>if we illegally seized all of facebooks, Apple, Microsoft,

>>721752177
Buy a new one

>>/pol/

It's just what they are... it really sucks that they pride themselves on being dense because I have conservative friends who are genuinely good ppl too. But they're retarded tho...

>>721752177
waaaaah goes op.

>>721752474
sure kid.

>>721752177
As opposed to
>we'll increase taxes on the wealthy (except for ourselves) and middle class (you peasants) but give all the excess to the poor and continue to encourage them not to work because of free handouts so we can get their vote
Yes. Democrats are obviously so much better than Republicans.
Both your parties are dysfunctional piles of shit supported by completely retarded sheepish morons who bleat in beat to whomever brainwashes them the best at the moment.
Professional politics is killing America, and you assholes are supporting it.
You all deserve what you get.

>>721752177
>Why are republicans so fucking retarded?
That's not retarded. What is retarded is ignoring what they're saying. What they're telling you is if you simply do this what is projected. If you have no other changes in mind you're going to run into a road block. You have to reform other things as well and if you don't start with the other reforms first you're going to have those problems. This is why I wanted a different candidate to win the previous election because the U.S. would of been much better off if Obama had used his second term in another election after other reforms were carried out instead of trying to push a square peg through a round hole.

>>721752848
>doesn't realize majority of welfare recipients work already

>>721753146
>6 years since the ACA passed.
>50+ times Repubs tried to appeal it

So where's the fucking plan we're supposed to be listening to? 'Cuz they sure as fuck don't have one.

>>721752177

Obamacare was written by insurance companies. Americans are now legally obligated to buy private insurance at whatever cost the insurance companies feel like charging.

And instead of a single payer that is able to negotiate prices down (like in ALL OTHER socialized healthcare systems), we are still in a quasi-free market system where the consumer "negotiates" with the insurer (by way of getting to choose your insurer), who then negotiates prices.

But because healthcare through private insurance is now MANDATORY, consumers have lost all negotiation power. Insurance companies have a captive consumer base and no incentive to drive down prices. They are making record profits.

Stupid fucking Democrats are too stupid to read their own laws and understand how they affect our country. They were more worried about a victory over the Republicans than passing a good law.

/libertarian

>>721753220
I know they work already, and I know they do nothing to reform the problem of underpayment for employment - instead, they keep the ready flow of food stamps, housing assistance, etc going on.
They're opting to treat the symptoms and not find a cure instead. Both parties are guilty of this because BOTH parties are too fucking stubborn to find middle ground and fix the nation's problems in an amicable matter to all parties.

>>721753498
>amicable manner to all parties
Pure fantasy.

>>721753492
This.
Healthcare in my state for those using the PPACA Marketplace premiums rose across the board this year 174% - why? Because all but 1 company left the marketplace and the one who stayed jacked the prices skyhigh.
And it's all legal, with no ramifications at all.

>>721753626
Yeah, it is, only because both sides have their heads so far up their own asses they refuse to see any reason anymore.
And the public supports that.
So fuck all you who are a registered democrat or republican - you all deserve this.

>>721753498
they haven't decided how hard they want to fuck the middle class yet.
the problem is the failure of the millennials to pick up the yoke as other generations have.

>>721753626
crying as he typed this, sniff.

>>721753637
try paying for a family you don't have.
funny how as soon as reason comes into play, the reasons for its appeal become clear.

>>721752232
/thread

Enjoy 22 million people going without healthcare America.

Lets see how this pans out for you.

>>721753637

The middle class is paying for private insurers to cover poor people, at a cost per person higher than any other country in the world. And prices are only going to continue to skyrocket unless Emperor Trump kills the law.

Even then, a lot of the damage is done. Prices are not going to come back down.

America!

File: 1486358553147.jpg (24KB, 600x522px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x522px

>>721752177
Seriously, doesnt he know Twitter is haemorraging money?

File: Anime is now Illegal.png (1MB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x750px

>>721752177
It's not just republicans, man. It's the entire way government is set up in America. From the very foundations of this country it was always set up to make a few elites very rich and everyone one else relatively poor/stupid.

>>721753734
Millennials aren't the problem (for once). Millennials are still young and relatively healthy.

They have been saddled with student loan debt that previous generations weren't, and now they're being forced to pick up the tab for health insurance for our country's poor.

>>721753492
single payer was what Obama wanted

the ACA was the compromise Republicans demanded

>>721753492
Imagine if other industries could legally obligate all Americans to buy their product?

It would be a very good time to invest in those industries.

File: 1484848533105.png (540KB, 746x768px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 746x768px

>>721752177
>successful

>>721754261
>the ACA was the compromise Republicans demanded

Obamacare was passed without a single republican vote and the Democrats got the plan they wanted as they had a majority in both houses.

>>721754261
/thread,
>gop turned it into ACA
>only took the compromise so they can shti on obama and blame him for it
>thinks letting insurance companies run free with some how lower prices

>>721752177
if they weren't retarded, they would not have been republicans, that's it.

>>721752177
>government funded healthcare would cost every working person an average 8% of their income

>the average working person currently spends 10% of their income on private health insurance

wew lads

>>721754261

Republicans didn't "demand" the ACA, they fought its passage tooth and nail. Not a single Republican in the House or Senate voted in favor of it. Try doing some research.

The ACA was definitely a compromise... between Democrats and insurance companies.

(And I'm not a Republican, I think they're retarded too... just not on this issue)

>>721754393
GOP turned it into the ACA by voting against it?

Holy retard batman

>>721754424
nobody said it would be free

>>721754393
It's amazing the revisionist history that Democratic voters can convince themselves of in the name of being able to defend their politicians.

ACA did not receive a single GOP vote.

Decades of propaganda promoting the billionaire agenda

>>721754021
It works fine if you just put them in prison.

>>721752177
>Canada, Europe, and Latin America has had successful government provided healthcare for decades now
>successful

this is how I know you're full of shit. Canada and Europe are slowly draining their resources to keep their healthcare system up and the Brazilian healthcare system is a fucking joke.

>>721752177
>Latin America has had successful government provided healthcare
>implying Brazil has good healthcare
wew lad

>>721753802
>did you just assume my gender
I honestly don't know who "he" is supposed to refer to. Your sentiment lacked some explicit language that would have made it easier for me.

>>721754021
they have health care idiot..

