Am i hebephile for liking her body of work?

Or ephebophile

>>722665495
>Am i hebephile for liking a grown woman?
are you retarded?

40 year old face with a deformed body.

who be dat

>>722665495
>generic pornstar with busted body
Nah, you´re fine.

>>722665495
No you're a pedophile. kys

>>722665596
Piper Perri

Thank you

She has been railed by so many niggers

>>722666128
Well yes anon, that is true

>>722666128
But dont you think they imagine they're fucking a kid?

She looks like a rat

>>722667246
> Implying that is not the standard

>>722667246
probably, yes. black people have higher rates of pedophilia. or, at least, they're caught more.

>>722665495
got news for you everyone is a hebephile.

>>722665877

With her head shopped larger...

File: 1476566160170.png (278KB, 468x375px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 468x375px

>>722667378

>>722665495
My gf is short and tiny frame. She keeps her vsg shaved and when we fuck, sometimes she says stuff like "You like fucking this 12 yr old pussy?" Gets me diamonds.
She is 22 btw.

>>722665495
I don't get this theory that if you like skinny women with no tits, or chicks that are like 5ft tall... then you must want to fuck kids.
Doesn't make any sense at all.

>>722667962
She has the face of a 60 year old that's had too many face lifts, Jesus Christ...

File: tiny4k-piper-perri-03.jpg (250KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1500x1000px

Creampie this bune

File: Piper-Perri-and-Elsa-Jean-in-Wet-And-Wild-Besties06.jpg (259KB, 1500x1125px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1500x1125px

Blew my load 5 mins in

Piper Perri does not look like a teen/loli at all. Yeah she is skinny, but I would never in a million years mistake her as underage, even in her earlier work I've seen.

File: 1361974917910.jpg (94KB, 500x482px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x482px

>>722665495
Are you asking if you are a pedophile for being sexually aroused by a child? Yes, you probably are.

The bigger point here isn't necessarily what attracts you, in regards to other humans, but what you do with your attraction and how you choose to deal with your impulses.

If you are attracted to children and you enjoy looking at them, feel free to do as you wish, since it's not against the law for you to be attracted to children, yet. The fact that children are attractive to so many people is probably the main reason why they are used so often in movies and to advertise products, people like children, and some people find children so beautiful that they want to fuck them.

One thing you have to keep in mind, though, is what the child in question wants, and here is where things start to get hairy.

Some argue that children can't possibly decide whether or not they want to have sex, but if children can resist their parents in virtually ANY subject, I'm pretty sure they are more than capable to decide for themselves, whether or not they want to grab someone else's dick and lick it, but that's just my opinion, and some people may disagree.

Having said that, your attraction, or what you are, probably has very little to do with what you decide to do with another human. There's a gray line between what is objectionably wrong, and what is acceptable, when it comes to what you find sexually arousing, and what you actually do with your perversions.

Overall, if you are a pedophile, you should pay a lot more attention to what the child wants, than what you want to do with the child. and if you are a normalfag who just want a reason to burn people alive, you are may not be as morally justified as you think you are.

tl;dr: Acting upon your urges is completely different than condemning yourself for what you find attractive.

>>722668641
WTf are you talking about? He asked if being attracted to a sort of young looking, perfectly legal, adult pornstar made him a hebephile.

>>722668641
I don't want to diddle kids, anon.
Piper is cute and attractive, to me.
In other words, is it wrong to be strong?
You be the judge

bitch is gross

>>722668488
link?

File: 1487179749943.png (8KB, 415x244px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 415x244px

>>722668641
Okay childfucker

Yes but your mum gay!!

File: purelyphysical.jpg (27KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x400px

>>722668641
if you think you should feel like shit for being attracted to this. then society has cucked your mind and you should probably slap yourself in the nuts for being so stupid.

File: 1475523646175.jpg (192KB, 624x420px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 624x420px

>>722667962
>tfw piper and my gf have the same butthole.

>>722669696
slightly used is best butthole.

File: 1365285347469.jpg (93KB, 479x472px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 479x472px

>>722668857
and I say that the fact he's so afraid of being labeled a pedophile is what fuels all the pedo hysteria he's trying to avoid.

The fact that he's attracted to children's physique doesn't necessarily has to reflect on his actions, but it DOES say a lot about what attracts him sexually.

This bullshit about "looking young" or "perfectly legal" or "hebephile" are just ways for people to justify their own attraction towards children in a way to conceal what they are actually doing without the emotionally charged assertion that they might be doing something bad.

The fact that people like that exist, and the fact that they try to justify themselves just to avoid harsh criticism, is the exact reason why they feel the need to justify themselves and label their "preferences" in a different manner.

You are still a faggot, even if you choose not to call yourself a faggot, and come up with some bullshit like I'm just sexually attracted to male's physique. The same way you are still a pedophile if you choose not to call yourself one, and come up with some bullshit like "I'm just sexually attracted to children's physique".

>>722670028
thank you anon! well-kept, but you're not afraid of breaking it.

>>722669683
Real pedophiles think I'm cucked by society and normalfags think I'm a child fucker.

I really don't know what to say if that's what you really think.

>>722670215
look at this photo.>>722669683

thinking this is hot is not weird. you on the other hand sound completely versed in how to be repressed.

