You fags will argue about everything.

>>727903212
Stick will win against Marines

>>727903212
op is a fag and the answer is 1 you dumbcunt

>>727903212
The question is ambiguous.

It is either
>6/(2(1+2))
>answer = 1
or
>(6(1+2))/2
>answer = 9

File: 1478128484164.png (922KB, 1000x1024px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 1000x1024px

>>727903212

the answer is 9, anyone disagreeing with this should go back to preschool

>>727903419
answer is 3 you dumbfuck

>>727903626
Okay. How the fuck did you get to 3?

>>727903626
Do the world a favor and kill yourself.

>>727903563
The answer is 1, anyone that has no brain yet telling others to go back to preschool has autism with maximum potential.

>>727903765
Congrats, you are not a retard.

>>727903551
Fuck you

>>727903792

>>>727903212(You)
2+1=4
6/2=4
4x4=9
The answer is nine

>>727903792
Says the person who doesn't follow the standard international model.

it's 1 you fucking NIGGERS

>>727903894
i think the number you're looking for is 3

File: Kk4TVTd.png (9KB, 641x267px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 641x267px

checkmate

>>727903910
What about the math calculator on google that says nine you NON NIGGER

File: ihaveaidspleasekillme.png (552KB, 533x601px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 533x601px

no, we will argue about ANYTHING.... not everything you fucking retard
fucking hard to argue about EVERY FUCKING THING IN THE MULTIVERSE AT THE SAME GOD DAMN TIME

It is 6.

>>727903549
Not ambiguous in the absence of parentheses you do operations left to right. The answer is 9. Also what kind of ass backwards way did you get your answers

>>727904048
surprise, surprise, google follows the standard international model, unlike some imperifags here.

>>727904048
>implying google is ever right at all

>>727903563
More like middleschool. This is too complex for preschoolers

9 or 2. Literally both are right. Anyone who disagrees is a troll or doesn't understand math

>>727904191
Welcome to Eastern Europe. Leave your hopes and desires at the door.

>>727904227
2 is literally impossible to get using any widely used model.

>>727904227
>2
Motherfucking yes

>>727903832
you're fucking retarded if you think the answer is 9

File: QuickMemo+_2017-04-03-17-25-37.png (76KB, 480x782px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 480x782px

>>727903212
Your mum

>>727904092
2(1+2) = 6
6/6 = 1
NIGGER

>>727904227
>american education
I got straight f's in school and i can solve this.
You are retarded.

>>727904372
further evidence that the international model should be used solely.

>>727904227
I can prove 2+2=/=4 using a bunch of proofs too congrats you took a slightly advanced math but that is not what this stupid question is about its about dumb shits that didn't learn their order of operations

>>727904108
Sure, I just thought about it like writing on paper. I don't really do math with ASCII.

I'm not sure what you mean with your last statement though, isn't it pretty obvious?

>>727903551
Ur gay

>>727903212
It's not a rock it's a boulder

1 (one)

>>727904514
If you can prove that, whatever you're using isn't math. Sound logic doesn't lead to false results.

It's 9.
6/2(1+2)
1+2=3
6/2=3
3 x 3 = 9

9. bidmas.
1+2=3
6/2=3
3*3=9

I wonder how many people posting here legit don't know this basic stuff.

>>727904645
Take non linear calculus

>>727904388
What a dumb ass.
Its 2x1+2 =4
6/4=1.5
Check yourself beofre calling someone,else dum as
You where close but it 1.5

>>727904922
Well the first look at it I thought it was 1 and then on the second read I thought I was retarded. To be fair, it's in the middle of the night.

File: Screenshot_20170404-073354.png (147KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1080x1920px

>>727904048
you actually typed in the complete wrong fucking equation. you're degenerate.

google is solving (6/2) * (1+2)
the actual equation is 6/2(1+2)

File: QuickMemo+_2017-03-15-00-15-04.png (492KB, 480x782px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 480x782px

>>727903212
What is there to argue about?

