Prove your not dumb.

I don't have a "not dumb". Sorry i cant prove something i don't have.

>>719529296
*you're

81 onviously

Bruh

>>719529296

5

>>719529296
17

>>719529296
5 or 17, depending on which autism you prefer

>>719529296
>Prove your not dumb
>your not dumb
>your

5 faggots

>>719529735
yeah

File: 1467099561630.jpg (471KB, 2272x1704px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 2272x1704px

>>719529296
The array "2" is not defined.

>>719529915

>post ends in 5
>answer is 5
>why the fuck are we still talking about this?

>>719529296
16 / 2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 3( 2 )] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 6 ] + 1
16 / 2[ 2 ] + 1
16 / 4 + 1
4 +1
5

>>719529296
4-2=2
3×2=6
8-6=2
2×2=4
16÷4=4
4+1=5
>The answer is 5

>>719529296
Nice try, 8/0 + 1.

Unless I am dumb. College grad, EE never used brackets therefore I will assume it is a bait and switch for parentheses to find people incapable of free thinking.

>>719530759
Oops did 2^3 like a dumb American. All my fancy education hasn't helped me learnt 2 reeeeed

lol
5

>>719529296
(4-2) = 2
(8-3) = 5
(5x2) = 10
(10+1) = 11
(16/2) = 8
(8+11) = 19

>>719529610
/thread

17

>>719529915
yes
same answer here, anyone not getting 5 is american or a troll

its fcking 1.8 -.-

16÷2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16÷2[8-3(2)]+1
16÷2[8-6]+1
16÷2[2]+1
8[2]+1
16+1
17

Most of you multiply the 2 and 2, but once it comes down to that, you simply follow the order of operations.

faggots don't know that the type of bracket dictates the order...

BIDMAS
FUCKING
BIDMAS

the answer is this vector: [65 -47]

>>719533153
yea you fucking idiot.
P
E
Multiplication comes before
Division
A
S

5 for christsake

http://edwards.jondreyer.com/gemdas.html

GEMDAS. It's 5. You people are retarded.

>>719534301
hahaha you think division and multiplication are different things
swap /2 with *0.5 and your logic fails

>>719534301
Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication and Division (from left to right)
Addition and Subtraction (from left to right)

Now you know.

File: nignog.jpg (45KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x500px

>>719529296
It's you're (your is possessive) and the answer is five.

>>719532239
>>719529296
B T F O

T

F

O

>>719534301
No Multiplication doesn't come first. MD are on the same tier, and come before AS, but one doesn't take priority. It's whichever comes earliest in the problem. Same with addition and subtraction.

>>719529296
>>719530450
TypeError: 'int' object is not subscriptable

File: SteinsGate-Kyoumas-Dr.-Pepper.jpg (35KB, 650x365px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x365px

>>719529296
You should know better, Christina. Forget about such simple equations and come back to the lab.

File: giphy.gif (480KB, 493x342px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 493x342px

>>719534794

1+1=3

>>719534301
Fucking idiot

File: d5c.jpg (36KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 625x626px

>>719534920

File: 11b5ea821e2a6c4fddd802f152bc3fdb.jpg (132KB, 750x523px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 750x523px

>>719529296
5

>>719529296
They way I learnt it would be 5. However, order of operations is actually dependant on where you were taught.

17

>>719529296
YOUR not dumb.
>having to prove anything to retards

>>719535062
>However, order of operations is actually dependant on where you were taught.
where do you need to live to teach you maths wrong?

>>719534301
being this retard must hurt

>>719529296
>your
You already fucked up.

>>719529296
This is real irony

>>719532045
Surely nobody is this stupid.

>>719534920
South park taught me to not feed the trolls. And you're as obvious and retarded as they get.

>>719529296
17

>>719535160
murica

>>719530759
>16 / 2[ 2 ] + 1
>16 / 4 + 1
that's where you're wrong kiddo

>>719533153
Pemdas or bodmas, etc is irrelevant. The 2 is next to the brackets. If it was 16 / 2 * (2) it would be arbitrary to where you learnt order of operations. However 16 / 2(2) means 2*2 must come first.