>>722669696
Your gf's butthole has been stretched by fifty niggers too?

>>722667725

That's a good woman. Pics?

>>722670492
I think she's only done a handful of DPs or anal.

>>722670376
normies dont think that they just dont talk about it because its taboo is some states. if you ever get called out on being a creep remind people that in a lot of states in the US age of consent is 16.

File: 218d0a362e193dd457676807fa3e3efe23bb0e92602de35c0cc49d24ebbf98d5.jpg (23KB, 306x450px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 306x450px

>>722670456
You are missing my point.

The fact that you feel the need to bring this up, just to avoid being called names, as a way to justify yourself, makes a case against you, because it legitimizes people who are trying to take what you think and turn it against you.

The ENTIRE argument against pedophilia lies on the grounds that children can't consent. If you go as far as to say that "finding x attractive isn't evil" but completely avoids the main argument AGAINST you, regardless of what you find attractive, then you are feeding into the same mindset that get people hysterical putting YOU in the same bag as those who want to fuck 4 year old boys.

Don't you see what you are doing? Don't you see that bringing up what you find attractive only HURTS you, and strengthens the arguments against you?

NOBODY cares about your distinctions. Society thinks you are a pedophile who deserves to be treated the exact same way whether you are fucking a 16 year old, or a 4 year old. THAT is what causes all the troubles you are trying to avoid, by justifying it's "natural" to want to fuck whatever you want to fuck.

Stop this bullshit about "huurrr i liek x but i'm not y", because in the eyes of the law YOU ARE.

>>722665495
what is this

>>722671176
you must be new here. the beauty of being anonymous is that you can say shit you would never say in your normal life. Its a Freudian looking glass into the human psyche. you need to learn to stop being so repressed.

>>722670549
Not any good ones. I'm on my phone.

>>722665495
Ummm NO! She does not even have the appearance of a Jailbait girl. First time I have seen her, and her body could work if that photo showed more of it.

>>722671176
Where are you getting any of this?
Is it weird to think Piper or any other petite pornstar really attractive, just like any other pornstar. Knowing their small stature falls under a category that men like, "teens".
Is it wrong to be attracted to teens, you projecting repressed man

>>722671776
I see nothing the matter with liking teens. Hell until really recent history these little teenies would have been wives, but the world wide progressive agenda chose to screw up the natural order of things.

>>722667983
You just helped me make up my mind to get in another relationship. I miss the crazy shit you get to do together.

>>722672103
wut?

>>722667485
or they cant afford lawyers as good as the (((other))) pedophiles and get convicted more often?

>>722665495
all men are hebephile

File: 1349311971038.jpg (63KB, 491x533px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 491x533px

>>722670732
Yes, and bringing up that you feel "natural" to be attracted to something, but it's only ok because they're of legal age, only weakens your point.

YOU ARE a pedophile if you want to fuck a 16 year old, whether you want to agree with it, or not, that's what you are. If you feel "above" pedophilia, and use bullshit excuses to defend yourself, you legitimize those who DO objectionable stuff, because they, themselves, can feel just as justified to do whatever it is that they do, using the exact same arguments.

If you are a pedophile, for the love of god, live up to it. If you are attracted to children's body, then ADMIT IT, don't just go around saying "ooohh, nooo, that's not meeee, i just like them when they are x" because when you do that it makes you sound like you are just trying to avoid being labeled a pedophile.

If you think the pedophile label in your forehead is bad then make a real case for why you think it's bad. Don't just go around justifying yourself saying it's ok because she's 18, because when you do that all accomplish is to normalize people who are actually doing wrong things, but excusing themselves under the claim that their own actions wouldn't matter if those kids were of age.

>>722665576
>a grown woman?
>grown
Top Kek

>>722665495
Not at all, she is one of the few pornstars to never do a black guy. She's still pure.

>>722665495
link to source?

>>722672794
Bad News m8....

>>722672985
bullshit

>>722673052
It's true

>>722673117
She's too petite, not the type

File: 1395608258553.jpg (43KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 960x639px

>>722671776
>Is it wrong to be attracted to teens, you projecting repressed man
You are not making a case for yourself when you just say "noo man you're just repressed", you're excusing yourself.

If you are a pedophile, meaning: if you find children's physique sexually arousing, you shouldn't come up with this bullshit "eh it's ok because she's 18", you should tackle the argument about consent.

Making a clear distinction that children are more than capable of deciding for themselves what THEY want to do, is a lot more important than justifying your attraction towards a single case where an 18 year old pornstar happens to be in a child's body.

What you find objectionable about pedophilia stems from the cases where abuse, and power, are being used against a child to force them into sex, which is the EXACT same argument used to attack YOU for enjoying 16 year olds dancing naked.

Pick your battles correctly, don't just try to find excuses to normalize what you do.

>>722667485
obviously a lie since there were more whites and latinos in "to catch a predator"

>>722672650
you are a repressed faggot. now hear me out. I only say this because I knew people like you in highschool. we used to call them cock blockers. you protected the young girls from all the "jerks" in highschool right? you are worse than me because my intentions were always clear. you white knights pretend that you would never do anything gross like having sex with them until they are ready.