>>721752177
If you seized all of those company's assets, they'd no longer be in business creating a far bigger problem. This is what happens when anything gets nationalized, they gradually fleece the company until it cannot afford operating costs and goes out of business. Look at Venezuela. Now everyone's starving, eating roadkill rodents and bugs, wiping their ass with their hands (no toilet paper), and when people get sick there's no medicine. Nationalization (a fancy name for the government stealing a company's assets) doesn't work. And even if the government supposedly "keeps them in business" do you think some bureaucrat or soldiers with AK47 can better manage a business than people who know the field and have been trained for it?

You lefties need to learn how to have sensible plans.

Here's a sensible alternative plan. With what we've spent on warmongering (over 50% of the US taxes go to the military, more is spent on military than the next 8 nations combined), we could easily put back into American infrastructure and health care.

We pull out of the middle east entirely, stop propping up our puppets, which has never worked, all our middle eastern puppets are either quickly overthrown or live long enough to turn on us. Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden were put in power by US, and they turned against us when the time was right.

With what we've spent on Afghanistan and Iraq alone, since 2000 (and this does not include the 7 other middle eastern countries we're meddling in); we could have afforded every current Americans health care for life and all college tuition. THAT would be investing in America's future rather than investing in what will eventually be our own destruction. America is like the biggest kid in class that picks fights with everyone, and up until now, it has worked; but eventually we'll get what's coming. The biggest kid in class will still get beat down by a group of 30 smaller dudes that he's always fucking with.

>>721754247
sure kid. no one made you go to college.

>>721754261
that's funny considering the democrats voted it in without the republicans present.

>>721754727
>big kid has an M60
Bring your 29 nationlet friends.

>>721754727
still not sensible.

File: Trump Reaction Face.jpg (165KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 640x640px

>Nobody in this thread understands that Democrats and Republicans are fundamentally the exact same thing and American politics are rigged

>>721754919
this
but shhhhh
you'll ruin the fun
>implying either party has power for more than 8 consecutive years at most

>>721754763
I don't have any debt.

And yes, society did start pressuring Millennials into going to college. Entry level jobs that required only a high school degree for previous generations now require a college degree. So no, nobody "made" me or any other Millennial go to college... but they made a high school degree worthless.

American universities have a guaranteed source of money (Federal student loans), so they can continue increasing costs by spending on luxuries and increasing faculty salaries.

tl;dr College is now essentially mandatory and costs >10x as much than it used to.

>>721754968
It's not even that. Republicans and Democrats divide the populous over social issues that government has no business being involved in in the first place.

While Americans are distracted arguing about whether trannies can use the bathroom, both parties (i.e. the political and economic elites) are swindling the American people out of their money.

>>721752177
t. clueless liberal who thinks public healthcare isn't crumbling on its own weight, worldwide, by the minute.

>>721752177
Because they fuck their mothers.

Who are also dogs.

>>721755007
still making excuses.

>>721753734
Millenials have fought harder than previous generations to fix this shit. Don't blame us because we are too busy with student loans and a low minimum wage to take down the oversized government you niggers should've taken care of before we were born, when fixing our government was still ducking possible without revolution. Millenials are innocent. This shit is on the baby boomers and their parents. I wouldve personally shot the first tax collector coming by to get my income and property taxes had I been around then.

>>721752848
Aww, babby's first civics lesson.

You don't get to decide where your taxes go. There's no box on your 1040EZ that you get to check that says 'BOMBS ONLY'.

>>721753637
Cite a source or you're a big fat liar.

Big fat.

>>721755480
>You don't get to decide where your taxes go.
Therefore we must push the government to put money in unsustainable, wasteful, and impractical "social programs" just because they do it in canada.

Yeah, I don't think you even realize you don't have an argument there.

>>721754722
The emergency room is not a viable healthcare option.

Idiot.

File: itslit.png (244KB, 428x619px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 428x619px

>>721755555
check'd

>>721755711
'Social programs' are the only reason the the federal government should exist.

Idiot babby. If you argue against people having healthcare you don't have an argument here.

>>721754863
A more accurate comparison would be the big kid has a M60, and he has 29 guys with AK47s against him.

I know where I'd put my money.

>>721755458
sure kid. blame everyone but yourself.

>>721755770
sure kid. if you can't be civil be nothing then.
still not a reason. stop the canned answers.

>>721753498
Finding a "cure" to welfare is racist because we'd have to face the fact that most of the people we'd be curing would be black.

Try to get a funding grant to do a study on poor black families to figure out the problem and potential solutions so you can enact policy? Racist as fuck.

>>721754763
Maybe if you went to college, you would understand complex concepts.

>>721756190
Then please explain how they all have healthcare.

Kid. Idiot. Babby.

brazilian healthcare is absolute shit fucking retards

>>721756596
so we switch to the ad homs now.
your argument is weak kid.

>>721756757
sorry if you're too stupid my explaining it to you would be a waste of bandwidth.

>>721752177

>Government seizing capitalist assets to pay for an unsustainable program

Republicans have gone full Communist!

>>721752177
Compare the quality of care between Canada and the US. The US is far superior.

>>721753734
True that. Special little snowflakes more worried about me under the guise of "but we're trying to make it safe for us" instead of actually fixing problems.

>>721755480
Apparently you don't understand how a representative government works. See, you elect a person who is supposed to represent their constituents and seeks to change things the way you want to see things changed - how your tax money is spent as one example.
So in effect, by electing someone with your same outlooks, or by running yourself and getting people to support your ideaology and by getting laws passed (which you can do as a non-politician with your representative's support) you can in fact determine how your tax money is spent.
How's that for a civic lesson, bitch.

>>721752177

Here's what would happen, Repub-Communists.

With the assets seized, the capitalists would stop making money and lose all incentive to make further money.

Without funds, your GOP-Communist program would collapse.

BTFO Premier Cruz!

>>721755555
https://www.kfor.com/2016/10/05/obamacare-premiums-in-oklahoma-skyrocketing/
Sorry, typo, on a phone and hit a 1 before the 74%. It was a huge rate increase, anywhere from 74-96% for individuals and families.
Anyway, there's your source.

>>721754529
>>721754488
The ACA is literally romneycare. Stop being so deliberately stupid

>>721756356
Most of the people on welfare in actual numbers, not percentages of population, is white.
While more of the black population may be on welfare, overall more whites are using it because more whites in this country.
Using the racist excuse for not fixing it is, in itself, racism.

>>721758161
sure kid

>>721758161

The sad fact is, contrary to GOP propaganda, a lot of whites are supported by the government.

>>721752177
To be fair, Cruz is especially stupid and not all Reps should be judged on his idiocy.

