https://discord.gg/WAbYwMu

>>728137927
9

>>728137927
23

>>728137927
1 faggot.
/thread
sage

i don't know since it doesn't have a fucking equals sign

Whats 6^0?

>>728137927
18

It's 9 faggots

it's 9

>>728137927
1

Its 9. have to go left to right

faggots, PEMDAS

>>728137927
Brackets > Indices > Division.
1 + 2 = 3 * 2 = 6.
6 / 6 = 1 you faggots

>>728142738
Nope.
Think of it as
6/2 * (1+2)

File: Balloon Dog Road from "Maddie on Things" by Theron Humphrey.jpg (332KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1280x1280px

>>728143038
this nigga is right and the answer is 9

>>If you want the result of your example to be 1, you'll need to override the equal left-to-right precedence of multiplication and division by including an extra set of parentheses (and preferably also include the implied multiplication): 6/(2*(1+2)) your the fag u have to change shit just to get ur answer lol

6/2(1+2) =
6/2*(1+2) =
6/2*(3) =
6/2*3 =
6/6 =
1

Order: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction

>>728142738If you want the result of your example to be 1, you'll need to override the equal left-to-right precedence of multiplication and division by including an extra set of parentheses (and preferably also include the implied multiplication): 6/(2*(1+2)) hum who's the fag u changing shit ur the people who know basic math

>>728143779
Your step to
6/6 =
Is wrong, cause you are dividing only by 2, not 2*3

so this is actually just a syntax debate? the original problem is just lacking proper syntax and the interpretation of the division mark will result in the answer being either 9 or 1

>>728137927
1

>>728143038
yea it's PEMDAS tho parenthesis comes first then multiply then divide, it's 1

>>728137927
6/2=3
3+1+2=5

>>728140608
it's 9 you fucking idiot

>>728144036
No? you're fucking autistic haha

File: Untitled.png (75KB, 1230x924px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1230x924px

the problem is wrong to begin with. that's why you can get either a 9 or a 1

>>728144810

Close, it's actually P E MD A S - M and D have the same priority in the US. In a toss-up, the rule is left to right so the answer is 9. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

There's different answers depending on the rule that you use.

Just type it in a fucking calculator, you cunts

>>728145213
Lol,no to what this what a child says when u tell them their wrong.what dose ur no refer to?

>>728145708
The calculator follows a different rule you mongo

>>728145851
Only because humans like to change rules like the left to right order in division and multipling c

you can't properly fit math syntax in one line format. this is the root of a lot of misunderstanding

>>728137927
this problem is written ambigously it could be either one or nine

>>728145275
this

>>728137927
I read that shit 6 divided by 2 to the 1 to the 2

ugh...

PEMDAS

triangle

i may be wrong

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%2F2(1%2B2)

>>728144927
You're using PEMDAS wrong

File: IMG_4693.jpg (145KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 639x960px

9. Ti 89

File: 5c935af1278a3af75cd07573d700bded.png (9KB, 428x220px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 428x220px

>>728137927
okay for all you faggots that don't "believe" 9 is the right answer,
C++ is never wrong!

>>728148345
You could of used BC.

Sip
https://youtu.be/nRHuSHQTGIc

>>728140211
how the fuck did you get 23

File: It's9Bitch.png (89KB, 578x342px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 578x342px

>>728148345
>>728148466

>>728148466
you could've written "could've"

>>728148466
I know bro, i just had codeblocks opened :p
>>728148943
nice
>>728149046
stfu

>>728148345
Hey asshat, you can't write division math on one line

File: 1464465642131.jpg (25KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 512x288px

Wait, now that i think about it
it is really 9, since PEMDAS itself says that division has the same priority as multiplication, an when's written this way, it gets resolved left to right, right?

>>728144293
Yes 6/6is wrong
6/2*3=
6/2=3*3
3*3=9
I still can't get he answer 1 without actually adding anything to the equation.
As I is written down its 9 but with the addition of a extra set parentheses

>>728149449
U can get he answer 1

>>728149328
no, this problem is written ambiguously and it could be either one or nine

>>728149328
Yes u are correct

if any on you actually studied math, you'd know that there is no such thing as ÷ when you write down a problem

OP is a monster for starting this shit.

File: 031.jpg (30KB, 545x365px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 545x365px

>>728149898
psst, don't ruin good fun

>>728137927
9

>>728145275
This. You never see a division sign past the age of about 12.

>>728145275
Thanks

>>728145275
Thank you.

>>728143851
the order is not implicit for multiplication/division.

>>728144810
Multiplication and division carry the same weight, it's whatever is first left to right.

1-1-1-1=0
prove me wrong

>>728150764
-2 idiot