The sex workers at party conventions are always asked about their clients during them and they consistently say "Democrats are more fun, but Republicans tip better."
And republicans like to keep pretty little parrots around. Except Anne Coulter. I can't figure out what they get out of her except soundbites.
Plus, look at the political parties in college. The short dowdy bookish brunettes favor liberal causes. The rich girl with daddys credit card thats being fucked by the football team tends to favor keeping that status until she can get her MRS degree and marry a junior executive.
And the philosophies are just different. Liberals are all about Save the Poor/Save the Whales/etc etc. Conservatives are "money and power at any cost."
>>724828245 Well. Kinda. I mean, having a thing for cute frumpy brunettes a-la Tina Fey is one thing, but when you look like the cast of Fox News, there's a clear bent towards a certain Pagent Queen type.
>>724827388 2 answers to your question. Conservative women tend to be happier, leading them to be more positive which makes your expressions generally more positive, leading to being more attractive. Liberals tend to be more negative because of constantly blaming others for 'all the injustices and bad things in life' which they see everywhere all the time. Negativity will make you ugly. And yes in serious, no it isn't bait and no there's no science behind it. Just my life experience. Idgaf id you agree or believe me or not.
>>724833615 Darling the world is begging for more people like President Trump. Look at Le Pen in France. Look at Brexit. People don't want liberals telling them how to live anymore, it's obvious to everyone except you guys because you keep watching CNN. President Trump is popular everywhere.
>>724835161 I am american, I now live in england... did some travelling... everyone hates us, every foreign person I've met and extreme retards calling themselves liberals has ruined the whole image of liberals around the world
>>724835161 I can say for Europe at least that Trump is almost universally despised. The right can deny it as much as they want but trump is simply not the loveable god figure they're making him out to be. And in fact according to the popular vote it was only a minority of people in America who liked him too.
attractive people tend to receive better treatment from society as a whole and our political leanings are more or less directly correlated to our world experience and learning. People are nicer to you if you're pretty, so you're more likely to think society as a whole is nicer than it is, so you're less likely to sympathize with the disenfranchised.
>>724835634 nope pretty sure, most people I've met seem to have a problem with america as a whole as a kinda race thing, people dont like the accent, or the amount of american media that pours out into the world and stuff like that... also over here they always go on about how 'america only got involved in the war at the last minute, did fuck all and then made us in debt to them' and I've heard similar things in other places...
>>724835708 Yeah but traditionalism in the states probably means that won't change soon. I'm unsure how winning over big states is more important than winning over the people of the country. But eh, murica
>>724827388 Because liberal women think basic hygiene, healthy diets and not looking like a complete hair dyed piece of shit are "misogynist oppressive patriarchal unrealistic beauty standards made by the patriarchy to keep 'womyn' down".
>>724835996 >Without it 3 states would pretty much control the election
You mean Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida?
Without the EC, or with mandatory proportional-allocation in the EC, candidates will have incentive to campaign in cities across the country. Studies have shown that they will likely hit every single state on their campaign stops, as even Boise and Helena are large enough cities to fall on the radar of relevance (and even more so if you do mandated proportional-rep, as I support). Others like Sioux Falls and cities across Texas which *never* get campaign stops would be hit extensively.
The argument that it disenfranchises small states is less relevant now than it has ever been for this very reason.
>>724835988 I have friends from across Europe and generally they hate how anti consumer the country is and how they always have to stick their nose into other countries businesses. It seems like England is the most receptive to trump but even then he's even amassed a ton of hate their too and I've been told that Brits especially don't like the way 'may is licking the shite out of trumps flabby old arsecheeks with a straw'
>>724827388 The bottom rung of society is ugly, and the bottom rung live off the government, so they support ideas to take from the rich. The libtards keep the poor addicted to the system to keep their vote.
Also, hideous ham beasts hate better looking people, so they justify their disgusting ways by saying they are not exactly male or female to try and escape ideas of beauty.
Better looking people are also more conservative because they make more money statistically. And who wants to to give away money that they earn themselves?
>>724836894 Hope so. His followers are a bunch of fucking cretins. Absolutely cancerous. Thankfully they're all pensioners too so they chance to be dead of old age before they can vote that dickhead in again.
>ugly women are ugly because they don't try >they don't try because they are lazy >because they are lazy they never achieve there goals >when they don't achieve there goals there life goes to shit >when there life goes to shit they look for something to blame >they blame the 'patriarchy' or some other made up source of oppression >they do this because blaming something other than themselves is easy >they do what's easiest because they are lazy
>>724836932 Fuck, sorry, man, I got so mad I posted this on your comment. I MEAN THE FUCKING TRUMPSKI FANS ARE A FUCKING MINORITY, AND THAT'S A FACT. That's why they have to show that map, like square footage matters more than people.
>>724837388 Full time education doesn't leave much room for a job. But if you honestly think a bunch of bed ridden, crippled pensioners with ptsd could take on the whole left wing just because they were vietnam vets I suggest you turn off your internet and watch fox news perpetually for the rest of your sad inbred life
>>724836515 This is so retarded. Trump did win the popular vote, he got the most electoral votes, which are the only votes that matter. Are Americans really so stupid that they think they vote for the president directly?
