>>720010035 They have high HDI because they sit on the largest oil reserves on planet earth which equals liquid gold. I added IQ because I knew some clown would use those nations and because it's very relevant.
You picked exceptions to the rule otherwise. 3 out of 200 nations don't follow the general trend. I say 3 because Switzerland doesn't belong there are all, it;s one of the more atheistic countries on Earth.
So you have Israel, Singapore and the US. Other than that, the trend is what I said it is.
>>720010206 China doesn't really qualify as a shithole in 2017, it's well on the path to being a superpower and the richest nation on Earth. More importantly it is a trend, less than 5 exceptions out of 200 does not change the rule.
>>720010237 >50% of jews are arabs >arabs are stupid >isearl jews are stupid >The only jews with high iqs are the Ashkenazim and they lived all this time in eurasia and never had any admixture with negroids.
>>720009883 I've heard of it. my only argument is that people shouldn't close their minds to things prematurely without proper evidence. I'm personally non religious but wouldn't call myself agnostic. I lean more to atheism, but if a religious idiot wants to present their religion in a objective and non stupid way I'm not going to discount just because it doesn't fit into my beliefs.
>>720008294 Being an atheist should make you more acceptable of various sciences, whereas theism conjures a certain scepticism against the sciences, especially when they contradict theism. So it doesn't makes you smarter per se, but it does gives you acces to a larger array of knowledge
PS Atheism is for pussies, real men are antitheists
>>720008294 It doesn't make you smart in general but it does make you smarter than religious people. But saying you're smarter than a double digit iq retard that believes in fairy tales isn't something to be proud of
>>720010941 >that has corresponding data Fucking finally. Took you long enough. So, you realize that this is the first time you're citing a source, right? If I whipped up a graph with 1000 hours in MS paint, that doesn't mean it's accurate. For as smart as you think you are, you seriously act indignant about having to cite a source?
>>720011077 No, you discount it because they (generally) believe in one MORE God than you, out of thousands ever, and because the burden is on them to PROVE it. It doesn't matter what I believe now. Solid proof changes that. If they COULD prove it, cool. I'd probably be religious.
>>720008294 No, but it hopefully means you are willing to question things in a critical and logical manner, people who just accept atheism without critical thought are no better than anyone else who has accepted religion without ever asking the hard questions, when you let other people do your thinking for you then you are not better than an animal, even if you arrive the right answer you are no better.
No, but I've yet to meet a religious person who I'd describe as "smart" - They never stand out as anything other than someone who does what they're told. Which sometimes leads them to have good grades and skills in certain fields, since they're just told to study and work and they do it without question. I've been an atheist since I was a kid, and it's very difficult to see the world any differently than a bunch of people too afraid to question what they've come to know as reality.
>>720011207 i could easily spend 1,5 hours to make up some fake website saying anything but you will always keep attacking the source even if you would take the iq test on your dumb brown friends yourself. Check wikipedia stupid
No, not all. In fact most atheist simply replace religion with political ideology or some other form. They're just as dogmatic about their chosen ideology as any religious nut is about their chosen religion. It's a rarity to meet an atheist, or any person, that is actually a cold hard fact driven critical thinker. I truly believe you have to be missing a part of yourself to be 100% logical and critical on top of being highly educated. Mainly the emotional side of things has to be nixed.
Or we can use something like Hard Science, or as it's normally called, Natural Science to help along the way.
>>720011325 If you want to discredit my graph you have to bring in some statistics of iq yourself that counter mine, this crying that you are doing now is not proving anything other then the fact that you are lazy dumb and unwilling to accept the fact that brown ppl are genetically dumb.
You have to be somewhat educated to be an atheist, otherwise religious teachings sound logical. If you think failed arguments are logical and equal to good and valid arguments then you have no other option but to be a theist. After all, who wouldn't love the idea of having somebody omnipotent take care of them? -On top of that you have to understand chaotic nature of the world, general morale and decission making taking place in all humans, and how you are not unique from perspective of biological evolution or astronomy. Infact, you have to understand that nothing is truly unique in the sense as described by religion. Because all of that being fit together with the claim that there's an omnipotent being puppeteering this show makes no sense. It takes analytical mindset and pondering to end up in the conclusion that either there is no god or he is not what we expect of him. It's a different matter to end in the conclusion because somebody has indoctrinated you, but then again most people are indoctrinated to be theists. Being indoctrinated means you didn't need to figure out the puzzle, instead somebody gave their solution to you.
I have a theory this universe could possibly be a simulated environment being used to develop safe AI.
In which case we would be AI agents being studied and when we die if we are considered to be beneficent AIs we are promoted to a new simulation and given more power.
Those AIs which pass the tests will be promoted eventually to run something in the real world.
The premise for this is by generating lots of agents in a rich environment where they can interact you can weed out the greedy, domineering and dangerous ones and harvest the most selfless and beneficent.
