Are you the 10%?
nigger
1x + 12
12 /thread
It's 0 because it's multiplied by 0 at the end. No more trolls please.
bedmas
12
2
missing plus signs
first two lines arent connected to the bottom line
it's 1
>>726693359
it's zero, the zero negates everything before and after.
>>726693359
This is a poorly written question
>>726693576
/thread
>>726693359
1
Nigger
>>726693562
one times zero is still zero sperglord.
20
l2math, gaylords
>>726693359
> 10.8
Fail answer is 12
90% of fail answer is 10.8
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5
1 + (1x0) + 1 = 3
5 + 5 + 3 = 14
37
30
>>726693359
1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1
1+1x 0+1=1
>>726693779
13*
Its 1 .The stupid american fags cant solve it because their IQ is low.
>>726693576
Correct
All niggers above cannot into algebra
>>726693424 it is
Just solved it with my scientific calculator and the answer it came up with is fucking 9765.34 which is 100% correct and verifiable.
>>726693779
Seems legit
>>726693359
FAILED MATH PROBLEM,
FAILED OP
no failed answer :)
>>726693779
>>726693779
Oh my lord.
that a good trolling
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1*0)+1=?
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 12
>>726693359
-1/12
>>726693818
Truly the best answer.
>>726693914
this
>>726693990
And you still take your time to answer it seriously. It's because people like you exist that trolls exist.
>>726693359
its only the bottom line . 1+1*0+1= 2
the answer is 2
>>726693359
12+x
also the dumbass who made this forgot a sign between '1x' and '0'. technically this problem would be DNE in mathematics
yall wrong, its 30
two
1 + 1 + 1 + 1
1 + 1 + 1 + 1
1 + 1 x 0 + 1
3 + 3 + 2 + 3 = 3 + 3 + 2 + 3 = 11
If there is a majority of + then it's + not x (the majority of symbols ALWAYS win). In this example there were 2 "+" against 1 "x", there "+" win.
13
>>726693779
My eyes hurt, ggwp
>>726693359
10
Order of operations, faggots.
>>726693359
for me that is 1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1x0+1=
which is 30
>>726693359
111111111111x01
ez gg
12
>>726693359
1+1+1+1+1 = 5
1+1+1+1+1 = 5
1+1x = 1+x
0+1 = 1
Rewritten
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 x 0 + 1
OoO
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + (1 x 0) + 1
= 30
ez gg
> Was your answer 12 ? Its not correct though.
> Actually there is a slight catch, if you see the image properly
> It is
> 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 x 0 + 1
> i.e. 4 + 11 + 3 + 11 + 0 + 1 = 30
https://puzzlersworld.com/number-puzzles/1-1-1-1-1-90-fail/
>>726693489
it's 1
>>726693359
1 x 0 = 0
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 = 30
itt: autists who can't differentiate the letter x from the multiplication sign ×
hint: there's no multiplication in this problem
x + 12
>>726695547
>1x
>no multiplication
go back to algebra, faggot
>>726693424
>>726693428
>>726693489
>>726693562
>>726693576
>>726693597
>>726693614
>>726693616
>>726693676
>>726693690
>>726693695
>>726693721
>>726693779
>>726693794
>>726693818
>>726693820
>>726693888
>>726693899
>>726693907
>>726693914
>>726693920
>>726693990
>>726694051
>>726694288
>>726694431
>>726694569
>>726694584
>>726694616
>>726694628
>>726694647
>>726694729
>>726694930 (You)
>>726694991
>>726695382
>>726695385
>>726695547
itt: you're a faggot
hint: you're wrong
>>726695622
>>726695664
>>726695683
>>726695712
Found the dyslogician
>>726695789
>> >>726694930 (You)
lmao fuck I'm gay
>>726693359
30
>>726695857
Holy fuck, I can't believe nobody else got it!
/b/ is dead.
>>726693359
2
2 first rows arent part of equalation
>>726693359
you always do addition and subtractions first so it's 12
>>726693489 0+1=1
12x1=12
ITT some faggot deliberately writes a maths problem wrong because it's the only way he can beat anyone at something.
He still loses.
>>726693888
You are Wrong, internet.
It's 13
>>726693359
>4
>4
>2
>>726693359
Would the answer not be:
5
5
1x+2
???
>Poorly written arithmetic sir.
12
1x0 first which is 0 so you get rid of the "1x0" numbers from the rest of the equation... and then add up all of the 1's at that point.
if you said 13 you are mistakenly adding up the "1x0" 1 again, but we already dealt with that earlier.
if you said "0" because you saw a x0 in there, you are negating the additional 1s added later.
simple stuff folks, PEMDAS, do them in that order and don't be an idiot.
there are no + signs after the first row and scond row...
5
5
2
in theory if you add it up, 12.
>>726693359
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1x*0+1
there's two 11's that are split up in the first two lines so simplified with order of operations:
4+11+3+11+0+1
thus:
30
/thread
19191919191969qbb9 2701 2306 5.
>>726693359
2
>>726696038
Parenthesis
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition/Subtraction
if by first you mean last, you're absolutely right.
>>726696115
>faggot deliberately writes a maths problem wrong
good summary
>>726693359
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1x0+1
4+11+3+11+0+1
30
>>726693990
Actually it's -12. All numbers sumb to -12.
>>726693359
5
5
2
It's 3 different problems.
>>726697048
But a bitch aint one.
>>726696624
Multiplication/division
>>726693359
anything times zero is zero the first part (12x0) is 0 so the real question is 0+1=x so x=1
>>726693424
That is clever, but it isn't solved, merely simplified. To solve, you would need to solve for x, which you haven't.
You dumb motherfuckers
end of line, no +
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+(1x0)+1 = 30
Fucking can't wait to check out
>>726693428
12/thread is undefined
>>726693489
Kek
>>726693359
50.
>>726693359
Do this is what STEMlords do for fun...
I think I'll stick to saving the world, please.
>Or should I say, you're welcome
>>726693779
>1 + (1x0) + 1 = 3
>>726693359
The answer is 30. (Betwen a couple of "1" there isn't any "+") Is it correct? :/
nx0 is zero plus 1 =1
>>726694051
Haha
>>726695334
Wee, I did it. xD
21
>>726693359
it's only funny if you're 12
oh wait
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1=30
ez
>hue hue it's actually 11 ecks dee
Write like that in any professional setting and you're going to look like a grade A dipshit. I suppose it's fitting of /b/, though.
>>726701497
You've written it wrong. Do you not see the missing addition signs? It's also written like a multiplication problem. How could you call be so retarded?
The answer is 50. The only answer is 50!
>>726693803
This
>>726702246
and where are you takiing those parentheses from ?