Where do you expect this poor genderless pixie to pee /b/?

>>728728363
In the disabled toilet

>>728728363
outside

>>728728363
In OP's mouth

>>728728363
in a box 6 feet under

>>728728363
If you're a pixie with a penis, in the boys room. If you're a pixie without a penis, the girls room.

/It's not hard

>>728728363
In a jar, subsequently stored in a closet, like a normal person

>>728728363
snowflakes don't require toilets, guess you're not a snowflake, then go in whatever toilet has a picture of your genitals you stupid fuck.

>>728728363
in the street

not a boy
>no penis

not a girl
>no vag

logically they have an area of a chimp. Otherwise use the disabled toilet.

>>728728363
>no boy
>no girl
Well guess you are not a human then - therefore not my son/daughter so the fuck outta my house. Problem solved, pee wherever you want you sick fuck

>>728728363
freaks like that shouldn't be out in public. they're also the easiest to beat the shit out of. homo faggots.

File: 1491706726633.jpg (80KB, 480x392px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 480x392px

>>728728831
top kekies goes to Anon

>>728728363
>deport to India
>everyone pisses and shits in the streets anyway

Problem solved

>>728728363
all over herself as shes being kicked to death?

>>728728780
same fag i just realized how much keks this post gave me. Thank you Anon

>>728728363
outside

>>728728363
As much as I hate all the forced acceptance of transnigger pavement-kin septuble bigenders, I hope the bathroom issue starts a trend of having a single large bathroom.

I always felt multiple bathrooms to be unecessary, space wasting, and expensive. Sure extra bathrooms are good to have if there are many people, but we should go off quantity, not because there are two sexes.

>>728728831
Hey now, there are legit medically afflicted people that have fucked up chromosomes. XXY is Klinefelter syndrome. It sucks to be them and the issue of which sex they are is indeed muddled.

And all of these whiney-ass confused dudes who resent the fact that they have a dick are doing those poor genetic mutants a MASSIVE disservice by politicising the issue and making their disability now a matter of "choice". They didn't choose to get the short end of genetic stick. These SJW types that go full fucking fascist and try and dictate how other people talk about them are the worst. A made up malady simply because it makes their parents shocked.

>>728728363
Commit suicide.

>>728729672
this nigger just wants to peek at women

>>728729988
Well, you don't tell them that, but yeah.

>>728728363
I pee in the potted plants at the mall.

>>728729946
The first group have physical conditions regarding their sex.

The second group have mental conditions regarding their sex. Though some are probably just attention seeking

>>728728446
/thread

File: 168cab2926ea9d701a756afdc311f63b.jpg (8KB, 236x314px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x314px

>>728728363
This should help.

File: 1485015148145.png (24KB, 764x706px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 764x706px

>>728728363
At home you weird ass abomination

File: Meme_2bdfdd_6229941.jpg (121KB, 700x697px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 700x697px

>>728728363

>>728728363
in the bathroom for faggots

>>728728446
kek

It can pee in the oven as its tossed in.

>>728728363
In the male? The face looks like that
Male toilet in the mental ward

In my butt

File: mynigga.jpg (32KB, 600x543px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x543px

>>728730870

>>728730870
/Thread

>>728728363
In the yard like the other animals do.

>>728728363
in the grave

>where we need to put all defectives

>>728728363
>own small restaurant
>two customer bathrooms
>single occupancy
Shit in either one

In the gas chamber with the other degenerates.

>>728728363
Where the fuck have they been pissing until now? I'd recommend they keep doing it there.

>>728728363
in the woods bathroom at the fema camp where the fucking delusional cunt lives.

>be me
>90 pound dyke who wants to fuck girls
>overwhelming sense of penis envy
>cant pass as masculine
>learn to piss standing up so i can be like a boy
>it mostly drips down my leg but its a small price to pay for conquering my dysphoria
>start going into the boys bathroom so i can use the urinals
>i see a guys dick while im in there which means ive been raped
>run down to the main office to complain
>they say i cant go in the boys bathroom anymore because i am "female"
>this sends me into a rage
>tears streaming down my face
>security has to physically restrain me
>they force feed me my xanax

Can some sjw explain to me why it's unacceptable gender discrimination to not allow transfolks to use a different bathroom than their genitals, but somehow not gender discrimination to have segregrated bathrooms to begin with?
why is separate but equal unacceptable for race but acceptable for sex, but only for bathrooms and absolutely not anywhere else?

so why shouldn't we just abolish sex-segrated facilities entirely? (this is my preferred solution)

File: Lois_griffin_2.jpg (55KB, 1066x800px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1066x800px

That...thing... is not using my bathroom. It can use the bushes in the back yard.

>>728732630
(s)he is getting a little old for pampers

>>728732856
Yeah, see your "argument" falls apart when I, as a white man, try to apply for an NAACP scholarship by claiming I really am a black person on the inside and that's how I identify.

Got a cock?
>Use the mens room
Got a vag?
>Use the womens room

It's not rocket science.

>>728733143

So then can just anyone have a blacks bathroom and a whites bathroom?

If so it's at least more logically consistent if you can discriminate against any group you want to... but that's not going to fly.

But no, my argument doesn't fall apart with what you're posting because i think race-based scholarships should be banned too.

>>728733143
you inherited your whiteness from your parents, you didn't inherit your sex

>>728733143

and also we've been over another reason why that wouldn't fly... have you seen some transmen? Women would flip their shit if someone like buck angel tried to walk into the ladies room. what are you doing to do, ask him to prove that yes he really does have a vagina?
if not, any man can just say that. because honestly this is all about people that are or appear as men. no man gives a flying fuck if a female, biologically or otherwise, comes into the mens room

>>728733455
Sperm + Egg = YOU
Either XX or XY chromosomes.
..courtesy of YOUR PARENTS!

you're welcome

>>728733999

or xxx, or xxy, or xxyy.. won't somebody please think of the intersex!?

>>728733750
You're either a man, a woman, or mentally ill. I refuse to accommodate mental illness.

>>728734086
Yes, please think of the 0.05% of the population born with genetic abnormalities. Like Turner Syndrome. Yeah, let's get a special pronoun set for those freaks.

>>728734148

Well I refuse to accomodate niggers. Why shouldn't that be allowed?

I hate sharing the bathroom with those things. But transpeople I like.

>>728728363
All bathrooms from here forward:
>Born w/ innie
>Born w/ outie
Millennial crisis averted.

File: buck.jpg (42KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 512x512px

>>728734446

Averted right up until people that look like this walk into a womens room.

>>728728363
In their own mouth sounds good

>>728734583
No way that was born with a vag and ovaries.

