Looking for a Photoshop expert for some personal work, leave me your snapchat for more information on it. potential payment.
>>728905176
>potential payment
You guarantee payment for work or you go die.
>expert
>potential payment
You're what's wrong with the world. Would you consider suicide?
>>728905267
Guranteed payment. Paypal
>>728905379
I don't trust you
>>728905320
If you are good, and haven't just used paint ill pay, if its believable
>>728905489
How could I make you trust me
>>728905544
can't
you already fucked up
I've been fucked over before
never again
>>728905581
how about i pay you half then the other half afterwards?
>>728905503
I think you're underestimating the cost of a graphics expert. Let's humor your pitiful ideas and see what the extent of the work is...and what you think it's worth.
At least tell us what kind of work you need
>>728905658
its putting some friends faces on some nude women. it would be like £10 per image, i dont expect you to spend ages on them anyway, just make it believable
>>728905176
>>728905760
If you want that then email me and I'll see what I can do.
"[email protected]"
>>728905760
there's a lot more than goes into it than you might think. you've got to consider the angle of the face compared to the angle of the model. you need to correct the lighting so it matches the model. you need to do the opposite of the skin tone so that the model matches the friend.
it's not a quick process if you want it to be believable.
you offering 10 pounds per image if the equivalent of 10 pounds for about 3 hours of work; or, 3.33/hr
reconsider suicide
>>728906123
well how much do you think it's worth?
just post 2 pics you want merged, op.
>>728906233
>>728906218
$60/hr. $180/photo.
but if you're providing low-res shit images like >>728906470 and expect it to look normal on a high-res image like >>728906573 then you are literally entirely clueless about how it works
trust me when i say that you're so oblivious to the process that you're better off not even asking. you're embarrassing yourself
>>728906905
180 for one?! I can get higher res, this was just for example
bump
>>728906470
dis bitch is hot
>>728907297
sadly not a slut so I cant get natural nudes
>>728907372
:'(
>>728907649
ik, thats why i need a photoshopper
>>728905176
The problem is really like light levels and stuff - heres a quick 2 min mock up of why thats a problem.
you'll need picks with the same lighting and stuff, but also to make sure that you get similar coloured hair and skin or whatever.
What's it for anyway? B
>>728909344
Im a noob, but could you not change the head completely? and ill find a better set of images.
>>728909771
yeah I guess so, the pic of your blonde girl didn't have her full hair so
do you want it to be this specific soft porn star?
>>728909998
no i just want her naked
>>728910149
then just pick more similar girls, its way way easier to get some of similar skin colour, in similar lighting.
Alternatively, if they are facing nearly the same way and you have a full shot of their hair, you can just replace the full head.
>>728910115
this for example has a shot of light over the face and therefore the recolouring for the fake has to be done twice.
It's actually a lot harder than you think, the better fakes are just luck or very similar pictures.
>>728910349
theres another girl that i would like doing, theres a few more of her, ill be easier
>>728906470
>>728910726
>>728911317
Im suprised you didnt do anything with the forehead
>>728911711
still no forehead jokes on the blonde
>>728912178
still no caring what you want.
her forehead looks perfectly normal.
>>728912289
OP disagrees
>>728912364
No more, thats a shame
bump for more roasts?
>>728905176
>>728911317
It's Macaulay Culkin
>>728913874
funny you say that. I was thinking the same.
>>728913874
you know her?
>>728914245
Found the 12 year old