It's because women have always had to trade sex and companionship for resources. Attractive women landed higher quality men with more resources. Ugly women had to develop a winning personality if she wanted to attract a provider.
But then women realized they could be total counts and just vote for the State to give them the resources they need.
So attractive women are conservative because they've landed high quality providers. Now they don't want to see their family's resources taken by the State and given to other people.
Ugly women tend to be liberal because they can't attract high quality providers and they don't need to become nice people - they just vote to take your shit and give it to themselves.
>>724838327 I don't live in America you fucking retard. University might be piss easy where you live but I guarantee you that almost everywhere else in the world has a much superior education system without factoring in America at all. It's simply facts.
That's fine. We're laughing at you guys. Europe will cease to exist in another century if you don't reverse the path you're on. We made the choice to reject the replacement of the white race in America.
>>724838194 I can't think of a country where full time education is 4 years. Hell even just further education which in the UK spans from sixth form to the end of university. I'm doing a masters in civil engineering and I'm hoping to go on to get a doctorate. I've spent almost 6 years in further education, let alone full time education, with even more to come.
>>724838738 Who gives a fuck where you live or the quality of your education system? That's not your argument Mr Strawman You said full time education doesn't leave much room for a job. Students all over the planet take night work or weekend work to help pay bills while studying, full time or otherwise. Requires something called effort.
>>724838852 There is no difference. Popular vote means getting the majority of the votes, which Trump did in the electoral college. What the public "votes" on is irrelevant because they don't elect the president.
>>724839191 I am putting in effort, for university. Employers simply avert themselves from employing anyone in education because they aren't flexible enough. And I'm sorry but I don't really have plans to work all night in a job and then all day at uni every day of the week. I'm not a machine and that's not effort, that's just ridiculous
And I know it may be the American mentality to work during education and make the education less strenuous in exchange, but the rest of the world is not America and we don't share your fundamental ideologies so stop thinking we do.
>>724835996 This is why only land owners should vote, that used to be a law.
But then the deceptive, petty liberals would try to circumvent it by selling land by the inch. I guess we could limit the smallest amount of land you could sell to a square acre, or half acre sq. Who knows, I haven't thought this through.
>>724828628 >Liberals tend to be more negative because of constantly blaming others for 'all the injustices and bad things in life' which they see everywhere all the time.
as opposed to conservatives who only complain when things happen to their own self because they are so self absorbed. "dont attack MY religion" "dont make ME pay for less fortunate" "Dont take away MY guns"
>>724839667 The world doesn't owe you shit. Nor does it care whether you think work and study together amount to being a robot. In many cultures it's just what you need to do to live with any kind of comfort while preparing for your future.
You know, unless you can somehow afford rent and food and bills and tuition and medical and whatever else life throws at you without a job...
>>724839778 That doesn't even make sense. Positivity is the mindset of entrepreneurs and Christians, two groups that are commonly conservative. Nobody is justifying anything. Make sure your commentary is at least somewhat cogent.
but they only care about individual rights as they pertain to themselves. Never thinking about other people. If they cared about individual rights they wouldn't throw a shitstorm about gay marriage or abortion.
The 'individual rights' argument is bullshit because it ends at their own self interests. Never taking into account others.
>>724840183 Oh noooo. Lets attack people for things they work for and work with. No the helpless welfare bums and the children demanding free things because work is hard. Not MY problem some dipshits procreated and can't afford the kid. Not MY problem some freeloading fuck wants everything handed to them on my dime. Fuck them. Fuck off. Fuck you
>>724840080 They cut women's clits off and throw gays off buildings. That should be a phobia for anyone with the slightest care for women or gays and should be extremely concerning for the leftycucks, so why they have aligned themselves with this ideology is a mystery
>>724840183 Actually man, the liberal party is the party of selfishness. Back when only men could vote shit was better off for everyone, people could buy two houses on a middle class income, with only the husband working.
Do you think anyone would have let that kind of buying power go by choice? Do they think they wouldn't have voted the fuck away from anything that changed that? You know what changed it? Feminism.
Liberal cucks let the globalists fuck their party by offering women the right to vote, the right to work, etc. And women took it hook line and sinker because they are dumb.
When only men voted they had to consider their families, not just themselves, if men just considered themselves they would have voted in female slave labor, ownership (into law not your imaginary bullshit), and had fuckfarms where they kept their extra women like slaughterhouses without the slaughter, just for fucking. People are stupid if they think men were just out for themselves that entire time.
So women got the right to vote and then were fooled into voting for things that were spun as positive but ended up causing disaster.
Then they started working, they felt accomplished, women could do things now, and because women don't think beyond what they already think, and how that makes them feel, they failed to realize that what this was actually doing was doubling the work force over night. With supply and demand companies had their choice, they could also pay a lot less, half, really, for the same work because if you weren't willing to do it at that price there was someone who was.