Well let me tell you they are fucking ready in highschool you just made up some nice guy persona to avoid the truth that you just arent going to get any pussy. and now you talk down to people that did have an active sex life from some bullshit moral highground you have created in your head.

protip: the key to living a good life is not doing what the authorities tell you to do out of fear. the narrative you are taught in school doesnt work in the real world.

File: piper-perri-in-takes-on-the-mcpipe5.jpg (440KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 2000x1333px

>>722673364

File: 1478534428997.jpg (147KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1080x1349px

>>722671176
Jesus dude. Like get over it there is a profound difference in trying to fuck a 5 year old and trying to fuck a 16-17 year old. If the chick has been fucking and you haven't cohersed some naive young virgin to drink some wine cooler then whats the trouble? The argument "well they can't consent" is foolish. Kids are not idiots. They can be dumb and annoying. But they have a general sense of what is right and wrong. this isn't some dojin were some young girl is tricked into fucking. This is girls trolling for dick. And I see nothing with wanting to give it to them

>>722672650
at what age does someone stop to be a pedophile and why?

>>722673685
Did she go past the point of no return, actual penetration?

>>722673364
kek, her cunt is as big as my ass

>>722673758
Many MANY times. I'm sorry anon. She's even been gangbanged

File: 3500969_9_o.jpg (93KB, 801x1200px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 801x1200px

Exhibit A

>>722673840
fucking niggers ruining everything

File: Its real anon.jpg (52KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 700x467px

Exhibit B. Now keep in mind, this could be cgi. We've come a long way with technology, we have

>>722673967
That thing is like half the size of her body, how does she do it?

>>722674120
This is pretty much every white girls fantasy

>>722673691
>there is a profound difference in trying to fuck a 5 year old and trying to fuck a 16-17 year old
NOT ACCORDING TO THE LAW YOU FUCKING MORON.

Jesus christ, are you people really that stupid?

If you want to have sex with a 16 year old YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE, according to the law. What part of that don't you morons understand?

If you want yourselves to be always relegated as some sort of second class creeps who want to fuck teenagers, then for the love of fucking god LEARN HOW TO DEFEAT YOUR OPPOSITION.

Jesus fucking christ, it's like I'm talking to a fucking wall.

>The argument "well they can't consent" is foolish
THAT is what you should be focusing, not on a fucking pornstar who looks like she's 12.

Trying to avoid the label "pedophile" by saying its ok in that case ONLY, is just a moronic way to make yourself look any different than a guy who uses a 5 year old as a fleshlight.

File: Retard.jpg (80KB, 1024x551px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x551px

>>722674052
Kek

>>722673704
Let me borrow your question: At what age does someone START being a pedophile, and why?

>>722673691
had a hot little slut like this on my dick for years. I was so fucking into her. felt like it was a highschool crush all over again but I decided to wait the few years till she was 18. Best fucking decision in my life. she was sprung for me on her 18th. Still pissed I had to wait so long. most other states I would have been perfectly fine fucking that little pussy of hers.

>>722674217
there are many states in the US where the age of consent is 16. bet you didnt know that moralfaggot.

>>722674217
Ok anon we get it. You've been molested or sexed up by uncle hester, or the older girl down the street who made fun of the size but still told you jack off for her

>>722674206
>projecting

File: images.png (6KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 224x225px

>>722674506

>>722674482
funny thing is I was molested when I was 8 by a faggot molester I'm also this guy>>722670456.
I dont know what this guys deal is.

>>722674217
lmao wtf is wrong with you.

it doesnt make you a pedophile faggot, it makes you a "child molester", where "child" has a completely different legal meaning than whats IRL.

>>722674317
at birth

File: 1351792509618.jpg (22KB, 279x284px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 279x284px

>>722674375
If you change 16 to 15 the argument becomes valid, so what exactly is your point?

The fact that you are fighting ME for stating that the pedophile label is being wrongly used to attack people, instead of being used to protect children, shows how your way of thinking is completely backwards.

I'm clearly stating that the "consent" argument is extremely flawed and it unfairly condemns people who wouldn't otherwise be committing any crimes, but people who fall under the legal definition of pedophiles aren't necessarily trying to tackle the unfairness of this system, are are just trying to find excuses to normalize their own behavior, instead of attacking the root of their problems.

It doesn't help you to call yourself a "hebephile" and get on with your day if you are still seen, and legally condemned, a pedophile if you get a boner for a 14 year old girl dancing naked on a webcam. THAT is my actual point.

>>722674912
look man I'm far too old to be fucking teens anymore. but I sure as shit know that I'm attracted to tight butts cute faces and nice tits. if that makes me a pedophile thats fine but I'm not going to go out protesting and shit.

>>722674848
Then you got your answer to your own question.

Just calling yourself something else, only to avoid the emotional charge attached to the "pedo" label, while ignoring the fact that you are a criminal in the eyes of the law nonetheless, makes you a fucking moron.

If you want to bring something up, don't just use some bullshit excuse like "she's 18, therefore it's ok", fight this "unable to consent" bullshit that holds the entire argument against you in place.