>>719535528
dude, 2(2) it's the same as 2*2

>>719529296
16
----- +1
2(8-3(4-2))

=(16/4) +1 = 5

Alternatively (though nobody reads it that way)

(16/2)*(8-3(4-2)) + 1
=8*2 +1 =17

In other news, /b/ still falls for decade old bait.

>>719535369
dog bless

>>719529296
5 stupid cuck

File: abnormal.jpg (21KB, 517x379px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 517x379px

>>719529296
16/2[8-3(4-2)] +1
16/2[8-3(2)]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
16/4+1
4+1
5

>>719529296
1 and 4 fifths

>>719535594
No, the first implies (2*(2)), and so 16 / (2*(2)) is 4, not 16

File: 1.1.jpg (541KB, 1143x1133px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1143x1133px

>>719529610
>Underrated
>/thread

bout tree fiddy

>>719529296
Depends on whether you solve right to left or left to right, since multiplication and inline division have the same operator precedence, even in the case of implicit multiplication.

Solution 1 (implicit multiplication first):
>4 - 2 = 2
>3(4 - 2) = 3(2) = 6
>8 - 3(4 - 2) = 8 - 6 = 2
>2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] = 2[2] = 4
>16/(2[8 - 3(4 -2)]) = 16/4 = 4
>16/(2[8 - 3(4 -2)]) + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5
>answer is 5

Solution 2 (inline division first):
>16/2 = 8
>8 - 3(4 - 2) = 2 (see previous solution)
>(16/2)[8 - 3(4 - 2)] = (8)[2] = 16
>(16/2)[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17
>answer is 17

>>719535614
that second way is incorrect though. you don't get to just choose how to do math and have more than 1 answer

jesus some of you are so fucking dumb

i'm leaving this thread in case i don't get contaminated with your stupidity

>half of the thread are middle school dropouts

>>719529296

16 ÷2(8-3)(4-2) +1
16÷2(5)(2)+1
16÷2(10)+1
16÷2(11)
16÷22
=0.72


EZ

>>719535839
it doesn't implies nothing, you do the first operation that comes from left to right

>>719536090
top fucking kek

>>719529296
5

17 you goddamn mongoloids

File: b.jpg (49KB, 296x1003px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 296x1003px

>>719536130

>>719535897
I mean this is clearly impossible from the first glance

>>719535909
>wrong
>pathetic
>google

16 / 2(8-3(4-2)) + 1
16 / 2 * (8-6) + 1
16 / 2 * 2 + 1
17

>>719536318
this is the true answer, thanks anon

File: glanceagainfaggot.jpg (1MB, 1143x1133px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1143x1133px

>>719536354

>>719529296
The answer reduces to 16 ÷ 2 x 2 + 1.

If you get 5, you're retarded.

>>719536498
no actually i am right

>>719536755
see: >>719535909

>>719536755
Clearly you're retarded because it reduces to 16 ÷ 2(2) + 1, which does come out to 5.

Order of operations, bitch. You can't just alter how it's written to suit your dumbass trolling.

File: hard_but_possible.jpg (462KB, 2895x1252px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 2895x1252px

>>719535897

>>719536755
>reduces for no reason
What?
16/ 2[8 -3(4-2)] +1
16/2 [8 -3(2)] +1
16/2 [8 -6] +1
16/2(2) +1
8(2) +1
16 + 1
17

Multiplication and division are equal so you then solve from left to right

>>719537019
Implicit multiplication and inline division have the same operator precedence. The answer is therefore indeterminate because it depends on whether you evaluate from left to right or right to left, for which purpose there's no strict convention.

>>719536712
lol
>glanceagainfaggot

>>719536354
Explain.

>>719536755
I think you might be retarded
16 / 2x2+1

2x2=4
16/4=4
4+1= 5

Anyone saying something besides 17 lacks a full appreciation for the order of operations here

Hey retards.

16/2(8-3(4-2)) +1

16/2(8-6)+1

16/2(2) +1

16/4 +1

4+1=5

Conclusion, if you're answer is not 5, you're a fucking retard. KYS

>>719529296
bomdas

>>719537284
How do you justify evaluating that as 16 / 2x2 and not 16/2 x 2?