>>727905020
>someone,else
>dum as
>you where close
>it 1.5
You have no right to call ANYONE else, especially not ME, a dumbass. Learn to type and spell, retard.

>>727905020
not me but you're retarded

you multiply everything in the bracket by 2

2(1+2)
(2*1) + (2*2)
2+4=6

>>727903707
Solve brackets first dickface 1+2 = 3 ~ 2/6 = 3 ~ 3×3 = 9

>>727905122
Look in the search bar you nigger

File: why tho.png (9KB, 239x211px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 239x211px

PEMDAS AND BODMAS ARE BOTH FROM DIFFERENT PLACES AROUND THE WORLD
SOME PEOPLE ARE TAUGHT BODMAS
SOME PEOPLE ARE TAUGHT PEMDAS

>>727905392
that's factorising not solving

>>727903792
Oh look, a retarded person.

File: dTtuUNG.png (33KB, 917x1186px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 917x1186px

>>727903212
Tfw, I can't even solve basic mathematical questions.
Am I fucking retarded or something?

>>727905415
B-but..w-what....that's...
okay... that's a 3... this is fine.

File: 1491166372129-b.png (177KB, 245x294px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 245x294px

>>727903792
PEMDAS, it's 9

>>727905455
>>727905534
>>727905415
you're beyond saving

>>727905329
You just made becuz I'm rite and your wrong you faggit. It 1.5

>>727905766
you mean BODMAS right

If you wrote an equation like this I would fire you.

As written? It's 9
But it's written poorly and if you think you're being a cleaver little faggot for "tricking people" you aren't. You used poor grammar and now people are having an issue interpreting the original intent.

You write like that in a mathematics course above some inner city nigger high school you'll get a big fat fucking F and sit in the corner with a dunce cap.

>>727905122
He typed in the right equation you sperg

File: 1490839935000-b.jpg (17KB, 308x326px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 308x326px

>>727905493
But it's the same either way

I love how they teach this is grade school, drill it into your brain, and people still get it wrong.

>>727905821
You are a massive retard, fuck off.

>>727905913
The difference being...?

>>727904388
>Hey guys look at me, I'm insulting people for being dumb and I can't even math right bro

>>727903212
47

>>727903551
k

>>727903212
The point is actually that this question is dumb, because no one past eighth grade math writes equations in op's form. Additionally, I would say that 1 is a safer answer, because if the 1 in the question were replaced with a variable, common sense states you would distribute the 2 outside the parentheses and then solve for x.

It's 1. Order of Operations you fucking braindead troglodytes.

>>727905980
but he didn't

actually look at the image
right above the 9 and tell me that's the correct equation

>>727905824
Is...is this a real person?
Can someone explain why moms are letting their autistic 10 year old on /b/?

File: 2014-08-09 010.jpg (20KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x168px

this shows how stupid some /b/ users are...

6/2(1+2)
6 / (2*1 + 2*2)
6 / (2 + 4)
6 / 6
1

>>727906212
How else would you write it? It's 9, by the way.

>>727906116
This guy gets it
6-2=4
6+1=7
So the answer is 47

>>727905493
PEMDAS
(Parentheses,Exponent,Multiplication,Division,Addition,Subtraction)
BODMAS
(Brackets,Order,Division,Multiplication,Addition,Subtraction)

>>727906078
LEARN ORDER OF OPERATIONS
NIGGER

>>727906212
The form should be

6 6
---------- or ---- (1+2)
2(1+2) 2

6÷2×(1+2)
= 6÷2×3
both division and multiplication have the same priority so you follow the order
if the operations were both multiplication you could've used a×b×c = a×c×b
but since it's not the case
= 3×3
= 9

>>727903212
we can see it as 6/2*(1+2)
6/2*(3)
3*(3)
9

you massive faggot

>>727903551
nope

>>727904108
Multiplication without multiplication sign is higher priority than division or multiplication with the sign.

>>727906519
NOO YOU'RE RETARDED AAA

YOU MULTIPLY EVERYTHING IN THE BRACKETS BY 2

>>727906311
It's the same equation, just grouped differently. The equation is six divided by two and then that times one plus two. Division and multiplication is from left to right with neither taking priority.

