Geniuses of /b/, tell me the answer.

>>728306822
0

https://www.quora.com/What-is-0-0-Is-it-one-zero-or-infinity

0/0=OP is a fucking faggot.

>>728306822
>tell me the answer.

17?

Indeterminate.

>>728306822
Penis

File: 1289225315129.jpg (963KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 1920x1080px

>>728306822

SYNTAX ERROR

Undefined

>>728306822
Null

>>728306822
n/n is undefined for n=0

Imagine that you have zero cookies and you split them evenly among zero friends. How many cookies does each person get? See? It doesn't make sense. And Cookie Monster is sad that there are no cookies, and you are sad that you have no friends.

42

>>728307031
:(

>>728306822
Whatever the value of 0 as a denominator is, it is still equal to the value of the 0 on top. Therefore this returns 1

>>728307001
/Thread /

>>728307010
just say fucking 0/0 is undefined you autist

Would your answer to what's 1+1 be "n+n is 2 for n=1"

Pamietaj cholero nigdy nie dziel przez zero

>>728307031
What f I have zero cookies and also zero friends, then I spread them evenly among all zero of my friends? Then each of my friends get a cookie.

Sooo 1

>>728307076
Sry. I forgot I'm on a webshite for retarded people.

I wrote it in a way it can be understood generally with respect to the problem.

n/n equals 1 for all real numbers, except for 0.

>>728306822
undefined

>>728306822
>any number/a number that will be0 will be = infinite,
>0/any number will be always 0. We cant use 0 down because mathematics logic,
>so it's indeterminate, maybe if it was a limit we could use L'Hopital to find the result
>f'(x)/g'(x)

>>728306964
I would give anything to see a quasar go through a planet.

>>728307076
n+n=2n

retard

>>728306822
all real numbers

0/0 = x
0 = (0)x
x = all real numbers

>>728307210
Retard. other anon was right, just say 0/0 is undefined. you think you sound smart throwing in a few big words in there? No, you just piss people off. Enstein

>>728307279

this is the only correct answer, all others pls go

File: 18fa7c95da9d06558affd49afbc57d1d.jpg (68KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 540x720px

>>728307467
>think you sound smart throwing in a few big words in there?
Yes. Yes, I do.

zero divided by zero is indeterminate faggots.

>>728306822
I can't because it's undefined

>>728306822
Nothing or undefined.

>>728307513

"undefined" is such a boring answer, it's an evasion and a hack. It's like saying that square root of -1 is undefined.

>>728307076
>>728307467
>Yeah, that OTHER Anon is so right, isn't he amazing?

Fucking obvious samefag is obvious.

>>728307708
square root of -1 is i tho

>>728307708

no it isnt you dumbass nigger its a result of the nature of the number fucking 0

>>728306822

lim x->0 { x / x } = lim x->0 {1} = 1

n/n = n * n^(-1) = n^1 * n^(-1) = n^(1-1) = n^(0) = 1

>>728307708
>It's like saying that square root of -1 is undefined
No, sqrt(-1) is well defined in the complex plane.
0/0 is neither defined in the real numbers nor in the complex numbers.

>>728306822
Math Error

>>728307467

you being a fucking drooling retard does not mean the rest of us have to stoop down to your finger painting level, fucktard

its all the numbers.

>>728307795

Please educate me about the special nature of 0, sir.

>>728306917
Undefined

>>728307808

You're just assuming x/x equals 1 for all numbers.
That's not how it works.

The second equation is correct for all real numbers, but not for 0. 0/0 is not a number.

>>728306822
1

>>728308019
Not who your replying to but it wasn't even around until the medieval times and the knowledge of the number zero helped define many concepts which contributed to western society developing faster than others...

So in a way it contributed to us bombing Syria today and not the other way around.

File: 1474493686038.jpg (125KB, 700x714px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 700x714px

>>728308230
Prove it, fag.

>>728308019

specifically, i mean that 0 is the only number which lacks the property of quantity

you cannot quantitatively divide something that doesn't have a quantitative aspect

>>728308230
0 goes into 0 a total amount of 0 times.

File: 1484486735940.jpg (31KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x480px

>>728308262
>So in a way it contributed to us bombing Syria today

File: image.jpg (77KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 480x360px

>>728308770
I don't understand your confusion.

How else could we have the theoretical number base that accurately displays the value of their lives?

>>728306822

Newfags should know that you can't divide by zero.

>>728307031
Siri, you bitch. <3

>>728309196

Very nice.

Philosophically it could be infinity because if you have nothing then take out all of the nothingness it could be everything

>>728307001
/thread

>>728307177
All your friends also get 2 cookies and also 3, and so on as long as you have 0 friends

>>728307446
It is undefined, because 0/0 is undefined. You don't know what 0/0 is equal to, so you can't set it equal to some random number.
>>728307808
This is correct, but that is not what is being asked. Using L'Hopital's rule you could get 0/0 to be anything you want, because you don't divide by 0, you divide by something infinitely close to 0.

>>728306822
0 would make an amount of sense. 1 would also maybe make sense, Each of these relies on a somewhat iffy analytic justification of "consider this sequence." But given that multiple series give different answers, it's probably a stupid statement. Similar to, "the set of all sets"

>>728306988
Wrong

Divide by zero error

>>728307446
>0/0 = x
>0 = (0)x
So how would the second line follow from the first? You'd get
>0/0 * 0 = x * 0
if anything.

How many nothings go into nothing?

>>728306822
Anything divided by 0 doesn't make sense.

∫adx

>>728306822

There is no solution. How do you divide something into 0 pieces?

File: sex-offender.jpg (48KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1280x720px

>>728307808

He didn't pose a converging progression, asslord.

>>728311494

How do you divide something into -1 pieces?

math error

>>728306822
x/y makes no sense syntactically. It should be x*(y^-1).

0*(0^-1) makes no sense, because 0 doesn't have an inverse. There is no number you can multiply by 0 to get 1.

>>728311626
3/-2 = -2/3

Divide -2 into 3 pieces, not 3 into -2.

>>728311626
By finding how many times it would go in normally and then making it negative

25 divide by 5 = 5
-25 divide by 5 = -5
25 divide by -5 = -5

Conversely,

-20 x 1 = -20
20 x 1 = 20

Geddit?