The fact of the matter is that there's no one answer to the problem.

>>719537021
I'll accept this answer.

Even if it's not a line in math terms.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/line

>>719537299
>>719537319
See: >>719535909

File: 1451859648581.gif (220KB, 280x199px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 280x199px

>>719537319
being this stupid

>>719532998
Glad to see I'm not the only one here who got that

File: 34.10.jpg (32KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x477px

>>719536871
Fuck you for making me (a logical person) look it up:
https://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
http://www.mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
http://www.eduplace.com/math/mathsteps/4/a/
Good job troll
(Inb4 b-b-b-utt their wong!

File: IMG_2879.jpg (65KB, 750x734px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 750x734px

>>719534301
You do know that the they are grouped. You multiply and divide as it is written from left to right just the same as you add and subtract as it is written from left to right

>>719537319
The scary thing is, I don't think all the people that gave different answers are trolling.

>>719537299
Yup.

I don't know why it's questioned that multiplication and division have the same precedence, or that math is performed left to right.

>no it could be 5
>you could be retarded

File: OP is STUPID and so are YOU if you agree with him.png (11KB, 832x223px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 832x223px

>>719536871
You fucking cunt

File: IMG_2888.jpg (555KB, 1143x1133px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 1143x1133px

>>719535897
Easy bait

>>719538471
ONE line through ALL the doors

Here's where the confusion comes from in this thread.

[2] is NOT FUCKING EQUAL to (2)

16 / 2[2] = 5
16 / 2(2) = 17

You fucking retards.

I can't believe anyone is this stupid.

I repeat

16 / 2(2) = 17
16 / 2[2] = 5

The equation in the OP is 5.

That's all there is to it.

>>719529296
16/2*2+1 = 17
No arguments will be heard, I have a math degree btw and graduated top of my class with over 300 confirmed 'A's

>>719538522
There is one line through all the doors.
Never stated it has to be continuous you autis retard

>>719537319
Why are you performing the multiplication operation "2 (2)" on the right, before the division operation 16/2 on the left?

The only answer for 16 ÷ 2 * 2 is 16.

Everyone suggesting 5 needs to reevaluate.

>>719538626
Lol passing the test is an indication you're autistic... Look it up.

For all the "mathematics students" here, that insists this is 17, please read back up on commutative properties of factors and tell me how you can't even comprehend pre-calculus.

>>719538674
well, that's stupid here in mexico we resolve parenthesis first.

is not
16y : 2y[8y - 3y (4y - 2y)] is
16y : 2[8y -3(4y -2y)]

learn to read

a-are you people serious??
the only answer is 17. are you really that retarded? there is no room for discussion here

>>719538547
Brackets are not a unique symbol snowflake...

http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=16÷2+%5B8-3%284-2%29%5D%2B1&x=0&y=0

>>719535897
That looks impossible? there exists +2 vertices with odd degree

>>719529296
since 1 is not defined as under the division sign nor added after

5 , 16/5

>>719539098
In certain fields of mathematics, like data structures, a square bracket indicates that the operation must have higher priority.

Wolframalpha, being the boss that it is, interprets this in these terms, giving the answer 5.

In simple, first grade math, the answer would be 17.

In complex, real world math, the answer would be 5.

>>719538992
Shit inside parentheses yes. However, you're perfoming shit outside them first, which is fucking wrong and the exact reason anybody is getting 5.

>>719529296
Why aren't you on a VPN

A VPN keeps you anonymous on the internet.
It bypasses any school, home, office or country blocker.
It keeps you un-banned from any website.
It keeps the government from monitoring your online activity.
It allows you to view region locked content from anywhere in the world.
It makes it look like you are located in a different country.

If you like your freedom, I suggest you get a VPN http://anonyourself.club

>>719539339

Wolframalpha's answer is 17, you absolute autistic shit

Know what needs to be done? Someone needs to email Trump and ask his opinion on the matter. His answer will be the end all of this discussion.

>>719539339
so, are you saying IT doesn't use real world math?