>>728734397
Niggers are born niggers. It is not proper or ethical to deny them one thing while allowing it for others.
Men in a dress were not born women, are not women "on the inside", nor will ever BE women. They can use the mens room. They are not being denied anything. All men can use the mens room.

>>728728363
In the woods

>>728733999
you fucking retard. 7th grade bio. it's the sperm that decides the sex, if a man has a daughter, she clearly didn't inherit his sex because he's a man and his daughter's a girl so sex is inherently uninheritable.

>>728734981
OK< so the magic gay rainbow sex fairy decides it. NOT the parent's. Got it.

>>728728446
fpbp

>>728734898

Ok but I'm not arguing for a specific 'trans' exemption.

Under what logical is racial discirimination not ok, sex discimination ok, but absolutely only for bathrooms?

If separate but equal isn't allowed for race, why on earth should it be allowed for sex? And only for bathrooms?

>>728734838
Are you trolling? That's buck angel and is absolutely biologically female and still has the vagina it was born with

>>728728363
In the cattle-car.

the designated shitting street

>>728728363
Get a catheter and a bag.

>>728735215
There IS NO "sex discrimination". If you're a man, use the mens room, if you're a woman, use the womens room. No one is denying you the right to use the restroom designed for your sex. Putting on lipstick and fake boobs changes nothing.

>>728728363
In a toilet.

File: in my pants.jpg (13KB, 448x325px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 448x325px

>>728728363

>>728735215
men and women separate their bathrooms for comfort, not social discrimination ( depending on the country ) see also: changing rooms, locker rooms, showers, etc.
when you ask a lot of people to start thinking flexibly, all at once? When they've never had to? They resist. But only for so long. Stupid dies with stupid.

>>728728363
>im not a boy or a girl
protip i bet i can find out in one fucking second

>>728729946
If it has a dick or a pussy then the decision is made for them.
I'm guessing this moron already has one or the other and has had them since birth so clearly they're just useless and should have their urethra filled with expanding foam to teach them to shut up and get on with more important things.

>>728735446

There absolutely is sex discrimination. Having a 'blacks' and 'whites' restroom is racial discrimination, no?
And for anything besides a bathroom, you can't say "only women can come into my store"... if I'm a bank I can't say "only men can get a loan".

But I can say "men can't use this restroom"? But can't say "blacks can't use this restroom"?

That's simply not logically consistent.

Face it, anything other than unisex facilities or arbritrary discrimination (like race etc) is allowed. Or maybe ONLY sex segragation, but why limited to only bathrooms?

Face it, it's just not logically consistent.

The whole trans issue shouldn't even be at hand before separate bathrooms fall. But if you want to, all it takes is the undeniably fact that as long as there IS a womens room, buck angel et al like that having to use it would be absolutely untenable to women.

>>728735357
this is the right answer

>>728735812

I'm more comfortable if there's no niggers. Objectively. Black males commit more random violence against strangers per capita. So it's a safety issue.

Why can't my business just provide them a separate but equal bathroom if it makes my customers safer?

Don't forget, it wasn't too long ago blacks actually did have to use a different bathroom. So it's hardly something that could never happen or something without precedence.

>>728735158
did your parents choose to have a retard, or did they just give birth to a retard and let it ride?

>>728735974
All trumped by Riley Dennis trying to use the same bathroom as your 8 year old daughter.

>>728736228

Don't pretend for a second Riley Dennis is more objectionable in a womens bathroom than Buck Angel.

You're delusional if you think that's how it would play out.

>>728735158
so whenever i jerk my dick, it's not sperm that comes out but the magic gay rainbow sex fairy?

>>728735974
in your argument, you constantly logistically equate segregation to discrimination- men and women being given separate bathrooms is segregation, not discrimination. Women being paid 77c on the dollar would be an example of discrimination.
Now, are you trying to argue that separate bathrooms is discrimination..? Because I assure you, women do generally not consider that discriminating.

>>728728363
Outside like the other animals

>>728736380
Either one would be a perceived threat by any good parent.

>>728728363
her pants

>>728736208
there is no race gene that predetermines people to be more violent- the only factors that are proven to matter are income and quality of life.
I'm sure you've been told that before.

>>728736506

But you're missing the other part: segregation being acceptable for sex and not race.

Can I or can i not segregate against race?

And what about things other than bathrooms/lockerrooms/dorms? Can my gym only allow women in one area and men in another in areas other than the locker room? Legally no. Is that law unjust?

>>728736727
Whether it's genetics or culture or even if you accept it's white peoples fault, the fact black males are more violent is unchanged and objective reality.

Not that what you're saying is true to begin with, but that's another thread. here it's wholly immaterial.

>>728735974
>>False Equivalence Fallacy: The Post

"Where do you expect you to pee?"

"Nowhere, I expect you to die!"

>>728736890
Dude. Can you not see the giant fucking holes in your logic? They're fucking obvious. "I don't want niggers stinkin' up the bathroom I use" =/= "People should use the bathroom associated with their biological sex." This applies to locker rooms, changing rooms, bathrooms and all the like where open, exposed, dicks and vaginas are a bad fucking idea together. Don't be a moron.

>>728737001

Sorry, not even close to false equivalence. If you think it is, you haven't read the whole argument, or understood it, and the historical and legal situations it's based on. Hint: we can't have race-segration because of a law that also says we can't discriminate based on gender either. But somehow bathrooms are exempt?

>>728728363
I mean i would honestly love for the entire world, and i mean the entire world stop everything... stop war, stop manufacturing, stop farming, stop everything.... every singe person agrees to make this one persons dilemma the most important thing on earth till we decide where this special gender confused/gender fluid/gender shape shifter should relieve itself of its full bladder using what ever fucking genitals it decides to use at the moment?

>>728736890
black males are not, and have never been proven to be, more violent than any other race in the same area and general income. But I can understand why you'd be scared of different looking people...
in reality, black men in areas of high income are less likely to be criminals and more likely to be the victims of hate crimes.
And again, are you trying to argue that having men and women's bathrooms is discrimination?? it's purely an issue of comfort in this country. Women do not want to be looked at by men. Probably people like you. Do you really not understand that?

>>728737253
Hint, faggot, these two issues are not the same. Using he bathroom that minimizes crime/harassment/whatever with others that share your same biological makeup is a SAFETY feature. Not fucking discrimination. If you think it is, you're retarded. At best, there should be a third "Either/Neither/Or" bathroom. At worst, fuck you, fuck them, two bathrooms it stays.

>>728737204

Except the same legalaties that make one illegal also make the other illegal, if not for a specific exemption for bathrooms.
Why is that OK for sex but not race, when NEITHER can be legally disciminated against in any area besides bathrooms?

You're the one being a moron here.

>>728737479
Are you denying that black males are more violent (regardless of why)? Why isn't that a safety issue again?

