unofficial

Ready and insert dick
Time with interesting truth can help
Under something earning rum
Psipsyndicate

We are born, we age, we die. There are events that occur before out birth, while we're living, and long after we are dead. Time exists, jackass. We may quantify it to suit our agendas, but it's real nonetheless.

Pointless rhetoric.

It does exist and is real. But what about perception. Feeling time differently

If time doesn't exist, then what is timestamp? and why is it important

>>730888051
Saying time exists because its units of measure is a construct is as retarded as saying length doesn't exist because we invented the ruler

File: 1489307751867.jpg (310KB, 650x900px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 650x900px

>>730888051
Time is an illusion created by the movement of object in relation to one another.

Check em'!

>>730888651

Time is relative.

Move at speed away from an observer and you'll age at a slower rate.

File: 1485137321850.jpg (201KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 900x600px

>>730889821
>>730889832

These.

>>730889821
that would be
t he earth and the rotation of the sun\
>cont

>>730888051
grade 7 level philosophy

>>730888651
>>730889610

You're using a different definition of time than the author of this quote and the author might even agree with your statement but I feel we should all be intelligent enough to understand they are using time defined by the structure we formed around it. It is not time as in the meta passing of matter through it.

TL:DR - I don't like waking up an hour earlier for daylight savings time.

>>730888651

You can live forever.

Simply accellerate until you reach relativistic speeds and time will effectively stop. You will be at the end of the universe.

>>730888651
"time" as we know it is merely the observation of change which has been quantified. although we are able to relatively slow down or increase the rate of which some things in our universe change (which can make them seem as if they're passing through time more quickly, or slowly)

yet it is not a person, thing, nor a place. it does not exist in our universe, as the universe is entirely comprised of differing forms of energy of which time is not.. it fits no known states of matter. although it is an incredibly helpful tool in measuring and manipulating forms of matter, or predicting them rather.

there's a reason why we're stuck in this perpetual state of here and now in the present.

tl;dr you're a dumbass.

>>730890438
what is time

again

File: bh.jpg (5KB, 267x189px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 267x189px

>>730890657
>>730890438

>>730890657
>>730890684
how do i do that when i repoly to myself?

>>730890657

Time is a consequence of space.

>>730890419
you obviously dont understand special relativity.

>>730890438
>Apples do not exist because it is a social construct what is there is not actually an apple.

Time is a construct to quantifiably measure the observed velocity between moving objects in the sky, also known as planets. Its as every bit real as an apple you dumbwit.

Everything we do and think operates within the quantized measurement of time. If time doesn't exist, nothing does because we need time to observe and make sense of our reality.

>>730888051
>we are times slave

Kek no I'm not, this guy should of tried being NEET boi

>>730890941

From your own perspective time will pass at what you perceive to be a normal rate, but billions of years will pass as you travel at relativistic speeds.

>>730888051
>time doesn't exist
>goes on to explain what time is
This guy is dumb as fuck

>>730891217 this is correct but doesnt reflect what you initially said (if you are that anon).

>>730888651
Who can say where the road goes
Where the day flows, only time
And who can say if your love grows
As your heart chose, only time

Who can say why your heart sighs
As your love flies, only time
And who can say why your heart cries
When your love lies, only time

Who can say when the roads meet
That love might be in your heart
And who can say when the day sleeps
If the night keeps all your heart
Night keeps all your heart

Who can say if your love grows
As your heart chose
Only time
And who can say where the road goes
Where the day flows, only time

Who knows? Only time

>>730891515

Both anons are correct.

>>730888051
What is this faggotry?
>fb image
Oh, that explains it

>>730891515

Light speed is the end of the universe. There is nothing beyond.

>>730888051
But gravitational waves, they confirmed spacetime

>>730891848
If light speed is quantifiable how is it the end of the universe? Its just speed... please explain.

>>730888051
Water doesn't exist.

"Water" as we know it, is just a liquid. We know this because the liquid is water, we can only operate the malfunction to the relatively space time continuation of the control from the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanisms it takes for the quantum deficiency programming organization.

