, 500x209px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 500x209px

>>734728836
Four and three fill up at the same time.

>>734731355
it's not, there are air bubbles in the right tube, lowering density.

>>734735794
That's what I meant, 2 fills which makes water pressure higher and #4 fills. Obviously #2 can't be FULL until #4 tops off.

>>734735872
... and 4 because they're connected.

>>734729140

Finally

>>734735969
>It's not
>It is because of bubbles
Wew lad, you're contradicting yourself. Anyway, it is even without bubbles.

File: IMG_1677.jpg (32KB, 320x318px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 320x318px

>>734735865
Lmao if you're gonna bring up pressure, make sure you know how it works you sorrowful piece of bitch trash.

>>734728836
I work with tanks all day 4 will fill first as water leaves the other 3 tanks when they are at lower levels.

>>734735941
and then spill over.
2 & 1 never fill up

File: IMG_1606.jpg (34KB, 300x470px)

34KB, 300x470px

You could use the first law of thermodynamics for a non steady state condition which this would most likely would be but since mass flow rate, velocity flow rate, and cross sectional area of the pipes are not given then it it is now possible to actually solve for this accurately.

>Mfw I just got a B+ in thermo this semester

>>734736131
There is no such thing as instantaneously. There would be a minimal delay, still... there is a small, almost irrelevant delay.. 3 first, then 4 after that small delay. Nothing is instantaneously, nothing can be faster than light.

File: romanaqueducts2[1].jpg (102KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 800x600px

>>734734823
>>734735732
this can't be right, for a siphon you need an air- and waterproof tube. Aqueducts had an open top

That is a picture so they will never be full

>>734736493
Google is your friend, look it up and see for yourself.

>>734735249
This isn't minecraft faggot.

>>734728836
3, then 2, then 1

4 never fills because the water is not pressurized and water does not defy gravity.

/thread

>>734736790
>because the water is not pressurized and water does not defy gravity.
If that's the case. then why does 3 fill? It's the same situation for 3 as for the tube connecting 3 to 4.

File: sketch-1496590177967.png (342KB, 741x720px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 741x720px

>Source: I do this every day

>>734729056
If its a fluid with no viscosity yes, but once you have nonoptimal fluid then shit gets wierd real quick

>>734729056
/thread

>>734736833
>>734736833
Are you literally retarded?

The water inlet tube is at the top of the fucking tank

>>734736790
Can't /thread your own post new summerfriend.

>>734737029
Okay, still, you can have inlets at the bottom and still have water pour out.

>>734737045
>Can't
Thats funny, as I seem to remember posting /thread. If I can't post it, then how did I post it?

/thread

>>734736858
this might be right dependent on how fast the water flows. That means as long as the siphon effect is never interrupted. But someone also said the container have to be 100% filled

>>734732892
how does the water enter the closed buckets when the air cannot escape?

>>734731566
Neither will two, half way point is at top of 4, tard

>>734728836
Depends. You're assuming that I don't just turn the water on full speed. In that case, #1 would fill faster than the water would leave for #2, same principle as a clogged drain.

But if the premise is the water will flow at a constant speed that allows it to leave the tank before it fills, then #3 shortly followed by #4. Now if this is the case, then 1 and 2 could never fill, because the water would overflow from 4 while never being able to fill 1+2 due to the slow speed of the water.

File: 220px-Helium-II-creep.svg[1].png (10KB, 220x306px)

10KB, 220x306px

>>734736893
yeah let's assume this is an average facet that pours out regular superfluids

>>734737209
4 will fill and then over flow
>ive had that exact scenario happen. Only thing that could make a difference is if your first pipe is bigger than the pipes connecting the tanks. In that case 1 would fill first and over flow everywhere because it doesnt drain into the subsequent tanks fast enough

>>734737223
They're closed, but he also adds that the fourth one is open so they're not closed at all. He's retarded.

>>734736858
There can never be less water in 3 than 4, else the water would not go up the tube.

>>734737194
And yet the thread continues..

>>734729008

>>734736790
Water Pressure can be created by the water's own weight.

Assuming mass flow in is slower than the flow rate of each connection between tanks,

1 fills to a low level, begins filling tank 2.
Tank 2 fills to a low level, begins filling tank 3.
Tank 3 and its connection to tank 4 begin filling.
Tank 3 fills to a high level, begins filling tank 4.

At this point, it depends on the definition of "Full." Two questions: Do the tanks have lids? Is a tank considered full at the upper connection level, or where the vertical lines in the drawing end?

Assuming they do not have lids (IE, can overflow).

