Have you seen Nicole Kidman clapping? Man fuck rekt and gore,

>>723787279
shes like 70 years old she probably has 5 pounds of make up on her hands that took 17 hours to apply in order for her to appear on live HD tv, cut her some slack

terry richardson is a god

>>723788482
What the fuck is your problem lad?

>>723787279
She's got them Anne Coulter hands

File: Harm K.jpg (1MB, 999x1469px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 999x1469px

>>723788520

I fucking hate this cunt, why is he so fucking popular, why can he fuck so many, wth

>>723787840
Who is that anyways?

File: Terry%20sniff%20sniff.jpg (158KB, 652x425px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 652x425px

>>723789490
drugs?

File: whirlwindheat.jpg (332KB, 650x422px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 650x422px

>>723789692
that bitch clapping from op >>723787279

It's legit so she doesnt ruin her manicure, which is probably worth more than your car

>>723789790
I know that but who is that guy in a red shirt?

Holy shit her hands are huge. If she were a due she would be sporting like a 13 inch dong. I'm very much in the average of cock size and it would look like a vienna sausage in her hands.

File: 2a343bc3bb1b.jpg (154KB, 856x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 856x768px

>>723789914
Uncle T-Bone
you see him in your dreams
\w/

>>723789824
okay, now i am jealous

>>723789490
because photographers
get yourself aquainted with lightroom motherfucker and youll have girls begging to get dicked down for a photoshoot

File: 97b.png (205KB, 803x467px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 803x467px

can a bitch live

>>723788031
Is that really winona ryder? Can't seem to find anything about this online

>>723790165
>>723790165

Doesn't look like it. Nose is way off.

>>723789987
Faggot

File: Gavin `bad mother fuckin` McInnes.jpg (828KB, 999x1448px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 999x1448px

>>723788611
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHVXSJ4QiLw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qm9lfWTGmDY

File: 1483532118920.jpg (63KB, 785x590px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 785x590px

>>723787544
>cut her slack for being just another cosmetic-slathered Hollywood piece of cancer

>>723789824
when you see it....

File: Gavin1.jpg (106KB, 432x647px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 432x647px

>>723790165
100%

File: 1318072405735.jpg (79KB, 800x565px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 800x565px

>>723787887

Is that really Lea Seydoux?

File: harmonie008.jpg (45KB, 429x650px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 429x650px

>>723790591
1000% legit

>>723790591
>>723790640
Incredible

>>723790568
I fucking hate terry richirdson with a burning fucking passion that will follow me to hell god i hate the fucking degenerate!!11!

>>723787279
Nicole Kidman is such a poxy ranga. Totally would not bang

Actually that is a lie. I would destroy her... but not care the slightest if she enjoyed it. That actually makes her an ideal mate because i wouldnt obsess or have any performance anxiety that normally ruins sex for me.

OMG i think i love that disgusting ranga. Shame she is so vile.

File: heisagod.jpg (59KB, 550x539px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 550x539px

>>723790700
but lord Terry loves you no matter how many times you sin a day,
now bow \m/

File: 1435715846761.png (142KB, 327x308px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 327x308px

>>723787279
That is fucking terrifying. The stuff of fucking nightnmares

>>723790591
Looks like it

I don't get how he does it. The guy's disgusting and not even attractive.

>>723790823
I'll fucking kill you if some how i ever meet you and spend 25 years in prison with a smile on my face every day.

>>723791064
Confidence

>>723791064
its a fame/shock culture circle jerk nothing more.

File: tumblr_mksfxf1HE31qa42jro1_1280.jpg (199KB, 1280x855px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1280x855px

>>723791089
can you still view /b/ while locked up?

