How accurate is this?

>>720272430

As a britfag, BBC and guardian look a bit too right for me

>>720272735
i would say the bbc is a little less biased then everyone thinks, i mean they let farage on various things even when everyone was making a big stink about him

>>720272430
>the way way far left
>buzzfeed, tyt
are you fucking stupid?

>>720272430
Pretty accurate but I would argue that some of them are much more left than in the Picture.

Including Fox. I watch fox along with CNN and Honestly I dont see the bias. If anything I see more bias against Trump on Fox

>>720272430
BBC farther to the left, The Guardian should be lower, Al Jazeera higher

The BBC is not 'state-run'

>>720273735
Yeah this, BBC is only slightly left biased

Also like fuck is wiki-leaks completely impartial.

>>720272430
I'm not sure whether wikileaks is perfectly nuetral, probably a bit more right, but more complex analytical

VICE perhaps a little more to the left?
ALJazeera more to the left.
CNN a little more to the right.

BBC is right wing since Tories threatened it with budget cuts, you're delluded if you think other wise. Question Time is proof alone at how far right it has went.

>>720274267
>BBC is only slightly left biased
Wrong, its a propaganda machine.

i think RT needs to be a lot further to the right, it's almost embarrassing how blatant the propaganda is on that. as somebody who used to watch it some years ago it's kinda sad to see them go from making cool documentaries about aspects of russia foreigners wouldn't know about to almost tinfoil hat levels of conspiracy theories

Telegraph is centre-right, not liberal

Economist belongs a bit further right

>>720274801
Torygraph is right wing, only Express and Mail worse

>>720274440
Why CNN to the right? I would say Al Jazeera belongs slightly more to the right if anything.

>>720274624
Then why are they showing Farage all the time?

>>720275019
Historically it is centre-right but yes I'd agree that now it's right. I would also say it's worse than the Express and the Mail as it is a lot more subversive.

>>720275075
Aljazeera seems to cater to the left-wing a lot of times, those poor refugees and nothing wrong with islam. CNN (at least CNN international, don't know about the local stations) is for European standards not really all that liberal put pretty reputable, always reporting on-time and pretty interesting stuff that you don't always see on local tv here.

>>720275268
Because it means nothing and it makes you cunts think the wrong things.

>>720275418
Ah, what I see of CNN in America is 100% liberal agenda, while Al Jazeera seems to cover quite a bit more. CNN in the states has done no reporting in the last few months aside from slandering conservatives. Strange how opposite it is across the pond

>>720275828
Flawless fact-based argument right there

>>720272430
BBC is way to high on the 'professionalism axis'. It shouldn't be higher than NPR.

>>720276309
Agreed with this, especially what I see of the BBC in the US, can't speak for the UK

>>720275907
>US CNN left wing
That meme died months ago. Maybe even years.
The most left wing CNN has been in recent times is their fucking 24/7 coverage of that missing plane.

>>720273960

but they are way far left clickbait bullshit. I don't see your point

>>720276309
BBC regular TV is pretty low brow, but the actual news reporting is much higher than the rest of what it shows.

>>720276805
Fucking this, "muh CNN libtards" was only partly based in fact.

>>720274932

Disagree. I read them all the time.

they are British and we have to keep in mind the Brits and americans have a different perspective of what constitutes a conservative or liberal.

By US standards they trend left/globalist.

>>720273960
Are you saying that buzzfeed is anything BUT far-left diarrhea?

>>720274440

CNN has become a race baiting left wing sob story. that fucking Don Lemon alone means they should be way over on the left for all their stupid identity politics bullshit.

>>720272430
Holy shit, what is the economist doing in the middle?

The rest is somehwat nicely set up

>>720276805

You have got to be kidding. How do you place Don Lemon, Van Jones, and their revolving talking head race bait evening news parade as anything but far left?

They totally incite BLM worship and are biased as shit for Hillary.

I think NPR should be a bit farther both up and to the right. They're certainly a little more left-leaning, but they're more centrist than most and they go an extra mile for their reporting.

BBC have traditionally tried to stay at the same level on the political spectrum as the general public of the UK. They're supposed to stay in the middle and be neutral or agree with the popular opinion if needed. If you're British and think the BBC is too left wing, then you're probably towards the right of the British centre and vice versa. However, with regard to the US, the UK is practically a socialist nation and so compared to the 'Murican media and the average 'Murican, it's pretty accurate.

