Ask a physics major anything.

2+2=5

What are your thoughts on how cold welding works?

File: ^5FEB607331CC513AF7DE06D134B81248A91C769503E0D94F7C^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.png (149KB, 394x261px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 394x261px

Which came first, the chicken, or the egg?

Side Question; How many genders are there?

Just majoring in it? Not a graduate? I graduated last May with my bachelors. Working as a manufacturing engineer.

Should I kill myself?

>>726160709
Not him but....

1) Egg

2) 1 gender

File: 1487265898082.jpg (90KB, 710x823px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 710x823px

>>726159748
How does it feel to spend time, energy, and money into getting a degree with which you will make a fraction of the money of one with equivalent difficulty to achieve?

>>726159748
How many cocks can one man suck?

why is psychics lab so boring and gay?

And yes i meant psychics not physics

>>726159748
why is it so fucking hard to get laid all the time?

I'm a physics General.
ama.

Will we have casinos on the moon?

why is gravity 9.8 and not 1?

>>726159748
whos going to win the super bowl next year?

File: rolls.jpg (145KB, 851x767px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 851x767px

>>726159748
EXPLAIN THIS SHIT TO ME, DAFUQ IS WITH THE SHADOW

>>726159748
How likely is it to have a partial Dyson's Sphere around our Sun? Can it be transferred vis Microwaves?

>>726161802
yo wtf

>>726160941
yes you should

>>726162035
I have been looking at this picture for so long, help...

Could we have really gone to the moon in 1969?

do you plan to make a death star to eradicate all of humanity so noone can stop you from claiming all of mars for yourself

>>726161802
>>726162035
>>726162156
They're fluorescent lights you goddamned idiots

>>726161802
>>726162035
>>726162156
It means you need to get dubs or trips on /b/.

>>726162332
Ha!

>>726162332
I see... now explain like i'm a child

>>726161802
The letters aren't over a solid background.

>>726162590
Have you ever seen the shadow from something lit by a fluorescent light?
Timmy

Hey im a first year physics major

File: 1487327435235.jpg (76KB, 441x401px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 441x401px

>>726162897
You'll be gone soon enough

>>726162897
after the first year how far can you see into the future?

File: brick.jpg (9KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 259x194px

>>726162590
::Florescent Lights::

File: enhanced-buzz-16022-1371047559-13.jpg (215KB, 625x819px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 625x819px

>>726162794

is Interstellar your favorite movie?

2001?

File: 1.jpg (23KB, 606x404px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 606x404px

>>726162332
>>726162794
>>726163011
the letters AKED are missing, how does fluorescent lights explain this?

How does it feel knowing your field has been largely irreverent since Einstein?

>>726163290
I was calling them a tard, tard.

>>726163415
Irreverent?

>>726159748
why is Australia referred to as "upside down Alabama"?

>>726163415
How does it feel to know only a fraction how the universe works because that which we don't know is so foreign as to be the laws of another universe? Feels good man.

File: ec 002.jpg (107KB, 1211x959px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1211x959px

>>726163511
k, thanks tard

File: 1486962962242.jpg (2KB, 125x121px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x121px

>>726163604
Well that's because it's not

>>726163694
That statement doesn't make any sense :^)

>>726163415
Just out of curiosity, are you referring to quantum physics in particular or all fields of science?

>>726163694
And in one of those universes ur mum is slobbin my cock. And by one of them I mean this one.

File: Uncle_Ruckus.png (104KB, 231x413px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 231x413px

>>726163699
Pic: No Relation.

>>726163890
He doesn't know anything, ignore him

What is the proper way to measure one's cock?

>>726163415

Einstein predates quantum mechanics, so if you want to give up transistors, say, be my guest.

>>726163830
The comment I was referencing was claiming that physics is irreverent in fields of little understanding. I was stating that we know very little about how these things actually work.

>>726163910
>And in one of those universes ur mum is slobbin my cock. And by one of them I mean this one.
>only 1 universe

>>726163910
Wasn't referring to actual alternate universes, thanks tho.

>>726164245
I think you meant irrelevant Joey
And I was referring to you talking about the multiverse theory saying that we will never understand the physics of our universe because we can't access any of the other branes. That
does not make sense

>>726161802
ONE SIMPLE WORD:

diffraction

How divide by zer0?

>>726164365
What's the probability amplitude of OP being a faggot?