>>723788031
Not even close to being Winona

>>723790840
Uncle T.Bone'r
is not going to age very well

>>723789490
probably started off as the least scary/imposing/demanding photographer
then by word of mouth from 'stars' they said they would only work with him (also his 'artistic' old school photographs are what 'stars' keep on referring as retro)
then there's the environment that he sets up. it's not high class, it's average non threatening. plus the atmosphere, drinking, and drugs.
pretty sure he's gotten a golden pass from law enforcement (or high end lawyers from the magazines he sells his pictures)

>>723791220
Grade A behavior privileges allow some internet access at various institutions, its not hard to reset the PC switch to SAFE mode and avoid the netnanny/filters.. :-)

File: hd-aspect-1470233530-esq-september-2016-double-trouble-01-terry-richardson.jpg (187KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 2048x1152px

>>723791310
he will live 4ever

>>723791427
No, he wont..

>>723791379
I'm not familiar with any of his work. Is it any good?

File: 82052_Scan10220_122_169lo.jpg (350KB, 1653x2338px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1653x2338px

>>723791456
he sucks the blood of the young

File: lea-seydoux-topless-in-the-beautiful-person-7592-3.jpg (136KB, 1000x720px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1000x720px

>>723787887
>>723790591
>>723790640
>>723790665
>>723790906

That maybe her face but it isn't her body. Look at the moles in the picture with the fag and that screenshot.

>>723791467
That's all horse shit he rides a fame wave dating back to the mid 90's he literaly dose nothing more that famous people in shocking/slightly shocking poses.. nothing fucking more!

>>723791565
Lol, it was a completely neutral question

>>723791488
In the figurative sense he sure fucking dose.. passing off his based mediocre shit as a craft while there's a whole world of culture that shit birds that are in to his shit ignore. he is a fucking discredit to exsistance itself and can only ever be called a social climber/parasite

>>723787279

She's like 5'11", very skinny and lanky, long flexible hands. What's the problem here?

Oh I forgot 4plebs are obese with stubby hands.

>>723790294

Holy shit that's a dude I wouldn't have imagined to be on this list

>>723791642
and i was just making sure you understood the answer to the qustion that is terry rickingham or what the fuck ever

>>723791530
Good point.

Speaking of Lea Seydoux, check out Blue is the Warmest Colour (or The Life of Adelle, same film, French title) if you want to see lots of her in action.

>>723791795
>>723791783
>>723791732
>>723791719
>>723791662
>>723791795
soon..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTCCGHucS7s

File: 002d29f2-815f-4b56-adfd-9d7088cc7d4d.jpg (86KB, 800x494px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x494px

We are drawing le doge may mays....
http://flockdraw.com/f4b4i9

File: @ all jelly beta manlets.jpg (242KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1280x853px

>>723791857
>soon..
never\m/

>>723791817
>>723791851
>>723791869
She looks wasted. Probably cocaine or some fine ass heroin.

>>723791530

>makeup

Hitting moles with concealer is not uncommon in the movie industry.

Also, same tits

>>723791901
cucks, liberals and fags.. its habbenen if you haven't already noticed my dear cuck :-)

So is it like some "Hollywood initiation" to fuck Terry? Or is he just that chill and cool of a person where everyone hangs out with him and the girls fuck him? I'm envious and also highly impressed. Seems like a cool guy.

File: Terry-Richardson-Nude-Archive-50-Photos-Part-2-48.jpg (101KB, 1024x693px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x693px

>>723791530
>>723791923

Of course you can cover moles but you would still see the bumps.
Here is the same girl from a different perspective again. compare all the moles, body type and nipples. It's not her.

>>723792091

You forgot the pic

Also you wouldn't necessarily see the bumps if the moles are flat bits of discolored skin

>>723792060
It works like this; If they are in a picture naked or having sex with him it means they are less famous and need to kinda borrow some notoriety off of him however when you see him in a photo or he has taken a photo of some one fully clothed it means they are more famous than he is and he is acquiring more notoriety himself.. a circle jerk of sorts.