>>721758345
sure kid.

>>721758355
aww, we feel all big now little man?
that's all you will ever be. a little man.

>>721752177
>Latin America successful at anything.

>/b/ trying to talk politics

funny how they all runaway when someone doesn't agree with them.
I see a long successful future for you.

>>721756757
It's baby you fucking autist. How do you go through life not knowing how to spell a 4 letter word?

>>721758788
well fuck what do you expect.
he doesn't know how health care works.

>>721754261
Obamacare was designed to fail.("SEE? See? Greedy insurance companies and republicans aren't letting Obamacare work, we NEED single payer to fix this!) It was the stepping stone to single payer.
Had Clinton won, we would be on fast track to single payer.

>>721753477
Notice how no trumptards or alt-righters ever respond to this question

Because they literally have no plan or concept of the enormity and complexity of healthcare needs/services/insurance structure.

>>721758867
sure kid. remember its so good they made themselves exempt.
this bill was passed without republican support.
its your baby, no one else's

>>721752177
>Twitter
Has literally never made a profit. I wonder if he's aware of that and using it to manipulate the facts or if he's clueless.

>>721758924
yawn. a little tardy are we?

>>721752177
As long as I'm not being charged for not having healthcare I don't give a shit. I'm 22 and healthy what the fuck do I need health insurance for. Tired of my personal life being up for political debate. Why can't the government just collapse and get fucked.

>>721755458
this

>>721754674
Source?

>>721752177
>Lenin did this during the Russian Revolution.
>All companies are nationalized. All profits goes to public programs.
>Become corrupt as hell.
>Take all the profits.
>Today approximately 10% of total GDP goes towards corruption.
>Utopia is impossible.

>>721757617
So you don't know

>>721758253
>>721758426
>White people being on government support doesn't fit my narrative, so thats alternative facts

>>721752177
Canada's population is 30 million and our healthcare system barely fucking functions you moron.

>>721752177
>successful government provided healthcare
That's funny, tell another joke.

>>721759382
Because if you get hurt and don't have insurance and can't pay for it, you still have to get treated, and that money has to come from somewhere. You paying for healthcare is also to subsidize others that can't pay as much. In a government, all citizens must be healthy for a country to be successful. Having this country be survival of the fittest would cause more slums, a higher crime rate, more drug issues, etc. Its just what is expected in such a large country when fundamental rights of citizens aren't met. We saw it happen in the industrial revolution, and we will see it again before we work out a system that works for everyone and seems 'fair'

>>721760474
Not the same anon, but obviously he doesn't care about any one besides himself. He doesn't care about the country or its people. Presumably, if he's injured, we should just let him die as well.

>>721760474
>Sociology major detected
We would be just fine if we just took care of ourselves. Anything government touches turns to shit.

>>721760474
When you get this kind of healthcare it tends to be overused. We have this shit in Ontario. People go to the emergency room because they have a runny nose. Our wait times are backed up 3 years. General practitioners are so booked they have don't even put people on their waiting lists anymore and specialists are just as fucked. On top of that they can't fucking pay the nurses and upkeep staff so they keep cutting them and our hospital infrastructure is going down the fucking shiter.

>>721760689
I care about individual rights and equal opportunity. The constitution and having a government that doesn't try to be the nanny for every citizen. Keep that silly delusion that your government cares about you and that you're morally superior for bending over to it.

>>721760689
Fair enough
>>721760737
I'm engineering actually, although my wife was sociology so she might have rubbed off on me. For the most part I agree, but the free market does not just fix shit either. There has to be a balance. Treating healthcare as a business is not the right idea.
>>721760948
I can definitely see that as a problem. I think there should be obvious limits on free healthcare, such as everyone has a yearly physical paid for by the state, and gets fined if the hospital thinks that you are wasting their time. Something like that. I'm not an economist however, so I'm not the best one to ask how to tackle this issue.

>>721760474
Subsidizing is just strong armed robbery. It's taking money from private citizens under threat of violence to give to other private citizens or corporations. You don't even necessarily receive a service for your money either so it isn't justified like taxation.

>>721754247
>>721754247
>they have been saddled with student loan debt that previous generations weren't

a) previous generations didn't go to college en masse

b) no one made you sign a contract where you agreed to pay back a loan, I know plenty who left college without $1 of debt because they worked and paid for it

c) i can agree that picking up the tab for the country's poor is not what America is about, but it applies to a healthy, no-problems-having 40 year old just as much as a 20 year old.

Simply put America is about equal opportunity, not equal outcome. You sink or swim and forcing people into health care systems where they have to buy a product they neither want or need is indeed socialist and against US values.

>>721761266
The point of a government is to take care of its people. If we didn't have a government you could get raped to death with an AK tomorrow and nobody could say shit. Without a government there is no equal opportunity at all. Its survival of the fittest, and the fittest is generally born that way. The government exists to take care of the misfortunate. Maybe when you are older and have problems functioning, or your mother is dying from cancer with no way to treat it you will understand why the government should have a hand in healthcare.

>>721761490
Which is why I believe that corporations should not have a hand in healthcare. Welfare and its derivatives exist specifically so that you don't get strong arm robbed in the street just so Sharquisha can afford to eat tomorrow. I assure you, without social programs such as welfare life in America would be much more dangerous and fucked.

>>721761432
Economy wise, Ontario is fucked. Our stupid dyke premier pays our provincial natural gas energy companies NOT to provide power. The liberals here literally make money disappear into nowhere. Dalton McGuinty lost billions on some stupid fucking plant contract of some sort and the money just fucking up and gone. Our taxpayer money fucking went to nothing. That's all the liberals do here is figure out ways to take our money and make it disappear. They tax everything the eye can see and burn the fucking money up.

>>721761610
>Without a government there is no equal opportunity at all

Health insurance isn't a civil right or whatever you're trying to equate it to. It's a combination of products and services. Like a pizza. Or a pair of pants. You have the money to pay for it or you don't get it. Should the government start subsidizing free iPhones next by taking money from one group to give to another because somebody thinks it should be a "right" instead of the product that it very clearly is?

>>721761610
The federal governments original purpose was to protect people from foreign threats. Domestic policy is to be voted on at the state level. Government is only concerned about growing and maintaining power. You spent too much time in a community college if you think government's purpose is to "take care of people." They swore an oath to defend the constitutional rights of the people, not make sure your mommy doesn't die of cancer pleb.

