>>720128093 >>720128093 >>720128093 So we see the place getting fuller and fuller and fuller Then we see a cut at 00:46 to when the inauguration ends and the people are going home / most of the people have allready left.
Go fuck yourself you lying piece of shit. Im not an american and if i was i would never have voted for trump (even if i don't like hillary...), but people like you are the filth of the internet. Please, please end it.
And if this was bait (what i doubt) it would have gotten me hard
>>720127251 Can we just all agree you're a retard if you even go there? '' Oh yeah i was at the inauguration, I stood somewhere on a white sheet of plastic, half a mile away and I couldn't see shit, also there were liberal tears and protesters anywhere, no idea why I didn't stay the fuck at home ''
Also, DC is 90% democratic, how fucking weird is it that a democratic president gets a higher turnout than a republican president in a democratic area?
>>720130567 That is a statement bereft of truth and proper diction. Who the fuck are 'they' and why the fuck would a guy admit to being a cuck when pressed by them? If you're going to lie, at least do it properly.
Also, you can watch a fucking time lapse of the crowd forming and dispersing. The fucking guy didn't draw as many people as Obama. Are you really that insecure about having lost the popular vote by almost 3 million? Jesus, fucking deal with it.
>>720130930 It's not weird at all. If the trump administration would just say, "Oh hey, isn't it weird that a democratic area didn't have a high turnout for a republican president? No, it's not weird at all, so that's why we had lower turnout".
The only story is because that isn't what happened. Sean Spicer and Trump are INSISTING that it was the most watched inauguration ever. And it simply, verifiably was not.
>>720131764 You mean Trump is lying? No way, that could never be true, he never lied before, he got elected because he was always open and honest with everyone, he'd never make stuff up or he wouldn't have been elected...
Short version: US intelligence agencies proved that Russia hacked into DNC systems, stole information, and released it along with propaganda designed to discredit the DNC candidate, in an attempt to influence the election in Trump's favor.
>>720131828 Antifa/soros and the liberals got BTFO . Wikileaks released emails showing the world what a criminal Clinton was and they lost the election.Liberals wanted a war with Russia so they blamed them trying to rally "the people" to reject Trump and start ww3.it didn't work so now they are on /b/ crying about Trump winning
>>720131488 So you're telling me that the video cuts, then off frame the capacity doubles, crowds as far as the eye can see.. then also off frame, the crowd capacity shrinks to exactly what it was before the cut, then the rest of the crowd freezes in place...then, only after the footage cuts back in does the rest of the crowd begin to disperse again?
>>720132099 >https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf >US intelligence agencies proved At no point does that pamphlet say anything about how they came to absolute certain conclusion that Russia was involved. But even if that pamphlet did say as such, who would believe it coming from the most politicized 'intelligence' agencies since J Edgar Hoover?
inb4 how can you not take what the acronym agencies say as scripture? How can you freely think?
>be trump >at moscow ritz carlton >presidential suite >melania is in manhattan >bored >try to fap >can't get it up >call room service >hire three dominatrix prostitutes >they make you lay on the bed >fully clothed >they're drinking champagne >ridiculing how badly your suit fits >they get up on the bed >walking on the bed >straddling your body >stepping on your crotch >dick twitches >they're each on their second bottle >tell them obama slept in this bed last week >they talk about how much they hate him >dick twitches again >they want to defile the bed so it will be destroyed >urine starts to flow >it's habbening!!! >they're pissing all over you >it's soaking through your suit >so warm >stream hits your face >dick is titanium >they notice your tiny bulge and mock it >one of them has to shit >squats over your lap and lets loose >it's runny but there are big chunks >smells fucking horrible >you grab a chunk and taste it >dick is diamonds >beg them to let you fap >they make you use the shit as lube >furiously rubbing micropenis >they take turns pissing in your face >unintelligible moans emanate from your mouth >OOOOAAAAHHHHHHAAAAHHHHHHH >they're laughing at you >OOOOOOAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAH >HAOOOOOHAOOOOOOHAAAHGHHH >they laugh even harder >OOOOB-BAAHM-MMMAAAAAAH!!!!! >cum buckets
>>720132210 It didn't even show that. Go read the actual emails. They simply show DNC leadership expressing dismay over the lack of communication between the Sanders campaign staff and party leadership. The rigging bullshit is just more propaganda.