>>723792060
>>723792060

he's a predator who has had several young models be told to work with him 'or else.' He uses whatever kind of leverage he has in his position as some kind of trendy photographer to pressure women into getting naked. Now, granted, some are just massive whores who don't have a problem with it in the first place. However, there have been several models who filed reports against him or have had their careers "plateaued" because they refused to ever work with him after attempting to before and getting super creepy vibes.

He's basically a pervert who is protected by the industry because they think he's some kind of savant photographer. His sexual perversions and borderline sexual assaults are hidden away because they like him. It's like how everyone seems to forget Roman Polanski is a fucking pedophile. They just look the other way because of his work.

>>723789824
>2girls one man
>3 cocks
Hmmmm.....

>>723792192
Cage who is very famous fully clothed, semi shocking pose..

>>723792264
very young relatively unknown at the time actress naked in shocking pose..

are you getting it now? thing is the feminazis and libs love the shit out of him..

File: terry cage - AP031492.jpg (24KB, 608x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 608x400px

=================================

John Waters:
I heard that Terry Richardson was doing the photo shoot for this piece. Did you see his book, Terryworld? Did you look through it? And are you going to show your dick in this photo shoot?

Johnny Knoxville:
Uh, Terry might already have some photos of that! [both laugh]


John Waters:
What luck for the editors of GENRE! Well, Terry’s is a great book. He always shows his own dick! It seems like he’s the only photographer who, judging from his book, shows up nude with a hard-on to take your picture. That’s a refreshing new twist, I guess, in a shoot.

Johnny Knoxville:
Yeah, he’s got a monster cock on him, for sure. And his assistant, Keiichi, will stand there with his cock out, playing with it, while Terry’s shooting.

==========================

https://web.archive.org/web/20060117030549/http://www.genremagazine.com/2005/7-1/magazine/content/knoxville.cfm

>>723792353
Faggotry=Degeneracy

>>723792188
>>723792269
Well ain't that some shit. So he's not some cool dude, he's just some slick mother fucker working the system.

File: c50479aaf79ea1d26aa7c4eb256bba6c.png (580KB, 492x436px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 492x436px

>>723792170

Where is that stomach mole in the picture you linked?

>>723788147
Is that a kid in the photos behind her.

>>723792396

Also if you look closely you can barely see the second, upper mole, but it's barely a little discolored smudge because of the filter they used

>>723792381
pretty much.. he's got himself a good little system too, legions of fans, victims to afraid to talk and a load of money to boot.

File: (chasing the dragon) terry & a buddy using aluminium foil to smoke grade-a pharmaceutical H.jpg (69KB, 600x403px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x403px

>>723792438
nah she 19yo

>>723792438
what do you think.. didn't you know its "progressive" so stop being a biggot..

>>723792466
Who is it then?

>>723792528
This??

>>723792527
Hot

File: TR pissing into the pacific ocean.jpg (32KB, 541x360px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 541x360px

>>723792528
brook

>>723792556
well fuck i'm convinced...

>>723792623
its brooke shields when she was a kid, the photos are famous and controversial as fuck

>>723788752
Pewds

Who the fuck does this guy get away with it?

File: choke-cumming.jpg (421KB, 1058x718px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1058x718px

>>723792674
>Who the fuck does this guy get away with it?
get away with what?

>>723791719
Is that Ashley Tisdale?

File: TR spits cum into a cunt's suckhole.jpg (435KB, 714x983px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 714x983px

>>723792777
how did you find that info?

>>723791584
well im jelaous

>>723792649
yeah still not convinced and even if it is brook shields shes still a fucking child.. why would you be proud to display that on a wall?

>>723792753
Fucking all these woman and not being sued for "rape"

>>723792868
I just did a search, it's definitely her, there are tons online

>>723792908
Yeah its her. Its by a photographer named richard prince.

File: Pepe Richardson.gif (106KB, 858x690px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 858x690px

>>723792874
cause these celebs and models beg T-bone to fuck them and he gives them free tees https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA282wVgAV4

>>723792820
Fron the girls face? Looks like her

>>723792908
>>723792942
..as a child... so we're cool with that now?