>>721761573
A.) Because it was not necessary for any modicum of success, and because those generations grew up learning that you did not have to go to college to be successful. A bachelors degree is the new high school diploma. To get any high paying job outside of trades (which the jobs for are dwindling because of the new fad of 'everyone get into trades') you MUST either go to college or start a business. Both of these have high start up costs. I was extremely poor growing up, and even with my grants and scholarships being a 4.0 student, I have to work full time AND take out loans just to pay for my PUBLIC institution.

B. See A. It may be possible to get out of college debt free, but it is not realistic and causes unnecessary burden to be put on people in their early 20s who have begun to resent education as a gatekeeper. I'd expect to see college attendance dwindle significantly in 20 years when millenial's children are college age. This cannot be good for the country as a whole. We need an educated work force.

C. I don't think anything 'being what America is about' is a good argument for rejection or imposing any law or system. It should be what is good for the country, not what is good for our idea of what America should be.

>>721762059
>>721762116
Health insurance isn't currently a civil right. It is my opinion that it should be. It is basically right to life, which I believe in.

Yes, that was the original purpose of the government. However, a lot has changed in a couple thousand years. We need to make the government take care of its people, or phase it out completely as it will have no point other than subjugating us. And nice stab with the 'community college' bit, really shows how mature your thought process is that you would rather attack me than my argument.

>>721762467
The government's only purpose is to govern. The government is not your dad. The government is not your mother's teat. The government is not your wallet.

>>721762227
a) A bachelor's degree is certainly not the new high school diploma, not even close. You admitted yourself that the trades have big money and there are plenty, PLENTY of positions where you can make more than a comfortable living without the prerequisite of a bachelor's degree.

b) See A. You can get out of college debt free, most of the younger generation just don't want to do what it takes. No one said you had to go through 4 straight years of classes. Take a semester to work, next semester go to class. Rinse and repeat until graduation.

If you're "beginning to resent education as a gatekeeper" then get out. Drop out of school and go do something else. What you don't do is bitch and complain while staying in that very same system. The rules are clear, the papers you sign are clear. Don't sign them and do something else.

c) It's a very good argument when the counter-point is to fundamentally change the fabric of the entire country simply because it suits the wants of a very small minority. Consider the fact that only 20 million out of 300 million+ even benefited substantially from obamacare. Less than 8% of citizens. While the rest saw more money being taken out of their pockets. Higher premiums. Less choices. America is not about placating the minority at the expense of the majority. Again, sink or swim. The opportunity is in front of you and that's all that's owed to you from any government. Nothing more.

>>721762467
Yes because I only attacked you and not your dumb ass opinion that healthcare is a right. Be honest, you're a Bernie supporter too am I right? Sociology class we need government to take care of us.
>Nanny state education taught me to love the nanny state
big surprise jackass

>>721762873
>too mad to argue properly

>>721762467
>Health insurance should be a civil right because it's basically a right to life

Wrong. You're trying to launch an argument that anyone (the government being composed of other actual citizens at the end of the day) owes you shit for simply being born. A right to life is being able to go out and breathe air. A right to life is being able to walk to the store without being hacked to death by a band of militant muslims with machetes for having a different religion.

A right to life is NOT other citizens fitting the bill from their paycheck because YOU decided to eat pizza 4 times a week or drink beer until your liver falls out your ass and now have health problems because of your own poor choices. Choices have consequences and no one is obligated to pay for the consequences of someone else's good or bad choices.

>>721752177
Shut up faggot.
Take 2% or income and youll.civer healthcare.

It works.
If you can't afford 2 cents from each dollar you earn then you're beyond poor...
Which raises the follow-up issue of why American minimum wage hasn't increased along with inflation for the last few decades.

Are you sure youre asking the right questions?

File: communitycollege.jpg (52KB, 422x388px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 422x388px

>>721762951

>>721762730
>America is not about placating the minority at the expense of the majority.
Yeah it is, numbnuts. Remember Occupy? 99.9% of Americans get fucked up the ass every day by their government and the private corporations that support it so that 0.1% get to keep getting richer. Sorry you like it so much.

>>721762982
>It's only 2% of your income

It's funny how those "only 2%" bullshit arguments have amounted to people paying ~40% of their actual income into a nanny state to make up for the rest of the citizens who (a good number of which) choose not to provide for themselves because it's just easier to depend on someone else's labor. This is where all the nu-socialist, nu-commie retards fail to see logic. There's a reason the shit's never worked before, because it gives even more people incentive to not work hard (which in turn leads to less money in the community pool) when they can just depend on the other joe down the road to pay for your shit. When joe gets tired of dragging around dead weight he does the same and pretty soon everyone's taking but no one's contributing. Every. Single. Time.

>>721763362
That was proven to be absolute horseshit years ago. Plus the occupy movement wanted to fuck over anyone making over 500,000 so fuck off with that. Incremental taxation is discrimination.

>>721752177
he looks like a rat

sad, because SO MANY trumpanzees hated him SO MUCH during the primaries.

now they're sucking his rat balls.

>>721763499
You're right dude. Life must be so hard for you.

File: 1481881792742.jpg (9KB, 480x277px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x277px

>>721763263
Nice pic. I'm not the same guy dipshit.
Stay mad.

>>721762692
What does governing mean to you?

>>721762873
>Being this triggered over someone's opinion

I bet you think the red scare was justified. See, I can do it too.

>>721762973
Its not wrong, its a different opinion. I see your side, and I disagree. I don't think people who have made incredibly unhealthy decisions should be taken care of. Kids that were born with debilitating illnesses? Yeah, I believe they should be cared for. Darwinism isn't reality anymore.

>>721763263
>Implying money couldn't be redistributed from other programs

Thats literally how budgets work.

File: 1564504.jpg (26KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x500px

>>721763499
>making over 500k
>getting taxed more than people in literal unlivable poverty
>discrimination
Boo fucking hoo. They should be discriminated against. It's not like they play fair or do what's right.

>>721763362
>Remember Occupy?

Oh right. The band of jobless hippies and homeless who decided to sit around wearing anonymous masks and pissing on the ground? The group of idiots who were crying their "voices weren't being heard" but then when a congressman actually came down, made an open forum for them and asked them to have a discussion, they elected a fucking dog to speak for them?

Yeah. No one takes you seriously because your arguments don't hold water 90% of the time and the 10% you might have something of substance to say you're smoking too much weed or generally loafing around while other people are working. Get real. Look out the window at the kids protesting right now, today. Jobless. Skipping classes. Generally shooting themselves in the foot then blaming someone else for their "not having" something that someone else has. Wtf.