And women are shit at negotiating salaries so it's still dragging down the workers financially in this country.
Congradulations, Liberalism. The party of women. The destoyers of countries.
>>724840664 I paid for my tuition fees mainly through inheritance off my nan and savings I kept up from doing the odd part time job in secondary school. Unlike some people I didn't blast away every penny I earned on wild parties. And asking your parents for financial support isn't a sin either, at least not in Europe. I'll gladly help my children out financially in university when they go there, just like everyone else does.
I partially agree with you. However, I think the real problem lies with corporations and those at the top.
Women coming into the work force allowed companies to pay two people for one job. Because of this, the average workers wage can't support a family like it did in the past. Is that the womens fault for wanting a voice and the ability to work? I say it's the greedy companies that dont want to pay a livable wage.
>>724841556 And thats one of the main failures of the left, in that they don't recognise this. They're still in the mentality that people who use government funding are doing it because they need it, not that its become much easier and often more lucrative than getting a low skill job
Why are liberals so fucking snarky? Hundreds of thousands of people work while in full time education. They don't work 24 hours a day, but they put in the effort to work when they can to help pay bills or whatever shit they need to pay for. Something that mommy and daddy clearly do for you.
>>724840994 Lmao let's not get carried away sunshine. It's perfectly normal for someone to spend 6-8 hours a day at college and do a four or five hour shift at night, or work weekends. Somehow you've ended up with a strange view of the world where you go to big school five days a week and somehow everything pays for itself. What have they done to your little head, anon?
>>724841488 And charities are full of scandal and most of their money doesn't go to causes, it goes to paying all the people in the charity. Democrats wants stronger consumer protection which would be against corrupt charities and stronger social safety nets.
>>724841556 But the rest of the world isn't America. And I've never understood the idea as to why it's somehow inherently wrong to ask for help in financially difficult times. No point trying to explain it though, I'm sure it'll be more of the stand on your own two feet, land of the free, government should never interfere nonsense that you all seem to have stored in a massive bullshit bin somewhere that you can just pluck out a completely idiotic quote that proves to the rest of the forward thinking world that americans are truly as retarded as we're told they are.
>>724841342 Well for the rest of the people who can't rely on Nanny's coin, getting a job while studying is perfectly reasonable. You clearly don't realise how fucked you are making yourself seem. I suggest you screenshot all of your posts for when you're older and a little less entitled
>>724841984 Maybe because I clearly stated I worked every day at university and I'm not going to throw away every night stacking shelves in fucking asda either just so I can say that I'm a big boy for working more hours than other people. The world doesn't work like that.
>>724837429 Possibly because we own more square footage. You can live with a family of 6 in your 450 square foot apartment. I will take my family of 3, along with the 3 dawgs, on my acre of dirt, in a 1600 square foot rambler any day.
>>724842404 Just because you aren't as driven to be independent as American ideals doesn't mean we're wrong or stupid. We happen to think it's the right way. There's 1000 ways to skin a cat. Americans (used to) like to skin em without govt help.
>>724841998 Funny you should say that considering most conservatives are probably failed coat hanger abortions left in the side of the road from a pair of nigger parents who left them there to die therefore growing up to hate every race that is a slight shade darker than milky white
>>724841670 Rich people aren't conservative or liberal, but if you want to point fingers, women suck at things, just look at any all female staff, like what was it, Yahoo? Feminst bitch gets in charge, fires all men, company that was still doing well enough despite being out of the public eye fails. Anyone with females working for them will tell you the difference in laziness and excuses and PRIVILEGE they think they have to work less when at work and take more days off, leave early etc. It's disgusting, women have not evolved to be productive at anything that doesn't directly effect them aka making sure their home is taken care of as well as the added chemical responses they get from raising children.
That's where the barefoot, pregnant in the kitchen meme came from, it's a stereotype and stereotypes stem from reality.
The work ethic thing seems to be less of a problem for asian women, it's a cultural thing,
That's how the world is right now, whining doesn't change anything. Your feelings don't change anything, thinking reality is unjust doesn't change anything. Changing things based on your feelings while ignoring reality causes a clusterfuck of problems. But women are good at ignoring reality, they live in their emotions which determine everything, while mens emotions are determined by reality.
Back to the point, the jobs moved because half the workforce here is worth less compared to other countries whose people will work for pennies and those jobs take no education, just repetition as well as discipline, which women have no discipline and will get bored with repetition, falling back to their privilege where they don't think they should have to do anything they don't want.
>>724842676 Who do you think is getting taxed? the 1%? People with money are smart enough and are invested enough to work around tax loopholes. The majority of the tax is paid by the middle class, hence the massive wealth disparity
>>724842215 Suing people is an americans favourite pastime. They enjoy getting greedy jewish lawyers to sort their problems out for them because they're all a bunch of manchildren who can't sort out disputes rationally, like a human being
Which is why trickle down economics didn't and never will work and we need to impose a wealth tax and close loopholes, more than just a progressive income tax. Most of their money just sits in the bank anyway we may as well impose a use it or lose policy when it comes to money.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.