>>726164589
Can we make this a troll science thread now?

>>726164709
1

File: tw0hhhh.jpg (14KB, 405x280px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 405x280px

what do you think of Time Wave Zero?

File: 1461589144-20160425.png (769KB, 684x2462px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 684x2462px

>>726159748
What are the best set of questions? What are the best set of answers? Why are they the same or different? What did you use as referance for either set?

>>726159748
Could you tell me why the best antenna has 1/4 of the length of the wave it transmits?

How long would it take to get to the asteroid belt going at 1/3 the speed of light?

File: ziggy.jpg (7KB, 250x190px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x190px

>>726164709
Ziggy says 99% chance OP is a Fag.

>>726164619
>>726163415
>How does it feel knowing your field has been largely irreverent since Einstein?
>knowing your field has been largely irreverent
>largely irreverent
>irreverent
bruh
I was stating that quantum mechanics is so foreign to the human perception of reality that we will likely never be able to fully comprehend it. That which we do not yet know about the laws at work in the quantum scale is likely to be as weird and incomprehensible as that which we already know and do not understand. I was comparing the laws that govern the quantum scale to that of an entirely different universe where physics is fundamentally different in every way.

tl;dr I was saying quantum mechanics is confusing.

Good. I'm major too. I want to know if there is any workshop or school in astronomy that is financial helped

File: 1b9.jpg (43KB, 640x539px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x539px

>>726165230
Nice save ;)

>>726164709
Well if we look at the Schrödinger equation and take the potential walls to be infinite you will see that the probability amplitude is indeed one.
That was shit and it means thing.

>>726165656
nothing*

>>726165794
**posted by newfag

>>726159748
from the photons point of view how long does it take it to get from sun to earth?

>>726165448
Feel free to give a lecture on your in-depth understanding of quantum mechanics.

>>726161774
>>726162992
answer plox

>>726162794
Background isn't liquid you nigger

File: 1487634621641.jpg (230KB, 1394x1255px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1394x1255px

>>726165891
I don't think anyone has an "in-depth understanding" of quantum mechanics
You faggot

>>726165871
8 minutes

>>726159748
How does it feel that your major is a dead field since all questions about the universe are answered in the bible?

why does it hurt when I urinate?

>>726160993
Literally nobody goes into physics for money.

Its entitely motivated by a deep sense of curiousity and awe towards the universe and reality.

> not OP but also majoring in physics

>>726166161
wrong. thats how must time passes on our watches, im asking about the photons watch.

>>726165871
lesser than it takes for the light to come from the sun to earth

>>726161153
Because you're a freshman. Optics labs are dope.

>>726166080
Follow the chain and see that you have exactly stated my premise.

>>726159748
Coca or pepsi?

>>726166272
cop-out. not accepted. exact answer is obvious is you understand relativity.

hint: light travels at "c" so there can only b one answer.

File: article229626918CD7756000005DC705_634x395.jpg (56KB, 634x395px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 634x395px

>>726161020
How many cocks could a gay cuck suck if a gay cuck could suck cocks?

How do i convert microwave time to regular time

>>726166250
Are they different because the photon is traveling at relativistic speeds so time would dilate for it?
Otherwise I don't see why the times would be different

>>726159748
are you a physics major

>>726159748
Why are liberals so bloody idiotic?

>>726166222

That said, if you do geophysics models for your PhD work in physics you can make 100k as a postdoc then millions when hired into the oil industry.

But yes, I do it for the love of the game and make shit.

>>726166250
according to the lorentz transformation it takes no time at all. Kind of doubt this is the case though.

File: here.png (97KB, 388x390px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 388x390px

how do you prove existence?

>>726165871
In an instant. No time

>>726166459
yes that is right. i wouldn't say a photons time is dialated but yeah thats the right idea.

>>726166331
No you said we will never fully understand quantum mechanics. I said no one now fully understands quantum mechanics
Fuck me, this board

>>726159748
i wanna do a physics soon too but at times i feel i am missing a few IQ to do the job right. What do you feel is the minimum IQ required to graduate with physics Bach focusing primarily on Quantum Mechanics?

>>726164220
Einstein was actually about the same time. His paper on the photoelectric effect was one of many to prompt the beginning of quantum mechanics.

