Well what do you think /b/?

>>720181874
No that plane doesnt have anyway to produce thrust

>>720181874
Mythbusters tested this. It would.

>>720182006

Not to mention it's going to snap its wings off when it hits the uprights.

How is this still a meme?

Airflow is what the wings need. Not rotation of wheels.

File: 1484794839907.jpg (32KB, 480x475px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x475px

There's a fucking treadmill in the way.

>>720182006

Who gives a fuck about thrust, you need airflow under the wings no?

File: 1461044341496.jpg (40KB, 500x318px)

40KB, 500x318px

>>720181874

No, it's a fucking model and the treadmill is in the way anyway

>>720182123
Actually over the wings but anyway...

>>720182048
retard

>>720182123
Do you see a fan in front? Where you getting the airflow from with no thrust or fan?

>>720182048
>believing what you see on tv
Ok fag

>>720182235

I aint no fucking engineer but yeah thanks for the clarification.

>>720182248

Airflow > thrust

>>720182086
/thread

>>720181874
Even if it did or would rip the wings off when it hits the treadmill support things

>>720182459
>treadmill support things
Is that a technical term?

File: 259fntk[1].jpg (8KB, 200x191px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x191px

Well what do you think /b/?

File: willittakeoff.png (234KB, 550x526px)

234KB, 550x526px

>>720182681

I think you saved the fucking thumbnail is what I think

>>720181874
>the fucking machine isn't even fucking plugged in
so no it won't take off m8, the fucking plane doesn't fly

>>720181874
No matter what u fuckers think will happen, the alternative facts say it will or will not happen

>>720181874

If the plane is a magical physics plane where the wheel bearings have no friction the plane will take off no matter how fast the treadmill goes. The planes engines don't push against the treadmill like a cars wheels do.

If the plane is a normal plane who's wheels have friction then if the treadmill is going fast enough to cause enough friction on the wheel bearings to cause more backwards drag on the wheels than the planes engines produce thrust then the plane will be dragged backwards. If the speed of the treadmill is such that the wheel bearings do not cause more drag than the planes engines produce thrust then once again, the plane will take off.

No it is too small

when you run on a treadmill, does wind blow on your face? no it does not.

>>720183712
The treadmills in my gym have built in fans....

>>720181874
If the treadmill is moving quickly enough to push the plane backward (those wheels aren't frictionless after all) with the same force that its engines are pushing forward... it might eventually produce enough of a breeze to lift the plane. The treadmill would die shortly thereafter, and the plane would crash into the treadmill's uprights once its wheels left the track, but it's technically possible.

>>720181874
treadmills are made for things with legs, the plane does not have legs so it will not take off

>>720181874
yes, it would take off.

>>720181874
Nope, but a real plane would.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YORCk1BN7QY

>>720184603
Well... yeah, if the surface beneath the wheels is moving at the same speed in the opposite direction, it should have an almost negligible effect.

File: 1294406828466.jpg (62KB, 604x483px)

62KB, 604x483px

>>720181874
this is the question that 4chan has been trying to solve for aeons

>>720184603
That tarp is pulling air with it and the propeller is also pulling air which creates high pressure underneath the wings.

>>720185328
>Propeller creates thrust
>Thrust creates movement
>Plane moving through air means air moves over wings

Whoda thunkit?

File: HKI0367.jpg (15KB, 480x320px)

15KB, 480x320px

>>720184603
this is why americans are retarded

>>720181874
Engines would likely push the plane forward on the surface a foot or so, but there would not be enough room for it to build sufficient speed to take off before it hit the uprights.

>>720185663
No its the fluoride in the water

>>720181874
plane goes the same speed as if it was on tarmac. It eventually gets takeoff speed and starting lifting off

wheels have zero influence on plane going forward.(see sea planes)

>>720182048
I really hate how "mythbusters" has become the standard of truth in this country. It's a fucking nation raised by televisions.

>>720185663
Lurk moar, troll harder.

>>720182252
>>720182244
Do you even mythbuster, fags?

>>720185663
Trying to insult the nation that invented airplanes.

>>720182235
Actually the plane needs to be submerged in a fluid of a sufficient density; in this case atmosphere.
>inb4 gas
fluid dynamics encompass lift

>>720184603
holy shit. this IS why Americans are retarded

File: 1377940932862.png (327KB, 750x775px)

327KB, 750x775px

>>720186271
the wright brothers are turning in their graves over that video

no, plane actually has to be moving forward to get lift

>>720181874
Of course not, ask yourself: what is producing lift with no airflow over the wings?

>>720181874
no you fucking idiot, it's gonna hit the bars in front

>>720186136
Because a well documented, practical experiment is absolute shit. What a dumbass.

File: 1353008752927.jpg (223KB, 400x528px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 400x528px

>>720186570
oh yeah? my alternative facts say that it will take off

File: image.jpg (134KB, 720x380px)

134KB, 720x380px

>>720181874
Does jet fuel weaken steal beams at high temperatures?

How many shits does popes wood?

Best assessment of the issue to date:
https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/09/09/the-goddamn-airplane-on-the-goddamn-treadmill/

Someone thread this shit.

>>720182382
what the fuck does "Airflow greater than thrust" mean

will not take off. wings would hit the handrails and shit would crash.

>>720186686
I'm not going to debate you over the authenticity of a tv show that you believe in fully just because they put it on one of the "smart people channels." There's nothing I could say that would make you any less of a stupid faggot, so just carry on.

>>720182382
Not really though considering you need both of them for the fucking thing to take off. That's like saying it's more important for my car to wheels than it is for it to have an engine.

The word you morons are looking for is "lift" without airflow over the wing to produce lift.. the wheels could be turning at the speed of /b/s retardation and nothing will happen