Is marijuana you buy today the same as the one you bought in

Your doctor makes money every time he gives someone a perscription for big pharma drugs

>>721868978
It's just a safe. Only stronger now.

its just as save but the strength depends on the strain

>>721868978
>today's weed has a lot of bad chemistry in it
bad chemistry?

he could mean pesticides, but there was a small risk of that back then too

some is grown with shitty chemical nutrients, but that really doesn't make it any worse for you

should have asked him exactly what he meant by bad chemistry

>>721868978
It's grown WAY better.

THC contents are up from 10% to 25-30% depending on strain.

That's really the only major difference aside from more/hybrid strains.

>>721868978
He's literally just saying that so youll get a normie prescription for some fat cat drugs that are far more likely to hurt you than pot

>>721868978
Same shit, just stronger.
There's just more greedy people now spraying their shit to make it heavier to sell more.

>>721869847
I started smoking 2 years ago, and it was always ok. Then a friend of mine who never smoked, smoked with me. He got something like "crazy": he thought he was God, he had very bad hallucinations, like thinking street lights were ufos and aliens. He was "feeling light", and believed he was about to fly and die and go to heaven because he was God. Now he is in an psychiatric hospital. Since that happened, I have never smoked again and I fear the same would happen to me. I always believe weed to be a beautiful thing, but how can I now?

>>721868978
It's more potent, there are alternatives like buying organic if you don't want pesticides. I'm guessing that's the only harm in it.

The only risk that I know of at the moment is cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Google it.

>>721870507
either your friend was nuts to begin with, or that was not just weed

>>721870507

i'll take things that never happened for 600 trebek

>>721870281
agreed! you also smoke less plant matter because you smoke less to get the same high.

>>721870653
Some people have very bad reactions to mind altering substances. It's uncommon but not unheard of.

>>721870653
I don't understand what you said, you're saying my story didn't actually happen?

>>721870507
He was faking it.

>>721870281
you're probably young, at best 20-22.

The weed we smoked in the mid 90's was 3-7%, we paid $20-30 a gram for shit that was confirmed to be 10% and it was rumoured to be from b/c.

The shit that was being smoked in the 60's and 70's was known to be .0-3% and could be smoked the entire day with impunity. The absoulte best of the best was tropical strains such as maui wowi, panama red/gold, we have decendants of these strains that are still only around 10% if grown naturally.

We didn't get ahold of proper growing until the mid to late 90's when hid became a possibility indoors, and strains only started taking off around the same time.

>>721870999
30.
But I'm not a faggot who's into the "culture".
I just smoke the shit and enjoy. Friend who had been growing for 16 years got me started. Been "chasing the dragon" since.

Fuck, I miss his weed.

File: 1440708820340.jpg (124KB, 700x933px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 700x933px

>>721870507
I'm a heavy smoker of the weeds and so was my cousin but he went mental cannabis psychosis the doctors called it went into full blown schizophrenia he is fucked but I still smoke it I think if you go mental the mental was in you anyway so just keep smoking anon

>>721870985
Believe me, he was not faking it.
1- he's not the guy to fake such things
2- you don't end up in a psychiatric hospital leaving family, friends, university work and stuff for... what?

File: 005a.jpg (324KB, 1384x920px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1384x920px

>>721871111
I was only explaining that weed itself was a lot weaker than 10% up until around 2000 going forward. And even then most places you couldn't find anything aside from reg's unless you paid a premium.

Home grown is always best

>>721871111
>Been "chasing the dragon" since.

Thought this was a weed thread, not a heroin thread

>>721871136
So you think it can't happen to me? He got mad because he was predisposed to it, and weed just triggered or speeded up the process?