>>726166533
yes this is the correct answer.
photons do not age/experience time.
nothing which travels "c" does.

good job

>>726166609
160+

>>726166609
Yes

>>726160012
roll

>>726166459

Uhh a photon travels at the speed of light always, by definition, as it is a massless particle and it is, umm, light.

So from the photon's perspective, whatever that may mean epistemologically, time stands perfectly still and travel "feels" instantaneous.

>>726166576
correct also. GJ.

id ask more trick questions but im trying to masturbate cya guys.

>>726166714
130 on a good day...

>>726166433
Is anyone gonna answer my God damn question?

>>726166592
Well when antimatter is created in a particle accelerator when a proton is moving say .95c, it experiences time dilation so it's observable before it decays immediately so I don't see why a particle moving at c (a photon) wouldn't experience time dilation.
Well I guess since the photon is massless
Hmm you made me think, thank you

>>726166714
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're retarded!

>>726166826
2 because there is always the possibility of an idiot savant. Since /b/ seems primarily concerned with the splitting of hairs I might as well join in on the douche cockery.

>>726166902
kek

>>726166609
feinmann had only an iq of 115

>>726166714
:(

>>726166826
i can do that.
which one of you is the physics(made up bullshit) fag?

File: TN2slZ6GfnahomwmTfv7bQ_r.jpg (116KB, 700x577px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 700x577px

>>726159748

>>726160012
fpbp

>>726166533
I would say that the photon doesn't experience time, not that that time is zero. It's in a state of constant limbo, like a person observing something falling into a black hole

>>726166674

1905 einstein photoelectric effect & brownian motion

1917 general relativity

1926 Schrodinger equation

1940's-50's QED

Serious progress in QM started after Einstein made his major contributions. Yes, there was overlap, and E did contribute to quantum theory. But most of the work was done later.

>>726167004
Normal America @90-110?

>>726167104
*wouldn't

>>726166680
lol wtf
if it was in the photon's pov then it was stationary

>>726167004
yes but he was smart

Why is E&M so fucking hard?

>>726160520
not op.
basically when you mush up molecular structures that usually form crystals close enough together there is no real "end" of one and "beginning" of the other, so they merge into one crystal

>>726167125
115 is pretty low

>>726166939
particles without mass are outside of time. they are emmited from source and absorbed by destination at the same moment.

ok ill stick around - here is triva question:
is it possible to cross an event horizon alive and in tact? (assuming your human and not every horizon, A horizon).

>>726166609
Hhaha

>>726167104
I was giving an answer according to an equation. The interpretation you're using does work within the mathematic framework of the answer I got from the Lorentz transformation. If a photon experiences no time pass when traveling up to an infinite distance then it could be surmised that the photon experiences no time at all.

>>726167149
eh, but stationary has no meaning to something like a photon we are forced to speak in analogies so forgive me :)

>>726159748

Anyone in your classes snap under pressure of STEM and break down publicly? How spectacular was it?

>>726167382
Yes if it's a supermassive rotating black hole. The gravity field is such that you wouldn't be torn apart atom by atom "sphagettified"
Theoretically

>>726166779
Photons have mass you cuck. They do not have a rest mass.

>>726159748
What is love?

>>726164967
not op.
resonance

>>726167004
no FUCK YOUR GAY SHIT

a simple googling reveals that he had an IQ of 125, but that this was lop-sided from low verbal abilities. The guy was a math autist. He toyed with math's asshole. Fuck everything I ever believed in fuck Physics im so over that gay shit it's for bitches man physics can suck my dick i'll just major in something any idiot can do like computer science or something.

>>726167498
in that case the photon is the observer, that's not an analogy.
the photon will "see" the sun traveling backwards and the earth coming closer, both at the speed of light.

>>726166604
>I said no one now fully understands quantum mechanics

Well that's idiotic. Classical QM is a complete theory, as is QED which incorporates special relativity. There are still new insights that very occasionally get made, as there are even in classical mechanics, but those who know and work with these theories regularly and who are also in touch with the experimental and teaching side are definitely in the "fully-understanding" business.

General relativity, color, and chaos are among the areas that still are incomplete in QM, but if you're holding that as a standard then we will never fully understand classical mechanics or basic addition either.

>>726167593
Effective mass isn't "real" mass. It has a mass if you calculate based on the fact that it has a momentum, but its not as if you actually measure it because in a "real" sense it has no mass, only momentum.