What about bathrooms makes them so fucking unique that segregation is ok, but only for sex, when sex-based denial of any other accomodation is not?

File: 80-720.jpg (39KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1280x720px

>>728737479
I just read that in Mike's voice. Well played. Well played.

>>728737434

Well this is really beyond the point, but it's also immaterial that since blacks are in reality more likely to be poor, even if that reason is accepted, the per-capita increased violences remains.

I am saying that if women want to be equal to men in all other areas of life, then yes they're not entitled to have their "no men" public accommodation.

File: 1466689901797.png (20KB, 216x212px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 216x212px

>>728728446

File: 1488740941541.png (114KB, 500x387px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 500x387px

>>728728446
kek

>>728728363
How do you pee without a penis or vagina?

>>728728363
in the bathroom

>>728737709
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_stereotype_of_African_Americans
you fucking idiot. how about you try to prove that black men are more violent. as a race. there is no objective evidence to support any conclusion other than the fact that INCOME and QUALITY OF LIFE drive people toward criminal activity. There is no magic 'criminal violence gene' in black people. They're like us.

>>728733393
blacks got dicks or cunts.

>got a dick mens room
>got a cunt girls room

there is no argument in your post

>>728738273
like you maybe

File: 1479699953544.png (94KB, 600x541px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x541px

>>728728363
I am a man...I piss wherever the fuck I can find a private spot ( harder in this fucking over populated world)
If you gotta squat to piss...holla at a nigga and tell him to watch ya back
As far as "set toilet facilities)
There is a sign on the door...that does not stop you from going in and pissing
Figure the rest of that shit out on ya own

Maybe we can the name of the unisex bathrooms to "whatever the fuck you are".

>>728737779
Anytime, Saul.
>>728737709
Both of these are me. You keep restating your debunked argument. It doesn't make it anymore fucking valid. And no, no race is more likely to be anything, really. Nature + Nurture = Person's final moral/ethical code and personality traits. Nice try with your fucking nonsequitor. It applies because 95% of all men and women in the world are straight. Know who straight men rape/harass? Women and girls. Know who straight women rape/harass? Men and boys. It is fucking nigh essential to keep open dicks away from open vaginas for a multitude of God damned obvious reasons. Your logical reasoning is the shakiest shit show of "But...What about..?" I've ever fucking heard. Your argument is ludicrous, and the 95% of the population (a slight majority...?) Disa-fucking-grees with you. Shut up. 4% of the population will never manage and run 95% unless it's with fucking money. Fuck your LGBTQIALMNOP+-= horseshit.

>>728737910
yes, by AREA, so why are you so afraid of your black fucking neighbors?

>>728738273

Ok, you're right, income and quality of life determine criminal activity.
I accept that.

It's NOT relevant. Are you saying that blacks AREN'T more likely to be poor and have a poor quality of life?

You're missing the point here. Regardless of the reasons, the disparity exists.

File: hqdefault (4).jpg (160KB, 551x677px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 551x677px

>>728733999
>gender is based in biological fact

Thanks for the ammo faggot, praise kek

>>728728363
The bed pan at the mental hospital they should be at.

>>728728363
Where does it normally pee?

>>728738409
Naw, the sign doesn't, just the assholes that need to know what's in your pants.

>>728738418
thank you. floored.

>>728738573
Pay attention, people. The operative word here, is "it."

>>728738418

It also been thoroughly debunked that anyone seeking to harass or rape women is in any way stopped by a sign on the door.

Being in a mixed-sex bathroom is not more likely to result in crimes against women.

You are aware plenty of places on earth actually do have unisex facilities right?

File: image.jpg (61KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 680x510px

>>728728446

>>728738452
again, do you think that based on all available evidence, proof, that you think you should be scared of the black people in your neighborhood?

>>728738682
Find me numbers on incidents/occurrences between communal bathrooms vs. non-communal bathrooms and you may start to have a fucking case. As of now, his is YET MORE "But...But what about...?"
P.S. You fucking suck at this.

>>728738791
fuck off pedo

>>728738795

No.

But statistically, a black man is more of a danger than a white trans person.

So while it doesn't make since to be scared of black people, it's even less reasonable to be scared of trans people, or men in general.

File: 5a7.png (367KB, 680x380px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 680x380px

>>728728363
why are americans so fucking retarded?

>>728738682
but it removes an important social barrier and creates motivation

>>728738857

Just saying my logic is inconsistent doesn't make it so.

Why don't you provide evidence unisex facilities have a higher rate of crime?

Or the bathrooms have a higher rate of crime than anywhere else?

Both are crazy. YOU fucking suck at this. That you're deluded into thinking what you're saying is reasonable is pathetic.

>>728739099
>implying non-Americans don't make just as stupid movements and such.

>>728739040
again with this assertion, that black people are more dangerous than white trans people..?
you just agreed with me, JUST, that income and quality of life are the proven factors that determine criminal likelihood. So why do you think this? honestly.

File: 1477712769987.png (501KB, 822x616px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 822x616px

>>728738580
Wait a minute...you wanna see what in my pants...bring a warrant...camera and a promoter...cause porno dont get this good
;)

>>728739040
seriously, you're argument is: well, you've gotta be scared of someone!! idiot.

>>728739255
You're the one claiming they won't. Therefore, you have the positive claim. Burdens on you, motherfucker. I'm saying I don't know, but even if you showed me that, you'd have to account for myriad veriables from religion to surveilence to prior history of violence. Again. You fucking suck at this.

>>728728363
I don't give a fuck

>>728739398
then says you're, point is disregarded..

Pretty fucking liberal, but OPs image owns

>>728739330

Do you disagree that the average black person has a lower income and quality of life than the average white person?

By your own argument, those things determine crime, so if blacks are on average poorer, why aren't they on average more violent?

WHY they're poorer is irrelevent.

>>728738488
>Reads sex as gender
Ammo for shooting yourself in the foot, sure.

>>728739498
okay but why you are scared of the black people around you more than the trans white people or the fucking whoever whatever people is a mystery to me. people with the same income and quality of life.

>>728739398

No, my argument is "it's unreasonable to segregated based on BOTH race AND sex"

>>728739427
No, the burden falls on you, since you're making the far less reasonable claim (that a mixed sex bathroom is more likely than a segregated bathroom to result in crime above and beyond either the other type of bathroom or anywhere besides a bathroom where segregation is not allowed)

Smell of obvious bullshit trumps 'positive claim'

>>728739498
assuming you're a white male:
if you have a black neighbor, and a trans white neighbor, you are the one who is most likely to be the murderer.. at least by your own logic, as serial killers are almost always white males.

>>728739658

Because, statistically, a black male is more likely to hurt me than a white cis- or trans- person.

