Here's a thousand year old loli for you
Says the person sexualizing animals.
I bet you fuck dogs too.
I just found out about this...thought i'd share
comments are pretty funny
Children aren't lolis, stop lying to yourself pedo scum
It's not like there was a close up of her cunny. If anything it's been digitally censored
>that first pic is clearly sexual
You're imagining things. Children cannot be sexual.The idea of putting her into a "sexual pose" is more of a commentary on sexual poses than an attempt to sexualize the child. If anything it desexes her by highlighting the lack of sexual characteristics.
oh fuck me, here we go again
are you saying they can?
Teenagers and children are different things.
Remember, shitposters feed on attention, and the only cure is starvation.
So long as you're not a pedophile I doubt they'd come back to bite you.
Well you're objectively incorrect. They don't have any sexual characteristics and sex with them is functionally purposeless.
Go back to lurking, it's all you're good for
>the creampie'd nekomimi in the bg oh lawd
It's correct in every sense. What are you talking about?
so now you're saying it's correct, you must be baiting
listen, kids can be sexy, period
Yes I am saying that my statement that children do not have any sexual characteristics is correct. How is that bait?
Kids cannot be sexy. You can stick a sexy butt and sexy boobs on a kid but the kid won't be sexy, the boobs and butt will.
Wasn't the actual creepy art in Podesta's house?