Trump is quite happy people are focussing on the size of the crowd at his inauguration and whether or not he copied a cake. He's pushing a lot of his legislation through and is busy as hell getting his ducks in a row to tackle more while people cry about stuff like this or his "National Day of Patriotic Devotion".
>>720132497 It also says that the majority of the proof is classified and gives a good explanation of why it needs to remain classified. Yes, at some point you need to simply take their word for it. If that isn't good enough for you, go apply to work for the CIA, get cleared, and read it yourself.
>>720132845 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCnPOEJDWIk /pol/ was butthurt about it and doxed him, kept calling him a cuck, thread earlier someone pointed out their hero go punched by a cuck, lulz were had and /pol/fags fuck off usually when you call them out for it
Again, if Spicer said this specifically and clearly the first time instead of obfuscating, it would have been fair (though he still would have blatantly lied or obscured facts about actual physical crowd size, which he did also talk about). However, total numbers of internet streamers have not been verified yet, nor have they been counted and compared with estimates from 2009 and 2012.
>>720132845 >antifa dude TKO's glorious Aryan leader Richard B. Spencer >/pol/ goes apeshit and tries to frame it on some old dude who did fem-dom porn, ate faeces and also died a year ago >/pol/ gets called out on their utter nonsense >/pol/ cries the saltiest tears ever >the rest is lulz
you can prolly find an achieved thread about it, on /pol/, if you like.
Live streams didn't exist in 2009? Didn't realize that. I must have been watching an elaborate basement hoax and not a live stream of Obama's inauguration.
I will grant you that internet viewership does muddy the waters a little. But the fact that Spicer made the claim means he needs to back it up with data. And as of current, there are precisely zero metrics that back the claim "Trumps inauguration was the most viewed inaug in history"
Photo and video evidence: clearly a smaller crowd than obamas Nielsen ratings: Doesn't beat Reagan or Obama (or Nixon or Carter) Public transit: Numbers were well below those on Obama's first inaug Digital viewership: there is no official body and lots and lots of streams. But Spicer cited CNN stream views at 17million and change. Well, that is just clicks, not steady views...but even that number is less than the same metric measured on obama's first inaug.
No thinking person could possibly look at all the evidence and conclude that there is any chance Trump had the largest viewership.
>>720133059 >under-cutting the Media This is the most troubling part of all of this. Trump's puppeteers are testing the waters, seeing just how far they can take their lies without losing all of their supporters.
Your lack of understanding of the sham continental racism and the human genome project is what's bringing the world into chaos. Also, you hate yourselves because you're pedophiles and you hate your mothers.
>>720133019 My imaginetions was that CIA and other intelagence deportamets uses some classified protocoles and some other IT staff (I'm a military guy, so i dont know all of this shit), not the damn emails. Looks like u crashed them. How the fuck they did it? Spamed the CIA?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/damaging-emails-dnc-wikileaks-dump/story?id=40852448 >"Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess," DNC National Secretary Mark Paustenbach wrote in an email to National Communications Director Luis Miranda on May 21. After detailing ways in which the Sanders camp was disorganized, Paustenbach concludes, "It's not a DNC conspiracy it's because they never had their act together." >The idea was nixed, though. "True," Miranda acknowledged in his response. "But the chair has been advised not to engage. So we'll have to leave it alone."
>>720133170 it's European, short for "anti-fascist", and refers to antifascist groups and movements that operates outside the official Anti Fascist Action.
it's a proper word alright, just like cuckold once was, but as always.. /pol/ and the rest of the stormfart alt right nutjobs have turned into another blanket term, simply meaning "people i don't agree with, whom shall perish on the day of the rake reeeeee".
>>720133486 The DNC and the CIA are completely different organizations. The DNC was hacked, not the CIA. The DNC is made up of civilians (career politicians and volunteers) who support the Democrats, a political party.
>>720132432 Are you retarded? Watch the video without your biased trumpo beer goggles on.
