I heard /b/ was smart which one would fill first /b/?

4 you stupid nigger.

>>725394594
3

>>725394849
4. You are an idiot too.

>>725394594
3

>>725394594

https://youtu.be/olCoGGQ6mAc

here's a detailed explanation.

>>725394594
if you mean "fill" as indicated by "to the hieght outgoing tube" then 3

>>725394594
3 and 4

File: braindrawing.jpg (100KB, 600x419px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 600x419px

4

File: 1336099711453.jpg (28KB, 458x450px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 458x450px

3 and 4 at the same time

>>725394594
3

>>725394594
4

>>725394892
no because with the amount of height needed to reach 4 would already make 3 full.

>>725394594
Alla at the same time

3 with a very tiny margin towards 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bINTrKspWQg
stupid niggers

how fast does the water pour into 1? if its faster than from 1 to 2 it's 1

>>725394971
This assuming a slow trickle

4 and 3 simultaneously. As this video shows
>>725395236

>>725394594
not enough information given
you'd need to know the exact fill and drain rates of each tank or have enough information to calculate them, i.e. the viscosity of the fluid, the volume of the tanks and the cross sectional area/shape of the outlet tubes

>>725394594
1, highest potential energy

>>725394594
Depends on the flow rate of the water into 1 and the flow rates on the pipes connecting the rest.

Could easily be any of the buckets without that information, even if the flow rate is the same on the connecting pipes

File: Image7.png (710KB, 807x992px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 807x992px

NONE

BECAUSE THE TAP ISN'T CONNECTED TO ANYTHING

>>725395159
truth

>>725394962
Kek

>>725394970
>if you mean "fill" as indicated by "to the hieght outgoing tube" then 3
Then 3 and 4.

And so 3 and 4 is the right answer.

>>725395364
Yep, 1. None of the others will fill to their brims because of the position of the pipes.

>>725394962
thanks anon

>>725394892
It's 3 you stupid fuck

File: GMAlr_f-thumbnail-100-0.jpg (194KB, 440x300px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 440x300px

1 and 2 at the same time

File: fdfsdfsdadsfa.jpg (19KB, 249x235px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 249x235px

>>725394892

>>725395364
>>725395491
>confirmed retards

>>725394594
3,4,2,1, in that order

>>725394594
Depends on the water volume per second

>>725395619
this

>>725394962
looks like a porno.. spoilers.. it's not

>>725394962
Nice explanation, very insightful and detailed, would rate 9/11.

>>725395642
This

>>725395491
need some tits

>>725395642
This

Rerererereroll

Rererererereroll

Rerererererereroll

>>725395159
Actually this is true

Rererererererereroll

Rerererererererereroll

File: 1485760273055.jpg (990KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 900x900px

>>725395489
The outgoing tube for 3 is pretty low, though!

Rererererererererereroll

My tummy mmm mmm my tummy would be full first my fully little tummy mmm mmm

>>725395642
/thread

Rerererererererererereroll

Rererererererererererereroll

>>725395596
Nope, 3 is not full to the top. "Full" is not known as "to the pipe".

>>725394594
3 and 4 will fill up at about the same time but 3 will spill first

>>725395416
underated post

>>725396135
why tf are you rolling?

there's only one tank

>>725396015
The outgoing tube is not the top of the tank.

File: fdfsdfsdadsfa.jpg (13KB, 249x235px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 249x235px

>>725396203
well if 3 were full to the top it look like this.

If the tap puts out more than tank 1 can drain into tank 2 per unit of volume/time than it will fill first. Otherwise 4.

>>725395416
winner!

>>725396203
how does siphoning work you utter crip

>>725394594
That depends on the rate of input volume relative to connecting lines.

Assuming containers are 3 dimensional and able to hold water at NTP:
Too slow = none due to evaporation
slow enough = 3 and 4 at same time
faster = 3 (just before 4)
fast enough = 1
too fast = none due to boiling

>>725395748
best definition of sexploitation ever

>>725396605
>too fast = none due to boiling

wat

You cannot know unless you know the water flux

jesus christ people are dumb as shit, this is the /pol/ iq circlejerk folks

>>725396687
Ok, boiling was a bad vocabulary choice. I mean the water won't fill anything because it will vaporize or exit the container first.

File: 1489433975224.jpg (17KB, 249x235px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 249x235px

>>725396459
Sorry, no, but like this.

>>725396605
Holy shit, finally a post that's not made by a retard
This is correct in all cases

>>725396789
well were assuming its just a regular flow of water like in a fucking tap.

