Let's be smart, fags!

10

>>722534776
10

>>722534776
6 + 4 = 10

>>722534776
-1/12

PLEASE EXCUSE MY DEAR AUNT SALLY

>>722534776
58

10 faggot

17

6^2 = 36
2(3) = 6

36/6 + 4 = 10

6^2 = 36
36/2 = 18
18 (3) = 54
54 + 4 = 58

>>722535482
oh my god kill yourself

>>722534776
6^2/2(3)+4
=36/6+4
=6+4
=10
>prove me wrong faggot

>>722535885
>>722535168
correct ones

>>722534776
58

>>722535885
go back to highschool
its not ((6^2)/2)*3

>>722536061
the order of multiplying and dividing are equal, you have to applicate the dividing first (in this expression)
The scope of the bracketing is just the 3 not the multiplying

>>722534776
17

File: jew.png (460KB, 932x690px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 932x690px

>>722534776
BIDMAS
6^2/2(3)+4
6^2/6+4
36/6+4
6+4

=10

REMEMBER BIDMAS:
Brackets ()
Indeces ^x
Division /
Multiplication x
Addition +
Subtraction -

>>722534991
>>722535014
>>722535055
>>722535093
>>722535406
>>722535482
>>722535885
>>722536061
>>722536209
>>722536402
>>722536454
>>722536468
Thanks, niggers! Smarter then I expected...

>>722534776
36 : 6 + 4 = 10

58

>>722534776
42

>>722534776
ERROR
invalid function: 2

>>722534776
17

6^2/2(3)+4
=36/2(3)+4
=18(3)+4
=54+4
=58
you do whatever operation is in brackets first, but 2(3) is the same as 2*3. so 6^2/2(3)+4 = 6^2/2*3+4

If the expression was written like this:

6² ÷ 2 × 3 + 4

Then the answer would be:

36 ÷ 2 × 3 + 4
18 × 3 + 4
54 + 4
58

However, the fact that the 2 and the 3 are literally touching, through use of parentheses, indicates that they are a singular term.

6² ÷ 2(3) + 4
can be more easily visualized as:
6² ÷ (2(3)) + 4

therefore,

6² ÷ (2(3)) + 4
36 ÷ (2(3)) + 4
36 ÷ 6 + 4
6 + 4
10

>>722534776
5

>>722537448
Derp, I meant 10.

my last two digits

>>722534776
posting in these threads already disqualifies you from being smart.

>>722534776
it's always hard to tell if you fags are trying to troll or just new

>>722534776
this is like arguing semantics. pointless

>>722534776
>10
This isn't even "smart" is just average school knowledge

>>722536532
funny, I learned PEMDAS
parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract. but it's important to note that both multiply/divide and add/subtract are done simultaneously, in order

>>722536532
Probably bait, but are you retarded?

>>722537991
you expect too much of b at this time

>>722535885
I support this, and I shit on all faggots that thinks that this 2(3) has another meaning than 2*3

>>722538043
you need a bigger worm on that hook

>>722537333

I forgot that "literally touching" came before exponents in PEMDAS.

Thanks anon.

>>722534776
10

>>722536532
Here is the REAL order:

Brackets () (or more exacty, what's IN the brackets)
Indeces
Division/Multiplication (there is NO priority)
Addition / Substraction (there is STILL NO priority)

Brackets have the priority on what's INSIDE of them, however, what's before AND after doesn't matter. If there's no sign before or after, then it's considered as a NORMAL multiplication, and as so, no priority over other multiplications/divisions

>>722534776

58, and now bring me a challenge, please.

>>722537333
This time, trips lies.

Because 2(3) IS 2 * 3

>>722534776
It givees nothing, as this is mathemathically incorrect.

2(3) has NO MEANING in maths. And as so, it can't be put in a calculation

>>722534776
>not just using proper notation
(+ (/ (^ 6 2) (* 2 3)) 4)
lmaoing @ ur life

if you didnt say 10 kys

>>722537333
Thank you!
>>722538967
IKR....

File: IMG_20170130_103349.jpg (10KB, 544x343px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 544x343px

>>722538838
Did you finish elementary?