>>721752177
Parasite.

>>721763580
The red scare WAS justified. Communism is responsible for the deaths of approximately 95 million people and we still see the long lasting effects of North American Marxist conditioning.

File: communitycollege2.jpg (133KB, 600x657px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 600x657px

>>721763644
>>721763555

>>721763734
And this is where liberal logic falls apart. You demonize ANYONE making $300k+ or $400k+ or whatever arbitrary number you come up with in your head that day. You're trying to start from a position that anyone who makes "x" dollars is inherently evil and breaks all sorts of rules to get there which is factually untrue.

It's funny though because you don't even see the hypocrisy in it when you're chanting for "less discrimination" but you literally discriminate against someone based solely on the amount of numbers in their bank account. Fuck outta here with that nonsense.

>>721763739
I have to wonder if that has anything to do with your retarded, ass-backwards country moving closer and closer to both civil and global conflict.

>>721763734
You're an idiot.
>be crippled
>see man with legs
>demand government to amputate man's legs and give them to you
Perfect fucking logic you hollow skulled moron.

File: 1440880118220.gif (569KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 500x300px

>>721763870
>too mad to even type
My god I love this. It's amazing how if you talk shit about one person a bunch of retards always assume you support someone else. You stupid fucking mongoloid, please gimme more

>>721763976
What a stupid analogy. Let me fix it.
>be crippled
>see man with hundreds of sets of legs
>he thinks we should both donate the same amount of legs
Jesus put some effort in.

>>721762730
A. Look man, I don't know how you missed it when I said that the trade jobs are dwindling. My buddy is a welder and is struggling to find work because of so many people his age getting into the trades now because of the cost of college. In addition, the bachelors degree is a requirement to get your foot in the door at most businesses. 50 years ago, that was not the case. My father got in at a fortune 500 company simply because he walked in in a suit and tie and told them he needed a job. A story he still loves to tell to this day. Nowadays you'll get laughed out of the reception.

B. Oh so I'm expected to go to college with ridiculous stress levels and working for 8 years instead of just 4? Not to mention that it would ultimately actually cost me much more than it already does? No thanks. Its more economically feasible for me to get it done in 4 and then pay off the loans with the extra revenue from my higher paying career.

>Drop out

Fuck no. You think I would waste all this time just to drop out and resent myself later in life for not having the best life I could? Quitting now would be me putting a bullet in my brain. This shit is doable, but should not be as difficult. Thats all I'm saying. Its silly that your argument boils down to 'try harder or quit'

C. America has ALWAYS been about minorities. Are you dense? The vast majority of our legal system is set up to prevent tyranny of the majority.

>>721763923
Great rebuttal. Answering with extreme exaggeration and alarmist bullshit when I state simple facts. Way to really get your point across, kid. Keep pretending like everyone else are the stupid sheep when you're 30, homeless, jobless and still whining about some imaginary oppression or something.

kek

>>721764017
>makes no legitimate argument
>expects a typed response
back to communism school with you weeb

>>721764124
You're an idiot. If anything it's more like
>be crippled
>work your entire life to earn a set of legs
>lazy cripple comes around and demands your legs instead of working for them

>>721759382
Natural selection.

>>721752177

How about this radical shit: everyone pays for their own shit. If you feel the need to pay for someone else's shit, use your own money.

/thread

>>721763893
I actually agree with you about the arbitrary numbers nonsense.
I don't know what you're on about regarding discrimination though. When did I chant "less discrimination"?
The rich should be discriminated against. Literally every aspect of the country favors them. If they want a runaway system with no checks and balances then that's too bed.

>>721764124
Anon you just made my day. That was the most skillful rebuttal I've seen on this board ever. And no this isn't a (you) moment. Just wanted to tell someone that I appreciated them :)

>>721764244
>totally blind to the idea that someone can have more than they need
ok

>>721764321
Discrimination of any sort pisses on the values of freedom America was founded upon.

>>721764300
No, that's too radical. Plus, it doesn't explain how you'll get your utilities if people aren't forced to pay for the wages of the people who's job it is to give you clean water, electricity, and heating. Also, some people live on loans on loans. They're so far in debt, it isn't even their money anymore.
>>721764425
What is the penal system.

File: 1429572430543.png (46KB, 185x196px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 185x196px

>>721764187
>makes no legitimate argument
I was pretty clear that your assumption that I support Bernie is completely unfounded.
Sorry I had to spell it out for you.
It's okay to be mad.

>>721764425

Socialized anything pisses on the values America was founded on.

>>721764416
It doesn't fucking matter if they have more than they need. No one wants just as much as they need. Everyone wants and people who earn what they want don't deserve to have it taken away from them.

>>721764535
Because socialization is inherently opposed to freedom.

>>721764300
That would be fine if equal opportunity were a real thing. Alternatively we could just agree to live in the Gold Saucer.

>>721764135
A) Your anecdotal evidence of "my buddy" does not prove at all that trade jobs are dwindling. In fact, it's the exact opposite. You're choosing to keep lying to yourself to justify your irrational narrative.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/katiesola/2016/04/12/here-are-the-20-fastest-growing-jobs-in-america/

Who is probably more versed on the subject? Forbes or "your buddy the welder" kek. So, you can't walk into an interview in a suit and tie and expect to get hired on the spot, big deal? You actually have to show you can be valuable to a company and you're worth the salary they're going to pay you? Oh god. That's, like, so oppressive.

B) Expected to go with ridiculous stress levels and working 8 hours instead of 4. Uh, yeah. That's called life, you little twit. A college degree is an investment just like a 401k where you put in the time, effort, and cash for a payoff later. I don't know where you got off thinking that life wasn't stressful or that you deserved to work 4 hours instead of 8 but your head is not in reality with that bullshit. "ridiculous levels of stress" you mean reading a fucking book? Writing an essay? Taking a test?! Holy shit, SO stressful. Fuck outta here.

College being difficult is par for the course. It's to weed out lazy, weak, entitled dipshits from the people who have the actual drive and determination to see something through to the end.

C. "America has always been about minorities." Only it hasn't. Again, just factually wrong.

>>721764649
Why should the world be fair for everybody you equal opportunity burn out? It can't be, get over it

>>721764504
The penal system is a system put in place to punish criminals? What the fuck do you expect me to say? Do you think I'm gonna say "the blacks are discriminated against by prisons"? No. Blacks commit 50% of violent offences. If they're in jail, they were found guilty and sentenced.