File: mcdonalds anime.jpg (422KB, 1109x709px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1109x709px

>>719529610
kek'd

>>719535911
That's why I said nobody reads it that way.

In any case, when a term is not written correctly, there are actually multiple ways of reading and solving it. Leaving out parentheses, for starters.

>>719539229
>there exists +2 vertices with odd degree
wtf r u talking about

Math major here, it took me a while to figure it out, yeah it's impossible.

>>719539689
modeling it as a graph(with weighted edges), there can exist a maximum of 2 vertices in a graph with odd degree for an eulerian path(path traversing every edge) to exist. these represent the start and end of the path. as there are 4, it is impossible.

It's 17, confirmed by TI-84

16÷2(8-3(4-2))+1
16÷2(8-3(2))+1
16÷2(8-6)+1
16÷2(2)+1
8(2)+1
16+1
17

>>719529296
Uuuu

Not this guy again, btw it's you're, not your

The answer is 2

>get 17 in my head
>check thread
>I'm not retarded
>go back to rating cocks

Actual problem: 16 / 2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1 = 5
How idiots read it: 16/2 [8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1 = 17

-4

>>719540092
fag

>>719540058
I meant 5

But everyone knows the real answer:
Is about tree fiddy

File: retards.png (11KB, 432x344px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 432x344px

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=16%C3%B72(8-3(4-2))%2B1

everyone here is autistic

>>719536354
Congratulations, you have autism

>>719540328
square brackets aren't parenthesis dumbshit, they don't follow the same principles as parenthesis

>>719534301
>>719535528
>>719535839
>>719534920

Holy shit guys, are you really this stupid?

>>719536712
You missed one in the middle you cunt

>>719534920
WE NEED A BED HERE ASAP

>>719538626
it also says trough
not through

>>719529296
16/2(8-3(4-2))+1
16/2(8-3(2))+1
16/2(8-6)+1
16/2(2)+1
16/4+1
4+1
5

File: oh right my bad.png (11KB, 438x328px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 438x328px

>>719540409
you were saying?

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=16%C3%B72%5B8-3(4-2)%5D%2B1

>>719540620
Yeah, like I said, PARENTHESIS
AREN'T
SQUARE
BRACKETS

>>719529296
8x10+1
Simple enough for you?

>>719540620
>>719540671
wolfram disagrees.

>>719529296
17

>>719536712
YOU MISSED A DOOR FAGGOT

>>719540409
yes they do you troglodyte, they're used alternating to parenthesis so it's easier to tell groups in large equations.

>>719540710
8x10+1 = 80x+1

>>719538420
>math is performed left to right
This is an elementary school level understanding of math. Math isn't just a thing you do with numbers following weird arbitrary rules that are just that way for no particular reason.

>>719540756
Not really

>>719540730
Wolfram also doesn't have a soul

>>719540671
they are functionally the same thing. they only look different so you can match them up easier

>>719538547
you're dumb

>>719540855
Everyone knows that math doesn't give a shit about easy

>>719540809
the right-to-left-ness of [multiplication and division] and [addition and subtraction] is not arbitrary or for no reason.
It allows you to switch any of the terms as long as you move the operator preceding it along with it.
It's pretty cool:
> 2/4*4/2*3 = 2/2*4/4*3 = 3

So I showed this to my Calculus teacher, and he says 17

>>719540409
>>719539339
find me a text book where this is written

>>719540809
feel free to rigorously specify the axioms and operators for your favorite flavor of math
without that, stupid puzzles on the internet must be assumed to follow standard mathematical rules

>>719540903
math is about making hard problems into easier problems.

>>719541081
good

>>719532773
I'm confused I live in the usa but I attended elementary school so I got five anyways

>>719541169
I don't have a textbook.
I shot mine up with an airsoft gun after my school closed down.

I don't post on 4chan. I win.

>>719540818
Yes really, I would know seeing as how I'm actually in Math and Astrophysics, they're the exact same as parenthesis.

>>719529296
>you're

5

>>719541252
Answer is 0

Easiest problem in the known universe

>>719541252
14

>>719540903
So you admit you're just a retard who doesn't know math

>>719541246
>>719541169
Well, actually, i closed mine after i shot my school up with a gun.