>>723793010
No it's fucking disgusting her mother allowed it. I'm just stating the facts.

>>723793010
Meh, I don't feel like getting into a philosophical argument about the morality and merits of unrestricted art. I'm at least half pedo though, so whatever

>>723793010

Like the guy said, they're controversial. He probably gets away with it because he/whoever took the pictures justified that they weren't pornographic in nature.

Contrary to popular belief, taking pictures of naked children isn't actually illegal as long as they're not lewd in nature. Obviously that is entirely up to the interpretation of the judge.

>>723793063
Who's the girl?

File: tumblr_n4l5ge16WK1si5ntmo1_1280.jpg (306KB, 560x802px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 560x802px

>>723793101
claudia

>>723793064
Your honesty is admirable but your dismissiveness of what he's doing is why you are just like him.. apathy will be your fate.

>>723793134
Jesus schiffer? She had that kind of nice tits

File: Richardson lovey dovey with Depp.jpg (291KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1280x853px

>>723793240
yes indeed

>>723793010
they're not illegal because they're not lewd, i'm not saying im cool with it, i honestly dont care i'm just stating a fact

>>723793067
and there is no moral constant? no limit of restriction to this "creative" process.. sounds like a legit way to run a society.

>>723793254
Terry is doing Gods work

>>723787279
my hands do that too
with my palm flat on a desk and my fingertips up, they curve enough to be 3 inches off the wood at the tips

my sister can bend her elbows backward


us white people are weird and lanky

>>723793262
honestly don't worry then when its your daughter.. i mean fuck if nothings sacred or limited why even bother with arbitrary things like laws and rules and god forbid morals..

>>723792264
This is a picture of the rape in progress of jamie peck. ;)

>>723793277

The pictures are 41 years old. Calm the fuck down. I'm sure you could find plenty of objectionable and borderline illegal material from the 70s and 80s that nobody gave a fuck about then that people would riot and protest over today. Because that's the kind of shitty and over sensitive society we live in.

It's a naked kid. Her mom was cool with it, and now she's an adult that probably doesn't give a flying fuck.

It's not porn, she's not getting fisted or anything, she's just naked, and it's not even frontal nudity.

Get over it.

>>723793340
>us white people
Jesus, get your head out of the PC identity politics pool.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/17/terry-richardson-new-york-magazine-model

http://observer.com/2014/03/the-true-nature-of-terry-richardsons-work/

>>723793365
are you an idiot? her mother consented to it, i would not consent to it, me saying i dont care what people do with their kids as long as its consensual and legal does not reflect how i would act if a similar situation arose

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiOlqGXkrDSAhVKsVQKHRl8DPUQFggiMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.buzzfeed.com%2Fjtes%2Fterry-richardson-is-back-again-probably-forever&usg=AFQjCNHno_Hg2RLGFY7CSDnxcLz9yUn2nw&sig2=cfdynYkwJwPCXu3dvqZRlA

>>723788890
Aragon got the aids virus, resto in pesto bro

File: 000815_3a3d650d0be8907a613050b6115a1d02.jpg (182KB, 637x800px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 637x800px

>>723793393
>>723793393
>This is a picture of the rape in progress of jamie peck. ;)

http://thoughtcatalog.com/gavin-mcinnes/2014/05/10-things-the-media-gets-wrong-about-photographer-terry-richardson/

http://streetcarnage.com/blog/terry-richardson-raped-me-too/

>>723793496
so when a mother consents to sex with her underage daughter thats what makes it ok, cheers for clearing that one up bud..

>>723793551

>so when a mother consents to sex with her underage daughter thats what makes it ok

What is this, the third straw man argument you've come up with? Are you trolling, or are you really this retarded?