File: 1413137686973.png (228KB, 379x439px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 379x439px

>>721764425
Same guy you're arguing with.
Do you actually, REALLY think anyone in power gives a shit about values or freedom? Absolutely every single time, no matter the party, religion, gender, age, it ALWAYS comes down to money. Money is ALL that matters.

>>721764752
Hey fuckface. When did I say it should be fair?
Your post implied that everything was balanced to begin with, as though everyone's effort amounted to the same outcome. Life's a little more complicated than that.

>>721764807
YOU should give a shit about freedom YOU STUPID FUCKING IDIOT. It isn't America that's failed it's people it's people like you who've failed America.

File: 1447889991114.png (498KB, 1600x1523px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 1600x1523px

>>721752177
>Population of California exceeds Canada and retard-anon thinks "free" healthcare in America would work.

>>721764541
So, it doesn't matter if one has more than they need, because no one wants as much as they need. But, everyone wants (more than they need), and thus everyone takes more than they should. So, people who earn what they want, as in, people who earn more than they should, don't deserve to have it taken away from them, because... ?

If it doesn't matter if one has more than they need, why would you need to mention whether they earned it or not? How do you earn more than you need, if you don't deserve what you earn? How do you earn what you don't deserve? How do you get something through the process of doing work/exchanging energy, if you don't exchange work/energy?

>>721764795
I expected you to say that the penal system is a system put in place to punish criminals, and then to go on to dissect what the word "criminal" means, how it relates to the average citizen, and how the penal system has operated since its inception, and alongside the statutes that govern the country.

I would hope you would have realized the irony in the notion that a criminal does not have the same rights and freedoms as a citizen, and as such, is effectually discriminated against for their missteps or actions.

Nobody said anything about blacks. Only you brought it there. Not to mention that the percentage you pulled from nowhere is woefully low to what the usual argument is for that nature of discussion. You also immediately assumed that every citizen that gets sentenced to jail, or gets a sentence regardless, is guilty. Mistrials do exist.

>>721764737
Holy shit its almost as if you are completely rejecting my argument without giving it any actual thought besides 'this is wrong'

I'm only gonna reply to B, because it seems you think I'm going to college for business or some bullshit

I am a chemical engineering major in the top program in the country. I am expected to spend approximately 30 hours exclusively on class and school work, including programming, math, projects, and systems. I go to work 40 hours a week at a highly demanding and unforgiving construction job, and am currently working on getting an internship so I can leave this hell behind. I have no social life, no close friends, no time even if I did, and I scrape by paycheck to paycheck.

Fuck off. Its clear we won't come to any new conclusions. I believe that education needs to be more accessible for this country to thrive. Look at how well certain European countries and Asian countries are doing. Automation is soon, which means unskilled labor is gone, which means that if you aren't educated, youre worthless.

>>721764321
a) I'm glad we can find some common ground on a least one point (even if it's arbitrary numbers)

b) I'm speaking in general. The only people arguing pro-socialist positions are also the majority screaming for "don't discriminate against my sexuality" or "don't discriminate for my skin color" while at the very same time you're turning around and discriminating against anyone you deem "rich" by assuming they all broke laws or cheated to get there.

Now, replace "rich" in that sentence with "black." and you'll see how fucked up that way of thinking is.

That rich guy only got where he is because he cheated, stole, robbed and did unsavory things to be successful.

That black guy only got where he is because he cheated, stole, robbed, and did unsavory things to be successful.

And you're saying that's not discrimination? Or it's ok to discriminate when YOU want it to be ok? This is why I, personally, can't take most of these positions seriously. It's hypocritical as fuck.

>>721763430
No.
What's funny is that you need to use the most extreme example of tax to make your argument seem valid.

I earn about 60,000 a year, and pay a little over 15% income tax.

2% of my earnings to never be out of pocket on medical is a good deal..

From what I hear, one birth in hospital costs more than 2% of what the average American will ever earn.

>>721752251
What exactly do you think random means?

File: 1426584514003.jpg (54KB, 610x400px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 610x400px

>>721764948
Oh, actually I do care, Captain America. I'm just aware that what I said is absolutely true. Don't believe me? Do some research and watch the money. Social change comes from profit, not sympathy or principals. The idea that American values make the country "great" or strong is incredibly naive. Eevn Trump would agree with me on that.

>>721765034
I think the real idea is that the black person in your scenario can't help being black, and the rich person can.

Not that I agree with either points, just butting in to say why one is treated different from another.

>>721765118
>Do some research
In other words, do MY research and accept it or be labeled.

>>721765013
I told you how you were wrong and even cited, with a valid source, how you were wrong.

Your claim was falling along the lines of "Well, trades are drying up because my buddy the welder said they were so it's near impossible to get a great position without college." Which, again, I showed was factually untrue. The trades aren't drying up. You're just assuming some false narrative not based on any facts, to support your idea that "everybody needs to go to college." It's just not true. If you refuse to see that, then that's your problem.

Again, nobody told you you had to work AND go to school at the same time. You're trying to shift the blame for you "undue stress" or whatever the fuck off on the way your uni program is set up and not on the fact that YOU chose to work and school at the same time instead of just working construction 6 months, then taking 6 months off for school. Your CHOICES are what's causing you stress not some "unfair" system or whatever you're trying to argue.

>>721764988
Because? Because it's unjust. Simple as that.
Criminals are treated as they are because they have forfeited their freedom by committing injustices towards other people. I brought up the black prison population because it is disproportionate but many people think that means it's discriminatory. It isn't. I didn't pull that statistic out of my ass. It's a commonly known stat that'll take you seconds to find. And mistrials are extremely rare and on the decline.

>>721765034
I'm also happy to find common ground. In fact, I actually agree with your entire post.
The problem is that the entire system is slanted to advantage the rich. Citizens United and such. If the government is too far gone to undo that imbalance and the people unwilling to elect anyone who will dismantle the bipartisan corruption, then the only solution is to indiscriminately tax the rich.
In my opinion, I'd prefer a flat tax, but that simply can't happen.

>>721765099
What exactly do you think sucking dads penis means?..

Other than enjoyable.

>>721765251
I would agree with your point if part of the liberals argument wasn't an overt discrimination against "trust fund babies."

Literally born rich and still discriminated against. How is that any different than a black kid being born black?