6 / 2 = 3
3 x (1 + 2)
3 x 3
6

>>727906269
Did you know that you actually don't know how the order of operations work?

>>727906338
4chan fucked my comment up but:

6/2(1+2) the way ops question is written it is easy to mistake as 6/(2(1+2)). In everyones defense, no school worth anything uses the divider sign op used at all past middle school. Ops question is stupid and designed to trick people for no good reason.

>>727903212
No we don't, not everything. Everyone is 100% in agreement that OP is a fag.

>>727906721
3x3 is 9

>>727906721
you are just a treat aren't you? a con man with downs syndrome could trick you.

>>727906792
Oh I forgot that the picture used the ÷ symbol. Yeah, I gotcha.

>>727903212
Those aren't numbers, are you tryin to trick me?

>>727906491
Da order is right bro, you wrong
9
9/3=3
2x3=6
3-2=1
6/2(2+3)=Nine you dumb spic

6/2(1+2)
6/2 * (1+2)
3 * 3 = 9

>>727903212
Btw it's 9

>>727907085
/thread

File: 1488576036345.jpg (29KB, 153x317px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 153x317px

no bullying plz

File: 1945.jpg (20KB, 438x351px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 438x351px

i'm not going to argue about anything. You guys should stop too. There's only one good thing in our lives. And it's a duct tape.

It's 9, Jesus Christ.

File: 1489461798887.gif (916KB, 400x361px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 400x361px

It is 1 becouse u have to do the operations inside the parenthesis first, then
(1+2)=3
And when it is next to a number,in this case the 2, u have to multiply it, then
6%(2×3)=1

>>727907171
Fuck you.

>>727906625
exactly
it's a different fucking equation
making your point completely irrelevant because you're retarded and still in year 7

the equation is 6 ÷ 2 (1 +2)
you multiply everything in the brackets by 2
6 ÷ (2+4)
then you simplify the brackets
6 ÷ 6 = 1

>>727906322
Wha you say about me mum? I'll knock your fucking head in m8

>>727903212
2+1=3
3*2=6
6/6=1
The answer is 1 and anyone who said anything else should stfu and kill themselves

If it was 6÷2×3 then it would be 9. Because there is no × you do the division first....

>>727907487

6÷2(1+2)=
PEMDAS
1+2=3
6÷2(3)
2×3=6
6÷6=1
The answer is 1.

>>727907488
1 i meant*

File: 1490209769868.gif (68KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x293px

>>727904134
Most popular search engine on earth with integrated calculator put together by mathematicians and the top computer scientiests of this world
Vs
You, a random anon withba disregard for simple fucking rules fam

>>727907557
What the fuck are you on, man?

>>727903212
Is this loli or just a young girl?
http://www.swingeer.com

>>727907469
You don't distribute when there aren't variables. You're actually retarded. You just do the parentheses. That's why the P in PEMDAS is for PARENTHESES. Then after the parentheses, you're left with 6/2*3. MD is multiplication and division from left to right.

>>727907357
You dumb fuck.
6%2*(1+2)=?
>solve the operation in parentheses
6%2*3
>Division or Multiplication, from left to right. same way you read, I guess it's assuming a bit much to say you do.
i.e.
(6%2)*3
3*3
>and now your answer is 9

>>727907487
P
E
MD (Equal value - order of operation is from left to right)
AS (Equal value - order of operation is from left to right)

6÷2(1+2)
6÷2(3)
Apply rule of MD left to right
3(3)
9

>>727903212

Ya'll are stupid.

You can represent this with an expression graphically with 6/2(1+2) like any proper math fucker. Now, you motherfucking simplify terms. For the bottom term 2(1+2), you can either multiply both numbers in parentheses by 2 or add them and then multiply by two, you still end up with the same number of 6.

That leaves you with 6/6, with is simplified as 1.

If you did it some other way you are a negroid or a troll or simply uncouth swill.

none of you should visit shanachan.org

especially not now.
it's dangerous.
continue simplifying this expression.

