I don't think there enough Fluffy threads right now
me neither
Is it just me, or is hugbox saccharine?
>>725666539
sup chocobro
>>725666661
Kweh.
>>725666598
nah you're right
>>725666598
That's pretty much the definition of fluffies as a whole.
>>725666772
Is that why abuse is so popular, because fluffies are so sickeningly cute?
>>725666777
please tell me this is a rhing
>>725667052
Please stop.
>>725666894
Exactly. They are an *overdose* of cuteness, leading to what is scientifically known as "cute aggression". It's the same phenomenon that makes you want to squeeze cute things in general, but the fluffies take that up to eleven and beyond.
>>725667084
Kweh.
>>725665350
shwarma, KEK
>>725667123
>Cute aggression
Is that a real thing?
>>725667123
then they shit on your carpet kill the brown babies and break shit
>>725666777
Omg
This is great
>>725667210
Yes. It's been aknowledged as a real thing a few years back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5xeWOGFIA0
>>725667210
http://www.gobroadreach.com/broadreach-blog-cute-aggression
>>725667210
>>725667249
That's the hellgremlin-spinoff for casuals who want to abuse fluffies just like everyone, but feel like they need to justify it first to no one in particular. You don't need to make the fluffies seem like villains in order to abuse them, if they ask why the "Because fuck you!" is enough of an explanation.
>>725667210
A less-than-scientific explanation of the phenomenon.
>>725667912
>>725667798
true though the way i see it if hasbio can program them to be cute as possible then why wouldn't they program then to cull or at least shun less desirable colors
>>725669244
Abuse fluffies because they are not "alive", genetically engineered things intended as toys, and disposable (e.g. all those rodents parents get for their children as pets that die in a couple years or by neglect).
Non-natural creatures who when escaped into the wild rapidly bred into a large ecological disaster, destroying them became a NEED.
Totally defenseless things, capable of communicating by speech, and perfectly permissible and encouraged to kill them off.
Sit back and enjoy the torturing and abuse of something that has no right to exist.
>>725668738
1. There are brown ponies in the show
2. Surprising amount of people would actually want a brown fluffy
3. There would be a media shitstorm if a corporation made their product racist on purpose
4. Spending time and effort on programming an unfinished prototype to cull its own young would be insane waste of money for a job that could be done by a human in mere seconds
5. Trusting toys for children to execute living beings on their own discretion would be even more ridiculously insane.
>>725669285
pretty much this
My favorite
>>725669285
The only right for them to exist is farm them for pelts. That would be useful. Or for animal experimentation to prevent any controversies with natural animals.
>>725666716
Hahahaha
>>725669285
I think feral fluffies could be easily eradicated if people really put effort in it, but for most people their whining and begging is still too minor inconvenience to actually spend resources on.
Speaking of right to exist, who here believes in souls, and would genetically engineered creatures have them? There was a pretty interesting discussion about it sometime ago.
the fluffies who neglect or abuse brown fluffies do so because they are ferals. feral fluffies live a shitty life at the bottom of the food chain, and are naturally inclined towards pretty, bright and shiny things. fluffies who learn to survive, start becoming more instinctual and start seeking to praise brightly colored babies as best because of there love of pretty, bright and shiny things. so when pressed by the environment the mare will always save pretty babies first, and after generations this changes to abuse.
>>725669709
janther pls
>>725668166
Find a branch
Insert that into fluffy anus
You got a good golf club
enjoy
>>725670401
If souls exist then you have the opportunity to reincarnate as a genetically engineered non-creature.
So no, there is no afterlife, no reincarnation, no souls. There is no evidence that supports this. Only hopeful belief of having a soul, exactly equal to the belief in torturing small animals, or non-animals, for entertainment.
So after skimming a few of these threads, I think you guys identify with the fluffies right? And then humans in these comics is how you feel society treats you?
>>725671026
lol are you autistic
>>725671026
>>725671026
vvvortic bait
>>725671026
why does filename read fedora and image show a trilby?
i never understand this
>>725670457
Wouldn't you think ferals would actually benefit from having more camourflaged colors?
But that is not the crux of the issue here. It's that hellgremlinists *want* the fluffies to be cruel and unjust in order to justify abusing them, while the original fandom is about fluffies being innocent so that abusing them actually means something.
What was the name of the series about a russian and a smart fluffy?
>>725670195
Fluffy is originally research toy from hasbio
PETA organization think fluffy is a animal and right to live in the real world
Silly choice is somebody in that organization Sue hasbio to release first batch to a wild
Now we are doom
>>725671549
Post-fluffy, I think
>>725671342
A. these are genetically engineered things with preprogrammed behaviors as toys. "Natural" instincts would not be needed to be added to their programming.
B. Overall they are showing irrational human behavior, that is done regardless of actual benefit to progress or survival. For an example go read any of Trump's tweets.
Kweh !
>>725671549
>>725671575
Maybe they would benefit to wild natural animal predators.
>>725671657
Thanks. will look for that.
>>725671338
because people are too dumb to know what a trilby is
in their defense, the fedora USED to be the way to spot hopeless autists, but since the late 2000s all the young fresh autists seemed to unaccountably start wearing trilbies, probably just because that happened to be a "normal" trend at the time.
You can still find photos online of vintage, dry-aged autists who rock the classic trench coat, fedora, and ponytail combo. Katana is optional but likely to be somewhere nearby.
Pic related.
>>725670401
I don't believe in souls in general, and fluffies have no more or less of a right to live as humans have. It's just that we have the upper hand and they have no hands at all, so no matter how unjust the biotoy-designation is, it never was about needing to justify our actions towards them anyway.
All I got.
>>725672041
made me kek softly, good analysis anon
>>725672207
Try to not include furries chocobro
>>725672190
Thanks. Wish i remembered what the author's name is.
>>725672048
>>725671342
let it go ZK. Please post more art.
>>725669013
Fucking kek
>>725666777
This could work. GM could control the humans and the environment, the players would be limited to their choices by their intelligence attributes, and botches would most likely end in gruesome deaths.
It needs more data, probably. The parameters already established would work well as the main attributes, but something akin to skills might be needed. Nothing too complex or pretentious; but things like litterbox proficiency, courage, object manipulation; and also something akin to morality that would be the will to live that would trigger wan die when emptied by traumatic events.
It seems like VtM would work well with them; but I might just be biased since I've been played Bloodlines.
>>725673624
That was the only thing I've ever seen of it.
>>725674153
leave
>>725674039
>>725674380
You're welcome.
>>725673920
>>725673999
>>725674046
Fucking hell, learn to link your posts
>>725672070
You know what?
Some specific chicken that belongs to big. Chemical company for created drugs didn't have a right to live outside Lab
Like Fluffy , if it's a genuine bio lab proposed
All of that will be terminated someday in there's life.
they can't even figure out trains
>>725675300