>>721870891
>cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome
>>721870985

it might of happened but he was faking the whole thing

dude was just high af

Anyone here growing weed?
I plan on moving out soon but won't be able to afford to buy weed as much as I smoke so I plan on growing my own while working at the same time.
>is it tough to grow weed at home?
>how long does it take?
>do I need to look after it often? I won't be home a lot because of work
>if I live by myself would it be easy for me to get caught? is the smell strong enough to alert people passing by my house?
I just want a single plant but have no idea how to go about it

>>721871401
His weed was that good, friend.
Gave me the tip of a cola once. TIP! Half ounce. Size of my fist. Texas Big Bud. Keep your demons at bay weed, as he called it.
His Cali Orange, grabbed you by the nuts and pulled you six feet into your couch. Fucking epic shit. Heady, body buzz. Fuckin' eh.

>>721871376
I'm aware. But I needed to clarify my position all the same.

its pretty much the same but stronger. one big difference is most of the weed is grown in dispensaries, which dont use toxic pesticides banned decades ago. In the 60s we'd import weed from mexico and south america where strange pesticides were normal.

But yeah, the weeds way stronger. Not a problem as most users are auto-titratory, and stop smoking once they're high.

>>721871478
I thought that too, "he is just high as fuck", i was even laughing at it... but his thoughts and madness kept going on for DAYS. you can't stay high for days

>>721871510
>is it tough to grow weed at home?

not if you have the right equipment
>how long does it take?
3-4 months germ to cure
>do I need to look after it often? I won't be home a lot because of work
Daily, but its only around 20 minutes at a time, until you chop, that takes hours
>if I live by myself would it be easy for me to get caught?
no
is the smell strong enough to alert people passing by my house?
kind of, depends on your filter setup and how much you grow.

If you did a 2 plant, 400hps setup of an l.e.d. equivalent, it would be easy to hide the smell, and easy to manage

>>721871510
i've grown before, its fun. if you're going outside start early april/march, be prepared to wait til september/october.

if its inside... try doing a hydroponics setup where 6 different plants are connected to a central reservoir. Takes a little reading and learning, but the yields are massive.

Just 1 plant isn't worth it, because if you get a nice 600w light to get some strong kush... well at that point you have so much excess light you might as well get 3 more plants.

>>721871625
My favourite is when you have a bowl packed, but you're so high that you're left staring at it thinking about how you want to smoke it. But can't bring yourself to lift the pipe and light up.

Don't know about percentages but in my experience good weed gives more of a buzz than a stone.

Best I ever had, the first 30 mins were almost like a sugar + amphetamine rush combined, then your knees decided they were rubber. Didn't matter though because you were just filled with the need to do something, not just vegetate on the couch.

I knew the grower personally so it wasn't adulterated in any way.

>>721871726
PROPER SPECTRUM OF LIGHT!

For both phases. Different bulbs are required.
To maximize effect, use green tinted lightbulb for the room light. So that no unwanted wavelengths affect your plant.

>>721871660
can you describe some of what he was saying?

also what did you smoke?? was it possibly laced with lsd

>>721871726
600w led if true 600w will buy you a half pound of weed for the light alone

and 600w for any lower end led will only be around 180-200 actual watts which is not enough for more than two plants

File: 5d6Ik83.jpg (2MB, 2262x2292px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2262x2292px

Weed is just better now, although I refuse to smoke anything that wasn't grown by me.

File: QxvjFCZ.jpg (2MB, 2952x1530px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2952x1530px

>>721872067
All I blow is loud!
t. Juicy J

>>721871871
God, if he doesn't know "proper spectrum of light" he has a SHITLOAD of reading to do.

If you're THAT uneducated, read The Cannabis Grow Bible. There's free pdfs online, they'll teach you the absolute basics.

>>721872161
Do LEDs provide the proper spectrum? Or does he have to go halogen?

>>721870507
Shit like that happened to my friend's girlfriend.

She was diagnosed OCD, and her mom was diagnosed Schizophrenia, so i was like "maybe dont smoke weed if your mom was in and out of psych wards her whole life"

File: D4Hn7DF.jpg (2MB, 1639x2500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1639x2500px

>>721872161
Old books don't know shit.

>>721872227
i dont know, i've been using HID lights, all my experience with those

>>721872261
old books know fundamentals like color range for veg/flower,

how to train plants with paperclips to grow sideways....

