Why were women better looking in the '60s and '70s?

>>728044340
lower quality cameras

because there wasn't 2 mcdonalds on every corner and no internet so people did exercise and ate well.

now fuck off

Their parents weren't druggies.

>>728044340
cuz no tumblr

>>728044340
No video games = Healthier and more social people

>>728044340
because they didn't have shitty self pretentious fucking attitudes

>>728044340
because they were actually women, not these LGBTQFMROPSCUNIXB idiots.

>>728044340
because people in general weren't so fucking fat then

>>728044340
They weren't. You don't like more recent women.

File: An-Ordinary-Family-In-The-60s-Fugly-Family.jpg (29KB, 500x563px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x563px

It's not like uggos didn't exist back then. You only think they were hotter because of sample selection.

food is much shittier today and it's more common for women to act like slobs (drinking a lot) = fat/pudgy young women

Cameras weren't as common as they are today so the ugly bitches were not worth wasting the film on = only pictures of hot ones remain

File: Los Angeles 1972.png (876KB, 1200x791px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1200x791px

They weren't prettier... but they wore less makeup and more white women were in the media than those of race and color. Women (and men) didn't groom nearly as much as they do today. They had stupid hair with minimal style and product and they had huge fucking pubic hair. Anyone caught shaving was considered homo. People spent much more time outdoors though so all the whites had tans and they all ate less carbs and sugar so they were generally MUCH thinner and healthier... therefore more attractive.

I grew up between then and now. If you watch any television show or movie from the 70s and 80s and even the 90s, you won't see any fat people. Back then, everyone (with few exceptions) was very trim and slender. Someone who wouldn't rate as "chubby" today would have been considered "morbidly obese" by yesterday's standards.

But women were prettier in other ways... they went to school and learned to cook. I'm married to a Canadian model who has only cooked me a couple of meals in a decade and hates children. Women of yesterday simply yearned to find a guy to fuck, marry and have kids with. Having a job was more important than what type of job it was... and life was much simpler with fewer bills and better quality of entertainment.

Women today wear more makeup and have far more incidents of cosmetic surgery. It's fraud, really.

All of those posts are filled with wisdom

File: 1460358244173.jpg (359KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 600x900px

Women today (and this is a rare 2016 Skinny)

File: 8a100a85d66934636a6fcd2489ed5f9c.jpg (368KB, 550x623px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 550x623px

>>728044340

>>728044340
because they were younger

America was a lot whiter back then

File: 1433992706722.jpg (56KB, 284x573px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 284x573px

Notice how women were slimmer, even into the 1990s?

>>728044340
Well, in Italy, they still look like that in the vast majority (as in healthy and not overly fat). Same for the men, too.

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 22.54.59.png (67KB, 118x202px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 118x202px

>>728045901
hi m8

File: IMG_0106.png (170KB, 423x284px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 423x284px

>>728045402
>LGBTQFMROPSCUNIXB

File: Subway babes - Late 70s,by Willy Spiller.jpg (131KB, 1440x960px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1440x960px

1970s. If you went back in time you'd be ridiculed for being a fatty when you stepped foot into the 1970s. Fat and gay.

File: 1979.jpg (531KB, 1152x1536px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1152x1536px

Average couple in 1979.

>>728044340
Better looking? Rather plain and boring with gigantic bushes. And they all smelled like cigarettes and so did their houses and cars because kids were allowed to buy cigs then...disgusting breath. Everything was yellow in the 70s to cover nicotine stains no joke

>>728046367
>not lardasses

It's the same reason people think all old music is better.
It wasn't, but now, in the future, the only old songs we still play are the good ones. You hear song after song of solid classic old music and think "wow, this was all good!" But it's only because no one still plays the shitty songs.

>>728045690
They was you are incorrect. I was made in the 70s and grew up in the 80s. Times today suck. People used to get out much more go places and didn't eat shit food all the time.

>>728044340
Because they were younger

File: 70sPMs.jpg (31KB, 260x346px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 260x346px

>>728044340

Looking at old Playboy magazines, your jaw kind of drops at how hot nearly all of them were.

Today, you look at chicks in Playboy and you want to vomit.