>>727907557
You know what those letters stand for nigger?
Unless that 2(3) operation has its own brackets or is magically a fucking exponent then it is a multiplication, on equal parity with the division (see: they're equivalent numbnuts). From left to right you divide first giving 9.

>>727907487
You're supposed to multiply and divide from left to right, not multiply first. There's no preference. So, when left with 6/2*3, you do 6/2=3 first because you go from left to right. Then you do 3*3.

>>727908042
The order of operation doesnt matter
You count the () first second multiplication and third division

>>727903212
I fucking disagree

>>727908421
There's no preference of either multiplication or division. You do whatever comes first from left to right.

>>727903551
god dammit

>>727908327
>>727908421 This is the preference

>>727903551
סתום

>>727908534
if you still think that then you have hardly even studied math

>>727907679
>implying mathematicians and the top computer scientists are always right

>>727908327

But you are forgetting that the divide symbol in proper math is expressed as a fraction, which separates 6 as the top portion and 2(1+2) as the bottom.

>>727907990
don't know what pemdas actually means because i learnt BODMAS
but you're still wrong because you're not multiplying the fucking brackets by 2. YOU HAVE TO EXPAND THE BRACKETS

2(1+2)
= 2+4
=6

>>727903212
9

>>727908844
Fucking hell.....THATS THE SAME. DAMN. THING.

GUYS GUYS GUYS

Implied multiplication has higher precedence than division. Thus 2(1+2) is calculated before 6/2, and the answer is 1. But I do agree, equations should always be written so that they cannot be misinterpreted, thus using a fraction bar or adding another pair of parentheses would be better here. It could be written as a fraction with 6 as the numerator and 2(1+2) as the denominator, or it could be written 6/(2(1+2)). If the result 9 was the one looked for, it should be written (6/2)(1+2).

>>727908894
9? More like 8

File: Screenshot_20170403-171009.jpg (102KB, 978x344px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 978x344px

>>727908710
>>727908548
Fucking retards

>>727908966
then how are you getting it wrong
it equals 1
not 9

>>727908844
Expand the fucking brackets? The fuck? You just simplify the expression inside the parentheses first before anything else. You don't multiply before parentheses. That's what you're doing. BODMAS is brackets first, or parentheses. They're essentially the same.

>>727909362
What's BODMAST? Some shorthand for order of operations?

>>727909362
There's no multiplication sign between the 2 and the parentheses. This is called implied multiplication, and it has higher precedence than division, thus it is calculated first.

>>727908844
6/2(1+2)
=3(1+2)
=3+6
=9
Problem?

>>727909539
refer to
>>727906445

>>727903551
nej

>>727909539
PEMDAS or BODMAS. They're basically the same thing.

>>727909362
that's still 2(3)

6÷2(3)
consider 2(3) as 1 number which needs to be simplified
6÷6 = 1

PEMDAS
Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication/Division, Addition/Subtraction; M/D and A/S means whichever comes first in the equation, not Addition THEN Subtraction, it's Addition OR Subtraction
So now that we have that established.
6/2*(1+2) [Multiplication is implied because no sign is present between 2 and the parenthesis]
6/2*(3)
3*(3)
9
easy

>>727903551
nig

>>727909612
yea it's wrong?
answer is still 1

>>727909697
What's remedial math class like?

The answer is either 1 or 9, dependent upon if you treated the division symbol as a fraction with the terms 6 and 2(1+2) or if you treated it as 6/2 and (1+2).

I would opt that the former is correct but dependent upon the rules you are recognizing you can argue for either. It can be 1, OR it can be 9, and a compelling argument can be made for either.

End.

>>727903551
Fuck

>>727903212
6/2(1+2)
6/2+4
3+4
7
niggers

>>727909766
I "expanded the brackets" -still dumb by the way
And it still isn't 1

>>727909697
>[Multiplication is implied because no sign is present between 2 and the parenthesis]

You stated this yourself but didn't take it into account in your operations? Implied multiplication has higher precedence than multiplication or division. 2(1+2) is basically considered to be one number that is divided by 6, producing the solution 1.

