Watch thread

File: 1482356171831.jpg (166KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1024x1024px

>reddit thread

File: IMG_7575.jpg (2MB, 2448x3058px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3058px

I don't row anymore.

And I don't wear that watch anymore.

>>718244187
Why?

File: 0b5da101908d1b990d7d2b0b3687ddb7.jpg (46KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 550x413px

>>718243805
>Wrist fedora thread

File: 6f28385810e0795be070c9f6509015c7.jpg (490KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 800x600px

Skx007

>>718244637
Wtf?

>>718244637
That's a cool watch... If you're 7.

File: R0005889.jpg (871KB, 1200x793px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1200x793px

current collection

I want a WW2 watch :(

Bulova A10 or an UHR

File: WatchCloseUp[1].jpg (54KB, 640x552px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x552px

You fags jealous?

>>718247177
No

File: 20161130_143141.jpg (978KB, 1464x2640px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 1464x2640px

>>718243805
>quartz

>>718244187
gshock lel

>>718244480
smartwatch kys

>>718244637
autismshock

>>718245399
>divers watch
>probably doesnt even dive
>nor does he know '200m' isn't actually 200m depth.
also seiko divers watch lel

>>718246896
actually cool vintage collection

>>718247177
got that out of a cereal box?

>>718247800
not sure about japanese watches nowadays man..


Get some real watches, faggots.
>pic related

File: 20161207_104337.jpg (1MB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1494x2656px

>>718248235
>more related stuff

>>718248235
>going for the constant and not the constantin

When will plebs ever learn?

File: 20161207_104346.jpg (922KB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 1494x2656px

>>718248345
Love the caseback on the Zenith.

File: 20161214_121036.jpg (1MB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1494x2656px

>>718248468
>wants to compare VC with frederique
>ayy lamo
Gtfo man, I barely started posting my collection.

>>718248683
Don't lie. Those are all your customers' watches.

File: 20161025_150742.jpg (1MB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1494x2656px

>>718248468
>>718248345
Also, you are allowed to drool over my El Primero.
Or my GP, even though it's not that much.

File: 20161025_144303.jpg (809KB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

809KB, 1494x2656px

>>718249110
No, my costumers' watches are actually a lot more expensive. Most of them are Rolex, which is in my opinion too mainstream. Not fond of Rolex style, I do like their movements though. The Zenith I posted is probably the most expensive one I own atm.

Here, last one I'm posting from my collection.

>>718248235
>>718248345
>>718248475
>>718249182
Reminds me of people who think they are superior for owning fedoras

pathetic m8

>>718249589
The only watch worth posting ITT.

>owning expensive watches
>owning a fedora
Choose one, and one only.

>>718249950
>>718249637

File: 20161026_142456.jpg (1MB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1494x2656px

>>718249758
Bonus pic for you, anon.

File: Capture.jpg (369KB, 1628x691px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1628x691px

Honest opinions?

File: 11823924_1214849901875595_26709613_n.jpg (86KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 720x960px

>>718250783
shit tier $10 watches parading as luxury

1st Datejust

>>718250783
>designer brands
They probably have a ~15 dollar quartz movement in them. I wouldn't recommend going for these types of brands. Try Tissot or Junghans. If you don't have that big of a budget, try Citizen or Seiko. Anything better than designer brands mate.

File: 11843975_1214919361868649_771556180_n.jpg (62KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 720x960px

>>718250783
Instead of buying 3 of those dogshit watches spend the money on a brand like Omega, and if it's out of your budget, go for Seiko.

>>718243805
>watch bigger than our wrist.
Yea naw, it's going to look like shit. You're an idiot.

File: 11693226_1199696830057569_1750688234_n.jpg (58KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 720x960px

>>718251178
2nd datejust

>>718251149
Absolute truth. Automatic or bust. Quartz watches that are over $100 are a damn joke

>>718251075
Nice, always fond of Rolex movements. Not so much the designs they go by though.