File: Mall-74.jpg (76KB, 720x484px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x484px

It was the mid-1990s when Americans and white Australians and UK folks stopped working out and grew fat. Interracial sex was no-longer offensive so now there's mixed races everywhere.

Fun Fact: Back when they made the movie "The Bodyguard" (with Whitney and Kevin Costner), they test audience (which was mostly black women) was so horrified that Whitney has sex with a white man that the studios had to censor the film and cut almost all the sex scenes from it. Especially the kissing scenes.

File: 228187af6f88a2f1c578e0b81daee11f[1].jpg (62KB, 650x495px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 650x495px

>>728046367

>>728046815
kys

>>728046503
Well I see someone a a stupid fag here. Get over it women was hotter then. That's life. Now we get ape loven slut bitches that men from then wouldn't shit on.

>>728046826
Back then, they had real tits. Now, they only have fake tits that look like they were welded in place, look lopsided, and don't move at all. No bounce, no jiggle, nothing. And they're so big, it's like the uncanny valley effect. It looks like a woman, but there's something very, very wrong.

On the other hand, downstairs trimming apparently didn't exist until around 1988, so we've gotten better in some ways.

>>728044340
They had character, it shows.
I mean, when you meet a woman with character these days is like finding a sheep that can talk and knows what gravity is

File: pic_058_clean_790.jpg (107KB, 790x1054px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 790x1054px

Trust me when I say this: We have NEVER been fatter, sicker and uglier than today.

File: BhWY15Q.jpg (361KB, 913x1297px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 913x1297px

We are now a parody of ourselves.

>>728047459
Don't help your country on that, it's too funny for the rest, I don't come to your house and break the TV you're watching your favourite comedy show on.

File: vintage cheerleaders (8).jpg (149KB, 640x334px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 640x334px

>>728044340
I am really cool with those knee-high tube socks. I got a thing for feet and socks. That's a keeper.

File: Fat-Future-42-percent-of-Americans-May-Be-Obese-by-2030.jpg (92KB, 400x228px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 400x228px

Even the cartoonists get it

>>728047909
Nigger wtf

>>728048233
You can see the buttcrack on that assface

File: 150428131440-01-star-wars-myth-1977-line---restricted-super-169.jpg (164KB, 1100x619px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1100x619px

Spot the fatty (there isn't one)

File: 973940213.jpg (142KB, 660x656px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 660x656px

Just a reminder that not everyone was pretty or slim in the past.

Jesus like: Hell no

>>728049807
is this real???

>>728050138
Yes. It is her, showing that she's working on it.

File: 1445799367173.jpg (160KB, 634x787px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 634x787px

>>728050138
>is this real???

I suspect it is... here's one from her at the beach...

>>728050138
It's slighly photoshopped. I don't know why though, it's not really necassary
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfUVygyUYAAmD01.jpg

File: 1425532107940.jpg (23KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 540x540px

>>728050659
has own harpoon

File: tomgoesface.png (161KB, 232x291px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 232x291px

>>728049807

>>728050659
amy is going to fuck up the japanese guy who threw that at her

>>728044340

they really werent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUTnNKhF-EU
Cause they took our jobs

>>728051284
prove it otherwise

File: 1517414_701388886638712_6261833990778763252_n.jpg (57KB, 572x842px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 572x842px

The thigh-gap is just godly

>>728044340
because they played backgammon obviously.

>>728051055
nobody in this image is really overweight looking?

whoever made this is probably obese

>>728045542
Didn't find a single person in this pic ugly. Explain yourself

>>728052182
yes actually they are. A random group of teens looking this way does underscore the point that our society is sicker and heavier than ever.

>>728052182
>nobody in this image is really overweight looking
are you serious?

>>728052496
>>728052452
the only one who looks bad is the chick with the pink bikini because it looks too small

>>728052703
OK. By the way, I thought Songs In The Key of Life was masterful, Mr. Wonder.

>>728051284

unable to prove, but i lived it. They really weren't. I would say that beauty has increased with diversity. Probably somewhere around 90's and early 2000's women much prettier. Around mid 2000s they started making themselves prettier with modern makeup tricks etc, but they were not naturally prettier. I think women are getting uglier these days.