>>727909686
2(3) is the same as 2*3. Just a different way of writing it.

>>727909865
this

>>727910024
"Implied" multiplication doesn't exist. 2(3) is just a different way of writing 2*3.

>>727903212
0+0=1
0+0=something
0+0=H1
0+0=o1
SOLVE IT BITCH HOW DOES NOTHING BECOME SOMETHING DEAL WITH THE FACT YOU CANT BITCH NIGGERS
U MAD BRO?

File: 1491254085891-01.jpg (111KB, 780x799px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 780x799px

>>727903212

>>727910485

An actually valid example is that 0! = 1

Here's a good read: https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html

According to this, the problem is ambiguous, like I stated here >>727908980.

If one needs to choose an answer here, I'd go for the 1 based on the precedency of implicit multiplication, but really it should just be rewritten so that it is not ambiguous, aka 6/(2(1+2)) or (6/3)(1+2).

>>727910697
yes but 1 what :3

>>727910773

Bag of dicks

File: Screenshot_20170403-172833.png (209KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1080x1920px

Check it, fags.

>>727903251
agreed

>>727910829
a bag of dicks is both made of a bag and dicks dicks come from people bags are made by people a sub theoretical particle makes up all of that you clearly have not done your sci good day sir I SAID GOOD DAY

>>727903212

ITT: i have no idea what terms are

>>727910963
Same

>>727910881
even worse than google.

you can't just rewrite the equation. the way it's written in the question the answer is one.

>>727911290
Six divided by two is six halves, if you didn't know.

>>727910829
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0... ECT = nothing

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 = nothing a correct combitionatl of sub theoretical particle have to aline to sub particles

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
you have now made a sub partical that is still therical its both their and isnt their once it comes into exsistece it has its own gravitial field and more sub therical particals pull to eachother
2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 until matter is formed that is how sub particles form i would give a time frame but time is made up and only explains the decay rate and the sun light we live by some crazy shit man

best explaion i can offer

>>727911290
6 / 2 * (1+2)
= 6 / 2 * 3
= 3 * 3
= 9

Deal with it. It's actually right, but I didn't believe it as well

File: faggot.png (14KB, 678x352px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 678x352px

>>727911290

>>727911569
yes i agree but the field of pull would be so small i imaine the decay rate would be so fast it would be less then a second only by chance that anything is here but at the same time it would happen no matter what it seems matter is something that would happen no matter what.

>>727903212
AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS AMBIGUOUS

>>727911569
Why are there quantum mechanics in my good Christian math thread?!

>>727911917
yo dawg i heard you like matter so i put some matter in your matter so when you matter you matter

Order of Operations you absolute cockmongling retards.
6/2(1+2)=?
6/2(3)=?
6/6=?
1=?

jesus christ you make me want to shoot myself in the balls so i never have kids this piss-brained stupid.

>>727906594
Do you get off on just memeing people like that

>>727912022
>>727908999

>>727903551
Fagget

>>727912022
Both is correct

>>727912148
Yes/No

>>727911974
I don't know i only have a GED i just think about this stuff is all.

>>727903894
2+1= 4
???
Do you even count?

File: count.jpg (602KB, 2316x1758px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 2316x1758px

>>727912414
You called?

>>727903551
The Answer will be That you are a faggot and your whole family should be dead

File: Screenshot_2017-04-03-17-47-48.png (226KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 800x1280px

Seriously /b/ fags can't answer this?
Look

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%2F2(1%2B2)

>>727903551
they use the raft to cross the river

>>727913078
6/2(2+1)=
6/(2•2+1•2)=
6/(4+2)=
6/(6)=
1

>>727913078
the answer is 7

>>727903551
So the non-existent boys go down the non-existent river to get to the ocean or lake. C:

>>727905415
Breddy gud troll

>>727913844
oh, snap

>>727903551
dickhead

>>727913941
What if you put?
6/(2(1+2))
In the other way you are taking it literally

>>727909941
this is correct 100% you get a gold star for effort

>>727914235
6/2(1+2) != 6/(2(1+2))

File: IMAG3946.jpg (65KB, 304x538px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 304x538px

>>727914235

>>727914235
there is no such thing as not taking math literally...
you take the equation as it is or you are doing it wrong.

