so what you guys think bout this?
Did you just assume my thinking topics
I refuse to perpetuate delusion.
Trainees and sjws are so fucking sensitive. Grow a pair or cut it off. Either way shut the fuck up.
>>722524728
Did you just assume my gender?!?!?
>>722524728
> hi
> hello
> how are you?
> how's the weather?
> what about the game last night?
> that's a nice purse
Are all sexist, now. There's now one and only one way to introduce yourself to a new person:
> what are your preferred pronouns?
>>722524728
Words depend on context to derive their meaning.. Faggot.
Honestly, I don't think about this. I work in a department full of them and I don't give a shit. I have yet to run into one that is militant about SJW issues so it has had zero impact on my day to day.
Don't give a shit. If you obsesse over these topics, pro or anti, you're just a snowflake. Enjoy your safe space.
>>722524728
Really wish I didnt live next to UC Davis
>>722524728
This violates at least two of my core principles: you *cannot* expect other people to control their behavior for your sake, absent any incentive -and- the belief that your feelings matter more than other people's feelings.
>>722526317
There is a game that some people play called, "Here, let me feel that for you." It involves expressing outrage on issues that effect you secondarily, but that you act as if you were the one being treated in a way that you don't approve of. This can be noble, but--since you point out, not all people of an in-group feel the sane about the issuesthat effect them--it can be misguided.
>>722524728
There is a leap and logic here. Words can be used to express belief, but they don't encapsulate belief that neatly. You can say bad words, even offensive things, and still be a good person. Comedian Patton Oswalt has a great routine on this: imagine a truckers who says, "If two faggots want to get married, I don't have a problem with it." This is hurt mining, pure and simple.