File: e1ED5Pk.jpg (2MB, 1769x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1769x2000px

>>721872227
You'll need white COB LEDs, Cree, Bridgelux and Citizen. Halogen is useless, it puts out shit light and lots of heat.

File: weedflag.jpg (121KB, 550x494px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 550x494px

>>721868978
Your Doctor is an idiot. Get a new one. If he had any real knowledge of science he knows that the only change has been selective breeding. Something that has been going on for a Millennia.

>>721871726
the reason I'm just looking for a single plant is because of how intense the smell would be. If its not much of a difference then more than 1 would be fine.

I'll be growing for personal use only. How much cash will I have to spend on equipment do you think for growing 1-3 plants indoors?

>>721871711
I might be able to convert one of the spare rooms in the house into a place where I can grow, but I don't want to make it too obvious in case my landlord would randomly show up or something. Any way to hide the smell/plants themselves in case that happens? or does it pretty much ruins my plans all together?

>>721872380
So there are specially made LEDs that put out the proper spectrum?
If this is true, then it would make a small home grow all the more viable as no one's going to notice the spike in electrical usage.

File: THzBG6w.jpg (1MB, 2706x1248px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2706x1248px

>>721872352
You don't need to know "color ranges", just use a full spectrum light source like CDMs and white LEDs. I use two 315w CDMs with 4200K bulbs.

>>721871872
He thought a lot of stuff during those days, I can't remember it all but I'll tell you what I remember:
Very first thing, he was sitting on a chair, then immediatly stood up and said "I'm about to die!" bringing his hands on his head. He then explained me that he thought he was being replaced by a third friend, who was not even there, and his entity, being replaced by the friend, was disappearing and then he was dying.

Another one... He knows he is a good person, honest and all, so he thought he was God and all the bad people were Devils, so his job on the earth was to spread the good word.

Another one: one night he wakes up (sleeped at my house), and said he was gay, and i was like what the fuck dude? Then he explained me his dick couldn't get hard because he is really a woman, and his dick is existing only in a physical form, but not in him.

Worst of all:
He escaped his house thinking Aliens were arriving (they were actually street lights) and me and his family were kidnapped by aliens. He risked to go under cars, and being hit by people. That's when he went to psychiatric hospital.

There is a lot of stuff he said and done, but I can't remeber them all... Those days were like living in hell...

>>721872499
You'll get good. But not best with that.

Optimization makes a world of difference to get your strains to their true potential.

>>721872390
I think he meant that humans put bad chemical stuff in there

>>721872431
no, you use carbon scrubber filters. You would have a much easier time buying and using a tent than trying to configure a room to be light leak free

>>721872695
Surround operation with that reflective shit.
So it's a room in a room.
Pretty simple stuff.

>>721872562
.. cmh has the absolute best yeild per watt right now, including cob

the only reason anyone would choose cob over cmh is head issues

File: 54DTxDS.jpg (2MB, 2560x1518px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1518px

>>721872562
Optimization is not required when you use good quality lights, things were different when people used high pressure sodiums and regular metal halides. CDMs and COB LEDs are the best light sources available and will maximize the genetic potential.

>>721872695
this tbqh fam. there's some super cheap airtight grow tents on ebay, and you can throw a carbon scrubber on that thing boom, total smell proof

>>721872791
Anon from a few posts up here.

I've been using HID since like 2011. teach me about CDM & COB? or throw me a link to read? i feel like im behind the times

>>721872754
how is a room within a room any different than a tent? other than a tent for a first time grower is assure to be leak free, while a room built within a room by a beginner is not?

its almost like you have no clue what the fuck you are talking about.

File: 0UNxBqL.jpg (1MB, 1930x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1930x1600px

>>721872850
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=299165

I started with HPS and MH, then tried "blurple" LED grow lights, moved to old CMH (400w) and then to the newer 315w CDMs, never going back. I still use white chip-on-board LEDs for micro grows, lots of high quality light for very low wattage and heat.

>>721872791
It's not required. But I've tasted the glory of true optimization. It's the difference between a 95% and a 100%. The average Joe would never know. But I do. So I say what I say.