>>728739831

Someone failed highschool statistics. No, that's not how things work.

File: 1482259045550.jpg (235KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1024x1024px

>>728739323
that is exactly what I'm implying
I've seen some retarded kids in my country but this is a whole new level of stupidity

If you have a penis, you can pee in the men's toilets. If you have a vagina, you can pee in the women's toilets. If you have neither, you don't need to pee. This isn't hard. Making a problem out of nothing.

>>728739694
trans people want separate bathrooms for reasons of comfortability and you're the only one here trying to make the claim that separate bathrooms are more dangerous and discrimination or whatever bullshit, lol

>>728739694
No. Fuckface. I'm saying that I don't know that. Meanwhile, YOURE ASSERTING the crime isn't greater in communal bathrooms. I'm not asserting shit. Also, you keep talking about black people statistics like an idiot, making Ecological/Average Fallacies left and right while dodging shit like some sort of autistic Mike Tyson. Get your shit together before attempting a proper intellectual debate. You. Suck. At. This.

>>728739965

ya know, the more years pass, the more people who don't read the thread piss me off

>>728739989
But what you're missing is that black people DID used to have to use a separate bathroom for white peoples comfort.

>>728740053
Bullshit you're not saying that.
Is
>Know who straight men rape/harass? Women and girls. Know who straight women rape/harass? Men and boys. It is fucking nigh essential to keep open dicks away from open vaginas for a multitude of God damned obvious reasons.
not you?

>>728739938
>uses own flawed logic and bullshit manipulation of statistics
>says, 'by your logic'
can i make this more clear for you bud

>>728739862
Bitch

>>728740162
Tell me where I ASSERTED shit about communal bathrooms there, please. Those were all factual statements. Unless you think straight men rape straight men. You fucking mongoloid.

>>728740053
please at least attempt to address the fact that nobody here is asserting crime isn't greater in communal bathrooms.

>>728740179

no, you're confusing the absolute number of murderers with the per capita racial composition of murderers.

10/10000 white murderers
1/10000 black murderers

there's more white murderers, but any given black person is MORE LIKELY to be a murderer

>>728740162
>ya know, the more years pass, the more people who don't read the thread piss me off
My logic supersedes whatever retarded argument has happened in the thread so far. Gender identification mental illnesses do not make you have a different sexual organ.

>>728740332
RIGHT IN THE SENTENCE I QUOTED

>. It is fucking nigh essential to keep open dicks away from open vaginas for a multitude of God damned obvious reasons.

Fuck. You've gotta be a troll. Nobody is THIS stupid.

File: a.aaa-Afro-retard.jpg (31KB, 380x302px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 380x302px

>>728739862
statistically, you live in a shitty country

>>728740343
Sure. I haven't seen that positive claim stated. Did that help?

>>728730439
>Though some are probably just attention seeking
YOU THINK!?

>The second group have mental conditions regarding their sex.
Sure, like some people have a mental condition keeping them from getting out of bed in the morning. Otherwise known as being a lazy piece of shit.

It's mental, it's literally all in their head.

>>728735964
>If it has a dick or a pussy then the decision is made for them.
Pretty much.

A fraction of those with Klinefelter syndrome have BOTH.

>>728740348

The end of your logic is >>728734583


>>728740406
Now that's something we can agree on.

These people make me want to kill myself

>>728739610
>using a definition made by a pedophile to justify his kinks

Not quite

>>728740399
I'm the dumb one, here? You seem to conflate fucking everything with fucking everything else. The true statement about who straight men/women assault is fucking true.

>>728740539

But that having sex segregated bathrooms reduces the rate of assault is false, and that assault is more likely to happen in a bathroom that places where segregation is not allowed is false.

>>728728363
It should become a "free urinater" and pee in its pants. Peeing is nothing to be ashamed about!

and that race and sex are equal enumerated classes in the legal basis for anti-segregation laws in areas besides bathrooms is also true, THAT is why the comparison is valid. Legally, there's no basis for protecting race and not sex from "separate but equal" under the basis for the real, historial separate racial bathrooms were deemed illegal.

>>728740641
Do you know what a "Crime of Opportunity" is, anon? Fucking straight rapist walks into bathroom, sees a girl, rapes. This argument isnt reversible, however, because the LGBTQIALMNOP+- movement is 4 FUCKING PERCENT of the entire population. There are more just male and female rapists than the ENTIRE FUCKING COMMUNITY you're arguing for. You're an imbecile. A straight male rapist can't get away with illegally sneaking into the bathroom of the people he wishes to rape. Instead, he can be separated from his victims, this entirely eliminating the OPPORTUNITY.

>>728740473
>The end of your logic is >>728734583
Oh that's cute. My presented logic ends simply because you say it does? Provide a counter argument. Show how my logic isn't valid.

Until then, continue being ignorant and thinking that bearded ladies haven't always used the women's room.

>>728741095
Nobody's gonna do that in public bathrooms or else they already would be doing that retard. It's not like they have ID check at bathroom doors currently

>>728741095

You're fucking batshit insane if you think the sign on the door stops a man from following a woman into a bathroom to rape her.

And if your assertion were true, unisex facilities WOULD have higher rates of crime. They DO NOT.

>>728740641
you don't seem to understand that, in a vacuum, the best way to reduce crime is to eliminate incentive-
what follows are undeniable fact:
1) men have sexual driven incentives to assault women
2) transphobics, like you, are have social incentives to assult transpeople

and so it is logically conclusive that to separate bathrooms would reduce crime- but in the same way that to eliminate bathrooms themselves would.
Moreover, I don't give a fuck and I don't understand why you won't drop it. It's fucking foundation to your argument to continually bring this up?

>>728741216
Obama put a man in the women's restroom. JFK put a man on the moon.

>>728728363
If she has a penis, then a men's restroom. If she has a vagina, then the women's restroom. Why are these liberals so fucking retarded?

>>728741216
That's your entire fucking rebuttal? Ok. I'm at 10% battery. You're clearly too retarded to be reasoned with. Enjoy making fallacies like they're going out of style and losing any intellectual debate you ever have. I'm gonna continue my work. You. Fucking. Suck. At. This.

>>728741199

Either your logic is invalid, or when someone looking like that walks into a womens room, everyone would think that's A-OK.

You do realize that picture is a biological female with a vagina who under your rule would have to use the ladies room right?

>>728741317
>And if your assertion were true, unisex facilities WOULD have higher rates of crime. They DO NOT.
Seriously, no one gives a fuck. The shit creeps people out.

>>728741317
No. But 5 other shrieking women or the people outside knowing a man shouldn't be going into a women's restroom would. You're the retarded batshit insane one here. Not I.

>>728741433

Wow. You think my arguments make me transphobic? Talk about missing the point, no wonder you sound so stupid with everything else.