File: 1471407639753.jpg (444KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1536x2048px

>>722674217
A law in Texas says you can't walk down the street with an ice cream cone in your back pocket too. does that mean that all these laws make sense fuck no. Laws say you can have 1oz of pot. But get caught with 1.01 oz fucking felon. >>722674375
This is best fact. As well as the age of other countries. If I traveled to a courtry with no age of consent law...would you just be ok with that. Is it just the law, and you are just looking out for us

>>722672668
>a grown woman?
>grown
>Top Kek
Zozzle

File: 1423310119517.jpg (77KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 960x639px

>>722671529

>Newfags cant even kamehameha

>>722667983
It's just jealous anons that can't get any decent, petite pussy. Only tall fatties for them. So they try to make you feel bad for liking what they can't get.

>>722665495
DK mode

>>722675383
And just because something isn't illegal, doesn't mean it's right to do

File: 198339_05big.jpg (156KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1024x682px

Those eyes

>>722675888
how in the fuck is fucking not the right thing to do?

File: SnrFrancesco444fa2a46874b.jpg (95KB, 960x929px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 960x929px

>>722665495
You're a faggot for even caring

I don't get this thread. She looks like she's 30 in OP's image.

>>722675960
Nice flat tummy. God, I'll never get to cum in one of those...

>>722675199
>look man I'm far too old to be fucking teens anymore

That's another bullshit you are clearly trying to convincing yourself of after being conditioned to think that way.

Teens won't fuck you, regardless if you want to fuck them or not, but if that's what you actually want to do, then you are not helping your own case, in the eyes of the law, if you just accept their narrative.

You are being played to assume a position that someone else decided for you that you ought to take, if you just comply to this type of thinking. It's not a matter of what you choose to do, it's your way of thinking that is retarded, and it's being used against you as a way to push for legislation that criminalizes you thoughts. If you think that is fair, then be my guest, but if you think there's some bullshit hiding under the whole "15 year olds can't consent" then you shouldn't just accept it and move on, just because someone else told you that this is the way you ought to think.

>>722671176
>15 year old speaks to the U.N. about environmental affects caused by humans
"Oh what an outstanding young man, more teenagers should be like him!"

>15 year old wants to have sex with a 20 year old
"THAT'S A CHILD YOU CAN'T DO THAT!"

Society needs to make up it's mind on what we deem teenagers as. Why do we draw the line at sex? Honestly, after you hit puberty, sex is sex. A 35 year old having regretful sex is the same as a 16 year old having regretful sex. It's human nature to be attracted to a ready-for-babies body, and we need to accept that instead of treat it as some sort of great sin that deserves the death penalty.

This leads into my next point: we need to stop treating teens as kids. I personally don't really like most teenagers because they are immature, but a lot of that is because our society doesn't train our teen population to become mature. We need to stop spoiling them and teach them how to be an adult. Start giving teenagers the responsibilities of an adult, and maybe they'll start acting like adults.

>>722675383
holy fk moar of dat

>>722669696
>>tfw piper and my gf have the same butthole
What like they share it between them

>>722675383
Any grown man who doesn't want to cum in that girl's body is a faggotsexual.

File: SpidermanWdick.jpg (78KB, 541x960px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 541x960px

"Among ali‘i, an experienced chiefess, usually a blood “aunt,” instructed and trained the young males. Similarly, young females were trained by their “aunt,” by another experienced woman, or by a tutu kane. The training concerned not only what to expect and what to do but also how to increase or maximize pleasure. Less formal but similar training was afforded to commoners. "

>http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2000to2004/2004-sexual-behavior-in-pre-contact-hawaii.html

>>722665495

two words: photo shop
base image appears to be a child

MODS

>>722675888
That's where objectivity derails into morality.

I'm not here to discuss philosophy, I'm trying to make people see that trying to avoid the "pedophile" label only harms their own cause, since creating excuses for their behavior, while policy makers still criminalize their thoughts, is not only a moronic it's them allowing themselves to be preyed upon their own fears of being misinterpreted.

>>722676605
weakest bait ever

>>722676975
nobodys signing up for nambla today anon.

File: 1487133124434.jpg (661KB, 2048x1366px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 2048x1366px

I like really skinny and short girls (such as Piper Perri) but because I am pretty small myself. I don't feel "big" around most girls because I am the height of the average woman. Most of the women I've dated have been my size or taller, but I did date one chick that was around 4'10" and 85lbs. She was so fun to throw around and I actually felt like I was dominating her which was a great feeling

>>722676975
pedophile is an incorrect term for those attracted to pubescent humans.

You want to co-opt it to suit your agenda, whatever.

>>722673691
in the old days you could have banged that young lady but you were expected to marry her...you can still marry a young lady 15 and above as long as her parents consent...but now we live in a society were 18 is the magic number soo too bad

>>722676298
>It's human nature to be attracted to a ready-for-babies body,
This is the type of argument that I'm so fiercely trying to dismantle as nothing more than bullshit used to excuse people in a way to avoid being labelled pedophiles.

Ready-for-babies or not isn't an excuse for sexual attraction. Being "ready for babies" isn't the reason homosexuals have sex, but, somehow, it's used as an argument pro-pedophilia, which is completely idiotic in my opinion, since both practices are anything but a "baby-making" excuse to engage in sex.

Am I trying to normalize having sex with a 5 year old? NO! The fact that people try to use bullshit about 5-year-olds-having-sex as a way to accuse weaponize laws against people who liked a picture of a 14 year old showing their ass on social media, is completely backwards.