>>720272430
The economist facebook page is soooo click bait anti-russian and anti-putin drive,. Its insane.... sometime they repost (sometimes re re post) articles that have proven click friendly

File: 3a5.png (26KB, 604x618px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 604x618px

>>720272430
vice is more middle (i know you crazy ass conservatives will disagree) and wikileaks is basically russias bitch now so i dont read it much anymore since you cant even verify where the news on there comes from

honestly the chart is fucked because mindless fools think everything is fake news that isnt russian disinformation

>>720274358
Not really much analysis given in Wikileaks. They find something out, they leak it. They might leak more partisan stuff occasionally, but it leaks what it's given. There is no bias or opinion in what comes out of it as far as I'm aware.

>>720277935
Do you follow vice on facebook?

>>720272430
CNN should be all the way to the left.
Daily Wire has some exceptions to its partisanship, as some of their informers bash Trump constantly.

>Fox News
>Reputable

pick one.

>>720277018
Eh, I can't see it. I mean BBC news at six as about as good as it gets, and it's definitely weak. Evening news programs in other countries (Germany - ARD, Austria - ORF, Switzerland - SRF) aren't that much better, but they still are.

BBC right now is 'meh' at best, and just filled with opinion pieces, even the bigger reports are full of trivialities.

>>720278364

FOX really isn't all that bad lately. They used to be much worse, but they've actually improved a lot since then and are arguably better than CNN and its ilk.

>>720278081
fuck no i dont even have a FB account


I just have common sense and don't assume some conspiracy plot is being pushed all the time with what I watch. All it takes is watching and doing research. RT for example always has an anti-american vibe going on, yet they helped Trump get elected along with the bullshit infowars pushes. Imagine that huh.

>"Objective news" is made up bullshit.
Everybody has an angle. The problem for most media outlets is that their angle is elitist and left-leaning, two angles that's very unpopular with the common people.

>>720279164
i don't see ap and reuters as having an angle, they just tell you what happened somewhere

>>720272430
left does not mean liberal

>>720273735
Then ask him loaded questions In a patronising manner in an attempt to discredit him.
They were not letting him on for a fair interview and a chnace to get his message across.

BBC should be moved a lot further to the left. Their coverage and bias of Trump/Hilary was laughable.

>>720272430
What do we think about Breitbart? It's clearly right wing, but is it accurate in what it reports?

>>720275268

They will do but usually there's at least two lefties to (attempt to) argue him wrong

>>720279424
they're news sources, used by other outlets. very few uses them as their daily go-to-source for news, especially localized news.

>buzzfeed and the young turks are the equivalent of infowars and TDS on the left
>breitbart and drudge report of al-jazeera and snopes

hahaha. well it is kinda true that the american right is so batshit you have to compare them with much more sane outlets on the left

>>720277493

BLM are far right

>>720279750
yeah ok maybe at first they treated him as joke candidate like literally every news site did
>>720279882
>two lefties
it's almost as if the uk has two major left wing political parties (or used to before the libdems pressed the self destruct button)

>>720272430
>>720277275

I think the problem is that "Left Wing" and Liberal are treated as the same thing.

Real leftie shit, like workers rights, civil rights, getting into socialism, that doesn't happen even on some of the most left of the sites pictured.

Most of the circled ones are huffing neo-liberal fumes off the burning wreck of Clinton's campaign. But real "power to the workers" shit is not going on there

>>720280857
that's because a huge number of Merkans, even supposedly 'left-wing' ones (the Clinton voting crowd) consider that kind of thing as dirty socialism

>>720276805
Saw this earlier today with brooke baldwin. She had 3 election experts and jeffery lord.
The only question about race was about latinos and given to jeffery lord, it was his first question in like 10 minutes.
CNN is bias but has journalistic integrity the the extent you can, they don't release news without triple confirmation, however they ask leading questions, sensationalize, and race bait. They don't have an agenda with their leanings, except to sell TV.
FOX news is obviously bias.

>>720279794
I seen a leftyanon got ppwned hard after saying a breibart article was false. 100% accurate in my experience.