>>719541275
Astrophysics? what the fuck are you doing on 4chan? This place will only make you dumber.

>>719529296

people like OP are a good reminder that you too can be a drooling simpleton, present a fundamentally flawed equation, completely disregarding functional, correct mathematical structure and troll dozens like yourself into believing they are proving something by arguing about what operations to perform first

you cannot evaluate 16 / 2x + 1 because it can be interpreted in two ways without contextual grouping of terms (which OP has failed to do):
16 / (2x + 1) OR (16/2x) + 1

go to school and take actual math classes, then you can scroll past these threads and not feed the autistic morons

>>719541339
if you think math is easy you haven't done any math

>>719541252
14

>>719541313
Order of operations nigger

>>719529296
16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16/2[8-3(2)]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
8[2]+1
16+1
17

>>719529296

25...

>>719541489
Congratulations you're not retarded

>>719541378
for those of us who have been to school and taken many math classes (and obtained a degree in the field) 16 / 2x + 1 must be interpreted as 8x + 1

>>719541562
Yay!

>>719541450
Trololololololo
KYS. of course I know to follow order of operations, quit easily falling into bait.

>>719541406
math isn't necessarily easy, but it dose make things /easier/.

try building a rocket without doing math.

The only reason math is hard is cause you end up doing really complicated stuff.

>>719541627
How many levels of irony are we at?

>>719541711
It's over nine THOUSSAAAAND

>>719541378
order of operations exists to give structure where structure isn't specified

>>719541580
It doesnt take a degree to figure that out

>>719541580

this is how we know you've never taken many math classes and hold no such degree in the field

>>719538674
multiplication and divition order is irrelevant but you have to do first the parenthesis

>>719541753
/thread

File: KEK N' REKT.jpg (20KB, 480x478px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x478px

>>719529296
When a faggot thinks math like this is actually important

I was calculating this in my mind while shitting in toilet and god solid 5 as answer. And I am just half asian. And if you brought your calculator and papers and fucking pen to calculate this and got different answer. You wouldnt get more american than u are.

>>719541771
no shit, but those of us with degrees can stop by threads like this to laugh at all the idiots

>>719529296
> 16 / 2 * (8 - 3(4 - 2)) +1
distributive property
> 16 / 2 * (8 - (12 - 2)) +1
> 16 / 2 * ((8 - 12) +(8 - 2)) +1
> 16 / 2 * ((8 - 12) +(8 - 2)) +1

>>719541794
this is how we know you're either an idiot or a troll (or perhaps both)

>>719541794
He holds a degree in the field of autism

>>719541851
E N G L I S H motherfucker, can you speak it

>>719529296
16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
1+16/2[8-3(4-2)]
17/2[8-12-6]
17/2[10]
170/10
17
checkmate

16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16/2[8-3(2)]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
16/4+1
4+1
5

>>719529296
probably like a million

it's 17
google said so bruh
https://www.google.com/#q=16+%2F+2%5B8+-+3(4+-+2)%5D+%2B+1

>>719541949

haha nice one there bro you really showed me

oh wait, no you still hold no degree in any math related field and probably live in a basement-like area

l0l

>>719541275
Square brackets are parenthesis with a higher priority, they must be solved first.

>>719542075
WHY ARE YOU DOING THE MULTIPLICATION BEFORE THE DIVISION

GTFO NORMIE REEEEEEEEE

>>719542234
PEMDAS
BEDMAS can kill itself

>>719542182
keep acting tough on the internet
i do in fact hold a degree in mathematics, live in my own place, and make six figures
hope your degree in trolling pays off for you

>>719542344
EVEN IN PEMDAS MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION ARE ON AN EQUAL GROUND WHERE THE FUCK DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL

File: 17tards.png (131KB, 1012x1452px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1012x1452px

The answer is 17.

No, the answer is not 5.
No, there is not more than one correct answer.
No, there are not multiple ways to doing order of operations; you are simply doing it wrong.
No, whether an operation is a division sign or fraction, or multiplication sign or a number being next to parenthesis, these expressions do not magically make the operation different.