It's these excuses that allow this bullshit to keep being used against people, instead of actually being used to protect those who need protection.

>>722677224
seconded

>>722677224
>pedophile is an incorrect term for those attracted to pubescent humans.
It's NOT in the eyes of the law.

THAT'S MY POINT YOU FUCKING MORON.

>>722673691
a 12yo boy can decide he's a "girl" then a 12yo girl can consent

>>722677764
if fucking a 9 yr old wife is good enough for the prophet muhammad its good enough for me

lil girls need orgasms too

>>722677868

Justice DiTomaso of the Superior Court of Justice wrote in R. v Byers:

>"Pedophilia is a sexual preference for sexual activity with prepubescent children, typically under the age of 11. It indicates a proclivity for sexual contact with children that cannot be expected to remit. It is present throughout the lifetime.

>>722676605
gtfo new/moralfag niglet

>>722677098
she is probably 4'9 or 4'10 those bodies are possible, they have to wear xs underwear and stuff I dated a woman that size, 30 years old, sex was great I was able to carry her like a teddy bear

>>722677868
THE LAW DOES NOT USE THE WORD "PEDOPHILE" YOU FUCKING MORON. FUCK OFF OUT OF THIS THREAD YOURE A FUCKING NO-HOPER.

>>722672509
They also lack any sort of leverage that keeps people like Trump out of the dock for diddling his daughter.

File: 1471539700622.jpg (133KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1080x1080px

>>722677868
Then answer my question, if fucking a 15 year old became legal tomorrow would you care. Maybe you wouldn't do it, but would you still care because it's legal

TFW you're 21 and dating a girl who recently turned 19, get's mistaken for 13 all the time. She's 4'11 and has a nice petite body. Feels fuckin good man.

File: 1464568567803.jpg (91KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 768x1024px

>>722677879
Boom. That shit seems air fucking right to me...Are we allowed to fuck shota traps now?

>>722677879
Not legally.

Which is another reason why seeing people trying to avoid being called pedophiles is so retarded and harmful for their own "cause", which I assume is the decriminalization of their attraction.

If you don't feel like you are being wrongly misrepresented by the law, then you are ALSO OK with people being wrongly condemned for something that you don't find objectionable in any way.

If you really believe you are being criminalized unfairly, why would you try to avoid this label just to justify yourself to other people, while under the law you are still criminally charged for your way of thinking, regardless of those labels you so desperately try to avoid?

You people seem more desperate to avoid the name than to shed a light on how wrongly misrepresented you are.

File: 1463121516089.png (121KB, 359x521px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 359x521px

>>722678511
that's the dream /b/ro

>>722672650
UK here. 16 is totally legal. Pedophilia is not. Therefore 16 year olds are not considered children mentally here.

Or across most of the world. USA excepted, no surprise though when you can't drink until the age of 21.

Your society considers you children long after the rest of the world does. In the UK you could be married, with kids, a house and a job at 16, and it's not illegal.

You still can't kick back with a beer and smoke after a days work, putting the kids to bed and fucking the missus.

Laws are a joke the world over and labels rarely tell the real story.

File: 1474683342202.jpg (147KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1080x1080px

>>722678660
Same reason all sorts of people avoid labels because of a sigma idiots associate with it. If you show someone a picture and they say "wow that chick is fuckin smoking I'd fuck her all day" *she's 13* "OH FUCKING GROSS DUDE" that's the gayest shit. You just literally admitted you think she is attractive enough for sex but now that she's "under age" she's gross. Please. We've been conditioned for thousands of years to find the most fertil mate now in the last 100 we are supposed to go against human nature. It's absurd to think that.

>>722679109
this girl would be 10/10 if she didnt have those fake nigger nails. fuck i hate that shit. white girls need to act like white girls and not nigerapes

File: 1462740522024.jpg (8KB, 268x284px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 268x284px

>>722679109
mfw jordyn is legal everywhere except murica

>>722678769
Preach nigga.

File: 1486674279333.jpg (24KB, 410x380px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 410x380px

>>722679320
But only in certain states.

File: 1474393694515.jpg (585KB, 1800x2292px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 1800x2292px

>>722679254
To each their own nothing wrong with a manicure. However she does indeed need to cut out the swamp ape shit. She's definitely going down the Elsa jean route

>>722668641
Sounds like ISIS talk to me...

>>722678357
If you believe you are being wrongfully labelled for something, but you don't really think this label describes you because it should be used ONLY on those who are, objectively, committing a crime, then it doesn't help your case to desperately try to AVOID said label, while being legally condemned the exact same way.

If you hate me calling you a pedophile because you enjoy masturbating to a 15 year old spreading her legs on cam, then you should tackle the roots of what makes you a pedophile: The fucking law, and not just try to excuse yourself to me on the internet.

Unless you believe being legally classified in the same category as a sandnigger who abducts a 7 year old and proceeds to have sex with her by force, just because you have a selfie of a 14 year old naked, then the LAST thing you want is to enforce this distorted notion that "somehow" your action should be validated because you think she's hot, since that same sandnigger could use the EXACT same excuse to justify his own behavior. Always keep in mind that according to the law, you BOTH are the EXACT same.