Has anyone ever wondered why the speed of light is the number that it is? And I none of that string theory BS.
I'm not a physicist but could it be thought of as the photon has no mass at rest and then as it accelerates towards the "speed of light" it gains mass and reaches that unpassable barrier that is the speed limit of the universe?

>>726167752
then it forms a stationary wave. whats so special about stationary waves that make the propagation of signal better in the antenna?

>>726167363
70 is tard, I think.

>>726167833
>Classical QM is a complete theory, as is QED which incorporates special relativity

are you fucking retarded?

>>726167562
ok didnt think it would be so easy. but rotation is not necessary, although maybe you could not find a black hole without rotation.

ok here is another one: why is iron magnetic.
hard mode: don't copy paste

>>726167593
mass via inertia is not the same thing as mass. does a photon attract another photon? no? but you vsaid it had mass? why? no gravity then? because its different. you are just bending terms when you say photons have mass.

>>726167805
Then it will "see" nothing behind it because it will outrun the light coming from whichever direction it came from.

>>726167833
kek this guy

>>726167805
no the photon doesn't see movement, no time passes between its departure from the sun and its arrival at earth.

File: f12b1b1871f137504b71b8768d6b90ee5ca5240a01b62f4f5d4867855d8ce2c6.jpg (26KB, 529x251px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 529x251px

>>726167833

>>726167847
>but its not as if you actually measure it because in a "real" sense it has no mass, only momentum.
did you know that momentum equals mass times velocity?

>>726167938
It's a wave stability thing I think. Most likely having to do with some multiple of its quantum wavelength if I had to take a stab in the dark.

>>726167921
The computer that the universe is on only has a certain number of bits.

>>726159748 is it even remotely possible to travel through time given the right kind of technology?

File: INTBELAVe.png (143KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x1000px

>>726167833
>:(

>>726167921
the speed of light at vacumm is not a limit ffs. its just a constant

>>726168250
Not in a linear fashion that most people imagine
*See: wormholes

>>726168211
Did you know that light is fucking strange? No one said it made sense, I've just told you what I know.

>>726168250
Would take an awesome amount of power.

>>726168217
thanks ill look closer into this question ive already for a couple of years

>>726168339
Nothing goes faster than it.
That's why it's called the speed limit of the universe
Fuck me

File: 4e4aa902efe98f9fd5132cc2ef8ee3f94f9c7e7f1bd3c8e59a6156830662e664.png (107KB, 790x768px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 790x768px

>>726167833
>>726167833
>General relativity, color, and chaos are among the areas that still are incomplete in QM, but if you're holding that as a standard then we will never fully understand classical mechanics or basic addition either.
you're just playing with semantics here my dood

>>726168339
What makes something a limit?

>>726168211
if photons have mass explain why they don't attract eachother via gravity

>>726167004

Unless he took an actual IQ test administered by a psychologist in a controlled environment in some year after 1975 then any number you throw doesn't mean shit.

Also, a physics education will basically let you cheat-solve many IQ test problems, so your score will be higher than for those it is meant to measure anyway (ie the general population). I can show you how to grid out a lot of the ones posted on /b/.

>>726168507
when most things cannot go faster than it

>>726168460
He was probably referring to particles that have been measured to move faster than light.

>>726168250
It's possible to create a universe identical to one in the past and go in it, besides that you could travel interdimensionally which takes crazy drugs/jesus consciousness/CIA technology, or you could go the long way around and wait for the universe to turn back in on itself temporally, you'd be gone by then but there isn't really a you in the first place.

>>726168179
why and how?

>>726168516
The gravitational force is magnitudes weaker than nuclear forces

>>726168047
:^)

>>726168507
I dunno ask your anus. I think the limit of dicks it can take is somewhere close to 9000

>>726168578
Of which there are none

File: 63307f2b9eaeb4e7d94e2a4f3a4fd58228e17c9873caeb95f34dae02d6a1de20.jpg (34KB, 410x396px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 410x396px

>>726168516
because radiation is stronger than gravitational-magnitism at such microscopic sizes

>>726166826
>130 on a good day...

You cannot take an IQ test more than once in 2 years for it to be valid. Your score doesn't mean shit. Stop masturbating to yourself.

When you have enough of an IQ to know IQ does not mean everything. It is racially biased. One can get two way different scores due to mental illness like Dystonia. .