>>728052908
LOL

innervisions was even better

File: 130417-MOTW-obesity-map.gif (450KB, 497x288px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 497x288px

>>728044340

oldfag passing thru. I lived thru the 70s and much of whats said here abut modern fatties is true. People got more exercise just because thats how anything got done unlike today. The real deal that I've noticed is that circa 1980s, everyone was a candidate for being a star- like in karioke, reality tv and now social media. People in the 70s and earlier were just themselves, there wasn't any alternative. See footage of just regular people from that time and you will see unselfconscious people. That changed with global mass media

>>728044340
Because they were women. Today's women are still kids until they are a lot lot older

>>728053927
CNN started in 1980.

>>728045883
Thats a child, not a woman

>>728048931
Sure, and that aint a photoshopped mash up..

>>728054101
There's that I guess. A popular news station started by a businessman. Again though, look at footage or interviews of regular people earlier than the 80s, they arent imitating anything on TV they are just being themselves or fitting in with their local social group. When I was a kid there was 3 channels + public tv stations, screentime was something you did occasionally. Now it occupies us most of our day. I was born at the end of the 60s. Life in the US is radically different than when I was a kid, we are self-absorbed posers most of us because we are looking at cameras most of our free time

>>728053066
Not a single statement here is correct.

>>728047459
that girl in the blue though, omg

why did girls before had bigger tits?????

>>728044340
That photo does not look like it was even taken in the 70s

I blame mass immigration on a lot of things and I'm going to blame it again.
If you have a bunch of people around and you need to drive to get anywhere you're going to be sitting in a car for a lot of the time eating garbage and getting fat.

Traffic is bad for the mind, body and soul.

>>728045690

Word.

Truth.

Honesty.

Far out dude.

>>728056169
I blame internet

Less tattoos and piercings. Some hair on the pussy.

>>728047555
Visual illusion. Horizontal stripes always make you look fatter.

>>728044340
Because bitches now eat too much and are fat.

>>728048060
I get it, we should just stop eating televisions and we'll be healthy again

>>728056520
Think about it though instead of sprawling suburbs there would've been green spaces.

File: mmmHMMMMM.png (275KB, 510x499px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 510x499px

>>728045402
>>728046185
>LGBTQFMROPSCUNIXB

I think you mean the alphabet soup group.

>>728057033
It's like that in Canada, doesn't mean faggots go outside and play

>>728058044
Yeah but Christ. Can't walk on the freeway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnGlYG8UjFk

>>728044511
>Film as opposed to digital
>Less quality

I don't think you know what the fuck you're talking about.

>>728048727
fatty dead center, 8th in from the left.

>>728044340
BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T SAVE PICTURES OF UGLY CHICKS FOR SEVERAL DECADES

>>728044340
>Why were women better looking in the '60s and '70s?
bc that was before the gov't promoted mass immigration

>>728045883
You sure that's a woman? Square jaw that goes straight back, large brow ridge, backwards sloping forehead, and large ears are all common traits in male humans.

>>728044511
Lol no. HD digital cameras are not even close to film quality

>>728044340
Obesity wasn't the norm.

File: IMG_7756.jpg (24KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 260x194px

>>728046757
>>728046503

Thank you two! Jesus Christ!

The selection bias and nose-deafness in this thread is astounding.

People were thinner and all forms of design (especially fashion) were better as was music... but this is all because that shit was harder to do and more rarified. That's really it. Nothing special.

Every other aspect of life pre-2000 was miserable though. Especially the god damn smoking everywhere.

>>728047459
The fried pork skins really sells this image

File: IMG_8195.jpg (62KB, 750x375px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 750x375px

This is a 57 year old woman in 2016. Not the average, but not impossible or all that uncommon.

Wasn't that way in olden times.

If you aren't a fatass, you're hotter and younger much longer these days.

Nostalgia is a function of selection bias.

>>728059404
Please tell me that little candle stick dick is shopped!

>>728044511
Don't agree but that was kekable. Every decade has hotties and ugo-es

>>728045690
Everything was a little sexier because it was a little more raw, and a lot more loose and dangerous than society had been pretending to be for decades.

We had just come out of the backlash to the WWII generation. Late sixties was the war for freedom from that strict misery, and in the 70s we got fucking comfortable as fuck anons.