If full is defined as reaching the upper pipe level, then 3 will reach the upper level first. If 4 was not present, 2 would begin filling next; however, any gains to 2's level gets redirected and rebalanced towards filling 4.

When 2, 3, and 4 are at similar levels (4 has reached the upper level), all three will begin to rise.

If we define full as the upper end of the vertical lines denoting the tanks, then 3 and 4 will fill about simultaneously, with 2 filled less than half way, and 1 filled only to the upper level. At this point, overflow occurs and the water level in all tanks stays constant.

>>734737404
And yet I can still post /thread.

/thread

>>734737398
Yes actually it does idiot. The downward pressure of the water in tank 3 actually pushes water up the pipe into tank 4.

Gotta love these threads, they always make the fucking numbskulls show themselves.

>>734737540
>Says the numbskull

>>734737467
>Water Pressure can be created by the water's own weight.
Not in this instance, brainiac.

>>734737609
Yes in this very instance retard

>>734737572
>says the guy who got it wrong, and took offence at being calked a numbskull that he had to reply, showing himself as a numbskull twice

>>734737636
No, not in this instance, Einstein.

>>734737663
Says the guy so anally annihilated that he responded to an obvious shit post because he cant help but to defend his frail ego

>>734737663
*called

>>734737393
if the fourth one is open then the water would pour out wouldn't it

>>734728836
If we consider "full" at 75%, then 3

If we consider "full" at 100%, then 3&4 at the same time. If you want to be witty, 3 will fill an instant before 4.

All are already full of air.

All are already full of numbers.

etc, etc... there is not a single solution for a question that broad and stupid. This obviously aims for a "lateral thinking" problem, but is so stupid and so simple, that all solutions will be boring.

>>734737693
I do it at work m8 it definitely happens in this instance, see
>>734736858

Depending on volume of flow from the source and the flow between the "tanks" #1 could fill first, but typically 3 and 4 should fill at the same time

>>734737726
>anally annihilated
Says the guy so fartbox flabbergasted that now he's resorting to projecting with reckless abandon

It'll run through the first and second tank initially. It'll stop in the third because there's pressure needed to get the water up the pipe. Soo the tank 3 will fill, after that there's enough pressure to fill tank 4. Then tank 2 and 1 will fill in that order due to their different elevation.

>>734737743
See
>>734736790

>>734737743
Yes, though if the hole is small enough and the flow is high enough, it would pour out at a speed less than that it's poured in, thus the other boxes would still fill.

File: 98-1-1399675521.jpg (83KB, 870x1024px)

83KB, 870x1024px

>>734737393
>>734737491

the opening is enough for air to escape but smal enough that the water wont leack out faster than it is poured.

>>734737778
No, no you dont and not in this instance

File: 1479769801573.png (31KB, 201x200px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 201x200px

>>734736858
wat ? you serious nigga ?
or just troll ?

>>734737609
Go look at a plastic milk jug. There is milk in the handle. Similar concept. When you fill the milk jug, milk fills both the main tank and the handle, with the tank and handle levels staying equal in height.

Also, someone else was talking about the Romans. They knew this shit too.

If you still disagree, feel free to better defend your position. I'd like to see a better defense than sarcasm.

>>734728836
#3.
#4 will fill shortly afterwards

>>734737816
>There she goes again
>>734737905
Oh so your just comfortable with being retarded, got it.
>>734737914
100% serious

>>734728836
it depends on which water level the tank is called "full".
generally it would be 3 and 4 at the same time

>>734737917
>Go look at a plastic milk jug
Holy fuck youre retarded LOL.

Go right now and record yourself filling up a water jug and post it. Prove me wrong

>>734738126
*milk jug

>>734738126
>>734737917
The handle on the milk jug isn sideways nor does it have a large amount of milk above it, its not the same

>>734738214
Nor is it more than 4 inches like OPs pic

>>734738291
Exactly so different results

>>734737985
>Oh so your just comfortable with being retarded, got it.
Says the dumbfuck who thinks tank 1 would fill first

WEW

>>734738394
Who ever said anything about tank 1?

File: 1480787040206.jpg (18KB, 308x232px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 308x232px

>>734737985
you are retarded
have a nice day

>>734738473
>Only one here that knows what he's talking about
>retarded
Oh you trollin'

>>734735402
It will because of P=F/A, the cross-sectional area of the pipe is small and the force of the water acting on the pipe is high. This means that the water pressure inside of the pipe should be larger than the water pressure inside of (3) so the pipe will fill up and squirt its juices into (4) as long as (4) is not completely full. Moron.