Prove your not underage.
You're*
>>719266113
6/2 = 3
1+2 = 3
3+3 = 3
1. PEMDAS you retards.
>>719266113
6/2(1+2) = ?
6/2(3) = ?
3(3) = ?
9 = 9
Check em
Lets finish this now, the order is:
Brackets/Parenthesis
Exponents/Orders
Multiplication/Division
Addition/subtraction
This means the problem goes
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/2*3
3*3
9
>>719266317
>>719266316
>>719266408
OP of this 4chan thread, you 3 are INCORRECT. Please re-read the question and re-submit your question by making a new reply or editing your original reply to this thread. If you cant answer this question, turn 180 degrees and LEAVE this thread.
>>719266692
If you type 6÷2(3) into a calculator, Google or WolframAlpha, the input has to be parsed and then computed. All of these will first convert the parentheses into an implied multiplication. The expression becomes the following.
6÷2(3)
= 6÷2×3
According to the order of operations, division and multiplication have the same precedence, so the correct order is to evaluate from left to right. First take 6 and divide it by 2, and then multiply by 3.
6÷2×3
= 3×3
= 9
This gets to the correct answer of 9.
Faggot
Answer is 1. Same retards from the golden ball thread in here saying 9
1+2=3
3x2=6
6÷6=1
Awsr 1
good and happy tuesday for everyone & THANK ME later for the pic haha
>>719266113
It's 1 because 2(1+2) is a term,. So it basically is treated as parenthesized and must be solved first.
>>719266113
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1
>>719266806
Graduate high school before you chime in, would you? Look up implied multiplication, you simple minded shitbird.
>>719267552
You should perform multiplication and division in order they are noted, from left to right, and not random
Been here since '04, I was 15 back then. You do the math.
>>719266113
>>719266999
Nothing has changed much on /b/ I see...
ADS GET!
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9
PEMDAS should more accurately be PE(MD)(AS). MD and AS are grouped as a singular function performed left to right.
>>719267768
It's a term, so in PEMDAS, you need to solve the parenthesis (including all distribution), then continue down the list. In this case, you add 1 and 2, again with P, still on P you distribute and multiply by 3, and get 6. Then you move down to M and D, and divide 6 by 6 to get 1.
>>719266113
It's 7. First, you need to distribute the 2 to 1 and 2, making the equation then 6/2+4. Then 6/2 = 3 + 4 = 7.
>>719266199
facepalm.jpg
>>719266113
6÷6
>>719266113
sdfsa
6/2(1+2) Im in adv calculus. Always do parenthesis first= 6/2(3). And then use pemdas again for the division. 6/2= 3. 3(3). The correct answer: 9. To all those who disagree, you are wrong.
This thread is cancer
>>719268134
>>719268134
You dont distribute this equation. You must go by PARENTHESIS,EXPONENTS,MULTIPLY,DIVIDE,ADD,SUBTRACT. A proper use for distributive: 2(4x+5)^2.
9 because multiplication and division are equal in pemdas and you go from left to right in a situation like this
>>719267552
this is the answer theres nothing else to discuss
spidey thread ?
>>719268952
this guy gets it
>>719266113
>>719257485
>Already home
>Shower
>Remember feminism still exists, Calm the rage
>Eat
>"Who am I to the people around me?"
>Lie down
>"Where am I in 5 years?
>Brush teeth
>"Damn, there's too many people on the planet"
>Bed
>"Too much of my personal info is on databases
>Stare at black ceiling until unconscious
>>719266113
Easy it's 2/3
>>719266113
Order doesn't matter. Divided by 2 means 1/2. Do whatever you want first, you'll get the same answer.
6÷2 (1+2)
6÷2+4
3+4
7
>>719266113
I've never felt so retarded in my life. It's 9
>>719267973
Appropriate approach is
6/2 (1+2)
6/2 (3)
18/2
9
As the original question is what is 6 2nths of 3
>>719267590
There's more than two genders! Look up implied genders, birdshit.