>>721872785
Efficiency is good. For the average growing, it will do fine. But if you truly love your plants, you'll go for the specific spectrum. Making them the 100% awesome they could be. Using a magnifying glass during the last few weeks of budding. Watching the THC crystals until they're juuuuuust right.

>>721872938
Or I'm just stating what my buddy used to do....

>>721870507
Your friend probably has a latent mental illness that's fine, so long as he doesn't do drugs. Speed and weed/psychedelics are a nono for those kinda people

new marihuana strains have 420% THC and are crossed with strichnine which will instantly kill you if you inject too much. Listen to your doctor OP.

>>721871872
And also, I forgot: if it was laced with lsd, how comes I reacted as normal weed? I should have reacted as it was laced with lsd. i think laced with nothing.. idk

>>721872850
cmh, is metal halide, with ceramic in the bulb build, it runs much cooler and full spectrum from 3000-4200k but its lumen is around 110000 like an hps. The difference is that it only runs on 315w instead of the 1kw that an hps takes to run the same amount of lumens.

COB is a type of led, they are 100w each, but people run them around 60% power for better effeciency. They run cool themselves, only the drivers need to be cooled, which can be done with a computer fan.

The true watt to these is equal to that of HID and CMH, but they run cooler and full spectrum as well. Technically they are led, but they far outperform standard blurple pannels that were pupular for a while. There are only a few mass manufacturers of these, and the same type of system you could build yourself for around $400 (equivelant to around 600w hps) would be around $1200 premanufactured.

COB is likely where the future of growing is going to be, but for the money CMH is currently top dog.

File: nThXzqa.jpg (1MB, 2300x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2300x1600px

>>721873022
I'm telling you man, there is no optimizing any more. You either use the best possible light (315w Philips GreenPower CDM) or Cree cxb3590.

>>721873182
ya a lot of people don't realize drugs dont just cause mental illness, they can catalyze it though. Of course someone who is internally crazy but has their shit together in the moment might loose it with some chemical alteration.

>>721870381
/thread

>>721873263
And I'm telling you, that person who loves their plants more than their children, will go out of their way to make sure their grow is 100%.

I doubt the majority do it. Only those that are truly dedicated in their love of weed will go that extra mile.
And from my perspective, it's worth it. Because holy fuck, his weed was the best I've ever had.

>>721873182
That's what they said at the hospital, we had that madness inside, weed just triggered it. I guess there is no way to know if a person can smoke or is one of those people

https://www.cutter.com.au/products.php?cat=MAU5+Cree

http://timbergrowlights.com/grow-light-kits/cree-cxb3590-kits/

Good COB kits.

>>721868978
Studies show that the raise of THC in marijuana, have lower other active ingredients. Which seem to counter the paranoid affects of THC.

Not sure if that is a good or bad, because (i forget the name of ingredient) is being studied for it's effects of helping schizophrenia.

source? fucking look it up. I did.

>>721873402
idk man I've met some fucking stupid as rocks growers that grew some seriously dank shit, I don't think getting obsessive over this shit helps at all. Its just experience and practicality, knowing how the plant is going to respond to certain things in certain conditions just based off of personal experience.

>>721873402
And I'm still telling you, there are no lights that are better than CDMs. You can "optimize" all you want, but there is nothing better than the CDMs.

You'll still need good genetics, but you can easily find them these days. RB26's GG#4 has been tested in multiple labs at 33%.

>>721873698
.. they're called CMH, because they are ceramic metal halide bulbs

CDM is philips naming for the specific bulb you've bought

>>721873837
CMH now refers to the older type, such as the "retro white". The modern "CMHs" are called CDMs.

>>721873686
well of course it would, but its not like most strains are sativa dominant. Most strains these days are hybrids and there is growing demand for CBD heavy strains which would be laden with other cannabinoids besides THC/be genetically free from disposition towards it. That just sounds like hysteric reporting, from an outside perspective raising some strains THC potential through selective breeding I guess might seem bad if THC is a boogeyman to you but the exact same thing is going on with other strains to produce the total opposite of this. Hell nowadays you can just get pure CBD/really any cannabinoid you like and drip terpenes on it. Don't like THC? You live in 2017, no reason to.