OP's question is not ambiguous.
I do not care what credentials you have.
The answer is OBJECTIVELY 17, and if you got anything else you are retarded or trolling.

Any replies to this post other than
>you're right anon!
imply that the poster is a wrong, flaming homosexual.

That is all.

Clearly I can speak and write english, probably you just have dyslexia and should get some help. You moron ass bitch go fap to some gayporn retard, you fat stupid americans, go eat some cheeseburger and die to it, kys plz ;)

>>719542454
you're right anon!

>>719542468
oops wrong thread, sorry.

>>719542454
you're right anon!

>>719542437
Your mom's house, I went to town on that pussy.

They AREN'T on equal grounds believe it or not,

3 x 5 / 3 can have two different answers depending on what method you use.

>>719542424
>i make up things on the internet because it makes me feel better about myself when talking to anonymous strangers

lmao drink the punch you worthless fag, and make sure you add extra cyanide

>>719542454
not the same equation, you stripped the spaces and the compiler followed its own built-in order based on how it parsed your statement

i bet you also wish you weren't born a retard

This is the lamest flamewar I've ever seen on 4chan, and I've been here for 9 years.

>>719541250
Have a look at your address bar :)

>>719542733

>t. wrong, flaming homosexual

Trolling or retarded.
Disregarded for being objectively wrong.

>>719541539
I will explain myself

16/2x(8-3x(4-2))+1
16/2x(8-3x2)+1
16/2x(8-6)+1 =So finally I get awake that I commit an error.
16/2x(2)+1
8x(2)+1
16+1
17 so you guys were right

>>719542585
I meant 3 x 5 / 4

>>719542619
well, my lunch break is about over, so i'm heading back to work where everything i said is true
maybe if you weren't such a drain on society you'd realize that there are plenty of successful people like me, and many of them browse /b/

>>719542859
WTF, how did i get here??
i could've sworn i was on reddit.

File: 1480909514532.gif (1MB, 800x667px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x667px

>>719532773

American here and I got 5. Weird.

>>719542884

lmao "objectively" wrong

was that the biggest word you've used today donny downs? gonna need you to refrain from lapping up the dust from the window for a moment so we can talk about why your parents lives were ruined the moment you came into being

>>719542920

is this the part where you run off to kill yourself in your cubicle?

remember to livestream please

>>719529296
5

>>719542984

tl;dr
Not an argument.


You're retarded or trolling. I don't care.

>>719540809
yes it is, because it's designed like that for readability and usability.

>>719530015
This its nine get your bimdas right retards

>ITT: perfect examples of how modern schools don't teach you to think. They teach you to regurgitate shit.

>See: All the retards spamming mnemonics thinking division comes before multiplication

>>719543242
Next one to roll trip gets to decide whether or not 17 or 5 is the correct answer

>>719543096

i bet you talk in a similar manner to the way you type IRL too

fucking sperg-o-tron 9001 detected, don't they have a board for you subhumans to coagulate on?

never forget that your birth was an accident

>>719529296
17

>>719541580
And 2^3x = 6x

>>719543391
>t. mad spurg lord who got btfo
tl;dr

Nope, that's definitely not an argument.
>m-muh spaces!
lmao, retard detected

Keep those non arguments coming, champ.
I'll continue to not read them while you pout and cry like a retarded ape.

>>719543391

put it into wolfram alpha to get your answer

I bet you won't because
A. You're wrong
B. You're a troll
C. You're a fag

>>719543532

>inserts random accusations and projections because literally cannot handle life as a genetic mistake

its not surprising you think im mad, retards aren't good at interpreting social signals anyway, but its okay baby, let it all out

surely someone will wipe your mutant tears away

>>719543498
2^3 = 8
2^3x = 8x

>>719542454
you're right anon!

And people getting this wrong even after doing some research is only looking for "proofs" that tells them what they already believe. Which makes me sick.

>>719543496
I keked

File: 1483960431021.jpg (52KB, 306x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 306x480px

>>719529296
I see your bait and I raise you this bellissimo son of a mama.