>>718251178
>and if it's out of your budget, go for Seiko.
Mah nigga. >>718251149

>>718251308
>Absolute truth. Automatic or bust.
Only downside is that Quartz movements keep time a lot better than Mechanical movements. Something like 0.25s a year? Compared to mechanical movements that mostly have a +-3 sec a day differential if properly adjusted.

>>718251149
>>718251075
Bah, fuck. My budget would be around $200 USD, what brand you think I should go for then?

>>718251569
Seiko probably has the widest range of choice for that price. Should definitely check it out.

File: Screenshot 2017-01-09 at 1.06.48 pm.jpg (456KB, 1164x1438px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1164x1438px

>>718251340
i'm not anymore fond of the designs I chose for them. I am aiming towards this one now (not mine) and probably going to fuck off the other two. The movements are beautiful though, the watches are 40 years old and running like new

>>718251569
seiko

>>718251543
and your phone keeps better time than any wearable watch, and digitals do better than quartz. It doesn't matter. There's no beauty or complexity to it. And the fact that automatics are kinetic and the sweeping hand looks great is nice.

>>718251869
Awesome, thanks man. I really never got into understanding the value of watches. I had no idea that quartz was considered so terrible. I'll check them out right now for sure, thanks!

>>718243805
Watches? Lol. You know it's 2017, right?

File: Girard-Perregaux-1966-blue-dial-13.jpg (224KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1200x795px

>>718251898
Slick looking Rolex. Rolex are known for their calibre movements in the watchmakers world, not so much for the mainstream image they have among buyers.

And true, I love watches for their complexity and mechanisms. The sole reason I started watchmaking.

This is the watch I eventually want to go for, but atm a bit out of my price range as it's ~13k. Not on top of my priority list now.
Also looking for a nice minute repeater with moonphase and chronograph. My zenith was close to being that. too bad it doesn't have a minute repeater. Would have made it the perfect watch.

>>718252023
they're not terrible as long as you're not dropping over $100 on them. Those watches you own are $10 watches masquerading as $300+ watches. It basically looks like 'look what I can afford, but it's not much' as opposed to a seiko which is just a good, not show off watch. Then you have Omega, Rolex , Patek etc which are very good watches but they're also show offy.

>>718252023
>I had no idea that quartz was considered so terrible.
Quartz isn't so much terrible. It's mainly the fact that they sell a watch for 100-200 dollar/euro when the case itself is worth ~30 and the movement is worth ~15. You literally pay for the brand, not the quality.

Mechanical watches don't come by cheap. There are some exceptions. Gotta say that chinese mechanical movements are improving last few years. Take a look on Alibaba.

>>718252083
You reek of underage, go play with your iPhone.

>>718249637
>>718249950
>whyicantgetgirlsinsteadofthesechadsthisissounfairmybackhurtsyouarefaggotsforwearingstufflikethatpleasedontinfringemythoughtsonlifereererereREREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

get out.

>>718252435
I'll stick to Seiko then, don't have the funds to throw more than $500 on a watch unfortunately.

File: IMG_20160220_162935.jpg (1006KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 3264x2448px

I use a Citizen Eco-Drive Skyhawk

>>718252706
>bmw
>tag
Just no. Anything but tag if you go for a good watch.

File: tmp_24498-2ee1617603578.gif (219KB, 600x719px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 600x719px

Ah, a fine selection of le wrist fedoras.

Good day to you gentlemen!

>>718252768
Not bad, but I bet you could have gotten a better, mechanical, one for the same price. What'd you pay for it?

File: 20161227_131951.jpg (756KB, 1632x1224px) Image search: [Google]

756KB, 1632x1224px

>>718244637
I like this - not on me but I like this.

>>718245399
Nice one. There's a cashier in my supermarket who must be into watches too, and he has this exact combo iirc.

>>718246896
Very cool, all of them, no exception.

>>718248345
Good looking one. I'm a big fan of the Jaeger perpetual calendar that looks like it, I just look at it through the window.