Crowd gathers. 46 mark the cut of what would probabaly be a minute of two of a relatively steady crowd size while trump speaks. cut back. trump is finishing his speech and only that does the crowd begin to disperse.
Read that again. The video cuts back. There is a second or two of the same crowd size shifting, and THEN they begin to disperse.
You understand what you're implying, right? You're implying that the media doctored this video...and that would mean that after the cut, the crowd size would have to have nearly doubled, then all of them would have to disperse until only the original core of people we saw before the cut at 46 seconds was there...and for some inexplicable reason, that entire group of pwople remains stationary for minutes on end...and only then do they themselves file out.
>>720132413 The low angle view makes the crowds look more full? Thats crazy. It's almost like you can't see the white ground cover or the empty space at the back of the crowd through the *bodies of the people in the crowd"
It's almost like, gee, i don't know.. people are made of meat and you can't see through meat.
>>720133844 Yep, this part of the email about sums it up: >The simple story is this: Sanders lost to Clinton by 5 percentage points in the Feb. 20 caucus and has been working to reverse it ever since. He pushed more delegates to the county conventions a few weeks ago but his team was out-organized by Clinton’s Nevada contingent on Saturday.
The rest is lamenting over what a shitshow the Sanders campaign staff/supporters are running and how they refuse to accept the reality that he simply lost to Clinton.
>>720134487 It depends. Hillary and Putin butted heads a few times while she was Secretary of State, but it was always in response to Putin's outrageous actions: invading Crimea, supporting a brutal dictator in Syria, etc. Putin shows no sign of stopping these sorts of actions, so they would likely continue to butt heads if she became President, but this would likely just mean more sanctions against Russia. I highly doubt it would ever escalate to direct military conflict.
>>720134461 You seem to lack reading comprehension, so I'll link you to someone who can explain the context to you. http://www.inquisitr.com/3338399/wikileaks-one-dnc-official-instructs-another-to-secretly-spread-ralston-article-slamming-bernie-sanders/
>>720127251 >Nobody blaming protestors blocling highway traffic. >Nobody blaming the fact that Obama closed schools and businesses on the day of his inauguration and Trump didn't. >Nobody blaming it on the fact that Obama was the first black president so obviously, near the coastal cities where most people are Democrat, he would get more people attending.
being able to see the front railings of each section at this angle means each section is not full. Keeping the cameras at a low angle like this will make crowds appear larger...this is a common filming trick.
>>720134822 >inquisitr Oh lawd... But I'll indulge you.
>Ralston was informed of the thrown chairs by another reporter, also considered a trustworthy source, according to news reports, and the leaked email gave no indication that Ralston was working with DNC officials. It still appears to have been an unintentional error on Ralston’s part. So another non-story.
>>720134793 Those sanctions made my food's cost grow double or triple. It would be massive hunger. U can doubt in my words but it is better that Trump won. Cause when peoples getting hunger they starting riot. It this situation control of nukes makes weak and idiots from Chechnia (who fucking HATE america and whole west) might get launcig codes. U guys should realy aviod sanctions because you need us to holding China
>>720127251 I'm really surprised we haven't found anyone who was there yet. So let me shed a little light on the subject. The building that some of you have pointed out as a reference point is at 12th St. The majority of the room up until there was standing room only, there were a few smaller than shown in OPs pic areas where they would not let you stand, but the vast majority of the national mall was filled with people.
Source: was there, mostly to see if someone would try an assassination(wanted to say I was there if someone did)
>>720135893 Well, something needs to be done about Putin. I agree, the sanctions suck, but it also sucks watching Putin fuck with the rest of the world. You all need to take back your country. Hopefully the riots will lead to that.
>>720136065 Dafuq? Which law do you think they're breaking, exactly? At that point, DNC leadership was clearly tired of Sanders' campaign's shit. It makes them look bad too. They clearly didn't know the information in the article was wrong, they thought it was just more of the same old shit from his campaign. Would you rather they try to bury information and prop him up that way?
>>720136410 Give me a fucking break. Invading Crimea wasn't about "cleanup" at all. And propping up Assad was all about securing Russia's monopoly on gas supplies to Europe, the last thing keeping Russia's economy afloat. Stop deflecting.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.