>>725394594
3 first, then 4, then 3 & 4 overflow onto the floor, and 1 and 2 never get filled up.

>>725396597
Look at >>725396459

>>725397236
Sorry, wrong link. I mean >>725396923

this is Hydrostatic pressure right?

>>725397047
you don't know the pipe circumference nor the flux, even normal tap on full could fill 1 if the circumference was small enough.

>>725394971
my answer aswell

>>725395045
I think this is correct.

File: 300px-MagrittePipe.jpg (11KB, 300x210px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x210px

>>725397425
Seems not to affect the answer. Otherwise we could talk about that we don't see any tank, just pixels.

Pic related

>>725395596
The downward force would pull the water into 4 filling it first

File: maxresdefault2-640x360.jpg (28KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 640x360px

>>725394594

If the water pressure is high enough, the first one will be full first.

If the water pressure isn't high enough to counter the effects of the water draining then it will proceed like this. The water will drain into the second tank. Then it will transfer into the third one. The draining process will still happen even if the tubes are higher.

So, four.

Pic unrelated.

>>725394594
4, but the person who drew this probably meant for 3 to fill up first

>>725396445
Exactly!

>>725394594
4 and 3 at the same time.

>>725397916
If someone disagrees with me please explain why they are correct.

>>725394594
3
i wouldn't call 'not full of retards' smart

>>725397916
3 will not fill up onward than to the highest level of the tube to 4 until 4 is as filled up as 3. The last bit they will fill up together.

Okay, maybe the last h2o-molecule will fill up at 3...

File: tanks.png (244KB, 454x427px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 454x427px

>>725395608

>>725394594
3 and 4 at the same time

>learn to hydraulics

>>725398105
see >>725396605

4 would never win but can tie 3.

>>725394594
3 is the right answer, at a reasonable enough flow rate, but 4 might not fill up second, because of the nature of the pipe between 3 and 4.
4 might fill until the pipeline, but then any past that and it needs the potential energy of tank 2, because the potential energy in both tanks 2 and 3 are needed to push the water up the pipe to get into tank 4.

>>725396605
Fucking mong. How the fuck is moving water boiling?

>>725394594
3421 not that hard

>>725395137
This guy gets it

>>725395347
WORD.
If it's water, the tanks are cubes and the rate of fill is equal to the rate of drain from each tank it's tank 3. If the rate of fill is faster than the rate of drain it's whatever tank has a negative fill/drain ratio. Fluid dynamics bitch

>>725398898

2 will never fill because 4 is open genius

>>725394594
Depends on how fast the water flows

File: back.jpg (12KB, 222x227px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 222x227px

>>725394726
No douchebag 3 would, see the angled pipe that goes to 4? well 3 has to fill past where the water comes out in 4 before there would be enough pressure to force water into 4.

>>725397842
no. he is asking you to solve a problem without providing you the variables you need. if this question was drawn like that on a university exam, you would be expected to write "this problem is unsolvable".

>>725394594
3 you autistic fuck

File: 1472708494332.png (326KB, 371x369px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 371x369px

>>725398527
>mfw trying to understand this shit

Pussy

3 and 4 will fill simultaneously

>>725394594

Tank no.3

I am glad that You asked.

File: 8e6q7Wn.jpg (27KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x480px

>>725398603
How can three be full to the brim if the water is draining into four???

>>725394594
I heard OP was a faggot

Idealized Model: 3 and 4 simultaneously
Real world: 3

3 you ducking dumbasses

>>725400163
> ducking dumbasses
> ducking
> dumbasses

>>725394594
Impossible to know given the information presented. If the outflow from the faucet were considerably higher than the flow from container 1 to 2, then 1 will fill first. If it's a slow trickle relative to the flow between containers, it appears that 3 and 4 should fill nearly simultaneously (3 would beat 4 if you're dealing with nanosecond timing, molecular fullness indicators, and ideal conditions involving no turbulence or other imperfections in water distribution).

File: jug calculation.png (26KB, 599x180px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 599x180px

>>725394594
All jugs will fill at the same time. Use the following formula

File: 1437367362829.jpg (29KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 450x450px

>>725400240
my fucking face when

>>725398789
see >>725396851

>>725400457
b8

>>725398527

tank 1 magically fills above its drain while the others don't?

>>725399530
>if this question was drawn like that on a university exam, you would be expected to write "this problem is unsolvable".
>if

>>725399875
It depends entirely on the flow rate into and out of each bucket. But given equal values of those, 3 is first because, well, it's first in line.