>>720272430
Everything should be moved to the left

>>720281018

That's bullshit m8. CNN clearly has an agenda. Multiple CNN anchors have been caught colluding with the Clinton campaign FFS. It's much deeper than "we're only in it for the profit".

As for FOX, it used to be a shithole but it has significantly improved lately. They're probably the best out of all the dinosaur media outlets.

>>720272430
Economist more to the left

>>720280301
info wars is biased but accurate tyt is biased and spewing false propaganda.

>>720279794
Yes, but they selectively report things.
When they post articles about the Presidents claim of 3-5 million illegal votes having been cast in November, they don't mention any evidence for it or against it. They're editors are right wing bat shit, but their actual journalists are actually decent. But even selectively reporting things is a bias. Not to mention their audience is the "God-Emperor Trump will save us from the non-whites" crowd

>>720281334
They'll still be shit as long as they have Hannity and O'Reilly Those two get more Alex Jones like every week.

>>720280857

I think the larger issue you're pointing to is that the traditional left and right political spectrum that's existed since the 70-80s is disappearing as a new spectrum is arising.

>>720281589

Hannity is definitely subpar but I can appreciate him sometimes. OReilly is entertaining but too hostile to appear balanced. Overall, still a whole fuckton better than anybody else, and the ratings show.

I'd say the Wall Street Journal leans more left in its social pieces but more to the right fiscally... It's probably a good average but the feel you get if you're not reading treasury meeting notes isn't that this paper is centrist.

>>720281784
O'Reilly and Hannity aren't news, they're opinionators. They're presented as news and Fox doesn't let their bullshit be called out.

>>720272430
This is a horribly reductionistic view on political outlets.

File: 1485210754620.jpg (69KB, 640x622px)

69KB, 640x622px

>>720272430
>fox news
>above the professional line

>>720282086

Yes, no shit, this isn't a peer-reviewed study.

>>720282294
It triggers my autism.

File: 0911202740120_50_14800529921_9bd88dd865_o.jpg (2MB, 2790x1571px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2790x1571px

>>720272430
>C-SPAN
Literally just putting politicians in the capital on TV without presenting an opinion either way. I fucking love C-SPAN because being fed other peoples agenda or twist is just dumb

File: 0911202808112_58_15113227251_4f8e7fca9d_o.jpg (1MB, 3000x1691px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1691px

>>720281359
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34dJ7nheBaw

File: 694940094001_5209864968001_What-to--expect-on--Tucker-Carson-Tonight-.jpg (35KB, 876x493px)

35KB, 876x493px

>>720282121

>Obviously never got the fact-slap from Tucker Carlson

>>720272430
Occupy Democrats should be even farther left and down, it's just plain embarrassing how bad they are. I would definitely put them worse than just about everyone else on the left. They honestly have no business even being on the same chart as buzzfeed.

Politifact should be farther left. Democrats can make blatantly false statements and get a "half true" with some half assed explanation where a Republican would have gotten a "Pants on fire".

Washington Post ought to be a bit more right. At least in the gun control area they play both sides of the field. One week it'll be an article how guns'r'bad, next week it'll be an article on why you should own one.

Infowars needs to be in that lower right corner a bit deeper so they can reach their super male vitality supply and water filters.

>>720283070
Then who the fuck are those ppl going out and interview ppl on the street , the hot blond and the other guy.? those are pretty based. alex jones at some feminist protes at womens day or what ever was pretty good to .

>>720283677
Water filters are not a joke dude.

>>720283070
thanks for posting that and allowing this retard to wallow in the fact that the guy he likes is a fucking moron who got fired from his real job and decided to make himself a living spewing conspiracy theories


and their is enough conspiracy theories to go around with alex jones, i watched his piece on where he talked about visiting aliens in a lab and i fucking lost it laughing

alex jones is a fucking loser, however TYT isn't much better tbqh

>>720283677

Infowars does have some decent people to balance them out a bit. Paul Joseph Watson for example

File: 0911200533578_14_10763752713_ac7f60f20b_o.jpg (171KB, 1535x999px)

171KB, 1535x999px

>>720284410
i honestly dont like either, with alex jones- you knows it crap. with tyt- it feels more like they verge on cringe

>>720284457
They do but then Jones has a his weekly meltdowns. Honestly if he just sat behind the lines and let the other folks be the voice it would probably be a lot more respected. Would also help to get rid of the product placements constantly following "SOMEBODY'S POISONED THE WATER HOLE!"