>>723793496
read this one and make sure you do filthy degenerate!: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/09/%E2%80%9Cit_was_degrading%E2%80%9D_terry_richardson_and_the_nasty_sexual_harassment_loophole/

File: richardson07bis.jpg (1MB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x994px

https://thebarchive.com/b/thread/689601641/#689620087

>>723793600
>http://www.salon.com/2014/07/09/%E2%80%9Cit_was_degrading%E2%80%9D_terry_richardson_and_the_nasty_sexual_harassment_loophole/

Terry Richardson didn't take the Brooke Shields pictures, btw

>>723793596
what else am i supposed to take from that statement you fucking tard..

>>723793010
>>723793010

She was naked and under age in a feature film for god's sake.

File: 1412347647362.png (128KB, 308x308px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 308x308px

>>723793551
what?
i literally said
>i dont care what people do with their kids as long as its consensual and legal

>>723793619
i never said he did, if you had fucking eye balls cunt you would have read that i said and i fucking quote verbatim "who would be proud to display that".. you fucking newt..

>>723793641

I don't know, asshole? Maybe at least make an apples to apples comparison, since consenting to nude, non-lewd pictures of your daughter is legal, while consenting to having sex with her is not?

>>723793692

Whoa, going 0-100 real quick

Calm down pal, just pointing it out

>>723788031
>A few pics with celebrities
>A pick fucking a crackwhore
>Damn, he fucks celebrities

Logic

>>723793186
There's a difference between what goes on in my head or what my sexual attractions and fantasies are and how I choose to act in my life. I've sort of come to accept that there's a lot of shit that happens in the world that I can't change. I was born in 1991 so I guess that makes me a millenial, but I don't share the "make an impact" mindset and idealism of that generation. Not to mention /b/ desensitizes you.

I try to be a good person and make a difference in the lives of the people who are close to me or in those few instances when someone who I don't know crosses my path and needs the kind of help i can offer. But that doesn't mean I don't occasionally jackoff to teens and preteens or look at gore threads every once in a while.

My so-called apathy only begins its extension at the boundary of my personal life and the people in it, I'd say.

>>723793665
and you didn't get the sarcasm of "when its YOUR daughter".. jesus god fucking shit are you high right now?

>>723793641

lol are you this dumb?

do you even know what a strawman argument is?

here's a hint, nobody said that consenting to having sex with a kid is okay or legal, you did

>>723793702
brook did not have sex but as the subject did not have the capacity to consent and i don't give a shit what a fucking servant class degenerate like you thinks but her mothers consent dose not make it ok, its the matter of the individule and at that age they are incapable of consent that's why we don't let them drive or drink EVEN if their parents do consent.. are you getting this yet?

>>723793924
May wanna change that filename bro

>>723793727
that is to say you care for your self and your immediate life yeah?

>>723790946
jesus fucking christ that's disgusting

>>723793886

By the same turn, there's plenty of things we do let them do with their parent's consent that they wouldn't be able to do without it. Like travel, or get prescription medications, or go on school field trips, or participate in sports teams.

This is entirely based on your perception of the pictures. They aren't pornographic, as ruled by a judge. While you personally might have an issue with a child being naked, (nude children are commonly portrayed in classical art, and have been for centuries, you don't have any issues with them there, do you?) legally speaking, and practically speaking, it's hardly any different than if she were simply modeling fully clothed.

>>723793877
why would i give a fuck about your label of an argument dick head you matter less than nothing to me let alone what you think and yeah champ, your the one defending child nudity in the name of art and refusing to belive that he has actually raped more than one woman under the guise of "professional art", fucking autist trying to call other people out pfft..

>>723793959
Sure. But not to such a narrow extent as it comes across in my post.

>>723793886
well in this situation the mothers consent does make it legal sunshine

all anybody here is saying is that the taking of these photos is legal and its entirely the morals of the mother that directed her consent

then you tried to draw parallels to a hypothetical situation wherein the mother consents to sexual conduct with the child, which is illegal

what point are you trying to make that we aren't agreeing with?