>>721873692
I'll use breaking bad as a reference. Because I think it applies here.

Walt's meth wasn't THAT much more pure than the competitor. Something like 1-2% better. But that 1-2% put it over the top.
That's what my buddies weed was. That extra "holy fucking balls I'm tripping balls so hard I don't know what to do with my balls!"

>>721870507
lol that is total bullshit. Either you're talking bollocks (the likely answer) or you weren't smoking weed.

File: Screenshot_20170209-123802.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>721870507
Pic related. It's your friend

>>721873920
I'm sure it is.

sorry it took so long to get back to you. had to put down the blunt.

Just because I smoke don't mean I don't read.

>paranoia maybe?

>>721870281
10%? You don't know shit about weed. Its closer to 3% in the seventies. Try knowing what you're talking about before you post.

>>721874139
We already covered this, friendo. Keep reading the reply chain and sperg less.

>>721869679
/Thread

>>721873945
Everyone knows "that guy"... I'm that guy in my city. Just taking a break because I got arrested a few weeks back. I got greedy with my plants and my scrubbers couldn't keep up. Even the mason jars were giving off smell. I have to thank US breeders for that, never have I had such loud genetics before (GG#4 x Wookie #15, OGKB 2.0 x GG#4, Cherry Pie x Face Off OG)

>>721873918
.. no... they're not

http://www.lightingsupply.com/philips-cdm-mastercolor-ceramic-metal-halide-bulb.aspx

Literally anywhere you look, they are still ceramic metal halide setups, bulbs, everything. CDM is the 1 single bulb line from philips

>>721874337
All the other bulbs are just copies of the Philips CDM. Literally identical, just not as quality controlled.

>>721874325
Give California Orange a try when you get back into it.

It's theorized that it's the OG in OG Kush. Which makes sense to me, because OG Kush vaguely reminds me of Cali Orange.

>>721874018
I really wish it was bullshit, really. But it isn't. And it was weed. Instead, tell me why you are so sure this can't happen (not provoking, I really want to know)

>>721874398
that doesn't mean it changes the definition and name of the style of lighting.

its still ceramic metal halide.

on philips own fucking site its cmh

http://www.lighting.philips.com/main/prof/lamps/high-intensity-discharge-lamps/ceramic-metal-halide/

nowhere on their site is there a CDM style of light, at all

http://www.lighting.philips.com/main/prof/lamps/high-intensity-discharge-lamps

have a look.

you are mistaken, CDM is nothing more than a product description internally at the company

>>721870653
best post in this retard tier thread

>>721874467
>he thinks a strain from the kashmere region of the middle east has anything to do with a sative from california

nah

>>721874671
Kush, is sand nigger weed.
There are hundreds of Kush varieties.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that California Orange wouldn't have been blended with one of these Kush strains?

>>721874577
Well, I have to admit I go by what it says on the bulbs package. Still, I think we both agree that the 315w CMH is the best there is.

I had (cops took em) two Lights Interaction D-Papillon fixtures.

so what actually is AK-47 a cross of?

>>721874744
because they are from completely different regions, like, opposite ends of the globe.

California orange was a storied strain from the 80's and 90's which is more or less non existant now.

To say that a strain which didn't make it to the states (indica/kush) until 91 when kushman started fucking with the phenotype and made the cover of time magazine is kind of far reaching

>>721874789
I full agree, I fully agreed the whole time. I am just trying to explain, that the next time you are into it, you are buying lights, you are looking for cmh. HTG has a set for like $400 bulb and all.

>>721874862
.... You are slow, aren't you?

You realize, that people grow Kush in North America too, right?
And I never claimed that this was an original strain from back before recorded history....

Seriously, put the pipe down. Take a break. Your brain is fried.