>>720285191

It's too late, honestly. The Infowars name has already been tarnished by their batshit craziness. Nothing produced by the show will ever be seen as credible because of the Infowars brand.

>>720272430
NPR goes lower.
Seriously, turn on your radio. Shit is fucking aggravating to listen to. They play NO music any more and read clickbait "news" stories all day.

RIP in pieces Echoes you will not be forgotten.

File: Doubt.jpg (16KB, 200x303px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x303px

>>720285434
Only stupid fucks think that way.

>>720272430
I don't see The Intercept on there

I also scoff at calling snopes "biased" when its essentially a fact-checking website.

>>720272430
as a libtard, this is entirely accurate. those left most news outlets are so fucking cancer. my only question is, do rightwings admit their far right shit is cancer or no?

>>720285821

Keep living in your delusional world buddy. Make sure your water doesn't have fluoride in it.

>>720285833
lol trumptards will call anything factual fake news then come up with their own alternative facts

common this is 2017

>>720285434
If the rest of the people at infowars jumped ship and made their own new news site with blackjack and hookers (and no Jones) they might be able to pull it off after some time of good reporting and proving they're not Jones's infowars anymore.

>>720272430
>FOX News
>Reputable

Pick one.

>>720285904

Never make the mistake of believing a fact-checking site to be free of bias. Fact checking services like Politico/Snopes/whatever are run by people; they can choose how to present certain facts, what facts to even check, etc.

>>720285938
Ow the insults are here already, you must have ran out of argumentation.

>>720272430
>fox news
>typically reputable
Alternative fact

>>720286010
whats the news site called? very interested to check it out if only for the lol's

>>720272430
I'd say that's pretty accurate.
The fact Buzzfeed is even on that chart annoys me. Piece of shit website full of cancer SJW clickbait.

I usually stick with BBC. The bias is clear to see but they usually cover all sides equally enough to be reliable on most stories.

>>720286102
uhm great point buddy but that doesn't answer my question.

>>720286116

What possible argumentation is there, retard? You're presenting an opinion. I'm presenting an opinion.

File: dont be ignorant.png (220KB, 480x360px)

220KB, 480x360px

>>720285984
Yeah a time in which you can look up statistics and holy book quotes with ease. So what is your excuse for being so fucking ignorant?

>>720286156
It is the aptly named "Site that does not yet exist".

>>720286202

You didn't even ask one lmao

>>720272430
Fox is fake news. Should not appear on meme.

File: Get out...gif (566KB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 200x133px

>>720286246
You stated th efirst opinon saying that no one would take anything from infowars with credebility.
Which is fucking retarded as they have many street debates, discussions , so why would that not be credible. then you have nothing but insults and no solid point or argument.

Politifact fact-checks statements by all sides against reality. Hurrdurr reality has a liberal bias.

>>720286510

No, I fucking didn't. Learn to read. I said that they will not be seen as credible--not by me, I didn't even mention my own opinion on the reliability of infowars.

You can't say I have nothing but insults but start with "only stupid fucks think this way" you moron. Have some self-awareness please. And seriously, learn to read.

File: TtLRFof.jpg (293KB, 1666x1853px)

293KB, 1666x1853px

>>720286570

Only autists can believe that politifact is unbiased

>>720286262
kill yourself

>>720272430
'Murkans claiming CBC is a far-left publication. You people are fucked. Fox is not allowed to call itself news in Canada, it doesn't meet the standards for honesty. You accept blatant outright lies as a slight bias. You are fucking delusional.

>>720287316
lol at trump making shit up

yeah okay buddy

>>720278542
I haven't seen it lately but I don't think FOX should be better than CNN and I don't think CNN should be better than FOX they both do retarded shit.

>>720287467

If you can't see politifact's slant then I'm sorry you were dropped on your head as a child

>>720287316
You are fucking moron. Die slowly and painfully.

>>720287316
I am honestly baffled that you are able to walk and breathe at the same time, given how retarded you obviously are. How have you not tripped and choked to death on your own tongue?

>>720287626
Well this "dropped on a head" child makes more than you and is more educated than you

It is called common sense and research, something you clearly don't have and don't know how to do


dont worry though, automation already stole your manufacturing job hahahahahaha

>>720287653

Weak and pathetic response.

