is everyone bisexual but just afraid to admit it?

ya

File: 1273616728616.jpg (329KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 800x800px

>>734684160
Studies show that about 40% of guys have had at least one same-sex encounter in their lives ending in orgasm.

Of course much of that is just puberty-driven teenage experimentation, drunken flings, desperation (prison sex, etc). Only ~5-10% of guys are actually fully gay/bi and consistently attracted to other men. But it does show that sexuality is a bit more fluid than most people are willing to admit... after all, you don't have to be attracted to someone to fuck them.

>>734684922


dubs confirms


nobody is 100% straight or 100% gay

therefore everyone is by definition bisexual

period.

No thinking of being with a guy literally makes my stomach churn

>>734685601
Would you fuck a trap though?

I think everyone has an exception, or would "go gay" given the right circumstances.

>>734685601


that's because you secretly want to do it

>>734684160
I suppose but I'm so picky with my traps and boipussy and the dick has to be just right

>>734684160
no, but more people are some degree of bi/pan/omni than would admit.

>>734684160
I am bi so idk

>>734685706
Not even going to lie it's possible...it'd technically be gay but it'd turn me on for being like a taboo? I see them more as female in the act obviously but when I really think about it starts to make me feel nauseous again

>>734684160
I've since admitted it to myself and my wife. We're both just sort of whatever about it, but telling her has made it easier to talk about. As far as I'm concerned, it's noones fucking business but my own. If anyone asks now I just tell them "You will never know for sure, so don't waste time worrying about it."

I think a lot of people are, maybe not everyone.
I certainly was when I was in my teens.

>>734684922
does traps count?

>>734686199
You'll never know until you have a cock in your mouth. If you take a chub to the throat and love it, sorry bud, you're queer or less.

>>734684160
No. Cock is something I find nasty. I only have watch lesbian porn. I love vagina.

>>734684922
You can become attracted to anything given enough desire or willpower.

>>734686322
>was

>>734686322


You still are.


>>734686428
Then how do you stroke it?

>>734684160
I knew I was bi when my first homosex encounter went horribly, and I still wanted to try again.

>>734684160

In discussing the question, we run into a couple problems. Especially since I'd like to pave a logical path to a "yes" answer.

What does "is" mean, when we say "Everyone is bisexual?"

Does it mean they would have gay sex if no one could ever find out? Does it mean they know?

Does it mean they have the latent ability to enjoy sexual activity with the same sex? Or, further than that, to not be ashamed or turned off by it?

>>734686397
Well that's why I haven't done it or want to. My insides turn but you obviously love being a sissy boy

File: 200_s.gif (49KB, 405x200px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 405x200px

>>734686595
>Then how do you stroke it?

>>734686836
Not a sissy boi by any means, I just foam at the mouth for cock. I couldn't give a damn who it's attached to.

But I will raep your shitter.

I don't identify as bisexual, but I've noticed that in lucid dreams I often don't give a fuck and will shove my cock into a boy's/man's mouth with no hesitation or regret.

Same with my sister in my dreams.

In dreams the unconscious is not repressed as it normally is in waking life.

File: 1496512286307.jpg (35KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 450x600px

>>734684922
If traps count 8 guys in my group are safe already.

>>734686530
yeah, I didn't know I could actually be attracted to other dudes untill I was 18 or 19, thought the feelings I were getting was somehow different from girls. Looking back I had a lot of crushes that I didn't know were crushes.

>>734684160
>is everyone bisexual but just afraid to admit it?
Yeah, pretty much.

>>734687084
Same, I just shrugged it off as an "admiration" for them, or that they looked so good that I wanted to be them. Turns out those feelings were totally normal.

>>734684160
I like traps, but pure gay sex just kills my boners. I mostly watch ts on girl and ts on ts.

File: 1496545865668.jpg (171KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 720x960px

the short answer is


abso - fuckin' - lutely

>>734687282
>pure gay


But traps are purely gay. They're men.

>>734687323
I dont see it that way. Traps gives me boners, dudes do not

>>734687323
>>734687284
>>734687235

>/thread

>>734687323
So you are telling me two hairy gay truckers 69ing are the same as a man fucking a girly trap

>>734687427


I don't think you understand. Traps ARE dudes.

>>734687493


It's not the "same thing", but they're both men. Two types of men, but both are men nonetheless. Therefore if you like traps as well as girls, you are by definition bisexual.

>>734687499
I dont think YOU understand

>grew up watching blowjob porn
>then cumshot porn
>then bukakke
>then gangbangs
>ffw 10 years later
>into shemale, gay creampie, and straight blowbang porn
>tfw you realize you were always just attracted to dicks cumming

>>734687493
people look different, some men are pretty and I guess that's your type.

>>734684160
No, you are a closet fag. Kys.

>>734684160
It's like everyone could eat shit but they don't do it.
No anon. I can recognize male beauty, but when I see two guys kissing I just think its hilarious and disgusting.

>>734687893
>implying you don't feel any sexual angst in the presence of an adonis

>>734688055
Im guessing you are a faggot. If you were a shit eater you would have said something along the lines of "implying you don't salivate a little when you see a hot, fuming turd".
No faggot, I don`t. Just like I don't get a hard on when I walk past a lamborghini or a beautiful horse.
Faggots tend to have this fantasy where they delude themselves into thinking they are normal and everyone is like them.

I guess its a common fallacy. We are all limited by our own perceptions.

>>734688272
relax, it was a joke

>>734687719


But I'm not in the closet, I'm openly bisexual.

>>734688272
you are either in negation or genuinely don't know there is homosexuality in your mind (probably because of a conservative mindset)
homosexuality is just natural in life, either you are an alpha male (which you are not) or a beta cuck, or something inbetween, we all have at least a tiny percentage of faggotry

There's no such thing as bisexuals. Only sluts

>>734688894
Haha. "Homosexuality is natural in life".
Yes my friend. Having two heads is also natural, its just not normal.
Homosexuality exists in a lot of mammal species, ALWAYS as an anomaly. Humans are the only specie who has the ability to be moronic, therefor do moronic things like try to normalize anomalies for the benefit of ideologies.

Of course anyone can stick their dick in anything. A cantaloup. A chicken. Another man.
And of course the dick is just a sensitive organ which will be stimulated by any friction.
That being said, feeling sexual attraction for cantaloupes, or men, is not normal in healthy human males.
Sorry to break the news fag.

>>734684160
Nope.

Lots of people are disgusted by the idea of gay sex.

I used to be. Now I'm bi.

What has 4chan become?

>>734689293
explain why is it an anomaly and i'll believe you

also, is it not normal if everyone experiences it?

>>734689736
Do I really need to do that? Well...ok. Im sleepy but I'll do my best to do it fast.

Its an anomaly because its a deviation from the natural exercise of an instinct.
All of our instincts are there for a reason, all the things that give us pleasure do so because they are bound to them.
Take eating for example. If we didn't get pleasure from eating, we would die, therefore we enjoy eating.
Deviations of course, have degrees. The more you deviate from the function of the instinct when exercising it, the more extreme your deviation is.
Bad eating habits are a deviation. Eating only candy, would be a more extreme degree of deviation. Anorexia, is one of the most extreme. And feeding yourself through your anus would be another example. They are all possible, but they are all deviations and anomalies, and the most extreme would kill you.

Now, lets move on to another instinct. The sexual one. We enjoy sex, because if we didn't, we wouldn't reproduce.
Having oral sex with a woman, is a deviation, but since its also part of the normal reproductive and mating process is not so extreme. Having exclusively oral sex with women, would make you a paraphiliac, since you are exercising your sexual instinct in a way that nullifies is purpose.
Same with anal sex, but since you are still exercising it with a partner of the opposite sex, which is what you are naturally designed to do for the exercise of the instinct, the degree of the deviation is not so grave. (same as wearing condoms, etc.)

Now, having sex with anything you are not designed to feel attracted to for reproductive means, is the most complete and extremest form of deviation and anomaly of the sexual instinct.

>>734690627
but we do not need to increase the population the way we are now as a society, actually there's overpopulation on earth. homosexuality would be a logical way to stop overpopulation based on the arguments you have already posted. what is the proof that homosexuality doesn't exist as a population control mechanism for the species? of course not being able to proof it is a false assumption does not make it true, but still, we can't say it is false.

>>734691228
it is normal though, most everything that we are capable of is a consequence of survival. People were more likely to survive in groups, especially if they were close to the people in those groups. If you think about it, variation in sexuality would obviously make for a tight-knit society that could expand the most rapidly. An mechanism to curb overpopulation isn't that feasible sadly.

>>734691228
The population doesn't matter at all.
Eating rocks would also serve to decrease the population, wouldn't it?
So what are homofeminists going to say now?

Eating rocks is natural and normal and everybody should be doing it and teaching them to their kids as such?

Even if we reached the point where we would be living on top of each other, an instinct deviation will never be healthy or normal.
That would be just a foolish and desperate attempt to justify the unjustifiable by assigning it some made up purpose.

Yes.

>>734689518
>disgusted


Pretty sure that's just a way that the subconscious usually labels things in order for the conscious mind to defer the sensitivity in being able to acknowledge the base attraction, especially when society has placed so much pressure against it

>>734688993


Literally makes no sense.


Words have meaning.

>>734691790
So if you are disgusted by shit, that actually means you are secretly attracted to it and want to eat it?

>>734691680
eating rocks kills individuals. being gay makes functional individuals who cant make more individuals.
You ran out of arguments already? that was fast.

>>734691942
You are a fucking moron, faggot.
Fucking goats would also make functional individuals who can't make more individuals you fucking clown. So thats natural and ok now?
There's a whole other branch of deviates that would jump in your boat if you say so. You'd be a bigger bunch.

Perhaps you are really as stupid as to find some logic to the disparate nonsense you come up with, to label them as "arguments", you silly fuck, but please, do not assume everyone else is such a fucking imbecile.
Stop trying to ridiculously justify deviations.

>>734691923


No, but when it comes to things more naturally like bisexuality I think it is. Like I said, not always, just sometimes can be an indicator.

>>734692531
So if a faggot thinks bisexuality is normal, a shiteater would say eathing shit is normal too. Many kids do it in early childhood.
Should we accept the opinions and judgements of deviates about their own deviations as rules of thumb for the rest of society?

>>734692315
Now with the insults. Chill, man, you're not getting more credible.
And fucking animals is bad for the same reason fucking children is bad: they can't consent. (plus animals aren´t hygienic at all but whatevs)
so yeah, it's not the same at all, smarty pants.

>>734692821
Nevermind the insults and digest the facts dumbass. Believe me you faggot fuck, an animal will consent more to being fucked by your tiny faggot dick than to be hunted, you politically correct "consentful" dipshit faggot.

"Consent justifies anything"

No matter what twisted insanity you try to rationalize it with, consense or no consense homosexuality is a sexual deviation. A painfully obvious one.

>>734692821
But maybe you are a vegan, and consider eating meat a deviation because the animal didn't "consent". Let's talk about corpse fucking then faggot.
It would be as effective on "making functional individuals who can't make more individuals" as your loved homosexuality, wouldn't it? And lots of people like that too.

Do you need the corpses consent? Why would that be wrong about normalizing that too, by your deranged faggot moral compass?

>>734693121
do you know how to read?
my comment says the inability to consent is what makes those things bad. i didn't say the ability to consent justifies homosexuality, but you don't have anything to disqualify it, so we can't say it is bad nor good nor neutral.

>>734693393
changing the subject a little, are we? we need to eat meat to survive, we do not need to be straight to survive. done.

move on, pls

>>734693612
Oh, so anything not essential to survival should be normalized, you simpleton fag? LOL.

>>734693612
Also, why did you stop reading at the eating meat part?
Tell me your point of view on corpse fucking deviate. Im interested in your perspective.

>>734694067
sorry, i did stop reading lol

it involves the same hygienic problem as zoophilia (maybe worse), and also it is harder to find a dead body. (also disrespect and shit but let's leave the morals out of this)

>>734693805
it shouldn't be if it places some kind of damage or danger in somebody. otherwise, i legitimately cant think of a reason why not.

Gayfag here. After I came out of the closet, I was amazed at how many of my supposedly straight friends/acquaintances suddenly started dropping hints and making passes at me. All very low-key, and usually behind a mask of "lol just kidding lol no homo lol". But any time I flirted back they were immediately ready/eager to let me suck them off, at the very least.

Probably helps that I'm fairly cute/effeminate, and I think I have a pretty approachable/nonthreatening personality. But still, this is way more common that I expected. Unfortunately, most of them aren't looking for anything more than sex... hell most of them don't even want to reciprocate and help me get off either, they usually act like their doing me a favor just by "letting" me suck or ride their cocks. Can never get them to wear rubbers, either...

>>734694734
It's hard only because its illegal. But if you normalized it the way homosexuality has been, it wouldn't be hard at all. There are millions of fresh dead people daily.
Enough for the deviates of each city. And the hygiene problem can be easily solved and regulations could be set up for it.
Then we could start talking about necrophilia in children's school books and programs, as part of the "diversity" ideology.

You are not disrespecting anyone, you are "loving them". (Isn't that what faggots do? It suddenly is all about "love" in their parades, not paraphiliac sex). And you're not doing any harm to anyone either.

>>734695078
>>fantasizing faggot detected.
Sorry to break it to you, but your buddies were faggots the whole time dude, just closeted, as yourself.

>>734695101
i really doubt it would be as healthy as you paint it. to be so accepted that it gets normalized doesn't seem like a realistic option, either. (due to the "respect" thing)
in an "utopia" like that, anything could be normal, actually.

>>734687499
>>734687633

It's pretty clear that they're dudes. Anyone who doesn't get that is in denial.

>>734695543
Well, the idea homosexuals getting married was a hilarious matter of laughing, not so far ago, as recently as in the 80's.
Them adopting children...not even in your worst nightmares.
And look at us now, just 30 years later.

All it took was enough deviates getting together and partnering up with feminist to exert enough social noise and pressure to accomplish such craziness. So why shun the other diverse?

And higiene would be easily tackled..I mean, read about it. Necrophiliacs never have been getting diseases like homosexuals have, actually.

>>734691680
IDK it wouldn't surprise me if some Trump supporters need gizzard stones to survive.

im american

>>734684160
Not really bisexual per say. I've only ever been attracted and wanted to fuck one other guy and he was my best friend.

At first I thought I am bi, but I just don't find dudes attractive in general. It was just him. I think it was the relationship that made him attractive, not his gender.

Anyone else experience that?

>>734696156
only if it's dudes in leather pants and gasmasks

>>734684160
Is everyone afraid to admit it and they don't know they're trisexual?

U could just be in denial op cause the girl of ur soulmate broke ur heart

>>734696251
trisexual eh?

I'll b stupid and bite the bait what's the third?

File: Untitled45.jpg (215KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 720x960px

>>734687284

>>734696156
>that's really gay anon
>having sex from feelings

>>734696156
Yup. Would fuck my best friend in a heart beat but I'm not atracted to any other male. GF finds it incredibly hot, but i'm too chickenshit to try anything with him

>>734696327
Bi is the only (third) option. Trans and everything like them are a mental illness not a new gender.
>straight
>gay
>bi
That is it.

>>734695923
well, in the end society decides what is normal. it wasn't normal niggers had rights, or women, or animals, etc. i certainly would not want to fuck a dead body, or someone to fuck mine or my family's. but if society comes to that in 60 years what could i do to stop it? maybe you're right and someday people will have corpse fleshlights to use, but that is still not the actual subject.

you still haven't said one biological reason homosexuality is wrong, and i assume you won't since there is none.

>>734696156
same here.
no other guy but him, how weird.

>>734696403
Right? Feelings are pretty gay. He's kinda androgynous actually.

>>734696516
Sounds like a 3some in the making. But yeah it's scary.

Actually we've gotten pretty close. We used to smoke weed together and it always made me horny and want to suck his dick. We've slept on the same bed many times before. He pulls away every time though and I think I do too. We're both afraid to try and a little grossed out at the same time, isn't that weird?

>>734697380
dude, are you me? it's like you're telling my exact same story

>>734697380
Drinking alcohol lowers inhibition. God its like schooling middle schoolers.

>>734697131
I told you, but you are dumb to reason.
It's biologically wrong because it is a denial of the purpose an instinct is imprinted on us.
Like bulimia is wrong because it's an exercise of the instinct which denies its function. That's why its a disorder.
It doesnt matter the degree of damage, or its lethality. What defines a disorder or a deviation as such, is its degree of separation from the purpose of everything related to the reason of the instinct.

I also explained the diverse degrees of deviations previously.

Will I have to explain this a third time?

File: f47103b4857a5bc2f2d1db96146878ae.jpg (1MB, 1038x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1038x1280px

>>734684160
i would be if furry lions / rabbits existed but i hate how male humans look and their shit personalities

>>734697871
Give up Anon
>he blatantly ignored all your scientific reasonings
>he seems unwilling to look beyond his own thinking
>he is just all around argumentative. These are the worst people to consider reasoning with
I read into wat u say anon I believe u.

>>734697612
haha, well just goes to show you that maybe this is more common than we think.

>>734697854
He's allergic to alcohol, but not that we haven't tried. I've been to raves with him too and he introduced me to molly. We've been through a lot. It's pretty much like we were dating already without the fucking part.

I actually had a girlfriend at some point then and they had history together. It was definitely a point of tension in the relationship. She was a little jealous probably cuz she knew there were feelings there.

>>734697871
yes you explained why it would be an anomaly (ergo, something that didn't came out the way it was meant to), which i do not recognize as true yet, but nvm.
what you did not explain is why it is wrong.
E.g: bulimia is a deviation or anomaly because blah blah instinct with no function.
Aaand bulimia is wrong because it causes health issues on the person affected by it.

so, you're saying homosexuality is an anomaly because sex with no bbys, but why is it wrong? cause right now it is as wrong as using a condom according to you.

>>734698251
what scientific reasoning did i ignore, please?
i am debating cause I believe what i am saying is true, and if im wrong i would want to know it too.

>>734695101
>>734697871

A dead body isn't a person though, don't put in on the same level as real sexual orientations. A dead body is nothing more than a fleshlight at best. Even if homo/bisexuals are less common than heteros, that doesn't make them wrong for acting in a manner that feels natural to them. Tell me, what should the consequences be for the "damage" someone causes when following the sexual instincts that comes the most naturally. Nothing is lost two people of the same sex decide to fuck.

>>734698251
You are right anon. I shouldn't wast any more time.
>>734698438
You ignored every single one that was shared with you anon. My last post is crystal clear, and even a retarded child would understand what's said there.Your asking again is, well...it says it all.

>>734698694
i am dissapointed. I thought you actually had a point instead of repeating some shit.
You just ignored a whole post of my answer, probably because you have nothing against it, and now you will more likely leave.

also, that wasn't very specific about "scientifical reasoning"

>>734698614
Listen you motherfucker. You do not define the boundaries of sexual orientations.

>>sexual orientations are limited by everything that is convenient for me.

If any other "diverse" person feels an inclination towards anything he desires, living or not living, person or object, any other deviates, like faggots, should respect it, and not take the side of the healthy people they hate so much for calling them out as deviates. Its hypocritical.
So guys who like fucking only dolls should be shunned as well, because dolls are not persons? Faggots should be the only deviates allowed to be normalized?

Nothing is lost on letting those other diverse exercise their diversity as you demand to do either.

>>734698614
that isn't me tho

>>734698210
please kys

>>734699063
sexual orientations are between people, sorry necrofucker. nice bait though.
>>734699168
I guess I'm having trouble following two conversations at once, apologies.

>>734698694
Yeah right on Anon
>if they never understand its the fault of their shit perception of advance concepts
>and they will forever annoy people with endless nitpicking questionnaires while at the same time denying all given answers

>>734698979
Wow, you exasperating idiot.

>> Im an idiotic fuck who wont understand the obvious and just babble like a fucking idiot.

I repeated myself because there is nothing more to say you dense fuck.

If I told you, I dont know, "plants need the sun because is part of the photosynthetic process embedded in their biology", and you responded by asking "and where is the scientific reasoning?" after that, well, what else can I do?
How can I say that clearer?
If you are such a fucking idiot to not understand that, repeating it a 100 times in a 100 different ways would change anything?

>>734699376
No you faggot fuck. Sexual orientations are not defined by faggot fucks at their convenience to separate themselves from other deviates.

>>734699608
can you answer?

to be specific, this:
"yes you explained why it would be an anomaly (ergo, something that didn't came out the way it was meant to), which i do not recognize as true yet, but nvm.
what you did not explain is why it is wrong.
E.g: bulimia is a deviation or anomaly because blah blah instinct with no function.
Aaand bulimia is wrong because it causes health issues on the person affected by it.

so, you're saying homosexuality is an anomaly because sex with no bbys, but why is it wrong? cause right now it is as wrong as using a condom according to you."

for an hipotesis to be considered even valid to look into, it should be able to answer at least something like that.

TLDR: gay sex = bad cuz no bbys? but condom sex=good?

>>734699719
there are three and they are clearly defined as the attraction towards sexes.
hetero, homo, or bi
it's not my fault you have a degenerate philia and get hard at funerals.

>>734699890
"Wrong" you babbling moron is a subjective concept. Fucking a 5 year old kid is not "wrong" for a pedo.
Sticking your cock into another mans ass is not "wrong" for a faggot.
Stealing is not "wrong" for a thief.
Raping is not "wrong" for a sociopath.

Hence, me, personally, like to define as wrong in this case, anything that results in an unhealthy exercise of an instinct. Which in some cases can be tolerated, like, not criminalized, but should not be normalized either, as to prevent the spreading of such illness or disorder.

>>734700207
So then why? why would you normalize condom using but not homosexuality? that is the answer of this fucking debate, what would decide in what cases it should be tolerated and in what cases it shouldnt?

>>734700048
Oh, now the faggot turns fully hypocritical!!
May I remind you that homosexuality was listed as a philia by the APA as recently as the 1970's, when a particular group of paraphilics took over it by force and violence, forcing them to twist facts and eventually transforming it into a propaganda platform.

Psychiatric institutions in other countries of the world not yet dominated by the feminstogay movement still list it correctly as such.

And 40 years later the faggots point their fingers at other deviates and call them deviates?

ahaha, would be hilarious if it wasnt so pathetic.

>>734700207
also, i am pretty sure all three of that guys think that they are doing wrong, but do it anyways.
this doesnt asks for a reply since what would i know.
PD >>734700207
still not me

>>734684922
I wouldn't consider 5-10% (if those numbers are accurate) to be fluid.

>>734700657
shit, i meant >>734700048 wasnt me

>>734700405
You're right. I never said homosexuality should be the only normalized thing that should be resetted to its real status as a deviation.
What should decide those things, is not the preference of the deviated, but their degree of the deviation from the natural design of the species.

Why is a deviation as grotesque as homosexuality normalized, but a 30year old man attracted to a wholesome and sexually mature 17 year old woman consider a hideous crime? Do we live in a crazy house?

"Ideologies" is your answer. Homosexuality has been normalized by feminsts as much as by fags, or even more by feminists, fueled by a resentment at everything that is wholesomely masculine.

>>734684160
Nope. I'm just gay. I wanted to not be a faggot but it was impossible (serously)

>>734699608
Senpai stop feeding the troll
>whenever I post theories of alt religion I'm met with the same kind of faggotry.

>>734685727
Garbage amateur psychology, and I'm with the poster.

>>734700811
i do not have a resentment to males, and also hate modern feminists sluts, but that is my case. homosexuality being grotesque is highly subjective, also.

so basically you are saying it is subjective in the end. sadly, debates like this end where they began.

>>734700851
i find it funny you call me a troll, since i dont want to annoy anyone. i just want answers. and if someone does not have them maybe the should start looking too.

>>734700207
different guy, this post makes your thoughts a lot clearer to me. The thing is, there's not really a specific known cause for homosexual behavior and it doesn't spread the way a disease would. If you look at places which sought to prevent it like Utah, it more so bumped up the suicide rate than fixed their sexuality. In my opinion, normalizing something is by far the better choice than excluding someone for something they can't control.

>>734684160
Yes

>>734701318
Faggots should support the change of age of consent laws to allow 40 year olds to have sex with 16 and 17 year old young women. That is completely normal and healthy, yet criminalized by the same people who promote homosexuality.
Doing so would get you the support of all straight men, believe me.

>>734687499
This

>>734701597
Hell a good portion of faggots are pedos as well. Its only a matter of time before kids are thrown to the wolves. Adoption rates are gonna skyrocket and the feminazis will be free of men once and for all.

>>734701597 not the same guy
age of consent differs by country, some countries are already allowed to fuck 16y/os. Idrc about acceptation, since i am bi and do not plan of coming out anytime soon (or ever), but 16 should be okay, younger girls sucked my dick when i was 16 so...
by girls i mean just one, but still.

>>734684160
there's straight then there's kinky

>>734701939
16 or 17 year olds
>pedos?

>>734684609
This.

>>734701939
Are you a fucking idiot? Feeling attraction towards a 16 year old young woman is as far from being a pedo as fucking an 80 year old.

Fucking shithead. Idiots like you will soon push us into the era of the "30 year old child".

>>734701597
I was hoping for an actual response but whatever.

File: 1495815880867.png (876KB, 1039x708px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1039x708px

>>734684160

Are you really this stupid? Stay in school.

>>734702119
Never explicitly said that. Just said gays are baby rappers and their new found political power will force some middle ground between what is ok for the general population and them. They literally fuck kids 1-10 if anyone can get the age of consent lowered its them. Tomorrow its 16. Soon who knows how low they will push it.

File: IMG_0329.jpg (1MB, 2320x3088px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2320x3088px

follow my insta @weehian64, aka Antonin Rosephesto, home of the mentally instable weeh lord ian

>>734684160
People are ambisexual. Snails are bisexual.

>>734702180
Here's your response moron. Is normalizing better than completely banning? Yeah.
But do you know what's even better?
Allowing society to call things by their name, and catalog them as such.
That results in science not being hindered by things like "political correction" thus allowing scientists to actually delve into causes of things, like homosexuality, finding reasons, and perhaps cures?

Did you ever read about that scientist, french I think, who discovered the relationship between stress in the mother during pregnancy and faggotry in the male offspring?

He almost got lynched by faggots.
And if you think about it, in the era of single mothers, unstable families and divorces...almost ALL mothers are stressed during pregnancy, which would account for the enormous raise of faggots in the world.

But nah, lets shun science, and instead enable disorders.

File: 6759F40A-8494-494E-976A-29DD1A094C6E-207-0000000C53EB6813.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>734701982
they should lower it even more
(seinfeld theme song plays) (north korean flag emoji and creepy moon emoji emojimovie)

File: 7c170cbf75475dc9d21536f5cc8da03d.jpg (125KB, 787x1296px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 787x1296px

>>734702119
This guy gets it.

>>734702612
i am bi and seriously it would be great if they found the cause. stupid faggots =/= all faggots

>>734702612
Still with u anon, not to mention the studies of viruses altering sexuality or becoming gay from traumatic experience. Or just gay from genetic defects which could also render them infertile

>>734686323
>does traps count?
Kill yourself Anon.

>>734702968
I hear you. I know that even if I were homosexual I wouldn't be in favor of normalization.
Just like those Dolce&Gabanna guys provoked the anger of the faggot community when they said that they where against faggots adopting.
Those are smart, conscious, non-fanatical and non-egotistical faggots.

>>734703334
may i ask why? i've had enough arguments for today so a quick answer will do.
is it for the possibility of making the kids gay?