My doctor said she doesn't care about weed but maybe I should try edibles or vaping because any smoke is bad for your lungs, I live in a hick ass town in Indiana too, my doctor is pretty based if you ask me.

>>721874986
get a decent desktop vape (not a volcano). I honestly haven't seen any conclusive evidence that smoking weed is bad for you, definitely irritates your lungs though/I personally dont smoke. Still though kind of interesting I cant find really anything negative about it long term wise, if anything it seems people who smoke have healthier lungs. THC is an expectorant though so maybe that has something to do with it.

>>721868978
depends on the source, you are more than likely going to get laced sit. but if you go through a dispensery or a trusted source. you are less than likely going to get shit weed

>>721875402
Medical strains are grown to precise specifications for specific effects.

Many a time I've gotten medical grade and been sad because I know the strain could have been WAY better.

>>721875477
There's a lot of contaminated medical cannabis going around. Mostly mold and pesticides, there's not enough quality control in the medical scene.

Everyone should smoke weed

>>721875739
I've yet to encounter that.
But here in Canada, we're only starting to fire up the weed machine in full. Suppose I can expect such things in the future.
Because we all know that the legislators aren't going to do a good enough job in regulating anything.

>>721875402
for the millionth time unless you are some east euro slav trash your weed is not laced

>>721875477
thats not really entirely the case, some strains are definitely grown for medical purpose but the average shit you find in a dispensary isn't curtailed like that. IE at least in my opinion the term medical doesn't really make sense because there isn't anything different between properly grown weed and weed that is grown under "medical" conditions. There is no functional reason a medical strain should be lacking in intended effect because it is is medical, that is a sales gimmick. Medical cannabis is pretty subjective to the user anyways, some people couldn't stand THC at all while others would claim they need it to live. Don't get caught up in the hype. Properly grown weed is properly grown weed.

>>721875853
There have been cases in Canada where banned pesticides were found. More than once.

http://herb.co/2017/01/30/organigram-illegal-pesticides/

>>721875947
This, seriously dude these kids have no idea kek

>>721870507
Hahahaha. What a fucking light weight

File: 3uqVeHK.jpg (1MB, 2560x1357px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1357px

>>721875947
This.

Weed has helped my spouse and I in so many ways. But the stuff I've got from other people has always been bad.. It can be potent, but won't help with pain, depression, anxiety etc.

>>721875947
I don't find medical lacking in effect at all. Just that I know what a well grown nugget is supposed to look, feel, and burn like.
And it's my understanding that as far as medical specifics, it usually boils down to THC and CBD content. So the budding phase would have been cut short once the desired numbers are reached.

>>721875964
Good to know, Still haven't encountered it myself though.

Only shit dealers blasting budds with butane to make honey oil, then selling the depleted budds for full price.
Which is shitty.

>>721876060
>do a drug that causes paranoia espcially when the user has low tolerance
guys I got spiked shit

>>721876170
no your missing the point, the entire term "medical" is marketing bullshit. What makes weed "medical" is 100% based on the subjective user.

>>721876180
Kek

>>721876250
When sold from the average dealer, regardless of what method of selling they use (buddy and/or dispensary) Yeah, you're right.

But from an actual industry "this is what we're supposed to be doing" standpoint, not so much.
The average dealer will call everything "Kush" too. Because slow people think "Kush" = quality.

If you are a licensed medical growing, you are supposed to follow strict specifications.
I won't say that all do, because that would just be retarded of me.
I'm just stating that what they are supposed to be doing is controlling THC and CBD levels for specific medical purposes; and that I've had weed that was clearly grown in this manner based on effect, and bud quality.