Do you think this is unfair? THEN FUCKING STOP creating excuses or justifications for your behavior, and EXPOSE this bullshit "unable to consent" for what it actually is: bullshit.

File: 1483937370948.png (199KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 600x338px

>>722668641
>The fact that children are attractive to so many people is probably the main reason why they are used so often in movies and to advertise products, people like children, and some people find children so beautiful that they want to fuck them.


You're only gonna see shit like this on /b/ folks.

Don't let the eloquency of his words seduce you, this dude is a closet pedo who's trying to use logic to justify his behavior. I hope the mental gymnastics are obvious to you guys.

File: 1 (11).jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

>>722679869
at least some of you aren't idiots

>>722679991
Only a nigger would miss it or point it out. Shoo shoo nigger, go play nigger all elsewhere

File: 2 (4).jpg (9KB, 220x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 220x200px

>>722680108
Look at the idiocy compounding from his idiocy

Just dumb blind hate

Bunch of imbeciles you are

>>722680214
>Saves the thumbnail
Only a retard thinks thumbnails look good. Like I said go be a nigger elsewhere.

File: 2 (7).gif (27KB, 24x20px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 24x20px

>>722680308
Does it fuckin bother you faggot? I hope it did

Fuck you people

>>722679796
This piece of ass is illegal in america? Wow you guys are LAME.

File: 8 (6).jpg (18KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x600px

>>722680415

>>722680367
>Fuck you people
The fuck does that mean ultra mongoloid?

>>722679991
pedos are pretty cool guys

give lil girls orgasms and doesnt afraid of anything

>>722680515
Are you autistic or a troll?

I'm guessing both?

>>722679796
>you will never spray your DNA all over that swimsuit moments after she gets done with her photoshoot

just fucking end my fucking life family

File: 3 (3).jpg (39KB, 472x652px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 472x652px

>>722680625
I'll tie the noose for you buddy

>>722680605
>Oh shit he got me
>Better call him autistic
Wew lad, you got me giggling.

>>722679796
yes but those nails are stick on fakes and not real. i hate all forms of beautification that looks fake.

File: 1292757863839.jpg (28KB, 200x251px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 200x251px

>>722679109
>against human nature.
STOP using these arguments, holy shit. Just fucking STOP.

Using this argument for sex with a 14 year old is NO DIFFERENT than using this argument to justify fucking a 5 year old.

CONSENT is what you should focus your energy. STOP trying to justify your behavior and focus all your energy into demystifying this retarded idea that "people under the age of xx can't consent".

Otherwise you fucking a 13 year old willingly will STILL be considered, legally, as grave of an offense as a nigger who abducts a 6 year old and forcefully penetrates them.

It doesn't matter if you think you don't think you are a pedophile who is doing something wrong if the law CONDEMNS you the exact same way as someone who DOES.

>>722680693
You're a shit troll and I enjoyed calling you autistic. Kill yourself now

>>722680689
you can try

acting tough on the internet wont stop things you dont like kid

>>722680762
Why do you think I'm trying to troll? Are you that desperate for an argument that you created one in your mind to justify your rambling to an internet rando?

>>722680824
Really? I can help?

The ledge is only a few feet away faggot. Take the dive.

>>722679254
How did you even see the nails :D

>>722680873
Because no one is legitimately as retarded as you're acting?

Was that a real question?

Wait I forgot you're autistic

File: feels.jpg (109KB, 288x283px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 288x283px

>>722675383
>tfw imagine that pic as the split moment before she tacklehugs me and genuinely feel what it probably feels like.

life is suffering

>>722680689
this is a knot they teach the boyscouts. did they know about the day of the rope?

>>722680887
post your address ill come right over

>>722680950
I mean I'm talking to someone who is legitimately retarded as me because they're arguing with me. Good job
You're a fucking retard. :^)

>>722668641
>>722670215
>reddit spacing

gtfo

>>722680949
the closest skin to her crotch

>>722681017
bruh. that bitch cheated on whoever took that picture soon afterward. keep your chin up.

File: 1471890841773.jpg (134KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1080x1349px

>>722680707
Fair enough. Sadly as much as I love a girl that just looks as natural as could be (see 2000 era stacy keibler) give me a Pam Anderson that I can choke and slap around in bed and I'm all for it too

>>722668993
Second

>>722681092
Come on pedo shitbag, you know you can't live with yourself. The only solution is to end your life. It's less painful with a gun, I know you're a pussy so that's the better option

normies need to leave

>>722681311
Start with yourself friendo

File: 1292755316926.jpg (4KB, 126x126px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 126x126px

>>722679991
What you consider objectionable in cases where people are target of violence is being used to target people who are doing absolutely NOTHING wrong.

The fact that some individuals may find someone underage attractive DOES NOT justify labeling them in the same category as someone who forcefully penetrates a toddler.

This is a VERY important distinction that gets lost into the whole "all pedophiles are monsters that must be exterminated" non-sense, and your post is an example of that, which only throws even more gasoline into the fire, allowing you to use accusations of pedophilia to attack someone who finds a 13 year old naked attractive, as if they were in desperate NEED to stick their penis into a baby.

You are being intentionally deceptive with your bullshit.

>>722681260
let me know where you are ill show up you can help

you must be as bad ass irl as you are on the internet right?

