Loli Thread
Tied up teen edition.
http://doujin.pomfpomf.moe/info/?id=450
>>718601674
>loli
>teen
huh?
>>718602751
He probably doesn't want toddlercon
>>718602751
Here's a thousand year old loli for you
Isnt this pedophilia? Get help
any doujin?
>>718602847
Sauce?
>>718603232
Says the person sexualizing animals.
I bet you fuck dogs too.
>>718604561
DAAAAAAAAYYYYUUUUUMMMM
>>718604561
>>718605261
>>718603232
>degenerates disliking other degenerate things
>4chan
>>718606050
>>718606126
>>718603442
Looks like HoneySelect to me.
I just found out about this...thought i'd share
https://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/brooke-shields-by-gary-gross/#comments
comments are pretty funny
>>718606614
theres some other sites hosting those images, all with similar text
>>718607058
I know...it honestly kinda baffles me that they aren't considered illegal
>>718607234
It honestly kinda baffles me that you come to 4chan.
>>718607234
its art, quite a few other things like that
>>718606614
Oh shit.
I'm on a list now?
>>718606614
Huh, I did not know this was a thing. Then again I forgot she existed.
>>718607377
I never said I was disgusted faggot, I'm just surprised
>>718607412
that first pic is clearly sexual
>>718607510
doubtful, look at how many comments there are
the pictures have been there since 2009
>>718607977
Pettanko =/= loli
>>718601191
die pedophiles
>>718608448
nah...so many more chil...i mean loli's to play wit
>>718606614
Hahaha holy shit
>>718608448
I agree, long live lolicons
>>718606614
I can already feel the FBI watching me.
>>718608844
Children aren't lolis, stop lying to yourself pedo scum
>>718609015
>>718607234
It's not like there was a close up of her cunny. If anything it's been digitally censored
>>718607552
>that first pic is clearly sexual
You're imagining things. Children cannot be sexual.The idea of putting her into a "sexual pose" is more of a commentary on sexual poses than an attempt to sexualize the child. If anything it desexes her by highlighting the lack of sexual characteristics.
>>718609101
fuck off faggot
>>718609128
>Children cannot be sexual
>>718609128
So many teen whores have like 500k followers on IG by exploiting their bodies, what kind of lie is this?
>>718609128
oh fuck me, here we go again
>>718606614
Dare I save these images?
>>718609317
are you saying they can?
>>718609325
Teenagers and children are different things.
>>718610028
yes, they can
>>718609414
Remember, shitposters feed on attention, and the only cure is starvation.
>>718609630
So long as you're not a pedophile I doubt they'd come back to bite you.
>>718610128
Well you're objectively incorrect. They don't have any sexual characteristics and sex with them is functionally purposeless.
>>718610644
Go back to lurking, it's all you're good for
>the creampie'd nekomimi in the bg oh lawd
>>718610644
>Well you're objectively incorrect. They don't have any sexual characteristics
maybe in the technical sense of the word, but not in the usual sense
>>718610962
rude
>>718611156
It's correct in every sense. What are you talking about?
>>718611397
kill yourself
how are any of these cartoon drawing any different from the art inside of ping pong pizza?
>>718611397
so now you're saying it's correct, you must be baiting
listen, kids can be sexy, period
>>718611852
Go back to r/the_donald with you own kind
Shitting intensifies
Shit does what shit needs to do
>>718612042
Yes I am saying that my statement that children do not have any sexual characteristics is correct. How is that bait?
Kids cannot be sexy. You can stick a sexy butt and sexy boobs on a kid but the kid won't be sexy, the boobs and butt will.
>>718611852
Wasn't the actual creepy art in Podesta's house?
Oh man I can't believe you're living off your own shit, man!
>>718612667
what? who is?