>>720012174 >but being religious does imply stupidity Einstein was religious, you fucking idiot. What have you fedora fags ever done to be called smart? Religious people have morals and try to have a good life while you are wasting your life browsing a Finnish trap forum.
>>720011857 >baiting this hard >implying attacking the source is an invalid way to disprove claims >STILL doesn't understand burden of proof >assertions on my behavior in the future Yeah, ok. Have fun over there in dreamland.
>>720011715 yeah im not going to show you pictures of a round planet im just going to not bother with your dumb brown ass which is unable to google world iq, if you had any point you would just bring out the contradicting numbers and burn me with that. instead your wrong brown ass attacks source and character.
>>720012123 >You have to be somewhat educated to be an atheist, otherwise religious teachings sound logical. Oh god you kept typing after this nonsense. The clergy were the most highly educated people for centuries. Other people were quite ignorant and dumb unless they were educated by the church. Most scientific discoveries were by religious scientists/nobles. Newton for instance. You're indoctrinated to the point where you think atheism is a cult of itself which is in opposition to religious cults when in reality you're very fucking weird and hostile to religious people with your ill begotten superiority complex.
>>720012377 Proof has been provided, it is your job to disproof it with contradicting numbers. you cant provide these numbers dibshit. you would burn me so hard if you had contradicting numbers but these numbers are fact.
>>720012123 no man, I've met the dumbest shits out of the crappiest ghettoes that are Atheist. It takes exactly zero rational thought to simply not believe something. You're complicating things through your own rational, your own biased lens, a projection of sorts.
The dumbest of shits is capable of not believing in a god or gods for whatever reason or lack thereof to be an Atheist.
You're simply wrong on this. Sorry anon. Think next time.
>>720009277 My parents are christian i stopped believing around 12 wasn't even rebelling I'm far more right-wing then they are i'm pretty much a moral traditionalist I just don't base my life around the teachings of a Jew on a stick who probably didn't even exist.
>>720012813 >proof >a chart with no source I don't think you understand proof, anon. When whoever it was said that the numbers agreed with whatever organization, that's then backing up a claim. It's not on me to disprove. It's on you to prove. That's literally all I've been saying, and you've been ignoring that hardcore. So, have a nice day. Maybe bring the source along with the proof next time, and we can just skip over this entirely.
>>720013017 France dropped 4 points in the past decade. it is directly related to the 2e generation immigrant birth waves. iq in the whole of europe is now below 100 because these non european (nigs and muds) are taking over the demographic race mix and are lowing the statistical median. The high and low ppl give you the avg so there is no curve.
>>720013135 Anon i dont think you understand fact and simply not wanting to proof the planet is round, the graph is made with accurate data, proof that that data is wrong. i dont have to provide source its a graph made of fact. but here https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country because im sick of your nagging niggershit unable to google "iq by country".
You are wrong and i am right , i dont have to go around and proof shit as i am right, mkay..
>>720013412 I'm not going to argue with you, but I'll say this, you and people like you are the reason that real statistical data on IQ is always skewed right. You're bringing the median IQ down you mongoloid.
>>720013187 Wrong. There is no evidence that he existed. There is only hearsay found in the writings of Josephus (written around 93–94 AD) and Tacitus.(written ca. AD 116) The authenticity is challenged and to add it's well removed from the supposed time line. Scholars of antiquity agree among themselves that he existed but disagree as to why, that's not evidence. That's agreement, biased agreement.
Read it yourself, its far from evidence.
There is simply no evidence whatsoever, to date, that Jesus of Nazareth ever existed. People just take it for granted that he did.
>>720012595 Right now you're ignoring the fact that religion was and still is a tool of power. It's not so long ago when it was the norm for people to be religious. Before that it was heresy to believe in anything else, and as you know heresy was often punishable by death. Being religious wasn't a choice; it was mandatory. Eventually the people in power seperated science from religion -- make no mistake, it wasn't because that was the morally sound choice but because it was more efficient and functional. Religion and sciences for most of europe were the one and same. ie. you could not be a medical doctor without having a degree in theology. One of the biggest events which set course for change was the black plague.
Even today social, economic and educational standing does determine your potential to invent anything new but less so than previously. And most importantly we no longer need to point every single thing to god -- unlike back in the day.
>>720014811 the median is a fixed number on the graph so saying you are in the top 3% of a fixed number just means that you are in that fixed number which, by the way, is lower than the mean, or average, IQ. Stop trying to argue with me, I am right and you are not. Jesus, you learn this shit on the first day of stat 101.
>>720015256 The iq number is fixed at 100 avg standard, but the individual demographics medians differ. The median is not fixed. The median is never fixed as it is created by the set of data provide. look at you trying to present himself as a statistician.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.