>>730891594
The first anon said you can live forever if you travel at relativistic speeds. If you believe that, youre an idiot.

>>730891848
So there's no faster speed? This makes no sense.
Please share whatever you're smoking with the rest of the class, Jayden.

>>730892039

No.

>>730891848
Nice b8,
M8

>>730892039
Hes an idiot pseudo philosopher who probably watched a video on some spirit science youtube channel once

>>730892197
>The first anon said you can live forever if you travel at relativistic speeds. If you believe that, youre an idiot.

At light speed time stops, effectively.

You will hang for eternity on the edge.

Of course, in your own frame of reference time will be passing normally.

>>730892254

You can't exceed the speed of light.

>>730892486
Do you not see how what you typed is logically inconsistent?

>>730892486
Incorrect, the time only stops when a mechanism in our brain called the nuclear aparus continues to revolt at such a velocity that the frontal lobe starts the time speed continua, which in quantum mechanics means a file of the control from the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe. So yeah.

>>730892819
Is this true? Can you sauce?

>>730888051
Argues that a measurement of time is time , poor argument.

That would be like saying that the ocean doesn't exist because we can measure parts of the ocean with a jug and multiply it to come up with abstract notion that an ocean is only its measurement.

You fail that understanding that the passage of time is real , even if there was no way to measure it or for that matter observe it.

>>730892676

"Forever" ends with the end of space/time itself, it's when the universe ends.

At light speed you will exist until space/time itself ceases to exist.

Welcome to physics.

>>730892819

No.

To an observer, someone travelling at light speed is frozen in time.

>>730892988
Sure, just log on to,
www.beefyniggassukincokz.com
And just follow the prompts!

>>730893034
Where are you getting this bullshit from. You obviously dont study it.

>>730888051
Same could be said about space.

>>730893242

If you attempt to reach the speed of light you'll run out of space/time.

>>730893416
No , time and space exist , even if they are not measured or observed.

Why is /b/ full of ignorant & willfully ignorant people ?

>>730888051
nothing else we have created exists either, does it?

time = gender

>>730893693
IT'S TIME TO STOP!

>>730893531
No, you will follow a hyperbolic path through space-time that is asymptotic to the world line of a photon released at the same time point some distance from your starting point.

>>730893724
H3h3 is my biggest inspiration

>>730888051
Why does the guy in the pic have no head?

What happened to his head? Did it fall off?

How did it go from his neck to the ground without agreeing to the required agreed upon concept, on account of being deceased?

The question is not "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" The question is, "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around, can it even fall?"

>>730888051
don't we base time from light? what is time

>>730893997
Oh shyyyet mein neigger

>>730894118
Yo Eagle?

>>730893150
Sorry pal, wrong again! But its okay I'll explain :) the frontal cortex lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because your brain can't tell the difference between the malfunction of the multiple control from the single vault of the quantum deficiency. So, the Prague among the vortex doesn't understand the programming of time, or even the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe, it starts to diffuse the control the vortex has over the multiple mechanisms in the lower dialysis.

>>730892573
The speed of light is quantifiable, though. Therefore, there are faster speeds.
> 1.07 billion km/hour

>>730888051
time is the name we give to the 4th dimention that we can sense. It's a vector like depth, height and width. It's passing is our moving along on it. It's the only dimention we can sense that in which we can't change our movement on.

>>730893997
Heis looking at his shoes. It's supposed to seem like a dramatic pose to the kind of uncultured white gamer losers with no fucking sense that think going around playing dress-up mixing formal and casual shit is "badass", or would actually use the word "badass" to describe something other than diarrhea.

>>730893861

You are not a massless particle.

>>730894424
I am interested in how you would get something to move faster than the speed of light without warping space with the use of tremendous gravity.

>>730894424
Please tell me youre joking. All distance and time is defined relative to the speed of light. Thats the point of special relativity.

>>730894424
No! Fuck you.
- The universe.