>>719266113
I know I'm ruining the point, but the way the question is written makes things too unclear. No self respecting math nerd would write the question like that (though I'm not a math nerd and I'm definitely not self respecting). You should either throw that six on top and use a line instead of division sign OR just use brackets to seperate the 6/2 from the 1+2.
>>719268072
No.
6/2(1+2)=
6/2*3=
3*3=
9
>>719270188
>>719270345
> then you have to do the *, because it's a rule.
No, it is not rule. The rule is to perform multiplications and divisions from left to right. You have to divide 6 by two first, becse it is leftier.
>>719270188
What a great argument.
>>719267590
You're a fucking retard lol
6
------ = 1
2(1+2)
OR
6
--- (1+2) = 9
2
>>719266113
6/2 + 12/2
6/2 = 3
12/2 = 6
3 + 6 = 9
it's 9
>looking through replies
>cant believe how much dumber people got over the past decade
>cant solve a second grade math problem
6/2(1+2)
6/2*(1+2)
6/2*(3)
6/2*3
3*3
9
>>719267590
American "education", ladies and gentlemen
>>719273082
OMG this guy is so right
>>719273273
thats americans for you buddy
>>719273273
why would you do
>6/2*(3)
>6/2*3
>>719266113
6/2(1+2)=1
PEMDAS NIGGAS
>>719273393
because i wanted to show literal step by step
>>719266113
POTATO!
YAY! I WIN!
>>719267892
no calc fag the fraction would be
6/2(1+2)
bitch
>>719272445
not OR
the top one it is
>>719273436
>PEMDAS
oh brother
simplifiy: 6/2(3)
re-symbolize: 6 / 2 * 3
multiplication and division have same precedence, so you go from left to right: 6/2=3, 3*3=9
git gud https://betterexplained.com/
>>719273629
THE PARENTHESIS ARE NOT COMPLETE UNTIL YOU MULTIPLY THEM
MULTIPLY THE 2*3 FIRST
>>719266113
Is it a 1st grade?
has anyone noticed that there is no ÷ symbol on a standard keyboard?
through my years in college ive never used a ÷ symbol.
>>719273925
Same, but I'm not murrican. And I was really surprised, when turns out that nobody use «×» as multiply symbol, just dot.
>>719273868
W-what is that in the background exactly?
So its six divided by two, which equals three times the sum of one plus two, which is three? So basically its three times three? Fuck off with this basic shit faggot.
This won't prove ur underage or not, just whether you are in elementary school or not.
>>719274090
Nothing.
Wait, it's 9, not 1.
>>719266113
>your
>>719266113
/b/tards dont realize pemdas could be spelled pedmas pemdsa pedmsa :/
>>719275363
underage
>>719266113
Priorities, fag.
6/2.(1+2)
6/(2.1+2.2)
6/6
1
>>719275228
Just curious what does the "P" in pemdas/ padmas etc stand for? where I went to school we had Bedmas
>>719275848
pkek
>>719275848
Parenthesis, instead of brackets
It's a shitty question. Is it supposed to be (6÷2)(1+2) or 6÷(2(1+2))? Write it the correct way and then try again, faggot.
6/2(2+1)
Substitute (2+1) for (x)
6/2(x)
Parentheses still present (Note 2(x) is not 2*x)
6/(2x)
6/6
1
>>719266113
i'm posting on 4chan, therefore i am not underage
>only person in thread who read the question
>>719266113
Somebody has samefagged this thread really hard
THE ANSWER IS 1
>>719266113
6/2(1+2)
3*(1+2)
4+2
6
Where's the challenge?
The answer is fucking 9!!! I'm sick of seeing this shit. It's 9! 9, 9, 9, 9, 9!!!!
Answer is 30 to the 72nd power
>>719277323
Are you a complete retard?