Also there were a lot of truly horrible fucked up greasy druggie murderous shits and culty wackos going around fucking people's groove up too, but it's easy to overlook them now.

>>728059648
Jesus Christ, not an other art fag bleeding heart film cuck.

>>728044340
The nation's food supply was replaced with industrialized garbage in the 80s and has been fucking you ever since. You're literally eating trash at a record pace.

>>728045542
Mom looks like Tina Fey

>>728061418
Correction: Mom looks better than Tina fey.

File: IMG_6133.jpg (106KB, 615x960px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 615x960px

God help me I do miss big smelly '70s bushes.

the easier taking and storing pictures gets the more ugly people's pictures become available

>>728044340
Not as fat.

File: 0624-farrah-fawcett7-400_0.jpg (8KB, 276x276px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 276x276px

>>728061041

>>728044673
In the 60s and 70s? The fuck they weren't.

>>728044340
More into having fun and not stressing about every little thing.

>>728044340
Musicians actually needed talent. The future is for hacks.

>>728050659
Whats your point? She's not even that big, yall always aim for low hanging fruit because of your lack of creativity

File: 1372064574891.jpg (301KB, 1600x1004px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1600x1004px

>>728044340
on the other hand, in the 1970s blood lead levels were higher than ever in modern history, violent crime and substance abuse more pervasive, and american cities were in decay. Trade offs.

>>728061283
No, dipshit. Randomly scattered grain patterns are more visually appealing than a fixed pixel array. Just as people look better under incandescent rather than flouredcent lighting or oil paint is more pleasing to the eye than magic marker, certain media amplify certain visual qualities.

This is neither artsy nor rocket science.

>>728045690
Plus, the trout pout hadn't been invented yet.

>>728060187
>I'm 15 years old

ftfy

Go and look at vintage photos of the general public. Obviously most didn't have the face of a model, but they were all thin.

>>728049807
>>728050659

I never realized how disgusting she really was until seeing this shit.

>>728044340
>Why were women better looking in the '60s and '70s?
They weren't, unless trailer trash is your thing.

>>728052182
This. None of those women are obese.

This whole website is fat people LARPING as skinny people

File: 1489569372.jpg (182KB, 752x1024px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 752x1024px

even the traps were better back then

>>728062277
I said they were thin. But that's it. That's the one and only positive difference. It's a big difference. But it isn't some goddamn mystery.

>>728052081
That's a nice pocket calculator she's leaning on.

>>728062619
It's not selection bias if everyone was actually thin back then.

Today there would be selection bias because popular magazines and movies still use predominantly thin people while the general public is as fat as ever.

>>728044340
They weren't.
They also didn't shave nearly as much as they do now.

>>728046826
One Playboy art director liked to say the girls had bodies by Monsanto and minds by Mattel.

>>728044340
Well that's a digital photo so your shit is BUNK.

>>728062924
1. Selection bias is inherent in the cheapness and easiness of photography now.

2. That's not at all the point I was making in the post you're answering.

>>728045402
What's the P stand for? Got all the rest

>>728045883
Stop flooding the boards with this small titted cum dumpster.

>>728054794
1967 guy here, I second the motion.
But I'll further the notion by adding that social media has made society even more self absorbed.

>>728044613
This.

>>728045883
Your interpretation of today's women is weak.

>>728044340
Cause they were slim

File: 93bIqjN.jpg (792KB, 1280x1799px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1280x1799px

I agree.

>>728063302
go go gadget gonz!!

>>728045542
>You only think they were hotter because of sample selection.

Nope, people were far better looking and in good physical shape.

>>728046367
>Average couple

Totally unremarkable for the 1970's

>>728064446
MODS

>>728044340
because being a whore hadn't yet been made the norm for women of the lower and middle class.

>>728047459

Back in the 70's other kids would have teased the girl in blue shorts for being a fatty

>>728055842
true dat

>>728060032
probably the gayest picture ive seen

Because most 18 yo girls were still virgins. Now days they have fucked half the football team like it is nothing and take pictures. They were not covered in tattoos. AND no big asses like the Kardassians. You never saw a big ass like they have back then!

File: DAAANG.jpg (10KB, 261x149px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 261x149px

>>728046037
>JLove though...

>>728047555
Wh... what is it, Precious? What is it!?