>>718250783
The other posters are being too generous. The quartz movement is less than 1 euro, and the case/bracelet must be close to 1 euro too.
Since you're willing to put money into watches, and you like trendy designs, look at Tissot indeed.

>>718252768
Not my style as all, but the dial is cool. I'd actually wear one with the dial even more clustered, I saw a pic once, loved how over the top it was.

>>718253403
fake

>>718253256
>Good looking one.
Thanks, my Zenith El Primero is my little baby.

Odd collection you got btw. A lot of different things going on.

File: watch.jpg (410KB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1224x1632px

Current daily wear.

Omega is on the cards though, always wanted one.

File: casio_edifice.jpg (98KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1000x1000px

Bought the other day. Needed something easy to see in relative darkness. Cheap, seems like a good value.

>>718253403
>>718253663
Most definitely a fake indeed. A pretty good fake though.

>>718252706
That's not even good looking, it's just LOOK AT ME!!!!!1

A watch should be appreciated when it's noticed, it shouldn't scream for attention, because that's what niggers do.

>>718246896
Don't like the middle one tbh, the others are cool though. Gotta say though, you have the taste of my grandfather

>>718254038
>That's not even good looking
People buy watches for personal use, therefore personal preference is a huge thing.

>A watch should be appreciated when it's noticed
People appreciate watched for a lot of different things.
Some use it to survive, to dive, to simply keep time or if you are a watchmaker like me you do it for the complexity and movements.
As long you don't buy a designer brand watch with a quartz movement (actually quartz in general) you should be fine if you also got what you appreciate about watches.

>it shouldn't scream for attention, because that's what niggers do.
First day on 4chan?

File: zodiac autographic, 1954, OTAN.jpg (453KB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1224x1632px

>>718253748
Originally I wanted one of each type (one digital, one diver, one swiss, etc, all the types you could think of).
What you see is the result of no money, mostly.

My end goal is to have 5 watches maximum, but that would last a lifetime and fit every situation.

>>718253956
Looks really good with the tame 4 numerals.

File: patek-philippe-replica.jpg (172KB, 704x560px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 704x560px

>>718248345
Dont have the money to buy
>Pic related

File: dsc211216.jpg (171KB, 848x636px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 848x636px

got it for my birthday

>>718254413
>Originally I wanted one of each type (one digital, one diver, one swiss, etc, all the types you could think of).
Makes sense.
Love the Zodiac, looks a lot like my Cyma Cymaflex.

>>718254386
My winding watch always gave me a headache it was always was too fast. I demagnitized it multiple times and it's still has the same issue. Quartz may not be as elegant but it works and works well

>>718253139
I paid like $600 mxn ($25 usd) 3 years ago. But here in mexico is a lot of money just for a watch. the price in our stores is about a $6000 mxn ($282.768 usd)

Do you have to have some sort of contact to buy a Rolex?

What if I want to buy a Rolex Presidential watch, do I just call them up and place an order or do I have to be selected or something like that?

How do you even know what the prices are for various watches from Rolex?

File: jlc_image.1434826.jpg (223KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1024x768px

>>718254462
No you didn't. Nice try cutting out the watermark.

>http://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf.forumpost/fi-2/ti-567556/pi-3512241/
Here's the real owner.

>>718254462
Nice as art. Tough for some of us to read.

>>718253256
I'll take the far right one from upper row

>>718243805
Nixon is such bullshit. garden variety shit with quasi quality price.

>>718254839
>My winding watch always gave me a headache it was always was too fast. I demagnitized it multiple times and it's still has the same issue.

Demagnetizing doesn't prevent this. You need to change the position of the balance regulator.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMQdXAZm044
This vid might explain it, haven't watched it. But seemed like it would explain it for you, can't be arsed to do it myself without visuals.

File: Raketa petite seconde.jpg (716KB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 1224x1632px

>>718255277
Oh yes it's a cute one. The dial has relief, too. But it makes so much noise, I can't sleep with it in the same room.