>>726168460
What are neutrinos?

when can we get pet dinosaurs

>>726159748
Why do niggers nig? I need to know. I don't want to be racist anymore. I just need to to understand nigging.

>>726168516
if photons like you said have no mass then how can they have momentum?
0 mass means 0 momentum

>>726168479
>semantics
Because accuracy of language is not important.

>>726168601
why, idk, god days so?
how? photons have no mass.

>>726168617
maybe give an answer that makes sense?
weak nuclear force only affects massive objects. same with gravity.

What's Planck time?

>>726168702
I haven't kept up with the research but they shot some kind of fermion (I think) through a portion of the earth and measured it as going faster than light even through a medium. I am happy to be corrected if this has been disproven since then.

>>726167833
>Classical QM is a complete theory

No, it's not, and it's not on completely mathematical grounds.

When you have a collapse of the wave function, you need new initial conditions to know the new propagator completely. Those initial conditions are constrained by the spectrum of the operator, to be sure, but the new initial conditions are not contained within the original initial conditions.

You can call this "complete" as a stochastic theory, but now you're in a whole other discussion about whether any stochastic theory can ever be considered complete.

>>726168810
A particle that doesn't travel faster than a photon

>>726168720
> gravitational-magnetism
nigger what?

>>726168729
They did them yearly in reform school. Do they still use WISC? I am more than a number.

>>726168460
what are waves that travel faster than light and carry no information?

>>726168863
That's one of the fun things about physics

>>726168928
comes after Miller time, when you're so drunk you fall down and hit your face on the wooden plancks of the bar room floor.

>>726168720
no.
>gravitational-magnitism
eh? gravity. you mean.

size doesn't matter either.

photons only travel in a straight line so no gravity.

>>726168729
are you below 130 or something dude?
what are you even doing in this thread?
I'm 148 (extremely high for a Mexican) but I was just asking around because I assumed that physics fags are smart
At least I admit the superiority of those I want to surround myself with.
Try to learn something from people smarter than you, dude.
You don't have to be butthurt for having a tard IQ (below 130)

>>726168523
then his iq was lower than 115

>>726159748
If blackhole lose mass by effect of Hawking radiation so blackhole disapears after finite time, but any particle or thing for us will reach border for infinite time so IS THAT MEANS:
NOTHING CAN REACH TO BLACK HOLE.
So if we live infinitive life we can see like all things which fall on BH just remain in place after BH death?

>>726168889
Not in the real world, especially not on the internet, so why should science be any different?

>>726169101
Tell that to a black hole faggot

>>726168907
what? weak nuclear force is responsible for the radiation, the decay of matter. strong nuclear force overcomes electromagnetism to hold atoms together. Nigga do you know anything about physics?

>>726168863
they have no momentum they have energy that is potential, ergo people call it momentum so they can talk about that energy in equasions.

>>726168863
Light is very fucking weird. I honestly don't know any other way to put it other than light doesn't have enough energy to have mass. It has a momentum because of the motion I presume, but I have very little understanding as to the why it is able to have no mass but a measurable momentum. And to be more precise, I think its mass is imaginary.

>>726168362 I figured that. realistically, it'll probably be a much more complex process. it's crazy to think that there's alternate universes out there (if this is debunked, don't be a fucking faggot about it, I only listen to SOME of the things I hear from scientists)

File: noneedtobeupset.jpg (5KB, 160x188px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 160x188px

>>726168720
bait

>>726159748
Why the chicken crossed the road?

>>726169247
eh? im correct.

>>726169270
weak nuclear forces do not affect photons. sorry.
photon is the force carrier for EM force, do you know what your talking about?

>>726168930
It was disproven in like 2012 shortly after the anouncement you mongoloid. Use the goddamn internet for more than /b/

>>726169078
so the formula for mementum is wrong?

>>726168516
Explain why your mother doesn't attract everyone around her via gravity from being such a fatass. Hint, it's a trick question. She does.

File: 1484979213177.png (32KB, 665x619px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 665x619px

>>726167833
>General relativity
>Classical QM

autism

>>726169052
There are none. But there's a thing called quantum entanglement which can act much faster than the speed of light, but no information is shared so relativity isn't violated. Does anyone here actually know anything about physics?