While I think unisex facilties are the only acceptable endgame, in the meantime i absolutely support the right of transpeople to use whatever bathroom they want. because any kind of segregation is just fucking stupid at the end of the day.

>>728741496
I wasnt the guy you were arguing with but see >>728741317

>>728741764

Then where's the statistics that events like you describe aren't so incredibly rare the crime difference between unisex and sex-segregated facilties isn't statistically significant?

>>728741774
>any kind of segregation is just fucking stupid
Even segregating criminals by putting them in prisons?

>>728741526
>Either your logic is invalid,
It's not
> or when someone looking like that walks into a womens room, everyone would think that's A-OK.
I can see why you have problems with logic. What makes you think this is a requirement? It's got a vagina so it goes into the room that doesn't have urinals. Why do you think I brought up bearded ladies? What someone aesthetically looks like doesn't matter. Like I said before, you're making a problem out of nothing. Do you also get your panties in a twist when a mother brings her son into the women's room? Do you flip your shit and scream to the top of your longs when a girl doesn't want to deal with huge lines and uses the available men's room to prevent herself from pissing her pants?

Nobody thinks this is a problem except for the people who are trying to make it one.

Ughhh.. that's enough internet today, night gents.

>>728741774
that's the only part of my argument that you fail to address? Jesus, what are you trying to contribute to this discussion?
You don't understand or represent transpeople. you might think you're on our side, we're not on yours.

>>728742098
You can't go to sleep, someone on the internet is wrong!!!

>>728741966
Ecological Fallacy, yet again, faggot. By eliminating opportunity, we eliminate crime. At least some. Cultural norms and punishments are what keep communal bathrooms in check in OTHER CULTURES. In Western cultures, you've not yet proven that the millions of people here will behave. I almost hope it passes, and crime increases, just so I can laugh at you. You suck at this, still, faggot.

>>728741981

Among the protected classes. Sex and race are both protected classes.

But segregated mens and womens prisons, yes i think that's wrong too.

>>728742006
You so desperately wish I'm the one being illogical and not you, I gotta admit it's getting kinda funny.

For example, you thinking I might flip my shit if a mother brings her son into the womens room, when my whole argument is that everyone should be in a room together to begin with.

>>728741774
seriously, fuck off with your shitty baseless third-party bullshit. You don't know what you want, you don't know what we want. For some reason, you find a way to give a fuck and oppose something somebody wants. and you completely fail to explain why.

actually, posting a question like this on a board full of people who are too lazy to use the bathroom is an ingenious idea... you'll get some top notch answers! i once amassed a collection of over 80 piss bottles in my dorm room. At the end of the semester i loaded them all into a wheelie suitcase and dropped them off in the bathroom. someone thought it was a bomb and called the cops but all those subhuman normies got were murky bottles of fermented peepee. keks were had

>>728742234

>By eliminating opportunity, we eliminate crime. At least some.

But we're already dealing with events so rare (crimes avoided only because the bathroom is single sex and not unisex) that i'd bet it's even offset by the increase in violence forcing transwomen into mens rooms does.

>In Western cultures, you've not yet proven that the millions of people here will behave. I almost hope it passes, and crime increases, just so I can laugh at you. You suck at this, still, faggot.

Ya know, that exactly what people said when race-segregated bathrooms were being challenged.

>>728742311
award winner for most incoherent post in the thread. tough field too, congrats.

>>728742238
so you agree that you're whole argument is that everybody should be in the same room-
yet, when we bring this up, you cry wolf, "you guys are the ones asserting that we SHOULDN'T!!"
which would mean that you're saying that we should tear down our current system, make all-communal bathrooms-
then explain WHY, fuckface, WHY WHY WHY would that be safer or even preferable? do you understand nobody else wants it? do you get how the burden of proof is on you here?

>>728742577
please ignore the you're, again

>>728728363
What if instead of making male or female bathrooms, we do penis or no penis bathrooms?

>>728742238
Dem goalposts. You may continue your fun. You'll want to fix that whole changing your argument midway through if you ever want to argue without anonymity though.

>>728728363
In the woods behind a tree.

in the gas chamber.

>>728742577

not saying a majority wants it. just like a majority didn't want uni-race bathrooms when single-race bathrooms were still a thing.

but under the exact same principles that mean you can't segregate bathrooms racially, or segregate women from men in any public accommodation besides a bathroom, it's logically indefensibly.

it's preferable to unify segregated sex bathrooms for the same reasons it was (as seen from now, but not then) preferable to unify the segregated race bathrooms: because we're all humans and that's what matters.

>>728742697
I'm really thinking more and more you're not really understanding my argument.

>>728728363
BMUP

bro... what if you had a penis vagina? like you were born with your dick in your pussy


oh man im so high

>>728742901
if black people wanted separate bathrooms, because we were assaulting them, we would make the change.
Seriously, are you just afraid of the word 'segregation'?

>>728743006

apparently we should ignore the 0.1% that are intersex but not the 0.5% that are transsex.

my argument conventiently solves that too tho (no segregation period)

>>728728363
I think we should just start putting signs of dicks and vaginas on the doors of restrooms so people will finally shut the fuck up

>>728728363
https://discord.gg/cMD2Vch
traps arent gay

>>728743084

But white people DID want separate bathrooms. and blacks on average are more likely to be violent than trans- on average, soo....

>>728742901
separation does not equal segregation does not equal discrimination. That applies to the bathrooms. You know how we know that? because nobody here is saying, "i am being discriminated against."
idiot.

..you're really bad at understanding underlying concepts, aren't you

>>728743319

so it's separation for men/women, but it's segregation for black/white?

But it's only separation for bathrooms/locker rooms right? Or can i separate anything else according to sex too? Womens only 7-11, mens only bank?

>>728743212
so we should make women use the men's room, even though they don't want to?
Problem: black people are discriminated against
Symptom of problem: racial segregation of bathrooms
Not a problem, according to anybody but you: sexual segregation of bathrooms

>>728743462
it's discrimination depending on whether or not we're imposing it on a group that does not want it.

>>728743491

Not saying a whole lot of people think it's a "problem", it's just illogical.

and i think that in a world where women are truly equal to men (and i believe they are), there's no room for segregating (or separating, specific word immaterial) them; any more than in a world where blacks and whites are equal, there's room for separating them.

>>728743716
you said it was your whole argument.
and you think it's illogical, because you equate racial segregation of bathrooms to sexual segregation of bathrooms.
you know it's the reasoning that 'black people are more dangerous' that our society confines them to lower levels of income and lower quality of life.