>>722538838
where'd you learn your maths?

not hating or anything, I've always thought x(y) was an accepted way to express multiplication. What's the proper way here?

3.6

36 ÷ (6 + 4)

>>722538335
It doesn't, and that's why I did the exponent first.

Parentheses come before everything except for exponents, which is why (2(3)) is the second term to evaluate.

>>722539163
No. Did you?

>>722534776
10. How is this supposed to be hard? rofl

  ▲<br>
▲ ▲
</div>

>>722538838
>being this mentally retarded

>>722539356
2/10

>>722535168
Correct

Source: Math Major and not a retard

>>722536061
you are a faggot nigger.

58 is the answer. Nigger.

>>722538713
They never said it wasn't.

>>722539511
>implying a math major qualifies you for anything related to calculation

>>722536532
Wrong use of brackets

>>722539676
no but given that I am a math major it is implied that I own a decent calculator

>>722536532
>Brackets
>Shows parentheses
Those aren't the same thing, Anon...

>>722539250
Not in America.

It's easy to know why in a logic way.

Why are the brackets for? To isolate a part of the calculation, to tell "What's inside has to be considered as a single number outside".
And as so, put a single number inside of brackets is a nonsense and can't be correct.

For simplification purposes, some people decided to remove the * sign if there was one before brackets. And of course, it's been accepted wordwide (we humans love to simplify things). The problem with this simplification is that people forgets that in x(y+z), between x and the brackets, there is a *. And that gives us situations like these.

>>722539829
Hahaha!
Epic trolle

>>722539911
Well, in every single North American school that I've ever seen, it is acceptable.
No difference between 2(x) and 2x, at least, in this case.

File: Screenshot_20170215-125254.png (82KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 720x1280px

>>722534776
6^2÷2 (3)+4
Parentheses already done. Exponents next
6^2=36
36÷2 (3)+4
Now divide and multiply from left to right
36÷2=18
18 (3)+4

18(3)=54

add and subtract from left to right
54+4=58
>58
anyone else is absoulutely retarded

>>722538838
You trolling or retarded?

File: 20170215_215123.jpg (1MB, 2824x2088px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2824x2088px

10 fags:

>>722540107
The problem is that between 2x and 2(x), the same simplification has been made.

Both means 2 * x.
but using brackets to isolate a single number is, as I said, a perfect nonsense

>>722540262
see >>722539911

>>722540302
How the fuck is it nonsense if you just fucking simplified it?!
Jesus fucking Christ, lad, you must be retarded.

File: 9886149.jpg (9KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 236x236px

>>722540269

>>722537333
You fucking nigger you just added parentheses to the equation that were never there. Kill yourself immediately, and save the gene pool from your stupidity.

>>722540426
What is the use of brackets?

>>722540172
Separating 2 from 3, are you actually that fucking retarded? 2(3) is 2*3 you tard. It's 6^2/2(3)+4 = 6+4 = 10

>>722540383
Its a notational thing if you wrote just 2 numbers next to each other like 2x but lets say x is 2, 22 looks like 22 not 2×2.

>>722540512
see >>722540494

>>722540512
Except it isnt you mong how its written isnt in fraction form. If you were to write it in fractional form it would very well be 6^2/2 ×2 just as it's written.
>lrn2maths

>>722534776
>itt
>10, 10, 10, 15, 25, 39.777~E
>PEMDAS
>the fuck is pemdas you americans are idiots
>at least I'm not a niggerfaggot, britbong
>rabblerabblerabble ad nauseum

prove me wrong just once, /b/

>>722540573
and what IS 2x? 2x is 2 * x.

So, if x is 2, you write 2 * 2.

Brackets are MEANT to ISOLATE what's INSIDE of them from the rest of the calcul. For example, in THIS calculation:

2(34+5*9)

The calculation can be written as:

2 * x
where x = 34+5*9

>>722540882
cont.

and that's the exact reason why using this: (x) where x is a single number, is useless: It's already a single number, he can be isolated the way brrackets isolates

>>722540882
The autism here is real
2x=2×2=2(x) they are all literally the same. Its just easier to write 2(x) than 2×x and 22 looks like 22.