>>726169272
oh thanks now it makes sense

>>726159748
what causes a curve ball to break

>>726161802
Yeah but the shadow doesn't say what the sign says, only says "b" not baked. How m8

File: 1487271524434.jpg (14KB, 189x292px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 189x292px

These people or morons. Losing brain cells. I'm out

>>726169272
but why not just use the poyinting vector instead of making up an imaginary momentum?

>>726169600
Strange attracters? ?

File: nbn9h98h.png (357KB, 452x532px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 452x532px

>>726169565
>Hint, it's a trick question. She does
i'll take your bait

it's because she is too small for gravity to start working

things have to be at least 1000 metres^3/sq in. in metric weight for gravity to take effect

>>726169710
Says the faggot that took the time out of their life to save a shitty fallout meme.

>>726169600
I'm not OP but I'm most of my way through my undergrad in Physics. So basically no. No is what I am trying to say.

ok times up on the magnetic iron question.
answer is iron has electron orbital configuration which leaves one orbital always half full, so its election can orient itself with magnetic fields without its partner canceling its orientation. the atom moves in space and its rouge electron produces its own field due to its orientation. this accelerates the iron, ego magnetism.

>>726169778
cause equations still work

>>726169600
you never studied transmission lines, right?

>>726168950
>you're in a whole other discussion about whether any stochastic theory can ever be considered complete.

Not if the theory is by definition stochastic, and when the necessity of some kind of nondeterministic theory is provable in multiple ways by multiple "established" theories.

Unless I'm misunderstanding you when you say you wish to "know the new propagator completely" -- by definition you can only get a probabilistic answer, and by definition that is complete.

>>726169851
If you mean for it to have a measurable force I suppose so. Everything has gravity so in a nitpicky way everyones mother attracts everyone around her.

>>726170032
>>726167833
retarded samefag with a pseudo-intellectual-[take michio kaku lectures seriously] level of understanding in physics

Hey all you neckbeards who've read wiki pages about physics, there's a thread starting hosted by another neckbeard who says he's an astrophysicist, and he started the thread with a pic of Carl Sagan, you better go and set him straight!

>>726169665
well what is the scientific answer?

>>726170368
Has to do with where you put your fingers, you wouldn't understand.

I could be doing actual work right now but instead I'm here arguing with a bunch of undergrads. My life.

>>726170073
>If you mean for it to have a measurable force I suppose so
>I suppose so

did you even read my bait you dumbass nigger?
i pulled the most bullshittest unit of measurement you can possibly come up with.
you're just an armchair physicist you pile of shit

>>726169003

They do them monthly at Church of Scientology, and wouldn't you know it, Scientologists' IQ results consistently go up!

Your school did it wrong. Foremost, it needs to be done in controlled conditions overseen by a psychologist. Outlier scores are not given with precision more than +/-10 -- usually they are capped -- and perhaps the psych will give special tests for measuring those students.

hey guys guys
ive an idea
what if we arent in space and time
but actually we are spacious and temporal entities?

>>726170457
>>726170368

The torque and higher order wind resistances created by the ball.

>>726161802
IT is due to the angle of the lights
There are three primary lights creating the shadow two of which overlap fields.
Notice how the B and the D actually overlap, the entire word "Baked" is actually compressed onto the B

>>726170544
kek

>>726170544
I was more taking you at a conceptual level. I could give a shit about your garbage values. There is a minimum amount of mass necessary to create a measurable force due to gravity you fucking pleb.

File: 1489217540615.jpg (261KB, 830x949px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 830x949px

>>726170605
literally this meme

>>726170776
WROOONG

>>726168450
I seem to remember Feynman Lectures vol. 1 had an explanation of this fact. It's not at all obvious.

File: science!.jpg (36KB, 262x310px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 262x310px

>>726170776
THERE ARE


FOUR LIGHTS

>>726159748
ive been trying to get a pregrad on physics for 9 years. why everyone keeps thinking that a shitload of work and study is better than reaching a result by your own means?

>>726170941
kek
but actually what i posted there is the idea of a philosopher
pretty good read

>>726170955
My analysis is absolutely correct, brainlet.

>>726159748
Is the christian God plausible?

>>726170976
thanks ill check that
maybe also has something to do with matched impendances
but what bugs me is why stationary waves are so special

>>726161450
Supply and demand.

Theres too many swingin dicks

This is why war was invented.

>>726171275
By a deistic definition, sure why not.

>>726171163
>analysis
>on /b/ while fapping to anime

>>726166454
laurentz transformations?