>>723794065

>why would i give a fuck about your label of an argument dick head

Because it's a logical fallacy. You're literally looking at their statement and saying "Well I can't argue against that" so you take another thing that is obviously wrong or illegal, that they didn't say that they supported and say "WELL HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT THIS?" in an attempt to divert attention away from your shitty argument.

You're putting words in people's mouths and it's obvious and stupid.

>and refusing to belive that he has actually raped more than one woman under the guise of "professional art",

This discussion isn't aout Terry Richardson, and if you're implying that he took those pictures, Terry Richardson didn't take those pictures.

Terry Richardson is the same age as Brooke Shields. He also would have been 10 years old when they were taken.

Nice try, though.

>>723794026
yes its very different, preserving something for antiquity is an obligation and most of the things (like the cherub) where drawn from imagination and not models who are exposed. the things done with parental consent are far less exploitative and will generally be something child understand as opposed to "hey sweetie just go over then and stand naked in frount of that man"

>>723794154
Instead of sitting on your fat cunt reddit backside complaining. Go out and do something about it then you'll see how fucked the system is.

>>723794072
if in some way i were a care giver involved in your life and your were seriously dependent on me and i showed the same apathy that you have shown to this situation how would that make you feel? this is a genuine question.

>>723794243

>the things done with parental consent are far less exploitative and will generally be something child understand as opposed to "hey sweetie just go over then and stand naked in frount of that man"

I don't get it, are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

>>723794260
wait, are you a bot?
your responses are becoming less and less related to the discussion

is this supposed to be "art"?

>>723794211
you're a fucking idiot i have already said multiple times that i know terry dident take the pictures of brook shields you huge fucking ass clown that has never been the point of this conversation so fuck and let the adults talk.. i swear they get less intellectually capable every summer.

>>723794318
You're going to have to define the situation. As I see it, the situation is two dudes probably hundreds or thousands of miles apart geographically discussing whether or not the background photo of a nude child in a Terry Richardson picture is ok. There's no personal interaction happening whatsoever in the situation.

I just told you that I try to be a good person to the people that come into my life, so your example isn't a situation where I'd be showing apathy, if the roles were reserved.

>>723794389
disagreeing, strongly.... are you trying to troll with that question..

>>723794430
>is this supposed to be "art"?
1 0 0 % >>723791039
>>723791003

>>723794430
apparently..

>>723794545

I too am arguing that it is not exploitative or even necessarily morally wrong that the pictures of Brooke Shields were taken, because they were taken with parental consent.

Where do we disagree?

>>723794515
for fuck sake we're not just talking about photos of brook shields..

>>723787279
Holy Shit! Be Gone Demon!

Same one call the Pope!

>>723794550
lmao. looks like my porn folder, dudes overated.

EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD IMAGE GOOGLE THIS:
sally mann three graces
AND THEN UPLOAD THE RESULT HERE, HURRY TIME IS RUNNING OUT!..............

███╗░░░███╗░██████╗░██████╗░███████╗
████╗░████║██╔═══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝
██╔████╔██║██║░░░██║██║░░██║███████╗
██║╚██╔╝██║██║░░░██║██║░░██║╚════██║
██║░╚═╝░██║╚██████╔╝██████╔╝███████║
▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓
▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓
▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓
moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators moderators mops mops mops mops MODULATORS

>>723794613
Please define what we're talking about then

>>723794545
her parental consent means jack shit that's where we disagree..

>>723794613
>>723794604
>>723794515
IMAGE GOOGLE THIS:
sally mann three graces

>>723794686

Okay?

I can apparently buy this picture of girls pissing for 20-25,000 dollars.

>>723794686
>sally mann three graces
yeah.. nahh

>>723794686
>>723794651
dude, your shit is weak

IMAGE GOOGLE THESE THREE:

sally mann three graces

jock sturges

david hamilton

.....SO WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK?????????

>>723794752
well fuck it must be art then..

i just took a shit, i can get a snap if you want to slide me a twenty?