File: DSC_0014.jpg (1MB, 3264x1904px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1904px

>>722540269

>>722541112

2(x) is a misuse of the brackets.

and who the fuck can write 22 as 2 * 2? That's just fucking stupid.

Fucking retards. It's just that the expression is written in a confusing way and there are 2 answers since there are 2 interpretations. It’s like trying to interpret the following sentence:“I saw the man with binoculars.”Did you use binoculars to see the man, or were you looking at the man who was holding binoculars?

>>722541499
>and there are 2 answers

Go seek professional help!

>>722541286
Have you met mathfags? they hate writing more than anything. They are lazy.You're just autistic as fuck.

>>722541233
because you are a nigger and, your calculator is also a nigger.

>>722534776
16
you imbred sandnigger fucks

>>722542037
They may be lazy, but as you said, they are fags

>>722541499
...arithmatic isn't "open to interpretation". It's math. 2+2 will ALWAYS equal 4 in our universe. It's not a fucking grammar problem, they're numbers. The answer is, for all intents and purposes, set in stone.

>>722542205
Ok how?

>>722542242
science

>>722542239
This so much the only people who complain it's confusing are idiots who cant read/do math.

>>722542298
You didnt show your work anon you get a 0

58, you american cucks

>>722535168
This

Hurr durr some people use order of operations and some don't so faggots will argue. I m genus.

Go fuck yourself OP. Back to Facebook with your faggotry.

10

>>722535163
>Please explain my dangerous ass sounds

>>722542239
The best interpretation is 62 ÷ 2(3) + 4 = 58, but it would be better if the expression was not written in a confusing way, with the purpose to make people fight over this. You won't find this kind of ambiguity in a fucking math book so that's the reason this is a shit question/thread

>>722539829
touché

>>722540172
2(3)=2x3

Thx thread for reminding how to use maths

>>722541286
Maybe this was an algebraic expression and the term is isolated because it's usually done when changing a term (say "x" for example) for a number ("3" in thsi case)

>>722539876
Called brackets here in ireland. Parenthesis is such a yank word

>>722542212
>being this new

>>722542785
>it would be better if the expression was not written... in this way.
But it I-S written in this way!
So fucking solve it this way.
You can not alter a thing.
Just solve it OP's way.

File: Ajax_(Carstens).jpg (536KB, 990x665px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 990x665px

>>722543007
It's actually ancient greek, Patty.

Its 10

File: IMG_0458.jpg (34KB, 500x432px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x432px

58. TI 89

so basically op created this thread as a bait because this problem is up to interpretation?

>>722534776
Stupid niggers the answer is 10 if you use fucking Bimdas that you learned when you were fucking 8.

I know most of this thread is trolling, but I haven't taken a math class in a few years. I always thought you distribute first before anything... making the answer 10

File: pemdas.jpg (113KB, 653x237px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 653x237px

so i googled and i found PEMDAS
never learned in that way tbh, but I'm not american

according to this the answer is 10

>>722544704
Nope ypu learned it wrong.
It's more like
PE(MD)(AS)

>>722536532
>puts division before multiplication
>does multiplication before division
I don't think you're bad at math, just bad at trolling.

>>722540302
Been awhile since I graduated but i thought 2x is a singular term whereas 2(x) is 2 * x

>>722545679
Both are the same mate

>>722535168
its this

so is the distributive property part of P or M in PEMDAS?

>>722544991
yea i just looked at some sites and it appears that order of operations goes from left to right

so for our 36/2*3 + 4 we go 36/2 then 18*3 then 54 + 4 and we get 58

lucky you, i was about to write a long response but i finally seen where i was wrong

>>722546061
At least you're learning anon.

Please excuse my dope ass swag

>>722534776
PEMDAS

Parentheses
Exponent
Multiplication or
Division (whichever is first)
Addition or
Subtraction (whichever is first)

3 is alone so you skip that

6^2 is 36

36 ÷ 2 is 16

16 x 3 is 48

48 + 4 is 52

why do we even let potatoes live when they do nothing but just sit there, taking up time and space?

