Why cant atheist define atheism????!!
I knew atheist couldn't define atheism!!
>>719483623
Uhm not believing in a supernatural force that caused everything know today?
Sorry that you have downs
>>719483968
That's not a definition, that's a description.
Why cant you define atheism??!!
How many times can you fucking post this bait? Do you not have a fucking life?
>>719483968
not op, but what caused the big bang? dumbass
Nietzsche Frederico
>>719484130
How long are you going to procrastinate on telling me the definition of atheism???!!!!
>>719483623
is it seriously the same guy this entire time?
get the fuck over it dude, your posts are hidden.
fucking loser holy shit
why can't atheist get dubs>>>>!!>!>WFOKPEFOK
>>719483623
>>719484543
Why cant you just define atheism??!!
>>719484559
Why cant you get DUBBS???!!!
>>719484703
because he is some pathetic neckbeard with no life. Love my Christ :)
>>719484586
LOL oh no there are memes about OP now
>>719484878
samefagging this hard
you're a walking sin and you'll die alone like everyone already has.
>>719484939
Why cant can't meme's define atheism???!!!
>>719485093
not op I just enjoy watching fatass pimple faced neckbeards who want to cut their dicks off to be a woman or some bullshit cry
>>719485093
Why cant atheist define atheism???!!!
>>719485206
You might wanna reevaluate your life if that's what you like to spend your time doing
Read a book or somethin' m8
>>719485400
I have its called the Bible, you should try it, good read, the power to save your soul lies within.
>>719483623
Cuz ur gey Feggit lmao get a 9 to 5 nigger
>>719485400
DUBBS I'm out
>>719484200
Your mom
>>719485392
Why cant atheist define atheism???!!!
>>719483623
I have your definition
Atheism- the nigger who is the best also white power!!! Just kidding kill yourself
>>719485206
right, because everyone that doesn't follow your self righteous ego maniac inducing religion wants to be a woman?
>>719485550
good, nigger
Atheism is the lack of belief in a god (or multiple) or any other ruling force other then the already established scientific laws that govern how the universe functions.
>are you happy now, mr baitposter?
>>719486020
.....
Why cant atheist define atheism??!!
The doctrine or belief that there is no God.
That is the definition /b/
>>719486041
I was never happy
Why cant you just define atheism???!!!
>>719486041
your god is science though, you believe in a set of laws don't you? who set those laws in motion? you mention a lack of belief in a god, but to even mention a god or gods you negated your own argument, definition, this is known as being a hypocrite
>>719486193
Now define religion
>>719486259
wrong!
see, there's these people who believe in sky fairies
and then there's everyone else
the definition of "atheist" is "everyone else"
a group of crazies can't say all the normal people are "acrazies", and expect the normal people to anything but laugh at the made up term
self-described "atheists" are just trolls who like baiting the crazies
>>719486505
That's Google. You're not Google.
Why cant atheist define atheism???!!!
>>719486692
Yes I am I'm google
>>719486692
because it's a meaningless word unless you're a theist (i.e. crazy)
>>719486516
Why cant atheist define atheism???!!!
>>7194867 religious nigger
>>719486734
No you're an atheist.
Atheist can't define atheism.
Whyeeeeeeeeee?!?!!
>>719486831
so you get an answer, and just repeat the question
so you get an answer, and just repeat the question
so you get an answer, and just repeat the question
I can't believe this thread still gets reply's.What ever,i guess my counts,have a (you) OP.
>>719486410
religion requires a dogma, science has no dogma, if a belief is demonstrably wrong, it is no longer a valid belief.
>>719486692
alright.. then it means to not have any belief towards any religious concept.
r u gone now?
>>719487067
Cuz I'm google nigger
I'm google nigger
I'm google nigger
Google hates god
Google hates god
Google hates god
>>719487281
& I still believe in god
>>719486831
no, YOU define atheism
you're labeling people, and then insisting people tell you what that label means
it's your label, you're the atheism-promoter
athiesm=reason
Atheismis, in the broadest sense, the absence ofbeliefin the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist.In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief thatat least one deity exists.
>>719487275
you have got to be kidding me. You dogmatically believe there is no god if you are atheist. You refuse to even admit that there could be a god(s). You think the idea is stupid. I believe there is one divine powerful God. You believe that you came from monkeys. I believe that I am created in God's holy image. You believe that your ancestors threw shit. There is a massive difference. Your science requires that you have no belief except in what Dawkins says or some shit.
>>719487468
definitions, by definition, are not subjective.