File: 1484829174496.jpg (56KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 540x540px

>>719529547
Kek

>>719531016
you are dumb no worries

File: laughingsluts.jpg (263KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1920x1080px

>>719543684

>this worked up on a Laotian scuba diving forum
>still no proof or work of answer
>still spurging like a chimp
>misusing the word projecting in the most ironic manner imaginable

wew lad, I think you need to get some air with all these non arguments.

>>719543896

wew lad, think youre the one whos been huffing cheeto dust and dew fumes too long, because it sure takes a whole lot of fucking brain damage to write the sort of responses im getting from you

i recommend a bleach/ammonia cocktail, make sure to inhale deeply before imbibing, it will 100% cure how retarded you are almost instantly

EVEN IF THE FUCKING BRACKET THING WERE TRUE, THE MULTIPLICATION IS OUTSIDE THE BRACKETS SO THE ANSWER IS STILL 17.

>>719544112

>still no proofs of answer
>no arguments

Definitely not an argument.
Projecting, spurging chimp disregarded.

>>719529735
Same.

>>719529296
5

() - 1st
* in [] - 2nd

Result: 5.

>>719530060
I got five on it.
How to get 17?

This thread needs to die

81 rtards

>>719544646

back to page 1 we go

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>719545017
God fucking damn it lol. I wish sahgeh would make the thread die faster but it just makes it not bump...

File: 1422672957452.jpg (26KB, 448x412px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 448x412px

>>719529296
1.5

>>719544737
Why?

>>719539229
At least someone here knows wtf they're talking about. Thank you.

>>719529296
16

Whoever gets dubs decides whether 5 or 17 is the right answer, trips decides any number or word is the answer

>>719545900
Turned out it was me, The answer is 5

81

>>719545900

Well you screwed the pooch, champ.

And it's 17, check these.

>>719546011
I know it's 17, I don't give a shit though, I won my own game, it's 5 now fucker, should have won before I made the first post

>>719532773
American AND a troll. 5.

>>719546060

>I know it's 17
>I won my own game

Okay, so we have two sets of dubs for 17.
Glad we could reach an accord.

Have a good day buddy.

>>719546145
I just realized you have dubs, yeah, let's just keep it 17

>>719538626
Line can't be continuous you autis. Line has no start and no end and can be only straight.

>>719536712
>trough

>>719546370
>Line can't be continuous

You...don't know what continous means do you.

>>719546395
>someone already pointed this out

>>719546460
a line goes on forever, especially if you know what algebra is

>>719529915
yup, use PEMDAS and this is the only answer you can possibly come up with

>>719534301

Holy nigger of all trolls. You can't be serious...

ITT: people with no real credentials claiming they know better than everyone else who also has no credentials

>>719546728
5 = 6, 6 = 4, 4 = 5

YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SOLVE THAT, FUCK YOU

>>719532773
Five for freedom

>usa! usa! usa!

>>719529296
5

>>719546527
So it can't be continous because it's always so long that you can't measure it. You can measure only the part which is simulateously fucking your anus, for example.

File: HNNNGG.jpg (16KB, 378x301px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 378x301px

Hey guys. I legit have a 2nd grade math level and I'm 22. Suggestions b4 killing self?

>>719547470
Lines are infinite. Get that through your mouth and out of your anus, not the other way around.

>>719546728
0÷0 sorry I'm dead. What's next?

17 you stupid faggots

>>719547802
Don't kill yourself, just become an hero instead. Seriously, all joking aside don't kill yourself, the afterlife is even worse.

>>719536755
dude despise your dubs you are a colossal mongoloid faggot. you write on top 16, LINE you write on bottom 2*2. you write 2*2 underneath 16, because it's connected via the multiplicator. so it comes down to 16 / (2*2) + 1

deal with it hory shit
solve
fuck you

>>719547809
But if the series is continuous, decreasing, and positive what test should I use to check convergence

>>719547809
Yes, that's what I'm talking about. It's continous because it's infinite. Sorry, I'm just ill.

>>719537144
write 16, underneath horizontal line, unterneath 2*(8-6) -> 16 / 4
FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT