whats a good encryption program you guys recommend?

>>731587729
>6÷2(2+1)
>3(2+1)
>(6+2)
8 I think...

>>731587729
cant be awnsered. Good joke tho

File: hue.jpg (113KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 700x525px

>>731587984
>>731587933

>>731587933
>3(2+1)
>(6+2)
What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>731587729
Answer is 9, but understanding intentionally ambiguous syntax isn't clever.

It's fucking nine

>6÷2(2+1)
>6÷2(3)
>3x3
9, the answer is 9 faggots.

>>731588143
>>731587933
i kek'd.
Either bait or vegetable.

File: 1493986103948.png (80KB, 1626x822px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1626x822px

>>731587729
Here you go. Pick whichever answer you like.

>>731587729
Fuck sakes its 9

the answer is 1 you fucking retarded people

>>731588290
1 is not correct.

According to oder of operations, division and multiplication have the same precedence, so you go from left to right.

Fekkin' numero uno

>>731588143
6+2 clearly equals 8 you spaatic

>>731588413
Then ignore the first answer and use 9.

Also take a math class higher than 9th grade.

6 * 1/2 * 3

>>731588567
1 isn't correct. A division symbol does not mean the entire expression to the right of the symbol is the divisor, as that goes against the order of operations.

It was only adopted as an exception in older times because it was harder to print as a numerator over a denominator than it was to print a division symbom inside of a textbook. This is now archaic usage and it's wrong.

>>731588290
You actually can't pick whichever you like. The operands of the divide operation are 6 and 2, not 6 and (2(2+1)).

>>731588453
6+3 not 6+2.

>>731588719
>>731588755

You can take whatever answer you like. It is given in an ambiguous way in order to troll the thread.

Whether you see it as 6 divided by 2 times the sum of 1 and 3 giving you 9
Or as 2(1+3) as a separate term. giving 6 divided by the whole term of 2 times the sum of 1 and 3 which gives you one.

This is why past like middle school math we stop using the division sign.

TLDR: OP is trolling you.

>>731589003
It doesnt matter if OP is trying to troll. He's failing because 9 is the only actual answer. You're a god damn degenerate if you think anything else.

9 is the correct answer.

Any other is a failure at math

I'm going with 8.

>>731589097
Thats just like your opinion man. this is why we don't use division signs. And why you don't mix division signs with parentheses

Put a multiplication sign between 2 and (1+2) and the whole thing changes.

as written it is both 1 and 9 depending on if you take 2(1+2) as a term divided by six. or six halves multiplied by (1+2)

>>731587729
9

>>731589453
You literally can't do it as 6/(2 (2+1)). That is mathematically incorrect. Just because divisions signs are retarded doesn't mean that they don't have a defined usage.

Don't you have to follow the rules of BIMDAS? So it would be:
6÷2(1x2)
6÷6
>Is 1

>>731589566
I am still using the division sign as it is defined.

I just see 2(1+2) as a whole term rather than two parts.

again, written by a retard who doesn't know that these things can be ambiguous.

>>731589957
Implying you can just pick how you want math to work. I think I'm just gonna go ahead and throw out multiplicatioms distributive property while we're at it, never been a fan of that one.

>>731589592
That would be BEDMAS retard...division comes before multiplication.

The answer is 9 stop being stupid.

>>731589957
>I just see 2(1+2) as a whole term rather than two parts.
this is where you fail to understand mathematics. it's not ambiguous and you're the retard

>>731590125
Division doesn't come before multiplication, they the exact same precedence. In the case they are at the same time it is to be done from left to right.

>>731590155
Except it is, that's why the division sign is like that you moron

>>731588215
The problem with stupid people is they just dont get they're stupid.

You solve the parentheses, after that you progress through the equasion normally. The operator precedence is parentheses, multiplications, additions. Between the first number 2 and the opening parenthesis is a multiplication so it goes from left to right. God damn i fucking hate people

>>731590288
It's ambiguous

>>731588453
It's not 6 + 2 you autist.

>>731587933
i think it's
>6÷2(1+2)
>6÷(2+1)
>3+1
4

did anyone ever actually attend middle school?
its 9
6÷2(1+2)
6÷2(3)
3(3)
9

>>731591359
I know right. These people...

>>731588453
Obvious bait.

>>731591359
the 2(3) counts as a Parenthesis/Brackets operation therefore precedes the division

>>731591959
wrong. its the bracket's contents only

>>731587729
openssl

>>731591359

this

>>731591345
hope u are trolling,kid.

>>731592213
HAHA TROLLED XD

>>731592543

: )

my eyes were in pain

>>731589592
>6÷2(1x2)
>(1x2)
are u blind?

>>731590197
Please
Excuse
My
Dear
Aunt
Sally

There's your order of operation, dumbass.

>>731587729
I got 7
>6÷2(1+2)
>6÷2+4
>3+4
>=7
Classic filename

>>731587729
Cerber 3

>>731593210
Where the fuck did you get 4 from?

>>731587729
yes

>>731593430
I got order of operations wrong
I expanded 2(1+2) into 2x1 + 2x2
When I was supposed to add up what was in the brackets first
So the answer is 9

>>731588290
BODMAS YOU FUCKING DUMB CUNT

Ok so riddle me this
Let's assume we don't know the value of both numbers in the brackets.
1 is a and 2 is b
How would you go on then?
What I learned is:
2(a+b) -> 2a + 2b
So why don't you do this then?
2(1+2) -> 2*1 + 2*2

>>731587729
I got 1.
I solved the 2 in front of the (1+2) first which gave me 6 then divided by the first number 6 which gave me 1.