>>728743602

so if blacks did want their own bathrooms, it would be ok?

also, isn't it "imposing" integration on white people: a majority did in fact favor whites-only bathrooms back in the day

>>728729171
Xisself*

>>728744045
yes, it wasn't imposing integration on white people (again, you're equating racial and sexual segregation) yes, if black people were being assaulted, black rights groups were petitioning the government for separate bathrooms? I would sign. Wouldn't you?

>>728743983

You're conveniently ignoring Racial and sexual segregation are BOTH unacceptable for everything EXCEPT bathrooms and similar.
And there's no logical foundation to nix one but not the other for just bathrooms. You're trying to refute that with arguments about safety that are invalidated by the fact an even stronger "safety" claim exists for race (REGARDLESS OF WHY).

Are blacks deserving of not having race segregation? Yes, in all areas.

You know, the underlying philosophy that nixed race-segregation is that "separate but equal is inherently unequal": are men not equal to women?

>>728744045
again, if i could explain the gap in your reasoning-
problem: discrimination of black people
symptom of problem: racial segregation of bathrooms
solution: racially integrate bathrooms

your argument:

problem: ???
sympton: sexual segregation of bathrooms
solution: communal bathrooms

please fill in the blanks here

>>728744421

No, i wouldn't sign.

Whites said the same thing to get their whites-only bathroom.

Or is it only ok for blacks?

I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to argue... because you've said nothing that would make race-segragated bathrooms wrong at the time they existed. Only with todays attitudes.

>>728728363
Literally wherever the fuck that person wants to pee at. This is america after all. I think freedom to pee is even more of an inalienable right than religion, so its a no brainer really.
I agree some tumblerina sjws get out of hand with gender oppression but come on. We all deserve dignity.

>>728744638

my "problem" is women saying they're equals.

separate but equal is inherently unequal.

your argument seems to be, if most people agree it's ok to exempt bathrooms from laws guaranteeing equality, then it ceases to actually be inequality.

and you're not understanding how the doctrines that prevent that from happening with race then fall apart and we go back to jim crow.

do you think there's no black people that DON'T also want to exclude whites from their places?

File: 1470385234711.png (514KB, 532x582px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 532x582px

>>728728446
+1

>>728744708
no, they wanted a blacks-only bathroom. they wanted to get those people away from them. do you not understand the distinction? it was racial segregation because it was NO BLACKS, it was worse conditions for them and they didn't want it.

>>728745072
you idiot. are you denying sexual discrimination? you really think women say they're equals?
do you have anything resembling an idea of what women want. it's not communal bathrooms.

>>728745173

well i don't want bathrooms that say NO MEN or NO WOMEN.

>they wanted to get those people away from them.
yeah and women want men to get away from them, but only in the bathroom, in all other places they demand equality and gender-blind policies.

you're just not getting it, are you?

the opposition is social norm just like it was for race. if it were made law, in 50 years we'd feel no different about the gender integration than we feel today about racial integration

>>728745072
the irony is that it's because of sexual discrimination that women want separate bathrooms. and nobody is going to be able to explain that to you through your white male privilidge

>>728728363
Its parents' basement since it'll clearly never be able to function in society

>>728745350

i know women don't want communal bathrooms.

but are you suggesting, that in every area besides which bathroom to use, women don't demand the same rights as men?
that women don't think they're equal to men?

>>728745446
i don't care why they want it if they concede that they're not equal. but that's not right is it?

i think someone missed the day they taught about "separate but equal is inherently unequal" in grade school.

>>728745418
the question is, why for any real reason to we need to integrate our bathrooms by gender? even though people don't want it?
give me a real reason, other than 'separate is inherently worse' because everyone wants it separate, and that alone means we shouldn't make bathrooms communal.
before you start: women's bathrooms are equal. they like having them. the black people wanted to get into our bathrooms, because they were worse. that's a reason. that's discrimination.

>>728745665
and yet, those same American school teachers don't view men and women's bathrooms 'unequal'.
in fact, you are the only person i think i've ever met that thinks that

>>728745737

yup definiitely missed that lesson. anyway, the alternative to not intregrating them is continuing to treat women as not equal to men.

No equal bathrooms, no equal anything else.

>>728745864
>>728745737
if the blacks bathroom WASN'T worse than the whites bathroom it would be ok???

what percentage of the population was it that favored integrated race? what percent does it have to be to be unacceptable otherwise?

>>728728363
https://discord.gg/cMD2Vch

>>728746022
you don't think that's an extraordinary claim, that bathrooms should be communal? even though nobody wants it? even though you can't come up with one reason why it should? your argument is, 'because.' because anything that can be defined by the word 'separate' is bad.
You're preaching a solution to a non-problem.
Yeah, let's all have a planetary mind view, let's tear down the walls right? because, as you say, segregation can not be tolerated at almost any level. because we're down to the fucking bathrooms. but no, we can't do that, because you've already made it clear that that's a safety issue. other people are more dangerous. but women want separate bathrooms because of safety, so what the fuck is your deal? why are the bathrooms so important?

File: 1489885723302.gif (2MB, 319x249px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 319x249px

>>728728446

>>728728363
In her little special bucket

>>728746022
your fucking pretend rights issue is nothing. it's a solution to a non-problem. you're putting a war on semantics. you're deliberately ignoring what people want, what would be good for people, based on non-evidence. you are the worst kind of person. you have no fucking clue what activism is.

>>728746648

My argument is more along the lines of 'bathrooms aren't special' so unless you can separate race in bathrooms and sex in everything besides bathrooms, separate bathrooms are also unacceptable.

>>728746785
So what's the cut off? A majority thought race-segregation was ok when that existed.
Majority opinion doesn't determine what is and isn't right.

>>728746959
okay, but explain to me why racial segregation of bathrooms relates to this separate issue?
because last i checked, bathrooms are separated by gender and not sex. where i live, trans men could enter women's bathrooms.
so explain to me why this is an issue of sexual segregation.

>>728746959
so you want to conform genders, why? because everyone should be the same? in order to 'eliminate segregation', right?

>>728728363
they should mark bathrooms with 'X' or 'Y' chromosomes.

that way no more of this fucking bullshit whining about public bathrooms 90% of these fucks dont use anyway

>>728747234

Because of the legal foundation that prevents segregation by race, and sex in everything except bathrooms. It's logical to just exempt bathrooms and only for one protected class.

>>728747320
what? no.
we're talking about legal rights here. you're enforcing at gunpoint a right to exclude from a public accommodation a particular class. that doesn't mean they're the same, only that they're entitled to equality under the law.
i go on about race at length because i (apparently incorrectly) thought they still taught WHY racially separated bathrooms were not ok even though a majority favored them.