>>719277835
obvious bait is obvious
>>719266193
6 / 2 = 3
3 * 1 = 3
3 * 2 = 6
3 + 6 = 9
YOU FUCKING NIGGER
>>719267351
2(1+2) is not a term in the expression.
6÷2(1+2) is a term.
>>719268072
The whole thing is one term shit for brains. When you distribute (which is asinine when you have something as simple to put together as "1+2") you distribute "6÷2" not just "2"
>>719268697
You CAN distribute this, but I wouldn't recommend it.
>>719273701
OY DIPSHIT! You don't multiply the "2*3", you multiply the "6÷2*3". Also, the parentheses are complete once you have fully simplified them. They don't have any priority outside of themselves.
>>719276914
>6/2(2+1)
>Substitute (2+1) for (x)
>6/2(x)
Interesting approach, where are you going with this?
>Parentheses still present (Note 2(x) is not 2*x)
While the parentheses are still present, you have done everything within them that you can do. You are done with them. Now you go from left to right with multiplication and division. Also, 2(x) is functionally the same as 2*x.
>>719266999
if you want to seem even the slightest bit convincing post this stupid shit on a thread that's relevant
Fuckin degenerates get mathed niggers
>>719266408
Why dont follow what you just said, multiplication before division
6/2*3
6/6
1
>>719278246
fuck off smartypants your not the boss of me you cunt
6/2(1+2) = 9
Too Too Roo mother fuckers
I wish discussions happened like this in school over a fucking math equation
>>719266193
/Thread
>>719269098
kek
>>719278419
It makes it easier to tell what you are mad about when you indicate which of the people I am responding to you actually are.
>>719266113
The answer is 1.
It's 6 OVER 2(1 + 2)
The formatting is ambiguous .
>OP
>the answer is...
>both 1 & 9
>this thread is bait lmao
>troll.gif
>>719266113
Easy. The answer is idgaf, since I've been out of high school for over a decade now.
>>719279384
>the only true answer
1!
ok anons
it's time to stop replying to this thread
>really, stop now
>>719266408
>>719266317
>>719266806
>>719267610
>>719267973
>>719268952
Dumbasses. Whats sadder is they think they are correct.
It's 1 you inbred fucks.
>>719266113
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPe1aBW_YCg
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/2*3
6/6= 1
>>719280074
except its actually nein
1. What the Fuck is wrong with people on here it's like you're all retarded or something
Answer is 1 for anyone who's never seen this thread before
>>719280213
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ
Calculation method was changed in 1917. Newton would've answered, "1".
>>719266113
6÷2(1+2)
6÷2/(1+2)
6÷2/(3)
6÷~.667
9
>>719277474
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoMgnJDXd3k
>>719266927
This use ur brains faggots order of operations
>>719268409
I agree its 9, but do you really have to be in advanced calculus to know this shit? why would that give you more reason to be right?
>>719266113
6 ÷ 6 (3x2) = 1
>>719266199
>>719266317
>>719266408
>>719266692
>>719266806
>>719266890
>>719266927
>>719267351
>>719267552
>>719267973
>>719268409
>>719269098
>>719268952
>>719269695
>>719269777
>>719270020
>>719270160
>>719270078
>>719270328
>>719272445
>>719273216
>>719273273
>>719273393
>>719273436
>>719273868
>>719275400
>>719275722
>>719276914
>>719277032
>>719277323
>>719277474
>>719278208
>>719278246
>>719278415
>>719278427
>>719278446
>>719278706
>>719278851
>>719279763
>>719280074
>>719280217
>>719280972
>>719282412
>>719283331
>>719283331
6 ÷ 6 (3x2) = 6 ÷ 36
>>719284086
>bait in 1080p
>300x168
>>719278415
>being this fucking dense
if you face 6/2*3, multiplication and dividing it's on the same importance level, so you calculate it as you read, that means from left to right
faggot
>>719266113
6/2(1+2)
6/2*3
6/6 = 1
>>719266113
everybody saying anything else than 9
>eternal BTFO
1
Seriously, PEMDAS.