File: 3 (4).gif (711KB, 200x331px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 200x331px

>>722681311
>I CAN'T CIRCLEJERK STOP DISAGREEING WITH ME I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO WHEN SOMEONE DISAGREES WITH ME HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

>>722667962
who puts a mirror over a light socket...and then what asshole covers it up with a mirror plate? wtf is this the 70s?

>>722681489
failure

>>722681471
I mean really shitbag, what would your parents think of you. Did they raise a little pedo? I bet they're as big of fuckups as you are, seeing how you turned out

>>722678054
The argument used against underage sex, whether they are 10 or 12, is the exact same.

You just have the legal definition, but courts still condemn you under the exact same process, whether it involves a 10 year old or if it involves a 13 year old.

>>722681594
oh so youre just a lil pussy who hides behind his keyboard but has zero balls to back up the tough talk

glad we're on the same page

>>722681213
>>722668993
OP here, enjoy the full video anons

http://pornhdx.tv/lubed-piper-perrielsa-jean-wet-wild-besties-29-04-2016-2/

>>722681771
Yes, it's illegal, but if they're pubescent, it's not pedophilia.

>>722681426
What I consider objectionable? What I, as in me being the only one, consider this act being objectionable?

You are no where near as intelligent as you think you are. All I had to read were eleven words, your first eleven words mind you, to know you're a dipshit not worth speaking to. Kill yourself like the rest of the pedos.

File: 1483752813575.png (2MB, 1376x1968px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1376x1968px

>>722680737
And that's the THIRD time you've avoided answering "if it was legal tomorrow would you fuck a 15 year old. Or at the very least have a problem with it?"

>>722681804
Boy I sure got on your little prissy nerves didn't I pedo. Got right up your spine. Not hard when you're talking to someone who's backless I guess?

>>722681987
yeah no

party on pedo brothers new lolis are being born erry day

File: 1463851736994-4.jpg (748KB, 2536x1673px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 2536x1673px

>>722681260
I can't believe there are people on /b/ still arguing that 15 is pedo lmao

It's going to be hilarious when SHTF and you are turning down girls like pic related left and right because "nah bro she isnt 18 and im not a pedo that shits disgusting"

L
M
A
O

get cucked faggots

>>722681956
That's just semantics, and it doesn't make any difference, under the law.

Avoiding the label just because it makes you uncomfortable doesn't change the fact that your attraction to pubescent teens is considered as illegal as raping a baby.

>>722669696
/b/ has never made me laugh as hard as you just did

>>722682117
Did you realize how fucking stupid you sound all of a sudden? You sure lost the spark in your step there friendo, falling back to trying to get a reaction.

You can't do either right. Kill yourself

>>722682097
I think the word you were looking for was spineless

Mommy is calling you you microwave tendies are ready

>>722682128
see >>722677224

>normies gettin flustered

as bad as libs

File: 1 (9).jpg (49KB, 330x479px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 330x479px

>>722682243
>it's not a common phrase so I don't know it

Are you just gonna keep doing my job for me? I can only call you dumb so many times

File: Trollface.jpg (10KB, 235x214px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 235x214px

>>722682239
>trying to get a reaction

>>722675484
>a grown woman?
>grown
>Top Kek
>Zozzle
f'donker'd

>>722681987
>What I, as in me being the only one, consider this act being objectionable?
What you consider objectionable as in: what others may not consider as objectionable.

>All I had to read were eleven words, your first eleven words mind you, to know you're a dipshit not worth speaking to
I'm not speaking to you, if that's really your way of thinking.

File: trolling.png (87KB, 755x1255px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 755x1255px

>>722682409

>NO REALLY I WAS TROLLING GUISE

>>722682296
see >>722677868

>>722682457
seems to be working

two for two responding to my posts

>>722682526
I'm not going in circles in an argument.

Off to fap. Cya

File: First+thought+was+piper+perri+i+need+_f25fac98330bd76a16e3540106372a6d.jpg (58KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x800px

>you anons still arguing
>while im still spanking the monkey

>>722678357
I was fucking 15 year olds until I was like 21.
When they're handing it on a silver platter... it's kinda hard to turn down.

>>722682444
Lol, look at you trying to prove how smart you are. Giving me the definition I damn near just gave you doesn't make you smart, it makes you a parrot. Just like you're parroting everything you've said, without even understanding the subject or the logic involved.

And trying to pretend like you weren't speaking with me is kind of an empty rebuttal isn't it? You did respond to me right? K

You are dumb as shit bro.

>>722682609
I just hope you are not fapping to CP. That would be very counter-productive.

>>722665495
Why do these pedobait women always have the most punchable faces?

>>722682694
And illegal :^)

>>722682545
It's ok buddy we all know you were the guy I was talking to. You don't have to pretend.

>>722682686
If you try to go back on topic and tell where exactly you think my reasoning is lacking, and I'll be glad to explain it to you in a more concise and direct way.

This name calling thing doesn't help anybody.

>>722682782
It's not illegal to fap to CP, it's illegal to possess and distribute CP.

Looking at CP isn't.

>>722683007
if it gets downloaded to your computer you can get popped. And I hope you do.

>>722683007
Now he chooses to be pedantic...

>>722683164
Rude.