No tattoos, no hair pink or green hair, no campus liberalism, oh for those days again

File: 1485321809177.jpg (71KB, 476x655px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 476x655px

confirmation bias, you're just retarded

File: Keiichi Nitta sippin his urine.jpg (938KB, 1195x800px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 1195x800px

>>728065319
what about this one???

>>728064446
wat

>>728059889
This x1000

They weren't. It just seems so because styles and tastes were different back then.

Nobody took pictures of the ugly ones.

File: 1353960046161.jpg (361KB, 990x691px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 990x691px

>>728061283

Hey, the science behind silver halide on single exposure cameras is fascinating. You should really look into it.

>Filmstock resolution is upwards of 5K, depending on things like the film's condition and quality.

>>728065476
Balls not touching.
No homo.

>>728065531
Julliett Lewis? Moar!

>>728061041

90% of teenage males in the 1970's had this tapped to the wall in their bedroom.

I think I'll fap to it for old times sake.

>>728045690
>cosmetic surgery
this, fam. women couldn't buy their bodies. they had to earn them

>>728047555

Towelliee

File: ...OR GET THE FUCK OUT︕！.jpg (92KB, 600x597px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 600x597px

>>728065921
google has the whole set

>>728065393
No campus liberalism? Are you stupid?

>>728046503
go fuck yurself faggot.

>>728066059

He is stupid, totally stupid.

Tattoos were not trendy fashion statements.

>>728049807
I remember when I wanted to fuck this cunt before. The hell was wrong with me then

File: This.jpg (114KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 3000x3000px

>>728046843
The admixture is spreading unseen and rampantly true pale mulattoes. it is depressing to see when you recognize it.

>>728062129
Fake news

>>728044673
There were more heavy drugs in America during the 50's than in the 60's or 70's, they just hadn't been stigmatized yet as most were over the counter.

>>728047459
That is just the food industries crating addictive food that is unhealthy.

ppl used to eat produce instead of processed foods. they had back yard gardens that they worked and ate from.

>>728044340
Camera film meant you couldn't waste to take a picture of someone who were ugly, now digital camcorders on every phone with minimal picture sizes mean you can literally take pictures of your own shit

File: jew_Amy_Schumer.jpg (93KB, 682x1023px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 682x1023px

>>728050659

>>728044340
all times when looked back upon seem golden

File: Bewitched.jpg (112KB, 1024x578px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1024x578px

>>728066827

File: Goldie Hawn.jpg (52KB, 564x785px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 564x785px

>>728066862

>>728066624
>see something that defies my world view
>say it's fake news
>???
>profit

>>728044340
Welfare caused the low iq poor genetics to breed. and breeding they did, they completely out bred the high high demographics and with that stupid ppl tend to be ugly.

>>728066915
Also fake af

>>728054365
its not....

>ITT

REMEMBER WHEN _____ WAS BETTER IN THE 19_0's?

#MAGA

>>728045690
>better quality of entertainment.

The tiny flaw that makes the rest of your post all the more beautiful.

>>728047555
Why's he hiding a mattress in his shirt?

>>728047798
There has always been fat folks. You sound young, you should get in the bed. Very very sleepy.

File: iq.gif (155KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 640x480px

>>728058300
lemmings

>>728067088

Not like that. Used to be a guy like that could get a job in a side show.

>>728044613
this

>>728047555
he's got a pair of balls over his pair of balls

b/c, they didn't eat processed and refined foods. GMOs or drink poisoned city water. There were no chem trails or mandatory experimental vaccines.

Their doctors didn't treat them like guinea pigs and force them to take pharmaceuticals and other unhealthy treatments at the threat of losing all their meds.

And we were much more innocent, honest and hardworking.

>>728062171
there are fucking retards who actually believe this.

That grainy shit assed old pictures are better than high definition images we have today.

what a fucking world.

>>728044340
Less race mixing

>>728067958
Reading this post requires a tinfoil hat.

>>728044340
because you're too beta to have a shot with the hot girls nowadays.

>>728067831
I guess that means he's a dickhead.

>>728067958
Someone escaped the Alex Jones thread again.
Go back to your supplements, nutter.
Also, i think theres a pizza place that needs your attention.