>>718254839
>>718255449
At around 11 minutes she explains it if I'm right.

>>718255449
Oh shit thanks

>>718255590
I felt it when I saw it. Watches with a bold tick are beauty but can't stand it for a long time either.

Anyone else with questions about watches? I'm open for a few min before I leave the thread.

File: 20160421_0dd436.jpg (136KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 600x600px

>>718243805
cheap watch but i like minimalism and im not trying to look like a 50 year old pimp

>>718256155
>cheap plastic dial
>shit material straps
>probably has an equal shitty 10 dollar quartz movement in it
>cases for watches like this are always heavy to make it seem like it's not just air and cheap materials you are wearing
Please hang yourself, you clearly have no clue about whats on your wrist. Also the sizes of those things are an indication of shit watches. You should try to look on the inside of those watches and see how shit they are for yourself. You should consider yourself lucky if they didnt glue the whole thing shut.

Look at some proper watches, mechanical ones preferably. Seiko, Tissot, Maurice Lacroix etc..

>>718256406
Fucking hell man, fucking moisturise.

File: download.jpg (11KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 259x194px

>>718251075
I'm sorry, but you really seem an expert. I always wanted to start collecting watches. Would this be good first buy or taste shit tier?

>>718256897
kek

File: 0bae9481b0f94f31a1baaa9bbed42ac9.jpg (327KB, 1536x1152px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1536x1152px

>>718256794
lol

>>718256406
>but i like minimalism
Try looking for 'dress watches'. Those are mostly pretty stylish and minimalistic. It's not an excuse to roll with a shitty quartz one though. Try considering an upgrade. Maybe Cyma Cymaflex is something for you.

>>718243805
Why do you fags where watches when your phone can tell you what time it is?

>>718257168
>dress watches
not my style. either way im happy with a shitty watch quality wise as long as it works and it doesnt ruin my wallet.

>>718257170
The same reason you buy shoes.

>>718256984
Not the guy you replied to but the other guy (watchmaker).
Bulova is definitely a good choice. They are making a comeback past few years. Taste though is all personal preference.

What are you gonna look for in your collection?

>>718257170
"where"
fuck man get a hs diploma

>>718257016
>owning not just one, but four g-shocks
G-Shocks are overpriced as fuck. You seem to know jack shit about watches.

File: IMG_9871.jpg (169KB, 614x576px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 614x576px

>>718257767
right right

File: 41f03c8d02f97bc770f6e34af71861fb.jpg (25KB, 470x399px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 470x399px

>>718257529
I like mechanical watches. Especially if they're from a war. I'd like an A10, b-uhr, u-boot, type-a. Maybe a bit of these hugh end ones anon has one day when I stop being a neet. Currently own this. Not mine, its somewhere now and im in bed.
Its crap but i like the design and tribute

File: 1465927755092.png (64KB, 537x537px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 537x537px

>>718257170
It's considered acceptable jewellery for men.

The watch won't die after 8 hours of usage.

It is slightly more convenient than pulling your phone from your pocket.

It gives you, or other people something to look at.

File: img54.jpg (47KB, 490x465px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 490x465px

>>718253403
What a terrible knockoff.

>>718258118
And plz don't rag on me because most of these are nazi lel

Hugo Boss did design their gear

My dad has a bunch of breitlings and breils

>>718257713
>>718257713
Kek wow I am retarded. Almost as retarded as you fags with you're expensive watches.

>>718258497
It looks like that piece has many fine stories it could tell

>>718258681
funny you believe shit on chan
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

>>718258863
So you guys really don't like watches?

File: watch.jpg (1013KB, 1815x2420px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 1815x2420px

I bought this because some anon helped me find it off a guys wrist from a porn pic on a thread here a week or two ago.. retard never added me on steam so I couldn't give him the game I said I would.

If you're out there add me fucker, I already bought the shit.