>>726161661
Because a meter is too short - or a second is too long

File: accountant.png (2KB, 32x32px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 32x32px

>>726171378
>By a deistic definition, sure why not.

i see.
consider changing careers.

>>726170457
No idiot the ball is a sphere if you pull down with fingers and rotate them to imitate the thunbs up configuration it creates spin as ball sphere spins out it creates a downward movement. The only part torque playes is how sharp the downward break is. Your Welcome

>>726170987
There are probably only 8 relevant lights if you count the gigantic fluorescent ones.

>>726171163
Then where is the overlapping K and E faggot?

>>726161774
Dallas
Dak Dak Dak Dak

File: nat0002.png (919KB, 785x1095px) Image search: [Google]

919KB, 785x1095px

>>726171386
did someone literally say feet thread? lol :3

>>726159748
what do you think about 3d feet? 2d pure feet?

>>726171575
>Your Welcome
>Your
>Welcome
>Your
>Welcome
>Your
>Welcome
>Your
>Welcome
You're welcome.

>>726161661
Not OP, but it's because gravity is measure of the acceleration we experience due to gravity. On earth we experience a force as though the ground below our feet is accelerating upwards at 9.8 meters/second per second. It is 9.8 and not one because it is a measurement, and neither meters nor seconds were defined as to make it one.

>>726171575
Magnus force. Look it up faggot

Have you looked into subquantum kinetics? It's a brand new field classified black. Finally corellates electrogravitics to the electromagnetism duality.

>>726171790
what do I know about English, I'm a Pitching Coach

>>726171532
I dodged the question a lot by completely changing the premise from the christian god to a deistic god, but its surely possible that some god like being created the universe. It just isn't necessary or even remotely indicated by anything that we know about the universe. You don't have to be an atheist to be a physicist. I am an atheist, but you are a douche.

>>726171822
I got your Mangus force swinging

File: fb4502e62d1b065584e76fd30b8aef981b950f9f4be5732129d94d178fe26538.jpg (25KB, 228x210px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 228x210px

>>726171932
>I'm a Pitching Coach
will you fuck me?

>>726162214
Absolutely.

If we hadn't, the Russians would've called bullshit by now.

>>726164690
Easy. Complex numbers and zero already has 4 values

>>726171822
magnuskek

File: 1489702281322.jpg (68KB, 465x549px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 465x549px

>>726171932
>teaching people how to pitch

post dick?

>>726159748
How can I imagine calabi-yau manifolds and hilbert space? Anything higher than 4 dimensions is too hard for me to imagine.

File: Forces.png (21KB, 654x189px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 654x189px

>>726164589
Engineer Major here.

File: e7106e14cce39fe87b77169e9f818ef85c4d3163d62b053af9f5d713daa036c3.jpg (188KB, 924x1019px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 924x1019px

>>726171932
have my chilren

>>726171997
>I am an atheist, but you are a douche.
>I am an atheist
careful not to cut yourself in those edges

How about trips we pick your thesis?

>>726159748
If two traps have sex does it count as straight sex?

>>726172232
Also a real artist

>>726164589
Have built this.
Can confirm it works, anon.

>>726172232
Thank you, I am far too lazy to explain this. My approach would have been way too complicated and involve way too many magnetostatic equations that aren't necessary.

File: 1489376266831.jpg (37KB, 751x389px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 751x389px

>>726172232
>admitting to being one of the most useless beings in the universe

>>726169274

None of this is correct.

p=mv is correct in classical mechanics. In special relativity, E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2. In QM, the energy of an oscillating particle looks like E=h f, where f is the frequency.

So light is massless (m=0), so E^2 = (h f)^2 = p^2 c^2, or p = h f / c

It has nothing to do with how much energy the photon has or doesn't have. A photon's mass is zero -- not negative or imaginary. For that matter, a tachyon's mass in current QFT models is also not imaginary, even though naive algebra with the classical formulas will get you that.

>>726172457
KISS = Keep it simple stupid

>>726172270
>calling me edgy for being an atheist
Did you even read the whole post leading up to that statement? It had as much edge as a wooden sphere.

Explain torque

>>726159748
Mechanical Engineering Major. Minor in math. Its hell, but i like learning physics (mostly fluids interest me)

>>726172503
Math Major I presume?