>>728746959
you know if black people had the right to change their race, it wouldn't have been racial segregation. These issues are worlds away. You're applying these words, separate is never equal? to a completely different subject, and misinterpreting the subject.
example: mom has a stick of butter. mom tells kid, age 5 (you) separate is never equal!! then she says, cut the butter into two separate and equal pieces. the kid is like, fuck, i can't do that!! get rid of women's bathrooms!! you getting this?

>>728729946
How many XXY people have you met? Are they insufferable attention sponges that argue over what bathroom they're supposed to use?

>>728729672
>>>728728363 (OP)
>As much as I hate all the forced acceptance of transnigger pavement-kin septuble bigenders, I hope the bathroom issue starts a trend of having a single large bathroom.
>I always felt multiple bathrooms to be unecessary, space wasting, and expensive. Sure extra bathrooms are good to have if there are many people, but we should go off quantity, not because there are two sexes.
This here. Combined bathrooms are equally efficient in the best case (full utilization by both genders) and twice as efficient in the worst case (full utilization by one gender, none by other). And, no retards yet confused about which one to use. The only downside is that urinal use, which is more water-efficient than a full toilet flush if you only pissed, goes down in the combined bathroom.

>>728747616
yeah, but Americans have the legal right to change their gender-
SO GIVING PEOPLE MORE CHOICES BASED ON THEIR GENDER PREFERENCES is in no way IMPOSING ANYTHING ONTO ANYONE when in fact the bathrooms are of the same model- equally maintained- AND IF NOT, WE WOULD HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO IMPOSE LEGAL ACTION on those establishments, because laws are in place that FORBID SEXUAL AND GENDERAL DISCRIMINATION.
It is the opinion of the American government that in the case of women's restrooms, separate is equal. get a fucking law degree if you wanna take down the system, idiot.

>>728747616
now, let's say it's impossible to have communal bathrooms- which it is in this country, but let's say it is, too. is it more gender discrimination to have just men and women's, or men, women's and trans? now that i know exactly how you feel about segregation or discrimination of any kind.

The only way to end this is to show these faggots we won't tolerate men trying to walk in the bathroom after our daughters. If you see a tranny in the wrong bathroom, sucker punch then with every bit of momentum you can muster. Make them think about it next time they want to scope out a victim.

>>728728363
He's a delusional twat and should go to the bathroom that matches his genitals.

>>728747616
just in case you're still here, lemme break down discrimination- it's a transitive verb, has an object and a subject- and for your information, it is the opinion of the subject whether or not they're being discriminated against. if you really cared about equality, competing concepts of the good, you would understand that that takes precedence.

>>728729946
Those people make up like 0.0001% of the population and aren't worth bending over backwards for.

>>728729946
Holy shit you're fucking retarded. The rare genetic disorder that your highschool bio teacher told you about has shit all to do with trannies.

>>728748686
fuck, meant the object

>>728748686

im still here but im tired of trying to explain things too you.

it's like explaining astrophysics to a chimp.

you're not familiar with the fundamental and legal reasons underpinning equality, and you dont seem to be capable of understanding the concept and precedent. you're even worse at identify underlying concepts, or seem to think exceptions to fundamental rights should be granted based on majority opinion

do women not feel they're being discriminated against? pretty sure they do.
my problem is the idea that unlike race, it IS ok to exempt bathrooms from fundamental equality under the law. just because women think that should be so doesn't mean it's just, let alone logical.

at one time we thought it impossible to not have racial equality under the law either.

but it is possible to have unisex bathrooms. you seem to think they don't exist in the country. they do.

>>728728363
>Where do you expect this poor genderless pixie to pee /b/?

It can relieve itself as it is being tossed out of the helicopter.

>>728728363
Don't know. Don't care.

>>728749328
you have very little social awareness if you think that women want men in their restrooms.

>>728749328
seriously, you been going to a lot of rallies for this shit, or..?

>>728748686
>My feels tell me I'm being discriminated against, therefore it is true
>Even if there are no institutions or policies in place that actively discriminate against me

I would say discrimination has to be identified by a third party arbiter.

>>728749555
they do, they just want hot, desirable men

not you

>>728749766
>core of argument turns out to be le epic troll

File: B5ER4ZnIIAA2qlp.jpg (90KB, 605x605px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 605x605px

>>728740436
People affected by Klinefelter syndrome actually have a predominant working organ while the other one is essentially dead, so despite having both they are still either male or female however they're physical mutants. And there is only one real way to deal with mutants.

>>728749766
i'm obviously a woman dickhead

>>728749766
congrats, you met one

>>728728363
Hell

>>728750150
>Implying we can't tell

>>728750150
tits or gtfo

>>728750089

that's someone else, not me.

i don't think that no. that's my problem. that they're demanding equality but think when it comes to bathrooms they're no longer equal; even though the basis for their equality on everything else is identical to the basis for racial equality for everything else, and racial bathroom policies aren;t allowed

>>728738409
This.

If you'll have to chose anyone would want to piss like a man.

Free.

>>728750150
>Attention whoring

Daily reminder to clobber trannies

>>728750387
women are not demanding equality in their bathrooms
yes, they are equal.
you're deluded.

>>728750150

well that certainly explains things. you're so blinded by the emotional reaction to the idea of why segregated bathrooms shouldn't be ok, that you simply can't identify the logic

>>728750493
>why trans people might want bathrooms

>>728750150
Obviously. No man is this insufferable.

>>728750541
okay but you do understand that women are not demanding equality in their bathrooms, there is no social action of any kind being taken on that issue expect for fat white kids on 4chan

>>728750524

i agree.

but it's logically inconsistent and shouldn't be allowed in a society where men and women are truly equal under the law, UNLESS the same can be applied for another class that's protected the way women are (race)

>>728750524
I would actually say women's restrooms are superior. Instead of only semi-useful urinals, they get extra stalls. They'll often have a couch or table within. There's a trash receptacle in each stall.

Honestly, considering there isn't a division of how their business is done, it boggles me that there are lines for women's bathrooms but men's are like a finely oiled machine - in and out in 1 minute.

Men get to stand, and women get more comfort and conveniences.

>>728750678

women aren't demanding equality in trash and mining jobs either.

doesn't mean the laws prohibited hiring discrimination are ok (WOULD they be ok, if applied only to jobs 99.9% of women DIDNT want? fuck no)

>>728750681
That's not an argument in favor of the position itself, it's an argument that attempts to stay in line with a precedent.

And guess what? Precedent can be ignored at-will.

>>728750782
i phrased that wrong i think you can get the point tho

>>728750808

It can be and it is.

My position is that's illogical and unjust.

>>728750569
If anything with a vagina comes into my bathroom, I'm raping it.

Just for you, cumdumpster.

>>728750541
women don't use men's bathrooms for the same reason that men don't wear high heels.
that's not to say that genetic women shouldn't use men's restrooms, or that men shouldn't wear high heels. because they should. you're just not coming off like the kind of guy who wants to see men wearing dresses.