File: watch.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>718243805
gf got me movado for Christmas

File: kZdnaKX.jpg (675KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 900x1200px

>>718258936
no one really posting pics of their own watches
see here is another one

>>718258681
Yeah every self respecting man wears a rubber wrist bands and beach kiosk bead bracelets

File: I need that shit.png (915KB, 790x792px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 790x792px

>>718259044
pic in question

>>718253256
>pros in the corner
What you write homie

>>718258041
Right.
Come back when you gained a little bit more knowledge about watch movements. Keep paying ~250 for your G-Shocks. Production value of those watches are ~20. You pay for the fact that it's mainstream. People know about it, therefore are more willing to buy it because other people will recognize it. People like you rather walk in a shitty watch that everyone knows than a 10k watch that people wouldnt even glance at for one sec because they don't know the brand.
Insecurities much?

>pic related
>my 8.5k Zenith El Primero
Another pic I got of it. Pretty complex movement as it has a chronograph along with a moonphase dial, day/date/month dial and automatic rotor (which is obvious).

File: ahhhhhhhh.jpg (299KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 2048x1152px

>>718259310
shut your whore mouth

File: 20161207_104343.jpg (949KB, 1494x2656px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 1494x2656px

>>718259310
Wew, forgot image.

File: IMG_1087.jpg (27KB, 750x158px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 750x158px

My watch.

>>718259392
Looks like a fucking beyblade collection. Kill yourself.

File: 131_1000.jpg (233KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1000x750px

24K g-shock motherfuckers!
to the watch aficionado.
Your an asshole, I bet you collect dildos.
OP only started this thread to fuck with you faggots.

>>718259490
Thats a clock, not a watch.

File: 1451181923002.jpg (26KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 480x480px

>>718259482
how do you read this

>>718258590
>And plz don't rag on me because most of these are nazi lel
Do you know where you are?

File: watch 2.jpg (734KB, 1815x2420px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 1815x2420px

>>718259044
>>718259117

also have this slick movado but the band broke and when I sent it to them they wanted almost a grand to fix it... fuckin shitshow. really need to get it fixed though, love the thin look.

>>718259614
it doesnt matter he doesnt know how to tell the time on a regular watch anyway

>>718259044
Is that mathematics you're working on?

>>718259614
It's the open caseback.
Here's the front... >>718248345

>>718259614
You turn it around

>>718259310
>moonphase
Woweee, FAGGOT

>>718259725
super accurate at telling time I bet

My dream watch is a Panerai PAM 111

File: 1363898956304.jpg (80KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 413x395px

>>718259725
>they wanted almost a grand to fix it
It can probably be fixed for less than 45, not sure as I cannot see if it's just pushpins or actually part of the case or if it's ceramic. Still though. Top fucking kek to whoever tried to scam you for a grand. Fucking lel.

>>718259101
I will admit they are pretty cool, and ever since I was a child I was fascinated by all of the gears and intricacies. Too bad I'm a pleb and never got into them.

>>718259777
Trying to pass the series 7, shit's gay but kinda neat. Also doing my nails so I don't hurt myself when I finger my ass.

File: IMG_1499.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>718259725
Take better care of your watches jesus

File: IMG_0074.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

Most reliable thing I got

>>718259565
Kek

File: trole.png (124KB, 377x700px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 377x700px

>>718259842
This is you.

File: 0000.jpg (92KB, 345x345px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 345x345px

Best watch.

>>718260145
Ah.. that sounds painfully dull. You have my sympathies.

>>718254970


>>718254462
got so fucking owned at this time. what is your response, birthday boy?

What's better than quartz and why?

>>718256155
Tell me the watch you have on the left, that's a goodie.

>>718260302
Who says fuck off to a mentally handicapped person though?

File: watch broke.jpg (791KB, 1815x2420px) Image search: [Google]

791KB, 1815x2420px

>>718260059
I know, I couldn't believe that shit. I tried taking it to a local guy but he wouldn't do it.. it was years ago so I should start looking again. It just looks like a pin is broken to me but idk

>>718260407
Not best but I like them.

