Loli
does this count?
testing
test 2
comics?
test 4
test 5
I guess test 3 failed
I will attempt low poly loli next
test success
high quality stuff won't upload :(
>>725240063
I'm taking this to the authorities, pedophilia and pedophilia-related material is against the law.
>>725241766
your sense of humor is shit
>>725241766
pedophilia, and most pedophilia-related material isn't against the law in the land of the free
>>725241766
Not in america, where this site is hosted you mong.
NOBANCHAN RIGHT NOW YOU NIGGERS
SOME ANONS POSTING DA GOODS!!
>>725242105
>>725242045
>>725242050
Actually there are laws against it in some states. Probably wouldn't hold up against a higher court but it's still a lot of trouble. Fap with caution.
>>725242340
If the sites hosting the material aren't getting into trouble, you really don't have anything to worry about. Maybe they could get you technically, if they really wanted, law is very complicated and all.
What happened to you autistic niggers as kids that made you want to fuck little girls?
>>725242537
I was molested, leading me into sexuality very early.
When you're a kid, it only makes sense for you to want to fuck other kids, so those are the mental links I made. When I grew up they didn't change.
Just kidding I made all that up it's just a fetish you dumb moralfag get over it.
>>725242672
No shit, but it's a faggot fetish for faggot retards.
If you killed yourself everyone would be much happier.
>>725242537
Same thing that happened to all homos. Nothing. It's something you do not choose. Why in hell anyone would choose to be attracted to little girls if you could just choose what you are attracted to? I would choose milfs and fuck em all day long.
Bit of a long shot but does anyone have that greentext story of the kid who was being molested by his moms friend, kids mom was a shitty parent and some friends of hers fucked up his saves on majora's mask on n64 or some shit so he went to the friends house and she tried fucking him and shit
>>725242740
I work at a kindergarten
>>725242817
>>725242537
they're cute. little girls are cute and fertile.
you cannot possibly go on a site that features beheadings and beatings and race hatred and harassment and hatred of the disabled and come and pretend to be angry about me jerking it to cartoons.
>>725242885
beautiful. i support pedos out on the battlefield.
>>725242950
>>725242982
>>725243002
i require an artist
don't leave us hanging
also i do some "farmwork"
>>725240295
What is this from? If it is from anything.
Or just the artist name?
>>725243045
>>725242990
Western style loli sucks.
It always looks like shit.
>>725243168
Says the fucking toddlercon faggot.
>>725243168
unless it looks like this
>>725242950
>>725242982
>>725243002
>>725243029
>>725243045
>>725243122
it's like shitting on a game because of the graphics, gameplay is far more important
>>725243168
you can't possibly shit on toddlercon
the line was crossed when you fapped to little girls
KYS
>>725243327
>it's like shitting on a game because of the graphics, gameplay is far more important
Except it's a fucking picture. How it's looks is actually the ONLY important factor.
>>725243012
I feel like I have a split personality. At work I take good care of the children. I am so invested in there personality and the future. But at home I bust out my cock and wank to a 6 yr old gagging on her dads cum.
It works for me though, since I am not a psychotic sexual predator who would hurt people in real life. Easy.
>>725243364
That is so original and well thought out that I might actually just do it.
On second though, you're fucking retarded, go kill yourself instead you waste of oxygen.
>>725243398
the expression and design of the face looks good, even if the style isn't exactly to your taste
>>725243447
this is what people fail to distinguish: pedos from child predators/molesters
it's the difference between a rapist and someone who is attracted to and would have consensual sex with a woman
>>725243716
>the expression and design of the face looks good,
I disagree.
>>725243813
Well then, you have a different taste. Big deal.
>>725243914
>>725243924
oc?
>>725243963
I like that one.
>>725244000
No, that's the girl he babysits down the road.
>>725244000
nope. same artist as this one
>>725243686
he is on pixiv
have you any umaru-chan? can only find lewds of her in her older state
The reasoning behind outlawing sex with children, and especially something like possession of child pornography is extremely flawed, and much is just omitted.
First consider what things are taken into account when evaluating whether an organism can consent to sexual acts.
>intelligence
>emotional stability
>sexual development
this is actually fucking it
intelligence and emotional/hormonal stability are on a bell curve, meaning that there are people on the extreme high and low ends with most being in between. This means that there are people at the age of 6 who enter puberty, or are intelligent, or are fertile. And there are people at the age of 24 who have never hit puberty, are mentally retarded, or are infertile, and yet we will never bar these people from having sex.
Also, you can "take advantage" of a child by doing something as simple and tricking him/her into trading their x-box for a bag of rocks you say are magical, and the same with an adult, and yet these practices are not illegal, even if they hurt the child/adult's well-being.
>>725243850
Why
Why would someone do this
>>725244272
source?
>>725244423
someone rolled trips
>>725244381
consider an education
https://youtu.be/TRF27F2bn-A?t=57
children are incapable of thinking for themselves, and they do not want your dick
nor is this a thread OR website for you to spread this bullshit.
>Have three four year old daughters
>Mfw I see toddlercon posted
Why?
>>725244674
it isn't real anon,non of use want to hurt real people,2d is best
>>725244674
cuz yo wana fug dem
>>725244272
i want a wife who's into loli's <3
>>725244601
i see freshman psychology is going well for you, young man :^)
consider learning about the most basic concept in statistics and genetic variation. My position is that you cannot set a reasonable age of consent. You can say that that's a bit too extreme but please just learn to think critically and think for yourself. At least come up with an age of consent that isn't straight and fresh from your ass.