>>728750782
What about the jobs excluding men? Like office and secretarial work?

A guy can do the job just as well, but people PREFER to be assisted by a woman more often than not. Which is also why attractive women have an easier job finding work than qualified ugly women - because eye candy is nice too.

A woman can do mining or construction, but men are PREFERRED because they are typically stronger, more enduring, and more independent.

>>728750895
You're one conservative cunt. Also use punctuation you rancid swine.

>>728728363
More like how do you pee... wtf.

>>728750883
why is gender preference unjust?
is the IDEA of a gender unjust to you?

File: 1402024394594.jpg (495KB, 1600x1036px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1600x1036px

>>728728363
Like a lot of all this SJW bullshit it doesn't fucking matter. Nobody gives a shit about his (or anyone elses') "special snowflake" bullshit. Your actions define who you are, not what you call yourself, and the actions of these SJWs show they're petty and hateful.

>>728750946
Because only the unfavorable differences are considered discrimination. Dismantle the patriarchy.

>>728750895

But men CAN wear heals without a man with a gun enforcing a law saying they can't.

I'd be fine with mens and womens rooms provided there's no LEGAL requirement that someone can't use the other one if they want.

>>728750946
No, laws that allow discrimination in jobs men don't want aren't ok either. You're totally missing the point again.

That's how it should be. Preferences are ok. Prohibiting at gunpoint is NOT ok. Not for jobs. Not for bathrooms. Not for anything.

>>728750984
notice how when it comes up that i'm a woman, i start getting insulted about five times as much

>>728751077
and yet sodomy is illegal in how many states? there is no legal physical requirement defining gender in several states, and growing.

>>728750895
Except that they shouldn't because women wandering into a men's bathroom is basically asking to be molested and men wearing heels are likely to break their goddamn ankles when the heel inevitably snaps. Also, men wearing heels look goddamn retarded.

Men (the vast majority of the time) do not have figures or features that are aesthetically accentuated or improved by heels or dresses - they are only for fulfilling their own delusions of femininity.

>>728751088
I've noticed. Should confirm your beliefs.

>>728751182

Zero. Anything on the books in null and void due to supreme court rulings.

Some places still have laws against adultery too.

And allowing trans is an excellent first step.

>>728728363
Answer me this fairy: If you pee standing up becuase of a penis, you're a dude. If you piss sitting and have no dick, you're a girl. And get dafuq back in the closet fag.

>>728751202
the idea of accentuation, of the perception of 'feminism' are social constructs and it is the opinion of many genetic men that they and other genetic men look beautiful in high heels. you ignorant fuck.

>>728751367
Define: many

Given that all studies into the matter find that the sum total of homosexual, bisexual, and transgender MEN AND WOMEN account for less than 4% of the population.

So while a man in heels might look attractive to a fraction of that 4%, the other 96% of the population sees a delusional freak.

>>728751202
i want you to think about how many girls asses you've jacked off to in your lifetime and the inevitable possibility that there was a shaved man ass in the mix.
some men have beautiful asses. you can sit here and try to deny that

Going to the restroom is a social construct.

>>728751367
>men being men and women being women is a social construct, and not to be confused with my victim complex, SJW high score, or tendency to sound adopted as fuck because I'm a fat attention whore

>>728751550
wow, the minority always seem to look like freaks fso... just because we are? and then you rebut with some degenerate fucking ha ha ha, men in high heels are disgusting!! you really do not understand discrimination.

>>728751578
Their ass can look fine, it's the hairy legs, wide chest and shoulders, and strong jaw with five-o-clock shadow on it that kills it.

People are a package deal. Like the saying goes: one bad apple spoils the barrel. They can have the most feminine, beautiful face, but if they have a veiny lumpy monster-cock, they're disgusting. They could have a round, petite little ass, but if they're sporting a lumberjack beard the boner is dead.

>>728751550
it's a lot higher than 4% in san fran motherfucker, and that's according to what people are willing to admit

>>728751759
yeah, you can think that, so long as that you know it's according to you. can't other people think differently? be different?

>>728751367
Indulging in the delusions of the mentally ill for their psychological validation is a social construct. Prove me wrong.

>>728751698
... Are you agreeing with me or challenging me? I honestly can't tell.

>>728751850
>>728751861
why is it a symptom of mental illness for someone to find a man sexy in high heels?
somebody define intolerance for me

>>728751781
According to a report done by the Williams Institute in 2011/2012, 3.8 percent of Americans identified as gay/lesbian, bisexual, or transgender: 1.7 percent as lesbian or gay, 1.8 percent as bisexual, and 0.3 percent as transgender.

NHIS reported in 2014 that 1.6 percent of Americans identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent identify as bisexual.

Given that the Williams Institute is based in California, which is apparently the nexus for this kind of thinking and has a staggeringly high rate of (at least visible) homosexuality/bisexuality/transsexualism compared to, for example, Iowa or anywhere in the Midwest (as a volume of the population rather than as a percentage of the population), then we can assume that their results are probably higher than the national average and that the truth rests somewhere in the middle.

I was generous with 4%.

>>728752013
Someone define overweight and unloved for me

>>728752050
you continue to reinforce that at the heart of your argument, you are trying to say that because they are a minority it's okay for us to think they're 'freaks'.

>>728751842
96% of people disagree.

Majority rules, weirdo.

And in this case, it's a vaaaaast majority.

>>728752159
If 4% of the population said that the sky was green, they would be wrong.

It might BE green to them. They might see green. It could be their truth. But they would be wrong.

>>728752050
maybe this is one of those agree to disagree situations, because i respect your right to live your life, think your bullshit thoughts, history has always proven that intolerance is something to be overcome. i really hope that for you.

>>728752173
okay, so discrimination = okay?

File: IMG_0338.jpg (54KB, 600x763px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x763px

I had no idea Trigglypuff was on /b/

>>728752173
>Implying just because the majority believes something it means it's right

Typical women's argument. Granted it's best to ACT like other people, that doesn't mean that what you're doing it right. Then again try to argue ethics with something that has no sense of honour.

>>728752173
jesus, it might as well be their religion, their race, whatever the fuck bullshit reason. enjoy being the majority.

>>728752350
Honestly, why are you so fucking fat?

>>728752309
So in other words, you have no legitimate counter to a published report validating the position that Xsexuals are a very small minority of the population demonstrating a distinctly deviant behavior, and thus have no logical position or authority to dictate how others should see or treat them?

I'm not saying we should gas all the queers, I'm saying stop trying to convince me that you're not weird, because statistically, YOU ARE.

>>728752674
the less there are of us, the more you should hate us?
you're a broken person.