>>721870507
yeah... your friend obviously had serious underlying mental issues

>>721870999
>>721871111
trips and quads check'd

File: barf8.jpg (1MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1333px

>>721868978
my doctor says mylanta!

the bong battle stuff has been shown for years,to damage young developing brains,interfering with learning,memory retention abstract thinking judgment,coordination reaction time,often doing permanent damage,evidence of this is xxxxx times more compelling than climate change mmgw whatever you want to call it,
medical pot for chronic illness?
in careful doctor monitored application if the stuff helps make life easier for a few illnesses,,have at it, but watch for state workers who scarf their state paid supplies to sell on their own

>>721873226
weed doesn't get laced with lsd, that's just plain bullshit

>>721877045
>smoking LSD having an effect
>a dealer putting LSD on weed
>a dealer lacing weed with something as rare as LSD
>a dealer lacing weed at all
were is the common sense anymore

>>721876972
nice sources

>>721877122
people getting told that "oh weed you buy on the street is dangerous cuz they put other stuff in it"

if they actually had some simple sense of what they were talking about they'd realize how incredibly time consuming and useless that would be. although they have obviously never done acid before kek

>>721877287
>Cost

That's the key here.
Acid costs money. Weed? Not so much. Also the risk reward thing just isn't there.

Now, having weed laced with crack... a dealer might want to do that for a new custy to get them hooked. But that would be the extreme of it.

>>721876146
>spouse

faggot detected!

>>721876972
I've smoked pot since I was 11, I'm now doing my phd. You cannot use proper punctuation, if anything this shows weed is good for a developing mind.

<15 please moot

>>721877392
but that shit only happens in the extreme asscracks of the world, that kind of shit is pretty rare. If you don't buy from a completely sketchy fuck chances are your gonna get weed, at worse they rip you off on the price. If you want to worry about fake shit go buy some molly.

>>721877392
This. I've been sprinkling crack on my weeds for years.

>>721877560
Yup. Also, some dealers like to throw a crack rock in with the weed every now and then.
Because again, addictive.

Moral of the story? Don't buy from the guy in front of the homeless shelter.

>>721877725
tell me where to do my shopping again

>>721877834
Walmart

>>721877423
I don't know another term for the woman living with me? There's no marriage because we aren't christfags.

>>721877905
your mother is your mother is your mother.

File: notmyhouse.jpg (35KB, 422x237px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 422x237px

>>721877904
Wally World is worst world.

File: RDudQLH.jpg (1MB, 2160x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x1440px

>>721878036
Oh you. My mother would never let me grow cannabis in her home.

>>721870281
>THC contents are up from 10% to 25-30% depending on strain.

imlpying nobody was good at growing back in the days too

>>721878133
How dare you?! She's a nice lady.

>>721878197
forgot to mention this post to >>721870999

>>721878197
Back in the days most people used soil and industrial HPS lights, maybe some low quality fluorescents. There just wasn't much you could do to bring the quality up.

>>721878498
miracle gro was a thing you kno

>>721869679
this basically summarized the issue as well as anything else can.

Yes, weed is stronger. And yes, they tend to spray it with more shit now. But it's still vastly better for you than anything his prescription pad has to offer you.

>>721878197
dude the genetics didn't support it, its not like good weed is just high power lights and plant food.

>>721876759
He looked like just a normal person, you know, like every normal person. never gave signs of underlying mental issues. it's a pity, we could have a lot of high times together. But everything stopped that shitty way. But I think I'll wait my "wound" to heal, and i'll start tripping again with the grateful dead

>>721879059
>A widower who loses custody of his daughter finds himself unable to hold down a job. He agrees to drive a truck across the country, no questions asked. But when he discovers what he is delivering, he is faced with a life-changing choice.

This. So much this.

Thc (chemical that gets you high) is something like 70 times stronger than it was back in the day, which is why everyone smoked hash. Now that our weed has higher thc levels, we get a better, stronger, longer feeling. Weed has no danger to you though.. No negative effects. Unless treated with pesticides.

>>721879605
My question is: why is it stronger? How can a plant change thc level in only 40 years? They probably do something to it, while it's growing, don't they?

>>721879839
They do everything known/possible to increase THC content.

If you do nothing to the plant while it's growing, it'll die.

>>721879158
I can't get the connection

>>721879839
>g
>e
>n
>e
>t
>i
>c
>s

>>721879898
Imagine that weed is his wife's death and you're the truck.

>>721879889
But there is a different process in growth today, that in the 70s was skipped? They increase thc in natural ways?

