Why does every game review read like it was written by a 12 year old?

>>723792929
>reading someone else's take about anything in 2017

Formulate your own opinions, idiot.

>>723793013
Who says I was reading it to formulate an opinion?

I read them occasionally out of curiosity of how bad the writing is. It seems to get worse every year. It's laughable that people actually get paid for this stuff, and it's considered a legitimate career.

>>723793113
Do you read Playboy for the articles too?

They're written for 12 year olds and adults who think like them. Gamers, in other words.

Because people pay shit tons of money to get a good looking website with a professional looking impression.
Any odd retard that can formulate sentence-looking things will look like a pro if their review is put into a professional looking website.

Games have lately been putting emphasis on graphics rather than good gameplay. Reviews seem to gravitate towards that.

>>723792929
cause they were either written FOR 12 year olds or people with the mentality of 12 year olds

File: 1487904071449.jpg (78KB, 499x460px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 499x460px

>>723792929
probably due to target demographics or retards,12 year olds and womanfolk, grown ass men know the vidya we want and dont need no cuntaku bitch telling us whats good.

File: 1488193541221.jpg (8KB, 245x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 245x250px

>>723793177
not th guy you posted, but yes i do. i wont lie though i do love seeing the chicks but not suitable fap material, thats what pornhub, xnxx and /h/ is meant for.

>>723792929

Because videogames are for children you fucking manchild.

>>723792929

Example website and review?