File: 1418758341728.jpg (53KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1280x720px

>>721765300
Calm down. Did I give a bunch of biased sources? No. You go and do your own research and see for yourself. I believe you'll see in the end both parties are correct and their meeting ground is cash.
Also, what would I even label you as? I mean "faggot" and "retard" since this is /b/. But what else?

>>721765034
Random anon here. Per me, it's just that I don't see the labels "rich" and "black" being of equal merit.

Try it this way.

The rich man is required to pay the legal fine for violating the law.

The black man is required to pay the legal fine for violating the law.

At face value, you would assume that since the man in the first sentence is being described as "rich", that paying said legal fine will be no problem. They are assumed to definitely have the means to deal with the situation. This doesn't change if you invoke the bias or influence of (insert region/demographic here). A rich man, at the end of the day, is still a man who is allegedly more wealthy than the average value of a given (insert region/demographic here), and rather, wealthy enough to most likely transcend said (insert regions/demographics here)'s standard.

But the word "black", in of itself, doesn't necessarily imply anything about the financial status of the man in the second sentence. We only know of his ethnicity/race/culture/etc, we know nothing about his financial or economic standing unless we use our bias and influences from (insert region/demograpic here).

So, when it comes to the discrimination deal, I imagine that it makes more sense to discriminate against individuals based upon a quality that they have moderate to excessive control over (i.e. money), than something they most likely don't have control over (i.e. being "black").

>>721765118
You're a moron. An empty hollow husk of a human being turned into nothing but a ideological mouthpiece repeating all the points your ideologues tell you to. You've probably never had an original thought in your life. Everything you say has been said countless times by occupy protesters and Marxist politicians.

File: 1486059224764.jpg (60KB, 564x811px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 564x811px

>>721752848
You strung together complete sentences and didn't make any spelling errors so it just CANNOT BE that you're one of those spergs who not only believes that people can live on welfare without working, but also is threatened by that. It can't be. You're like an ape who learns sign language.

>>721765013
>I'm a pornstar in the top company in the country. I am expected to spend approximately 30 hours exclusively sucking dicks including ball sucking, taint tickling, and ass play. I go to work 40 hours a week at a highly demanding and unforgiving homo job and am currently working on getting an internship so I can get fucked from behind. I have no social life, no close friends, no time even if I did, and I scrape by fuck check to fuck check.

>>721765535
simply epic

File: 1433862076609.jpg (2MB, 2560x1522px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1522px

>>721765649
Haha if you say so. What, do you want to to jump and clap my hands about the American Dream while I gargle goldman sachs's nuts?
If you think I'm repeating someone else, at least say who, I honestly can't think of anyone. And besides, it doesn't matter at all if it's true.

Unrelated, I'm enjoying the shit out of this thread.

File: Muson.jpg (54KB, 1109x704px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1109x704px

>>721752177
About fucking time a cuckold democrat made a republican hate thread on /b/

>>721765635
Now you're trying to split hairs. Discrimination on any level is wrong and assuming someone is inherently evil or broke some laws because they have more numbers in their bank account than you is just as bad as assuming someone is inherently evil or broke some laws based upon their skin being darker than yours. It's wrong.

Do blacks commit a shit load of crime? Absolutely. Does that mean most, or even a majority, of black people are criminals? Of course not.

Do "rich" people commit a shit load of crime? Absolutely. Does that mean the majority of "rich" people are criminals or inherently dishonest people? Of course not.

Simple logic.

>>721765863
Proof it's possible to value the wrong things and to be dogmatically indoctrinated.

>>721752177
>but mr Cruz Canada, Europe, and Latin America has had successful government provided healthcare for decades now

The shittiest healthcare on the fucking planet.

File: Cubano.jpg (213KB, 901x889px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 901x889px

>>721752177
> Cuba does bad leninst communism
> Emargoed for decades by nearby hyperpower
> Still better living conditions than the US
> Also US assasinates political opponents and manufactures consent for mass incarceration of millions of poor people. So equally as bad as Castro (also remember that time US sheltered terrorists who attacked a Cuban commercial jet)

File: 1414840132114.jpg (4KB, 229x250px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 229x250px

>>721766117
>literally no substance
It is interesting how since I don't accept at face value politicians who say they care about the people, others think I have no values of my own.
It doesn't really bother me, but it does illuminate how silly it is that you think I'm indoctrinated while being separate from both corrupt parties and their fake values.

>>721765717
>What even

>>721766393
>>literally no substance

proof you can tell people what they need to hear, and they still often ignore it. This is why the indonesians decided it was just better/easier to kill the communists than to try and educate them

>>721765387
There's something wrong about 50%. Specifically that you won't go out of your way to provide me with something to accept that percentage with, if it is in fact something that will take me seconds to find.
I shouldn't have to prove your claims for you. You should be proving your claims. Doing otherwise is disingenuous.
https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_race.jsp
37.9%, not 50%.

And, even, then, if mistrials are extremely rare and on the decline, does that then mean that mistrials have never occurred, or that they are not worth noting? I don't think that such is the case. Nor would it be fair to insist that since the black prison population is disproportionate, that it is solely because it is discriminatory.

>>721766041
I would agree that assuming someone is inherently evil or broke some laws because of the numbers in their bank account, is wrong. I would agree that assuming someone is inherently evil or broke some laws based upon their skin color, any skin color, is wrong. I have yet to say otherwise.

I think what you think I would be asking for, is an arbitrary system of black and white dichotomy. Clearly, the world is grey. So, when I suggest that I would be for the discrimination against people who's total value is worth more than almost half of the population of the country they live in, I suppose it has nothing to do with crime, but instead with the imbalance in regards to something as abstract as numbers in your bank account, which in turns seem to decide almost anything about the way you can be made to live in a society.

There's something wrong about suggesting that those with incredulous amounts of wealth should preside over those who cannot afford to have such wealth, while simultaneously arguing that no group is homogenous and thus must all be held to the same level of scrutiny, as well as held to the same level of decency, regardless of whether they are rich or black. It's almost... discriminatory in a way.

>>721766387
forgot about the 30,000 people castro murdered

>>721766387
And of course we expect stats from a communist dictatorship that hundreds of thousands of cubans fled to be accurate.

File: 1416585381000.gif (1MB, 233x291px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 233x291px

>>721766674
>what they need to hear

Which is what exactly? That I I should care about freedom? I already said that I do. That discrimination is wrong? I agreed to that as well. That I am a husk? Meaningless.

You seem to be reacting to the fact that I believe that both sets of party leaders are disingenuous in their values and that money is their one true loyalty. You then conflate it with a belief of your own that I either have no values or have values you find to be evil, which has not happened. And so.