>>719487275
>science has no dogma
I can think of two:
>Occam's Razor
>If it can't be objectively measured it doesn't exist.
Copernicus had to deal with the first one. His idea of heliocentrism was a little off, because he was trying to describe planetary motion in terms of circles, kepler hadn't come around yet with his ellipses. So Copernicuses models were unnecessarily more complicated than the prevailing geocentric model.
But he ended up being right. A simple explanation sometimes is wrong! Considering there's an ocean of information out there that we don't even know that we don't know, Occam's Razor can be a huge problem.
The second one is a pain in the ass when you describe phenomena that are only present when you are the thing experiencing the phenomena, like free will or consciousness. Any atheist who tries to use science to disprove freewill or consciousness is being intellectually dishonest because they're making an aesthetic choice, not really following through on anything procedural. A hammer can't blowdry my hair, science can't touch 1st person phenomena.
..which are hugely important when you ask the question: oh this whole information filled system we call the universe, does it do its own thinking?
>>719488010
so you think words are objective reality?
delusion, much?
>>719487760
>You refuse to even admit that there could be a god(s).
when did i say that? i believe there is the possibility that a being that meets the definition of a non OOO deity can exist, i just see no sense in alien worship and i absolutely oppose the idea of prostrating to one. if your talking about an OOO deity, you're talking out your ass, it's the mother of all logical fallacies.
>>719488544
then you are no atheist, you believe but dont worship or follow.
>>719488259
>Occam's Razor
is not part of the scientific method
>If it can't be objectively measured it doesn't exist.
metaphysics is the realm of philosophers
>>719488782
>is not part of the scientific method
>metaphysics is the realm of philosophers
cherry-picking this hard is akin to the different Christianity sects cherry picking the parts of the bible they like, you look sincerely retarded
>>719488427
you could stand to read some Wittgenstein, you obviously dont fathom the topic you are getting into, if you could even begin to fathom Wittgenstein.
>>719486767
Lol I'm a theist am I crazy?
Go research the Hard Problem of Consciousness. Any system (possibly) can experience itself. You know personally that you can experience stuff, why can't a city or a forest experience stuff. Your brain is just a city of glia and neurons, and not much more complex than a computer.
It's not that big (or philosophically unpopular) a stretch to think the universe is conscious. Or at least just earth, or even just your house.
Like have you ever broken up with someone after a very long time? The relationship itself is its own person, and figuring out who you are apart from that person is so difficult, and also it feels like a death, but not of you or your partner.
The concept of agent vs. object is pretty cool, and atheism is a little uh, close minded to a lot of that. Whatever sells books I guess!
>>719488694
>you believe
i believe in a possibility, a very remote possibility that is highly unlikely, that an alien being could exist that has developed technology that can fit some criteria of what would be considered a deity. in that regard i am agnostic. i also believe worship of such a being is a threat to human existence and should not be encouraged or tolerated, in that regard i am an antitheist. OOO deities are nothing but logical paradoxes that could not possibly exist in this universe.
>>719488782
>>719488957
Yeah, and I'm almost positive my chemistry, physics, and biology texts all mentioned parsimony (OR) in the first chapter as being a guideline.
ALSO worth mentioning now that I think of it, my biology book hammered home the idea, in chapter 1, when, mind you, the student hasn't read anything else in the book yet and isn't equipped to argue against it,
that increasing complexity is what's responsible for emerging phenomena. It's obvious they were taking a jab at intelligent design, probably rightly so, but c'mon. The point is that yes, there is dogma, and a philosophical choice that (some) scientists choose to make, even if it's wrong.
We got some philosophers in here! Woo.
>>719488957
scientists do not use ockams razor, pseudointellectuals who want to sound like they understand what they dont use it.
outside of logic and perhaps mathematics, philosophy is not part of science, therefore it could not be used to consider metaphysical concepts.
its not cherry picking, its pointing out the flaws of your reasoning.
>>719489882
yes, some individual scientists do refuse to admit when they are wrong, it's hard to admit to oneself that what they have been working on the better part of their professional life is wrong, but science does not follow an individuals dogma, it's a community that's constantly trying to prove itself wrong to make sure as a whole they get it as correct as possible with the resources available.
>>719483623
Holy fuck was that hard, still to autistic to understand?
>>719489132
so you're saying cities work like brains, and the universe works like a city, so the universe is a brain and that brain is God?
learn some cognitive science, and get at least some idea of how the mind works, instead of making airy false comparisons
I am the father of God and I know God my lovely son is an atheist!
>>719490923
Cause I'm still two autistic to use proper forms of to, too, and two