The moon landings are fake.

>>723521480
yes

>>723521480
As is the sincerity of your assertion.

>>723521480
Yet you can see all the equipment left behind including the rover in your picture with a simple telescope if you know where to look. So IF they where fake then how the fuck did that shit get up there?

File: 68-HC-642 (2).jpg (323KB, 925x727px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 925x727px

>>723521480

File: Saturn_V_launches.jpg (120KB, 1014x545px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1014x545px

>>723522720

>>723521480

your mom is fake

>>723521480
Your mom is fake and you are fake news

File: 5408_640.jpg (142KB, 640x637px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 640x637px

>>723523111

>>723521480
this shit is tiresome

https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

File: 5505_640.jpg (298KB, 633x640px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 633x640px

>>723523153

>>723521480
9/11 was faked. There never were any twin towers. If you see pics of them, they are faked. Why would these pics have to be faked if these towers ever actually existed?

World War II was faked.
All the pictures are faked.
Everyone who tells you its real is lying and have been bribed.

>>723523837
fake

File: IMG_2944.png (2MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1334x750px

>>723521480
Yeah I know, follow the compass.

>>723523886

jesus was fake.

>>723524309
Australia doesnt exist

File: 1487911557026.jpg (182KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1024x768px

i believe pizzagate is completely real

>>723523624
I'm from Brooklyn and can confirm

>>723522720
Are you fucking retarded or something???? There has literally never been a telescope created by man that can discern objects that small on the moon. Even the Hubble Space Telescope is unable to see such fine detail.
"Hubble's 94.5-inch mirror has a resolution of 0.024″ in ultraviolet light, which translates to 141 feet (43 meters) at the Moon's distance. In visible light, it's 0.05″, or closer to 300 feet. Given that the largest piece of equipment left on the Moon after each mission was the 17.9-foot-high by 14-foot-wide Lunar Module, you can see the problem."

>>723522720
To see the largest object left on the moon by mankind would require an optical telescope with a diameter of at least 25 meters. Even then, the lander would look like a single pixel. BTW the larges telescope on earth has a diameter of 10 meters.
In short, you are retarded and just made that shit up off the top of your head.