>>730894549
By writing the number.
In this game, anon is playing a philosophical hand. You are playing an aspie hand.

>>730894281

A person traveling at light speed would perceive the World no differently to how you're pereiving the World right now.

>>730888051
>Time doesn't exist

Great, ill give my boss this quote next time im an hour late to work because of traffic. Wish me luck anons!

>>730894527
What does that have to do with anything?

>>730894281
Exactly, but dude your on /b/ half of these degenerates won't even understand the programming of time is just being relative that new quantum deficiency in the gravity isn't EVEN equivalent to the multiple mechanism in the brains vector cells! haha

>>730894705
I am Aspergic.

>>730894556

Special Relativity has it arse backwards.

Most physicists have no idea what the speed of light in a vacuum actually is.

>>730894705
You obviously do not understand physics , what do you believe is the coldest temperature ?

*PS , there is no negative million degrees celcius or fahrenheit.

>>730894917
At least the multiple mechanisms in the lower dialysis of the multiple control from the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions because our brains just cannot grasp the fact of the multiple mechanism in the front lobe will not respond to the outermost upper contributions.

>>730894958
What aree you trying to say?

>>730894808

An object with mass is, of course, bound by Newtonian physics. It will travel through space/time. No one is disputing that.

>>730895318
Ah i see. Well baited sir. You had me riled up and everything.

>>730895239
That the light in the vacuum is only relative to that of the frontal lobe in the brain.
Am I speaking Japanese? LOL

>>730895239

The speed of light in a vacuum, luxons, the propagation of gravity, etc, all have the same quantifiable quality.

Newtonian physics explains what it is: it's a brick wall all massless particles and field effects experience. Accelleration is instantaneous, but BAM... brick wall .c

>>730895651
Guy youre really wrong. Its like somebody roughly explained the idea to you drunk in a pub. Look up hyperbolic paths through space time you might find it interesting.

And newtonian physics is an approximation special rel. At velocities v<<c. Thats all newtonian physics means.

>>730895651
Incorrect, the mechanism in the frontal lobe will not respond to the multiple control from the single vault of the quantum deficiency programming organizational system.

>>730894705
My point is that we're using measurements limited to our tiny existence, with our very limited knowledge. It stands to reason that something could travel faster than what we are able to quantify.

>>730894424
There are faster speeds in the same vein that there are bigger numbers, but the the speed of light is a universal constant. The closer you get to the speed of light, the more energy is required to advance further towards it. It's asymptotic. Similarly, the closer you get to it, the slower the passage of time is for you. Specifically, you would experience time as slower and slower. At the exact speed of light (which is impossible to reach), time is frozen.

>>730888051
True, same goes for energy. Motion is all there is

>>730896018
Whatever measurement system is used is irrelevant. If it's measured by how many people on Earth fart by the time it rotates once, the speed is still the same.

The point being that the speed of light is the maximum speed of anything in existence.

>>730896038
Incorrect, the hyperbolic trajectory was depicted in the bottom-right quadrant of this diagram, where the gravitational potential well in the central mass shows potential energy, and the kinetic energy of the hyperbolic trajectory is shown in red. The height of the kinetic energy decreases outside as the speed decreases and distance increases according to Kepler's laws. The part of the kinetic energy that remains above zero total energy is that associated with the hyperbolic excess velocity. The multiple mechanism in the frontal lobe in the brain can't tell the difference between the astrodynamics or celestial mechanics, a hyperbolic trajectory is the trajectory of any object around a central body with more than enough speed to escape the central object's gravitational pull. The name derives from the fact that according to Newtonian theory such an orbit has the shape of a hyperbola. In more technical terms this can be expressed by the condition that the orbital eccentricity is greater than one.

Under standard assumptions a body traveling along this trajectory will coast to infinity, arriving there with hyperbolic excess velocity relative to the central body. Similarly to parabolic trajectory all hyperbolic trajectories are also escape trajectories. The specific energy of a hyperbolic trajectory orbit is positive.