>>725244821
>consider learning about the most basic concept in statistics and genetic variation
no u
this applies both ways lmfao
>At least come up with an age of consent that isn't straight and fresh from your ass.
kek, you mean exactly like you're doing ?
seriously just off yourself, you're a waste of oxygen
>>725244746
Yeah but the body shape is just...impossible for anything sexual.
>>725244821
My wife told me she liked loli when we were still just dating. I'm not sure how many girls out there are into and open about it though. Good luck.
>>725244793
parents can consent for their children no?
then parents can give permision to man for sex with child.
>>725244969
>parents can consent for their children no?
of course they can't
where are you even getting this
>>725244969
Parents wouldn't do that unless they had ulterior motives - prostitution being the most common. And that is illegal, so sorry to disappoint.
>>725244821
>cannot set a reasonable age of consent
Sure you can. For strictly vaginal sex you can set it to when the average woman has developed her vagina enough to not cause serious damage to it. So around 15 years old.
>>725244674
>three four year old daughters
Your wife gave birth to 3 lolis at once?
>>725242990
Laura makes my dick diamond
>>725245118
>>725245145
Yet they can decide for their "trans" kid what gender they can "change into" with medications and surgery. Weird how that works, yeah?
>>725244947
then i guess it's morally wrong to have sex with small, flat-chested women. or midgets or whatever
>>725244944
>no u
>seriously just off yourself, you're a waste of oxygen
i'll be honest with you, that's cute
Anyway, yeah I took quite a number of classes in psychology, and I took particular interest in things like IQ and how it correlates to a number of things we observe.
And I actually showed my cards, so no I didn't pull an age of consent out of my ass. It's never been proven that 18 is the optimum age of consent. Therefore I take the (easy) negative position, and say that no there isn't one until someone proves there is one.
>>725245180
It's more than just physical development. There is an emotional power imbalance between a 15yo, and a 25yo, let's say.
>inb4 "but adults can be immature too"
if an adult is tricked, or forced into sex that's called rape friendo. and last I checked it wasn't legal.
>>725245372
>Yet they can decide for their "trans" kid what gender they can "change into" with medications and surgery
No they can't. You're talking out of your ass again.
>“remember, it’s (blocking hormones) reversible. If it’s decided to stop the treatment, puberty will resume.”
>“It’s completely reversible and there’s been no untoward effects.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/12/looking-at-suppressing-puberty-for-transgender-kid/
>“[m]ental health professionals can help families to make decisions regarding the timing and process of any gender role changes for their young children” and that parents should make it clear to their children that social transition is reversible.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/22/it-s-absurd-to-claim-that-trans-kids-are-being-rushed-into-transitioning.html
etc
>It's never been proven that 18 is the optimum age of consent
It's not the age of consent in most places. And what you CAN do is easily place where there should be. See >>725244601
I would say 16yo is the ideal age of consent.
>>725245325
They aren't 2d but yes. Labor lasted close to 17 hours so it probably killed any chance I had of ever having a son.
>>725245412
see -> >>725245647
wtf is wrong with the mods
>>725245180
yeah see this is actually something we can work from and it's perfectly reasonable to start from here.
Now ask yourself "why here?"
Consider the fact that you said the AVERAGE age of consent. For about half of women, the age of 15 should be ok, so for the other half, it's morally reprehensible (for women who were to lose their virginity on their 15th birthday) because about half of women haven't developed their vaginas by that time. So then you just made a law just fucked up half the people meant to abide by it, congratulations. And half of the women who lost their virginity the night before their 15th birthday, are now unfairly treated even though they have developed completely. I guarantee that, like most things, vaginal development is on a Normal distribution, so there should be about one in six women who develop a standard deviation after this age (also one in six women a stdDev before that age), i don't feel like looking up the numbers right now, and they don't precisely matter, because you can just plug them in later. Let's imagine that the standard deviation is 2 years. So now move the age of consent down two years to 13. You are still treating one in 6 women unfairly.
Now where do you stop?
>>725245647
>No they can't. You're talking out of your ass again.
But you didn't disprove me, you just provided some evidence of it happening? Kids not even at the age of consent can "change their gender" with the help of medication, with the consent of their parents.
>>725246153
I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.
>>725246173
>But you didn't disprove me, you just provided some evidence of it happening?
What are you looking for? How about you find evidence that prepubescent children are capable consent to sex, or even comprehending any long term consequences? and do this without mentioning your community college course once, you fucking degenerate
>Kids not even at the age of consent can "change their gender" with the help of medication, with the consent of their parents
no they can't. they can temporarily block hormones, which is reversible at any time. See -> >>725245647
Suicide & depression rates of transsexuals drop after they've begun transitioning. wouldn't want that now, would we?
It's clear you want nothing but for children to live as brutally, and uncomfortably as possible.
>>725244548
Is that peppy long stocking what the fuck
>>725246173
you faggot bitch quit making nigger anon think that you are me
>>725245647
>>725245647
>if an adult is tricked, or forced into sex that's called rape friendo. and last I checked it wasn't legal.
you're a really unpleasant person.
what you just did was really just fiddling with semantics, and it wasn't even very good.
>if you just look at a healthy, average looking 18yr old man having sex with an average looking 18 yr old woman, you won't give a shit, zero.
>if I demonstrate that this 18 yr old man is actually an autistic, psychopath with an IQ of 40, you still won't give a shit
>or will you insist he was "tricked"