>>721880004
I think most weed in the 70s was just outdoor ditch weed. You used to let nature do it's thing, but nature is easy to manipulate.

>>721879935
I'm no science teacher or things like that, but i thought genetics changed in thousands of years

>>721880004
you dumb bastard. tomatoes are larger, so is corn. who does your grocery shopping?

>>721880106
not when you are selectively growing them over 40 years, why do you think there are so many strains?

>>721880070
So if i grow weed outdoor and i let nature do its thing instead of buying by 2017 unknown dudes, i get 70s weed?

>>721880269
if you eat more orange crayons, your poop will be more orange.

>>721880269
not really you are using recent seeds with recent genetics and it would be shitty outdoor, you would be lucky if it flowered at all.

>>721880154
How do you say they don't make larger tomatoes by putting strange chemical stuff in there? tomatoes are larger for genetics? every single food in this planet got larger for genetics? Even cows get fatter for genetics?

>>721879839
You're retarded.

They cross bred different strains of marijuana to birth a more potent plant. Actually they had weed back then that was the strength of average weed now due to strain and growing conditions, it was just saved for rich people.

They didn't splice any genes and whether or not there are pesticides or harmful chemicals used during growth is up to the grower themselves. You can 100% grow strong ass weed organically.

>>721880419
yes, is it that hard to believe in a mechanized industry that is utilizing this shit as product and has been manipulating it since day one and its just got that efficient? If it bugs you grown your own shit.

>>721880406
there aren't outdoor seeds around?

>>721880419
what do you think genetics means?

>>721880534
no but if you just ditch some seeds in the wild the chance of them being any good is pretty low, I mean I guess you can get strains that are more hardy/suited for climates like that but nothing specific. I mean if you took care of them it would probably be fine/plenty smokeable assuming it flowers. Just go buy some shake it will save you time.

>>721880572
Sorry, I replied without thinking. I must agree with the dude above that says that i'm retarted

>>721880628
stop telling this retard how to grow garbage weeds.

>>721868978
>2017
>still believes what doctors say

Ask yourself: How do pharmaceutical and healthcare companies ensure their survival in fierce competition where maximizing profits is key for investor retention?

Do they:
A) attempt to maximize benefit to patients by providing treatment options that are cheap, generic and don't cause side effects, or
B) attempt to minimize cost of treatment and maximize profit by ordering unnecessary tests, unnecessary specialist visits, unnecessary diagnoses, unnecessary medications with side effects and unnecessary procedures that require more procedures and more medications?

>still believes that doctors have your best intentions in mind
>keep on rockin' in the free world

>>721880719
low hanging fruit are good for the tree anon

>>721871510
Use fuckin google
Choose a strain
Have seeds sent to you
Use fuckin google again
Grow that specific seed how that specific seed should be grown according to case studies or published grow sheets

Then look up how to cure the shit

Congrats now u know how to solve a problem without letting everyone know ur stupid

>>721880664
apology not accepted. put your mouth on the curb.

>>721868978
there may be some truth to that. Todays weed is prolly treated with more pesticides and similar treatments compared to the shit grown in the woods and shit back in the day.

>>721880821
I mean you could say the same thing about produce, assuming its legal in your state functionally its supposed to be tested before its sold but currently that seems like an issue because a lot of shit weed is hitting the market. Just grow your own.

>>721880821
it's not true jessica. you're not in the industry and you have no idea what you're babbling about. save the stupid opinions for your diary.

>>721881068
Thanks anon

>>721880968
you give a shit about some pesticide residues but don't give a shit about the PFOA and PFOS that's in everyone's bloodstream and everything in the biosphere by now... and that's way more dangerous stuff

howling cows vomiting blood and dying on the fields contaminated with PFOA

>>721881138
>this is now a conspiracy thread

>>721868978
>><>< stop being a cuckfag and do some hardcore shit already. Weed are for baby's. Try meth and shut up.

>>721881195
>conspiracy

http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/welcome-to-beautiful-parkersburg/