>>726166511
It only seems that way.
Liberalism is like quantum physics.
You wont get it at first.
Many never do.
Nonetheless - it is correct thinking.

>>726159748
roll

Explain field propulsion based on the ulf microwave maser tube using a holographic grate generated by a phase conjugate beam in the gigahertz range.

>>726170243

Yeah you're butthurt. And that's *Doctor* Retarded Samefag to you.

Does your intelligence and extensive knowledge about our physical world sometimes make you depressed?

File: aWmjKV3_460s.jpg (27KB, 460x361px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 460x361px

>>726159748
Please give me a fucking idea what's going on here

>>726159748
Who is your favorite physicist? My is Maxwell. His equations are so beautifull and symmetric...

>>726172558
You're totally right. Feel a bit embarrassed for not just pulling out my intro quantum text book.

>>726172691
It's the application of a Force along circular motion.

>>726170368

Just fucking google it.

But if you just want someone to say it, it starts with a "B" and ends with a "ernoulli's Principle." Uneven stitches, spit, and dirt can make it way more complex however.

>>726159748

Why do kids love cinnamon toast crunch?

File: newton.jpg (64KB, 735x387px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 735x387px

>>726164589

1st question: Have you figured out yet that all this free mason science we're being taught in school is actually total bullshit and just doesn't work? Well, it works as well as hammering a rectangle into a circular opening.

2nd question: Have you looked into electromagnetism and how this force actually sustains and energizes the entire world?

It's 10:30pm and I'm tired. I know my questions aren't being asked intellectually, but you should be able to understand them nontheless.

>>726173168
The mass distribution makes the center of gravity weird in everyday objects like those pictured. If you balance everything you can do weird shit like this. If you were to find the center of mass for this garbled mess of shit it would be somewhere to the right of the center of the pencil.

Have you ever wondered if Thomas Townsend Brown was telling the truth about electrogravitic thrust from a pulsed DC current run through a high dielectric medium continuously?

>>726173796
I get that, but I don't even understand the fucking forks, fml

File: 848ee3fe4ceb0b55e58e831d3976cb11072e39f59006de66475a59af5aaf9db7.jpg (218KB, 492x600px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 492x600px

>>726173048
>Doctor
what can a glorified pharmacist even contribute

>>726173728
What specifically doesn't work? I'd love a nobel prize if you end up being correct. And electromagnetism is pretty great, not sure what your point is there.

>>726173934
no

>>726173974
The majority of the mass in the fork is in the handle. Thus the forces of gravity of the whole fork system, when you take into account the level arm of the tooth pick thing, comes out balanced. The lever arms are really what make the whole system function the way it does.

>>726174267
Why not? What if he was? Something has to be going on beyond simple ionic thrust--he demonstrated thrust even in an oil medium.

>>726173241
>His equations are so beautifull and symmetric...
Bait.
they werent his equations, he just arranged them

>>726174092
>Implying the only people with doctorates are medical doctors
You are a dumb nig.

>>726174095
How about the combustion engine. That certainty doesn't seem to work in any way similar to nature. Nature has these "loop systems" where something is used, transformed into another thing, used again, re-transformed into the original thing. One example is trees and people. Trees make oxygen, people breathe said oxygen, produce carbon dioxide, trees use the carbon dioxide and again produce oxygen.
My point being that combustion engines don't work naturally at all. Shouldn't we have something that run electromagnetically by now that is powered by its own "loop system?"

Your thoughts?

>>726174376
I do understand that, sorry for the typing work. It just seems too unreal, like magical
I get it logically I mean, but don't really get it

>>726174627
And he related other equations through symmetry. His equations work best for symmetrical systems.

>>726174627
I know. Thanks to Faraday and Gauss but still, these equations are my favorite.

>>726174376
>HBTB

>>726172996

It's the equivalent of making your car run by sitting in the driver's seat and punching the steering wheel as fast and hard as you can.

I designed a more efficient reactionless propulsion drive (that actually works) in 10 minutes while I was sleeping after reading that stupid article. Their shitty laser setup can't even match my radioactive-isotope-in-a-box.

>>726174718
you high dude

File: 39804575_p0.png (345KB, 1000x1200px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1000x1200px

>>726174643

>>726159748
If i put a 23N force on a 4.5kg round object (30º above the horizontal) in earths atmosphere but gravitational force is halved, how far from the starting location will it land?