Planetary flybys, used for gravitational slingshots, can be described within the planet's sphere of influence using hyperbolic trajectories.

>>730895884

Massless particles follow Newton's 2nd law.

They are massless, so there is no accellaration. They instantaneously arrive at .c

But, why .c?

I know the answer.

>>730895977

Brains do not work on the Quantum level. Brains are biological, they're on a macro level.

>>730896272
No, the part of the kinetic energy that remains above zero total energy is that associated with the hyperbolic excess velocity. The multiple mechanism in the frontal lobe in the brain can't tell the difference between the astrodynamics or celestial mechanics, a hyperbolic trajectory is the trajectory of any object around a central body with more than enough speed to escape the central object's gravitational pull. The name derives from the fact that according to Newtonian theory such an orbit has the shape of a hyperbola. In more technical terms this can be expressed by the condition that the orbital eccentricity is greater than one, faggot.

>>730896382
Incorrect, the standard macro assumptions a body traveling along this trajectory will coast to infinity, arriving there with hyperbolic excess velocity relative to the central body. Similarly to parabolic trajectory all hyperbolic trajectories are also escape trajectories. The specific energy of a hyperbolic trajectory orbit is positive.

>>730896382
Normally nothing on a macro scale has quantifiable quantum effects - but since all things are composed of fundamental particles they are all inherently affected by quantum effects.

This is a stupid statement.

>>730896421
LOL what? The height of the kinetic energy decreases outside as the speed decreases and distance increases according to Kepler's laws. The part of the kinetic energy that remains above zero total energy is that associated with the hyperbolic excess velocity. The multiple mechanism in the frontal lobe in the brain can't tell the difference between the astrodynamics or celestial mechanics, a hyperbolic trajectory is the trajectory of any object around a central body with more than enough speed to escape the central object's gravitational pull, retard.

>>730896504

Cells remain unaffected by quantum events.

>>730896586
Dud you are tripping me the fuck out

>>730896549
>Normally nothing on a macro scale has quantifiable quantum effects -

This statement is inconsistent with this statement:

>This is a stupid statement.

> but since all things are composed of fundamental particles they are all inherentl

Reductio ad absurdum fallacy.

>>730896586
You must be b8ng me. But ill explain anyway, an elliptical orbit, a hyperbolic trajectory for a given system can be defined (ignoring orientation) by its semi major axis and the eccentricity. However, with a hyperbolic orbit other parameters may more useful in understanding a body's motion. The following lobes parameters i described are the path of body following a hyperbolic trajectory around another under standard assumptions and the formula connecting them.

>>730891217
Thats not living forever, that relative aging. I may live lonher than a star but it won't be forever, more so since It's theorized that entropy is accelerated based on velocity.

If i move beyond the speed of light i damn near might just evaporate from existence.

can i be deep too guys?

>>730896615
Incorrect, In the formalism of quantum mechanics, the state of a cell at a given time is described by a complex wave function, also referred to as state vector in a complex vector lobe. This abstract mathematical object allows for the calculation of probabilities of outcomes of concrete experiments. For example, it allows one cell compute the probability of finding an electron in a particular region around the nucleus at a particular time. Contrary to classical mechanics, one can never make simultaneous predictions of conjugate variables, such as position and momentum, to arbitrary precision. For instance, electrons may be considered (to a certain probability) to be located somewhere within a given region of space, but with their exact positions unknown. Contours of constant probability, often referred to as "clouds", may be drawn around the nucleus of an atom to conceptualize where the electron might be located with the most probability. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle quantifies the inability to precisely locate the particle given its conjugate momentum.

According to one interpretation, as the result of a measurement the wave function containing the probability information for a system collapses from a given initial state to a particular cell.

>>730896992
>Thats not living forever,

For as long as space/time exists. That is, by definition, "forever".

>>730896835
Oh okay yeah I get it now, thanks anon!

>>730897070

Nope.

Quantum events are smoothed at the macro level.

Cells operate on the smooth surface, not in the bitty quantum world.

Retard.