Exactly what the fuck are you smoking?

>>721766696
The world is full of imbalance. Why focus on the amount of money in some other person's wallet?

Our system is based on paying for what you want with the "points" you have in your account. Don't have enough points? Then you don't get to buy that product/service. The problem is when people start telling others that they're "too wealthy" like that's a bad thing. Capitalism is the best system we've come up with yet and if people don't want to play by the rules or feel they're unfair, why stay? I don't show up to a basketball game with a football in my hand and tell the teams playing they should bend to my whim. It's ridiculous at best and it's incredibly amusing that the majority of people arguing for a more socialist/communist system in the US would never pick up their things and actually go to live in an overtly socialist nation because the only purely socialist countries have been, and always will be, failures.

It's ironic though that "greed" seems to be the main talking point of those reaching their hands into the "rich" people's pocket when we've seen time and time again that same greed is what causes socialist/communist collectives to crash and burn every time. In short, Capitalism is pretty great and efficient and still the best option in a free world.

>>721752177
Europe ain't a country kiddo

>>721766387
>> Still better living conditions than the US

I'm sure that explains why so many still flee to the U.S., because it's so good there.

File: 1413181832444.gif (468KB, 148x148px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 148x148px

>>721768340
It might as well be compared to the US. None of those little sub-countries matter on their own.

>>721767737
I'd rather focus on the amount of money in some other person's wallet, because that can either directly or indirectly affect me as a member of society. Instead of, well, how someone looks, which doesn't exactly affect me as a member of society.

Where I live, someone pays a percentage of my healthcare, so that if either of us reap some misfortune, we benefit from the prepaid tax, and are not bankrupt by a world full of imbalance and entropy. Someone pays a tax that ensures that all of us, who have purchased the utility at an initially flat rate, get running water every so and so months.

That is significant enough. If no one payed their taxes, the government, nor the privatized entities, could or would be able to provide their services to the collective group. That's bad. If someone has more "points", and they pay for more, they should have the right to do that, sure. But, if this is a society where we're going to pretend that we hold eachother to equal measures, it should follow that those with more "points" should, or could, split with a percentage of those points so that just about everyone benefits- especially those who we either say or pretend are of equal measure to those with more "points".

If you're going to argue the realism of the world, you should be observant of why one can't simply leave a system like Capitalism. The first thing to come to mind, is the debtor morality. You owe someone. That someone can go to great lengths to get you to, repay them. They can use the law. The law, in fact, enabling the majority of actions that can be taken to ensure that one is given what they are allegedly owed.

That's because all of those countries have far less than 100 million people like there. America has 300 million.

Also, really terrible tax rates.

File: eye.png (2MB, 1005x774px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1005x774px

>>721752177
Communism/Socialism/progressivism and religion have a lot in common.

Both have undeniable evidence of shittiness throughout history.
But, still thousands of people flock to it, extol its virtues, indoctrinate others to it, and will deny any counter evidence that shows what they value is wrong.

>>721768607
>Also, really terrible tax rates.
Most progressive tax system in the world. Punishment follows if you decide you want to be successful.

>>721767737
Football is competitive, no one is arguing otherwise. Football is not a government, however, so it's almost a false equivocation. Suggesting that all current overtly socialist nations are failures, and thus will always be failures, doesn't sound rational, either. It only sounds empirical, and it sounds like it isn't entirely forthcoming as to why the conclusion is such. Systems can be ratified, this isn't a new concept. Capitalism is the only known option that most are willing to adopt, if not stay within- changing a paradigm like that requires a lot of resources, including time. And, since it is a world of imbalance, I'm sure there can be things that go wrong. And, furthermore... why is it that you are now arguing against the concept of an overtly socialist nation... when I haven't explicitly, nor do I currently, argue or mention this as a talking point?

Why do you keep doing that? Why aren't you referring to the more moderate model of dynamic exchange that you seem to have preached earlier, what with the dissection of the No True Scotsman fallacy that most people hold? In fact... are you going back on that? Should we not focus on the amount of money in some other person's wallet, if the world is full of imbalance, and thus apparently must be held to some measure in which we can keep "order", as some must be more equal than others- and then, bar none, be entitled to that in-equal value? What is Capitalism? Does it have rules? I think it has rules.

Why are you essentially forcing me to argue other points that I have yet to explicitly, clearly, support or play devil's advocate for? It's as if you are caricaturing me so that it is easier to argue against me, by constructing my points for me.

>>721752177
They're not. Canada's healthcare fucking sucks man. My mom had to wait in extreme pain for a full year before she got her hip replaced. Now she needs the other replaced and I have to stay home from work to help her with everything. Canada's healthcare is only good for people who don't need it.

>>721769189
> Canada's healthcare fucking sucks man.

Wealthy Canadians come to the U.S. for treatment.

>>721769189
I don't imagine that there is an overflowing amount of doctors, medical staff, and hospitals in any one region of Canada, though. Especially not the hospitals and medical centers near the big cities, which become overburdened by those who don't need to be in the ER, on top of the fact that most people don't, or are not referred to, other hospitals that could at the very least handle them without an absurd waiting period.

It's either everyone tries to go to the few hospitals we can reach, and get seen by 14 people, or some who can afford to go to the hospital without aid of emergency services go to the hospital, and those who can afford to pay out of pocket can come back out- while the rest stay at home and suffer anyways.

We just need better infrastructure to deal with the absurdity that comes with our current healthcare system, if it doesn't change.

>>721768340
Neither is Latin America

>>721752474
Sjw detected. Go drink some bleach you pleb

>>721769516
Until our healthcare becomes socialism medicine, then they'll be going elsewhere to get treatment.

File: 1478458616698.jpg (20KB, 368x475px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 368x475px

>>721752177
Boo hoo!

>>721758788
>>721758866
we must do way with instain mothers who kill their babbies because their babbies can't frigth back

>>721769824
Trump is a lot like Hitler, except no genocide or expansionism or murder. Hitler made Germany great again before he went off the rails.

File: 00346270.jpg (71KB, 588x421px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 588x421px

>>721769972
>off the rails
Uh oh.

>>721765798
I feel the flood of cartoon images either validate my point.

Had shit do do so I was away for a while.
Checking in on break.
50% of users there days should become an hero.
Fucking pathetic.

I'm now going back to the shit that need doing.
Feel free to sperg, but know I will never see it..

>>721752177
democrats and republicans are basically the same