>>722683164
those who live on hope alone

die starving

>>722683228
>>722683258
I bet you are one of them gay pedophiles. fucked up dude.

>>722667725
damn you're lucky. my gf isn't into roleplaying at all

>>722683363
im a hetero pedophile thank you

>>722675383
is there moar?

>>722679960
Under the law those would be two very disparate offences.

Possession of a single pic of a girl of 14 that you were not personally grooming would likely result in no further action. If she's nude but not explicitly so then there are exemptions.

Sexual abuse of a 7 year old will land you in solitary for years, as long as your luck holds and you don't end up in gen pop you might survive the experience.

Two different scenarios, two different crimes. Contrary to popular belief being a pedophile is not a criminal offence. Your argument is based on a faulty premise.

You're a male homo sapien.

File: 1449083921349.jpg (55KB, 576x520px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 576x520px

>>722683363
>implying gay is bad

>>722665495
why this shit look like big head mode

File: 1476525241244.jpg (170KB, 455x639px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 455x639px

>>722683793
Jordan Jones. There is always more

>>722674506
Kek!

>>722683946
this guy is smooth as sand paper

where can I subscribe to his romance blog?

>>722683007
Unfortunately to view an image you must first be in possession of it.

>>722684032
anyone else imagine snuffing and eating JJ? like she has such a tight body you just know she'd be fork tender roasted over some coals like a little piglet

>>722684113
I need me a banter bitch that can take that sort of talk without getting all butthurt ;)

File: 20170120_233038.png (2MB, 1285x1293px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1285x1293px

>>722674217
Trumps law allows you to fuck any women you want regardless of age. His law out speaks your shitty little edgy words.>>722683811

>>722684290
this.... gave me a boner

>>722665495
is this shopped? does anyone have nudes?

>>722684490
?????

You know she's a pornstar, right?

>>722684402
You're an idiot. Trump is good and as a 35 yo I can bang a 16 yo all legal you fuck wad

>>722684490
You are looking at it. It's not shopped, that's pp

How about Alyssa hart?

>>722684931
she's ugly af

>>722683459
see even you hate someone's sexuality. think about that shit for a minute.

>>722677879
touchE

>>722684733
>>722684560
? can you post some?

>>722675960

Hell yeah like she gots down syndrome or sumtin

>>722674912
You do realize the law has exceptions right? Romeo and Juliet laws allow pedophilia.

>>722685503
Sure anon, I could. Or you could look in the thread. There's even a link. For you know, a video. Have at it buddy

>>722665495
If being a hebephile means wanting to fuck a woman obviously in her 20's, then I guess so.

>>722683811
In both cases you are labelled a pedophile.

If those two very different scenarios then why are you labelled the same?

>Contrary to popular belief being a pedophile is not a criminal offence.
I never stated your sexual preferences are what get you charged as a criminal.

>Your argument is based on a faulty premise.
My argument is that wrongfully attaching the "pedophile" label to someone who finds arousing to look at 14 year olds naked, isn't correct if you are going to use the EXACT SAME label to classify someone who rapes a 7 year old.

Two VERY different scenario, where very similar laws are applied to condemn suspects and two very different scenarios where the exact same label is used to described the people involved.

My point is that this definition is being used in a very deceptive and dishonest way just to create an emotional response towards a situation that has absolutely nothing to do with what the name "pedophilia" implies.

If you really think this a faulty premise, then I really don't know what to tell you.

Can you believe this thread has been up for 3 hours

File: eb16.jpg (73KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 750x750px

This is a picture of Ester Baxter when she was 16. If you think it wrong to be attracted to THIS just because of age/the law says so, you must be damn crazy.

>>722687573
all black women should be euthanized for their own sake. if we repeat the process with sex selective abortions in subsequent generations, blacks will be integrated in just a few decades

>>722684169
Not at all, but I know what you meant.

>>722687720
This ↑

I wouldn't be attracted to a nigger at any age, and I'm not trying to be edgy here. Niggers are disgusting, 100% of the time.

>>722687062
You're welcome.

>>722687062
time to call the mods

>>722688682
Sleep tight sweet prince

File: karly_pilkoids.jpg (5KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 225x225px

>>722678660
Because we're talking about 2 separate things here. Being attracted to 13+ pubescent girls, with periods and tits and pubic hair IS NOT THE SAME as wanting to fuck a toddler. Believe it or not, guys can think it's evil, shameful, and immoral to want to fuck kids, whilst also logically agreeing that the reason they are attracted to pubescent teens is NATURAL> As in, MAKE MORE BABIES, KEEP THE HUMAN RACE GOING biology. You seem to be on the side of law. Are you so naive as to think all laws are made with the people's best interests at heart? What an idiot you are. Please leave. Or come to terms with your own feelings of sexual attraction for teens and stop projecting. It's like all the preachers who say Fags are sinful, right up until the point where they're caught in an airport bathroom sucking a young dudes dick through a hole in the wall. You don't fool anyone.

>>722679991
Yeah dude, great, great point. Because, as we all know, Hollywood is notorious for NOT having an underground network of pedophilia that stays hushed up with money and power. So, good point, there's NO WAY the people that make all those TV shows and movies would be down with that shit. You are so smart.

>>722678660
because we dont have autism.