Why can't atheists define atheism?

>>723443274
Because agnosticism is masterrace. All else claims knowledge one cannot claim to know.

>>723443392
Atheism makes no assertions, only the dismissal of those not able to be properly supported.

>>723443699
Atheists usually claim knowledge that there is no god. Others say that is incorrect and else claim to be atheist. Agnosticism makes it clear.

>>723443888
*also

trips dont lie

>>723443274
Because only a god can create, when you prove the non existence of God, you realize you cannot create, only observe so an atheist can only observe the meaning, not create it

>>723443996
But to claim any other knowledge beyond the idea that a higher power created is illogical. Even to claim this higher power has sentience or a conscience is a step beyond what you can know.

Atheismis, in the broadest sense, the absence ofbeliefin the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist.In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief thatat least one deity exists.

>>723444182
On the whole I agree but the problem I have with this is the vague definition of deity. The nature of entropy suggests a singular event that started this universe. That is an all encompassing power that could fit the definition of deity, regardless of sentience or intelligent thought (as we know it) of any kind.

>>723444102
Exactly. Only observations, we cannot create

>>723443274
\it is a religion

>>723444760
I dig it. Gives a much more powerful meaning to the term create. People think they're creating when it's just procreation.

File: magnospheric.jpg (65KB, 321x500px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 321x500px

Fuck atheists. Atheists claim that they know what the fuck is going on, and they have no proof what so ever.

Agnostic master race.

>>723445900
Why not be both?...