>>727914446
These Casio calculators set a higher precedence for multiplication without the multiplication sign, aka implied multiplication. Which is also how I think it should be.

>>727914446
your calculator is old and bad, get a newer one and you will get 9 because newer calculators arent stupid

>>727903212
Fuck

>>727914795

i now have no need for calcs, i design factories. but yeah, that calc is maybe 6 years old

>>727914338
kek

>>727903212
No we won't you crusty lip corner

>>727914795
Let's call things by their proper names here. They way the operations are carried out has been programmed into the calculators, by humans. The issue at hand is not new, there have been conflicting views as long as the nomenclature in maths has been the way it is now, so you can't really use the age of the calculator as an argument.

File: 2017-04-02_02-07-18.png (55KB, 670x441px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 670x441px

>>727903212

>>727914781
There is literally no reason to change the order of an operation based on the fact if there's a multiplication sign or not.

>>727903212
Rolling

>>727915719
Look, it ended in a 9. The answer is obvious.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%2F(2(1%2B2))

>>727903212
The correct answer is 9. Proof: https://youtu.be/URcUvFIUIhQ

>>727916220
You used a video which states 1 as being the correct answer as your proof?

>>727903212
if you want to argue do a question without a definitive answer
>>727904048
>>727905122
im actually amazed that google delivers on this one as most algorithms are working on a heap and cant solve that equation

>>727916339
>actually answer is at 1:58
the number at the end of the video is historically how it would have worked using the 1917 order of operations.

>>727903212
6/2(1+2)
(1/2)*6(1+2)
(6+12)/2
(1/2)*18
18/2
9

easy

9
PEMDAS
GEMDAS

>>727913709
6/2(2+1)=
3(2+1)=
(3*2)+(3*1)=
9

File: 1473785185020.png (10KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 224x225px

>>727908727

82

>>727903212
Hmm this formula must be related to the inner workings of the time leap machine

>>727903212

Okay I have a PhD in mathematecs, let me try:

6/2(1+2)
3(1+2)
3+6
9

And there you have it, the answer is 9!

PEMDAS you dumbfucks

6/2(1+2)
6/(2+4)
3+1.5
4.5

/thread

Distribute.
6 / 2 (1 + 2)
6 / (2 * 1 = 2) + (2 * 2 = 4)
6 / 2 + 4
3 + 4
7

>>727920197

how did you even get to this

>>727920197
Lol how the fuck did u ended up with a fraction i hope u don't use math in ur job and are not in charge of more than a dame out house

6 / 2(1 + 2)=?
1 / 2(1 + 2)=6
(1 / 2)(1 + 2)=6
(1 + 4 / 4)=6
(1 + 1)=6
2=6

read it and weep boys

>>727920882
even if you made the wrongg decision to multiply the numbers inside the parenthesis THE 2+4 IS STILL IN BRACKETS and the answer would be 1. At least get your wrong answer right

File: huh.gif (879KB, 245x230px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 245x230px

>>727921415

Fuck any calculater on the planet will give u the answer 9 wether it be on ur comp a handheld one the one on Google ur even ur phone the answer is 9 ask fucking Google or use the one on the phone in front of u

>>727903551
fuck off erik

>>727920197
>>727920882
>>727921415

I cannot tell if you are joking or comletely retarded.

>>727903212
It's 9 you faggots
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
18/2
9

>>727903551
Lol I've been ignoring these lately, and nothing has happened to my mother.

It's. Fucking. 9.

File: IMG_20170403_1925426_rewind_kindlephoto-9398277.jpg (1MB, 3120x2749px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3120x2749px

>>727921877
>any caculator
Autism speaks and so do you.

>>727903551
gaiodsvnods