I have a soft spot early digis have that blocky retro look you can wear unironically these days.

>>718260170
That's a handsome watch. If I can't get this shit fixed for a decent price I'm going for a new movado next. Some of their new designs are gay af tho

File: IMG_2244.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Unique

>>718260543
Radio controlled movements and Atomic movements are better than Quartz at being precise when it comes to keeping time.

Mechanical movements are better than Quartz movements for retaining it's quality, reliability and value. If you take proper care for a mechanical watch, it will still run after 50 years. You probably won't even notice a difference.

Anyone know how good the Sunto Core is? Ones shipping to me now

>>718260940
>Suunto*
Pretty reliable, but worthless if you don't intend to use every function it has on a regular base.

File: Casio-F-91W.gif (377KB, 1024x1364px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1024x1364px

Ok elder watch gods, rolex and patek phillipe people

Am I a lost cause for liking this thing more than some mechanical ones?

File: IMG_1700.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

Isn't she..beautiful?

>>718261370
Personal preference. Though speaking in long term use, mechanical watchers are more reliable and retain their value a lot better.

>>718261900
You are too poor for watches.

>>718261631
I do know that. I love vintage watches. Pocket watches are intruguing too but they are too m'lady for me.

I'm the guy who wants to buy an A10 and jerks off to PAM 111

But it's jst sort of cool.

File: photo_2017-01-08_22-37-57.jpg (67KB, 631x883px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 631x883px

Is This Fake?
Kid I know who doesn't make more than $60k a year keep posting pics of expensive watches. Not sure if fake or trying them on in store.

>>718261631
I do know that. I love vintage watches. Pocket watches are intruguing too but they are too m'lady for me.

I'm the guy who owns the communist Gagarin replica, wants to buy an A10 and jerks off to PAM 111

But it's jst sort of cool.

>>718261900
I posted this. That LG one in the middle is the rarest watch I own.

>>718262074
>Pocket watches are intruguing too but they are too m'lady for me.
Though expensive, Bovet make s beautiful "pocket" wristwatches. But yes, pocket watches are too hipster. Used to be fond of them untill I worked on a few. Very old movements, mostly not even that interesting. Most movements in pocket watchs are like ETA 6497's. Most basic you can go with mechanical watches.

If you like vintage watches, try looking for 50/60's watches. Mostly really nice. It's the overal inspiration for most modern watches.

>>718248235
>>718248345
>thinks he's superior because he owns dogshit swiss memes
>couldn't have picked worse watches
do you not know "Divers 200m" is actual cert?
>>718249182
lmao you literally buy just for the name, with no taste as to what you're actually buying
>>718249589
KEK

Watch n00b here. My price range is 200-300. What are some decent brands in that range and what styles do yall prefer?

File: 5392c89e60f45.png (56KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 512x512px

>>718259482
>my 8.5k el primero
>fake steel plating is rubbing off the pushers
my fucking sides it literally couldn't get more fake
what do you have to gain off of trying to fool anonymous shitposters on /b/?

>>718262194
very fake, rolex cyclopses over the date magnify 2.5x and this one barely raises the font, the hands are super poorly made, unevenly cut, and very overly glossy (usually something you see with horrid paints used by low end fake companies)
>>718263881
in that price range seiko will have something for everything you're looking for, divers, dress, just go to seiko5finder.com and look for something you like

File: watch.jpg (570KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 2448x3264px

Pls r8

>>718260858
Get outta here summer fag

>>718262194
nah that looks legit. rolex explorer 2 ref 216750

>>718248235
lol bet you wish you had an actual piece of horological excellence, so close yet so far

>>718264324
Thank you. You made my night. That dude is annoying and usually full of shit. Next time he makes fun of my Seiko, I'm going to call him out on it.

>>718264324
this guys full of shit. that explorer looks good. the new 42mm explorers have the glossiest hands i've ever seen on a rolex