>>725401095
not an argument

>>725395000
>Nobody checking these trips

4, but it depends on the rate of the inflow.

Probably 3

123 hundred trillion?

>>725394594
potatoe

lt could be 1 if the pipe can spout eater faster than it can go through the hole

>>725394594
4 and 3 will both be full at the same time.
>anyone who disagrees is retard and doesnt know the principle of communicating vessels

>>725401600
OP asked /b/, not students. So your consideration of university standards is smart, but not obligatory. Consider standards of primary School is well likewise.

>>725394971
this

>>725400914
Each drain is the same size. So if the first drain only let through what it can allow, then any proceeding drains will only be met with an a flow of water that the drain can fully let through. So yes, I believe the diagram the anon drew would be correct for the scenario where the tap releases more water than the drains can let through.

What is them rooms temperature?
Watch is the container volume?
What is the size of the pipe?
What is the flow of the tap?
What is the temperature of the water from the tap?
What is the size of the room it's in?
What is the rooms airflow like?
What is the humidity?
Is the water pure?
What are the containers made from?
What are the pipes made from?
How close to the earth's surface is the room?
What state is the moon at?
These are a few of the factors that might matter depending on the tap flow.

>>725404437
Are you retarded?

>>725404704
I'm autistic, but thank you.

>>725404704
Yes

3 and 4 at the same time

File: eugh.png (373KB, 950x1316px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 950x1316px

>>725398527
>2 doesn't fill above top pipe
>water still travels from 3 to 4

there is a clear discrepancy in whatever you think the laws of water physics are

>>725405073
2 won't fill above the rims of 3 & 4

>>725394594
depends on the speed the water is inserted into the tank. If its a fast stream, 1 will be full first. then 4 being first with the slowest possible stream, 3 with a faster stream, 2 in between. because the connecting tubes dont have too much volume.

File: IMG_1789.png (10KB, 761x284px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 761x284px

dumping related shit

>>725403519
it would be the same in primary school though. to calculate something based on a number of variables, you need said number or it's just guessing.

>>725405318
4 - because no border
1 - because smaller than others
5 - because circle, not square
3 - because green, not red

2 - because it wasn't ruled out of any of the above discrepancies.

>>725405318
2, because it's the only one that's not unique in any way

>>725394594
>>>725395596
>The downward force

You mean gravity?

>>725394594
If you mean fill-to-overflowing, 3 and 4 would tie

>>725394970
1 will fill to the height of its outgoing tube first.

File: 1489439806410.png (679KB, 1000x1024px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 1000x1024px

>>725405447
Only need 1

>>725405447
fill the corners on the bottom left and top left of both 0's to make the letter D. 2D > 3D, and I agree.

File: 1489439806410.png (679KB, 1000x1024px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 1000x1024px

>>725405447

Can someone just do a simulation of this, I've seen this pic for years

File: IMG_1533.png (908KB, 1000x1024px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 1000x1024px

>>725405705
god damnit
ever since some faggot posted that on r/4chan it's been guessed every time I post it

Laws of water physics?

Are those different then the normal laws?

>>725405807
Haha, 2ez

it`s not water, it`s cum!

File: delme.jpg (56KB, 675x472px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 675x472px

>>725405703
Damn, sorta beat e to it..

>>725394594
3, then 2, then 1

4 remains empty because water cannot defy gravity.

/threading my own post and check these dubs real quick.

>>725406379
>4 remains empty because water cannot defy gravity.

can't tell if b8 or stupid.

>>725406379
>water cannot defy gravity
Are you retarded

>>725395236
/thread

>>725406525
>being this goddamn retarded

>>725394594

4 and 3 together. The others won't fill up ever.

>>725406551
You're the retard here, numbskull.

>>725394594
3 and 4 at the same time

>>725396203
Fucking slav, if you had indoor plumbing you might understand 3 & 4 would eventually equalize and fill to the brim simultaneously.
But 3 is the right answer.

>>725395596
>>725395596
>>725395596
>>725395596
your are a moron!

File: 1482114740212.jpg (156KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 720x1280px

now clear?

File: 1467222016205.jpg (32KB, 600x449px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x449px

>>725407002
>your are a moron
>your are

File: NYQmZ.gif (1012KB, 318x207px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 318x207px

>>725407071

>>725406764
c and d are already connected

>>725394594
Needs more information. Depends on the velocity of the water coming from the tap.

Its 1 make something like this and try for yourself 1 will fill up first.