>>722534776
6^2 / 2(3) + 4
36 / 2 (3) + 4
18 (3) + 4
54 + 4 =
58

>>722546343
36/2 is 18, anon.

parentheses
exponents
multiplication
division
addition
subtraction

>how hard is life for all of you retards?

>>722546343
36/2 is what anon?

>>722546406
/thread
Anyone that gets anything else is autistic.

>>722537278

This

Brackets first only counts for whatever is IN the brackets you trolling retards.

2*3(4)=?

I think the problem a lot of people are running into is that they're trying to distribute 2 to (3), when it would actually be appropriate to distribute the whole phrase of 6^2/2 to (3), which means you're distributing 18 to (3) and then adding 4, giving 58

>>722540269
>thinking the calculator is right without the right setting

kek

Bodmas/pemdas/whatever the fuck exact same system you use states you solve anything within the brackets. The 2 isn't in the fucking bracket. It's just 2×3. No priority over the first division. 6^2/2×3+4=58

If the question was 6^2/2 (3×3)+4 then yes, you'd do the brackets, making the equation 6^2/2x9+4 and there's still no fucking priority over the division.

TL;DR unless that 2 is inside the fucking bracket, you don't touch it before the division.

Answer is 58. Those in disbelief can take their argument to any scientific calculator giving you the same answer.

>>722534776
>BEDMAS/PEMDAS (same thing)
6^2 / 2(3) + 4
>Brackets
6^2 / 2(3) + 4 (nothing to do within brackets, skip)
>Exponents
36 / 2(3) + 4
>Multiplication and/or Division in the oder they appear from left to right
18(3) + 4
54 + 4
>Addition and/or Subtraction in the order they appear from left to right
58

(36%6) + 4
0 + 4
4

36 % 6 is 0 u faggots

>>722547800
where did u find that modulo???

>>722534776
Not to use Comic Sans

>>722547800
there is no mod sign in the equation.

69 Dudes!

>>722534776
Why can't we all agree on using brackets like sane people so we don't have to see shitty threads like this again?

>>722534776
10

>>722539829
Real math majors don't own a calculator you faggot

Well nefags,

python, bash, tcl, ML, erlang, Ocaml and C, all say that its 58 therefore must be 58.

##
$ python
Python 2.7.12 (default, Nov 19 2016, 06:48:10)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 6 ** 2 / 2 * 3 + 4
58

##
$ echo $(( 6 * 6 / 2 * 3 + 4))
58

##
$ tclsh
% puts [expr "6 * 6 / 2 * 3 + 4"]
58

##
Standard ML of New Jersey v110.80 [built: Tue Jan 31 18:57:43 2017]
- 6 * 6 div 2 * 3 + 4
= ;
val it = 58 : int

##
Erlang/OTP 18 [erts-7.3] [source] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]

Eshell V7.3 (abort with ^G)
1> 6 * 6 / 2 * 3 + 4.
58.0
2>

##
OCaml version 4.02.3

# 6 * 6 / 2 * 3 + 4;;
- : int = 58

##
$ cat > /tmp/c.c
int main () {
return 6 * 6 / 2 * 3 + 4;
}

$ gcc /tmp/c.c && ./a.out && echo $?
58

File: bill-and-ted-s-excellent-adventure_55029933-3000x2005-3000x2005.jpg (652KB, 3000x2005px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 3000x2005px

>>722548427

58.
BODMAS rule
brackets, order, division, multiplication, addition and subtraction(decreasing order of priority) I learnt that in 1st grade. You guys are so retarded to think it's 10.

File: 1456033741213.gif (393KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 640x360px

>>722534776
58
y'all are retarded

File: Capture.png (127KB, 1380x840px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1380x840px

For those that had to sit at the retard table in 5th grade

File: shitters_full.jpg (160KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 640x480px

>>722535885
This is why America has gone down the shitter.

6^2 / 2(3) + 4

36 / 2 x 3 + 4

18 x 3 + 4

54 + 4

>>722541233
Holy fuck what the fuck is this, your calculator must be acient

>>722552123
>6^2 / 2(3) + 4
>36 / 2 x 3 + 4

That's where you fucked up, son.

>>722552221
So close retard

File: checkem.jpg (3KB, 124x124px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x124px

the answer is