Americunts can't solve this.

it's three you fucking retard, try making it longer to make it harder

orange

Anyone who says something other than 5 did not go to school.

Easy:

>1x2 = ?-1
>2=?-1
>2+1=?
>?=2

Brackets
Indices
Divide
Multiply
Add
Subtract
Its simple. 1+(1x2) = 3.

>>722971861

fuck

>>722971767
>try making it longer to make it harder

Then no americunts what so ever, would be able to solve it.

>>722971960
>Its simple. 1+(1x2) = 3.

There was no brackets!

>>722971861
are you fucked

Fuck me I didn't realise /b/ was this full of retards, I was never big on math but even I know this is 4. Fucking hell.

>>722972081
Found the retard. Its there to show that 1x2 goes before 1+1

>>722972081
In what he said multiply is still above add therefore multiplication should be carried out first and is exactly the same in this case as having brackets

>>722972081
PEMDAS, fuckhead. It doesn't need parentheses*, because MD comes before AS. Still, the parentheses aid n00bcakes like you in figuring out that the operation comes first.

File: maths.png (53KB, 648x642px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 648x642px

here is one for you faggots

>>722972192
>Its there to show that 1x2 goes before 1+1

Nope, you can't add brackets. Even without brackets multiplication goes before addition.

>>722972192 same answer to you.

6?

You guys are idiots.

Solving for x,

1+1=2

2*x*2=?

x=?/4

Bunch of morons here.

1+1 = 2
2 x 1 = 2
___________+
2+2 = 4

>>722971707
17

112

>>722972081
The brackets are implied... Not necessary, but can be inserted and it is the same equation.

>>722972901
>Not necessary,

They are not "not necessary" they are plain wrong. You can't add brackets if there are none to begin with.

>>722972901

This. PEMDAS, bitches.

>>722971707
by PEMDAS its 3, by left to right its 4

>>722971960
>>722972192
>>722972249
>>722972279
>>722972901
>>722973397
>>722973717

I give up. This proves once again that americunts are spastics when it comes to maths. There is no need for PEMDAS, if anything, you might use the --M-A- letters, the other letters don't exist here. Americunts = pissheads about maths.

>>722971846
Suffered through 12+ years of that living hell and I can tell you that the answer is goddamn 3.

>>722971707
potatoe!

>>722972163
Cool bait

Explanation for why this is 4 in modern math.

https://youtu.be/wtE2eix6s1w

>>722971707
?

>>722972507
Are you actually fucking retarded. Multiplication/Division comes BEFORE addition/subtraction. No one is adding brackets

Humanity evolves backwards yet again

>>722974625
>Brackets
>Indices
>Divide
>Multiply
>Add
>Subtract
>Its simple. 1+(1x2) = 3.

You are better at yack-yack-yacking, than reading, and using your brain.

>>722974625
Stop swallowing anons bait

>>722974867
instead of complaining you could start explain whats wrong

>>722974995
>explain whats wrong

The weak brains that americunts have.

theres so much cancer in this thread

>>722974867
Parenthesis are unnecessary. You do not add them in. It does not change the answer any

>>722973892
>No need for PEMDAS
>IE no need for order of operations
>the other letters do not exist

You're fucking stupid. You had to use order of operations (PEMDAS) to solve it, that's how you know 1x2 comes before 1+1. Whether your are actively thinking of order of operations or not you are using it, doesn't matter the simplicity of the equation.

How many times do I have to say that it's three?

>>722975476
why do you need to solve basic math for fat autists on the internet at all?

>>722975476
You completely misunderstand the point of the thread. Euro fagtrash come here to insult Americans, Americans come here to troll, other Europeans pretend to be American to further their fagtrash agenda of proving there "obvious superiority".

>>722971767
you like it long and hard don't you anon

>>722972507
>you can't add brackets
You can if it doesn't affect the equation, like in this case to show aesthetically how it's done

>>722971861
2+1=2 thanks anon, looks like school was a waste of time.

>>722976044

One more proof of dumb americunts.

>>722972506
A-level faggot detected.

its obviously 3 becuase you Always take multiplications Before addition therefore.
1+1x2=1+2=3.

>>722976194
Or proof of trolls, or proof of Europeans pretending to be Americans to fuel your jack off parties

>>722972506
a) integral of sqrt(3-x)(x+1) from 3 to 0. substitute x=1+2sintheta
integral of sqrt(2-2sintheta)(2+2sintheta) *2costheta from -pi/6 to pi/2=integral of 2*sqrt(1-sintheta^2)*2costheta dtheta from -pi/6 to pi/2= integral of 4*costheta^2 from -pi/6 to pi/3. therefore, k=4
b) area=4* integral costheta^2 from -pi/6 to pi/2 = 4*sintheta*costheta (from -pi/6 to pi/2) + 4* integral of sintheta^2 from -pi/6 to pi/2=4*(1/2*sin2theta from pi/6 to pi/2 +(2/3pi)- area) therefore, are=1/5(1/2sin2theta from -pi/6 to pi/2 +2/3pi)=1/10sin-pi/12+2/15pi=1.84

File: wheresyours.jpg (235KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1024x768px

At the end of the day both Americans and Brits know the score of where their respective countries place in the world and in greatness, so troll on.

>>722971707
Not enough information

Could be
>(1+1)*2 = 4
>1+(1*2) = 2

>>722977014
Eugh, typo, meant 3 not 2

>>722977014
It cannot be because multiplication is always done before addition when there are no paranthesis

>>722977014
and what do you get without the brackets? thats right 3

>>722977140
That's just an arbitrary rule used when there's not enough information

>>722977191
Your method is identical to
>1+(1*2) = 3

File: artist_showing_bread.jpg (27KB, 300x190px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x190px

>>722971813
>>722971846
>>722971861
>>722972081
>>722972163
>>722972512
>>722972751

Look at all these anons that will be making me a sandwich at subway soon

File: godsSpeedSpaceman2.jpg (67KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x450px

>>722976834

>>722977259
It is an arbitrary rule. But using the "+" sign to represent addition is an arbitrary rule too. In mathematics, the multiplication before addition rule is set in place so that everybody can understand what it's written. If you don't respect it you might as well define "+" as meaning division, and you get 1+1*2=2, but we're talking about real conventional math here, not individual ways of interpreting signs.

>>722977483
>the multiplication before addition rule is set in place so that everybody can understand what it's written

But it's only needed when there isn't enough information to come to a conclusive answer, such as in the OP

>>722976194
I'm English and it's entirely possible to make aesthetic changes to an equation as long as it doesn't affect the outcome. You spend fuckloads of time in school learning simplification and all that bollocks which is exactly this sort of thing

>>722977671
Yes, that's why in the OP, the answer is 3