>>725407355
Velocity does not matter once it hits the bottom of bucket one.

>>725407355
Smartest answer yet. 1 could conceivably fill first

>>725403726
No. If each drain is the same size, 3 and 4 would overflow before 2 is full.

3 & 4 at the same time, if you mean which one will reach the border first

>>725394594
3,4,2,1

>>725407468
The rate at which 1 is filling relative to the rate at which it is draining matters.

>>725407574
2 and 1 can never fill.

>>725394971
3 and 4 will overflow at the same time. Assuming that the flow into 1 isn't faster than the diameter of the connections can flow.

If the flow from the faucet into 1 is faster than the connections can flow then 1 will probably overflow first.

Holy shit, its shocking how fucking dumb some of you are.

And no, you're not trolling, you really are dumb

>>725407623
1 would fill up first if you knew how a hot water tank work you would know why

>>725407623
1 can momentarily with enough flow rate from the tap.

>>725407606
What if the buckets are the size of 55 gallon drums? It doesnt say.

The faucet is clearly a faucet, and they dont put out that much pressure, so if the buckets are 55 gallon drums, velocity of water exiting the faucet does not matter

>>725407732
1 would actually overflow before the rest fill up

>>725394594
4 and 3 same time.
Then 2.
Then 1.

>>725395045
Thats what i figured

File: download517f4496__2fstorage_2femulated_2f0_2fDownload_2f1489440649856.png (568KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1200x960px

>>725406764

Under ideal laws, 3 and 4 are tied.

In reality, 3 wins by less than a second assuming earth gravity and no relative motion between tanks and the earth's surface.

File: dope.jpg (70KB, 500x462px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 500x462px

>>725407623

>>725407903
I think most of us took the illustration to be conceptual, but we also need scale. The question is too vague given only the illustration. We need more information.

>>725407903
Actually, they are tanks, but it still doesnt state their capacity

>>725394594
4 and 3 at the same time

>>725407924
Wow, this dude is hella smart.

>>725394594
first 3, then by tiny pressure 4,then 2....

>>725408035
Yeah, like capacity of the tanks, rate of water flow...

Is the faucet on full blast, or slightly trickling...

>>725394594
1 would fill up first overflowing into 2 and 4 then 3 last

>>725394594
But depends if the containers are closed and filled whit air

Op's moms pussy.
She's a whore.

>>725407978
This

There will be some small resistance to the flow in the pipe between 3 and 4. So 3 will always be a little but ahead of 4 due to the resistance. But only by the smallest amount.

>>725394594

Assuming drain flow is the same for all drains:

- 3 and 4 would overflow at the same time.

- If the tap flow is smaller then or equal to the drain flow, 1 would never overflow.

- If the tap flow is a little greater than the drain flow, 1 would overflow after 3 and 4.

- If the tap flow is much greater than the drain flow, 1 would overflow before 3 and 4.

Trust me. I have a PhD in computational fluid dynamics.

File: poguespan.jpg (26KB, 533x250px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 533x250px

<-- how fast must the treadmill go before the plane lifts off?

>>725394594
Not enough information.

Did not define "Full"
Did not define Volumetric Flow Rate or Mass Flow Rate
Did not define inter-tank pipe cross-sectional area
Did not define tank heights, cross-sectional areas, volume
Did not define what liquid is entering tanks

Not enough information.

OP is a faggot.

>>725408442
no.

>>725395732
This

>>725408442
The airplane won't lift off unless it has airflow over the wings at a velocity greater than it's stall speed.

>>725406664
1

3 and 4 at the same time.

>>725408617
It's 9, dumbfuck, how did you even get 1

>>725394892
not sure if you are a completely retarded piece of shit or a simpleton troll

>>725408746
Clearly amerifat and never learned to maths. Anon >>725408617
is right, it's 1

>>725395045
agree

>>725408873
6÷2(1+2)
6÷2(3)
3(3)
9

>>725408442
how powerful is the treadmill's fan feature?

>>725408873
You could even put it into a fuckin calculator, willy muncher

>>725409001
6÷2(1+2)
6÷2(3)
6÷6
1

Lrn2ImpliedMultiplicationByJuxtaposition, newfag

>>725409121
Everything to the right of the obelus is divided by everything to the left of it

>>725394594
Sorry OP, You're a NewFag and You're Wrong.

>>725409367
Put it into a calculator m8.

>>725409367
It ain't 6÷(2(1+2))

>>725410333
Trips never lie

>>725394594
4 and 3 at the same time.

>>725405556
I fucking died