>politically-related journalism outlet claims to be impartial
>you lap that shit up

>>720287316
>>720287467
>>720287653
>>720287852
Politifact is owned by the Tampa Bay Times, they endorsed Hillary. Not reputable

>>720272430
like not at all
>reuters
literally one of the biggest fake news out there

>>720288144

It seriously baffles me how one can be this stupid. They call themselves "fact checkers" and people assume they never ever show any bias ever! It's not like they're run by human beings who are naturally always biased or anything!

>>720286338
the end of my sentence is literally "my question is". holy fucking shit. how dumb are you?

>>720288859

Oh fuck I just realized I replied to the wrong person. I wasn't even talking to you.

>>720288144
difference between biased and "completely full of shit". Politifact does a pretty decent job and will at least point you in the right direction.

Please point me to a single republican leaning factchecking site that ISNT fucking infowars.

>>720288144
>>720288144
you know how many republican newspapers endorsed hillary clinton? ones that had NEVER endorsed a democrat in 100 years. You need a better reason.

>>720273960
do you know what the young turks is

>>720275075
>>720275418

Where al Jazeera ends up on whether or not you include the jew/muslim stuff.

NYT is pretty liberal, until you look at the blindly pro-jew stuff.

Al Jazeera is definitely pro-arab bias.

>>720272430

Wikileaks has been known to publish altered/propagandist work, and has an agenda against the US gov't in particular.

They're not accurate, and they are biased.

Other wise the chart is roughly accurate.

>>720273960
>>720273960
buzzfeed changed their business model, they think they are journalists now. not even joking.

>>720289596

I've heard similar things that have been debunked. Would love to see a source for that.

>>720274358
>>720274358
>>720278078
>>720278078

That is no longer the case, sadly. Julian specifically timed DNC releases to impact the election ( or allowed his organization to be used that way ) . If you look through his posts, he is very anti-Hillary and pro-Trump. It wasn't this way previously, but yeah.. I decided I would no longer donate to wikileaks after that. I saw them as being apolitical, and just a repository for leaked info ( which I support ) .

>>720289767
>>720289596
I'd like to see some proof of that as well. I do agree they are biased ( now ), see my comment here:

>>720289802

>>720289879

If they're biased then it's not explicitly left or right wing. Julian just really fucking hates Hillary Clinton, like any reasonable person would.

>>720280857
I wish Huffington post and Breitbart would both DIAF. They are worse than useless.

note: I read fucking motherjones and the new republic ok? They both have very strong political views, but at least I don't have to fact check every fucking other word they write.

>>720281334
>As for FOX, it used to be a shithole but it has significantly improved lately. They're probably the best out of all the dinosaur media outlets.


you have to be fucking kidding me. You bash on CNN for colluding with the Hillary campaign, when FOX did the exact same shit with Trump lol.

Fox is a fucking joke man. At least CNN if they fuck up, will print a retraction. Fox just makes shit up. Fox is about the factual equivalent of The View.

>>720281359
>info wars is biased but accurate

no. fucking no.

infowars is a conspiracy site that somehow became relevant god knows how.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gn2kuT6Xx8w

Please fact check Alex's rant for me ok?

>>720290263

When did FOX collude with Trump? Were FOX anchors caught attending secret meetings with Trump? Were FOX anchors asking Trump for questions to ask Hillary during the campaign? If so, where did you find that information?

FOX is obviously biased. I'm not saying they're not. But that's a hell of a lot different from direct collusion.

>>720272430

Skews right. Economist and WSJ are both right-of-center and Washington Post is pretty moderate.

>>720272430
>infowars is as professional as huffpo

holy shit are you an idiot?

infowars is straight up nonsense and belongs in the trash

>>720290867

Huffpo is also straight up garbage that belongs in the trash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntWieh7YIgY

>>720290867

>>720291155
not arguing that, but they at least fact check themselves

What about business insider

>>720290469
You know I could be wrong. I was thinking of an article where Megyn said it happened, however I see she has clarfied that statement.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/did-trump-get-a-debate-question-in-advance-megyn-kelly-suggests-so-in-new-memoir/2016/11/11/15416798-a7ce-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html?utm_term=.54ac9d28580b