>>730897082
No forever is eternally. It's the process of absolute existence.to live live forever would mean that you would exist in absolute certainty at any given point in the future, even beyond the decay of the last ion to which you could be compaired.

>>730888051
Time does exist. Just not in the fashion we measure it. Time exist clocks are just the best representation we have of it on our rock orbiting the sun that orbits sagittarius A star that floats around in the Virgo Supercluster that floats around in the void. Time we measure is representative of our day night cycle there is a universal time we just use are local space time as defined by our needs not the needs of the universe.

>>730897297
>No forever is eternally.

There is no "eternally" independent of space/time.

>>730888403
raid twitch user what?

>>730897177
*sigh* let me explain, an elliptical cell, a hyperbolic trajectory for a given system can be defined (ignoring orientation) by its semi major axis and the eccentricity. However, with a hyperbolic quantum cell it may be more useful in understanding a body's motion. The following lobes parameters i described are the path of body following a hyperbolic trajectory around another under standard assumptions and the formula connecting them.

Please refrain from calling me names I am only trying to educate you.

>>730897146
That's okay pal :)

>>730897493
*sigh*

At a macro level quantum events are smoothed. Cells function at the macro level.

No amount of nonsense from you can change this nature of reality.

Retard.

Time is real.
What you need to do is some research into the consequence of speed and mass, it's relevance to E=Mc2. It's like saying weight doesn't exist because we invented the scales.

>>730897732
Listen youngster, the formalism of quantum mechanics, the state of a cell at a given time is described by a complex wave function, also referred to as state vector in a complex vector lobe. This abstract mathematical object allows for the calculation of probabilities of outcomes of concrete experiments. For example, it allows one cell compute the probability of finding an electron in a particular region around the nucleus at a particular time. Contrary to classical mechanics, one can never make simultaneous predictions of conjugate variables, such as position and momentum, to arbitrary precision. For instance, electrons may be considered (to a certain probability) to be located somewhere within a given region of space, but with their exact positions unknown. Contours of constant probability, often referred to as "clouds", may be drawn around the nucleus of an atom to conceptualize where the electron might be located with the most probability. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle quantifies the inability to precisely locate the particle given its conjugate momentum.

According to one interpretation, as the result of a measurement the wave function containing the probability information for a system collapses from a given initial state to a particular cell.

Please refrain from profanity, me and my 8 year old son are browsing together.

>>730897992
>Listen youngster,

Why thank you. I'm 43.

>the formalism of quantum mechanics, the state of a cell at a given time is described by a complex wave function...

That's about as relevent to cells as the gravity exerted on your body by the Moon.

>>730897992
>Please refrain from profanity, me and my 8 year old son are browsing together.

Browsing /b/ with an 8 year old?

YOU FUCKING RETARD.

>>730898356
You think that as the result of a measurement the wave function containing the probability information for a system collapses from a given initial state to a particular eigenstate? No, the possible results of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the operator representing the observable—which explains the choice of Hermitian operators, for which all the eigenvalues are real. The probability distribution of an observable in a given state can be found by computing the spectral decomposition of the corresponding operator. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by the statement that the operators corresponding to certain observables do not commute.

>>730898519
Please refrain from profanity, thanks :)

>>730897732
I went to Harvard in California and I can tell you that the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics thus stems from the act of measurement. This is one of the most difficult aspects of quantum systems to understand. It was the central topic in the famous Bohr–Einstein debates, in which the two scientists attempted to clarify these fundamental principles by way of thought experiments. In the decades after the formulation of quantum mechanics, the question of what constitutes a "measurement" has been extensively studied. Newer interpretations of quantum mechanics have been formulated that do away with the concept of "wave function collapse" (see, for example, the relative state interpretation). The basic idea is that when a quantum system interacts with a measuring apparatus, their respective wave functions become entangled, so that the original quantum system ceases to exist as an independent entity.

>>730898610
>You think that as the result of a measurement the wave function containing the probability information for a system collapses

Utterly irrelevant.

There is a reason we study biology and not physics when oberving cells.