>Not using the glorious Red Sword
It's like you want to die
>>716567837
The question is, what is my Dex?
What if you are fighting a hoard of enemies with only 1 hp?
>>716567837
>Use the red sword
>Can't parry for shit because of frontal weight
>Single edged only
>Can't even do proper forward jabs because of the autistic way the front is cut out.
You think this is a Cambodian cartoon anon?
Not being a Blue Sword master race bearer
>>716567837
Green dagger is clearly the best
use red, get stun locked, die like fag you are
>>716567837
Depends if you miss
Blue i guess
>>716567837
What possible reason is there for using blue sword?
>>716567837
>implying green sword can't do the same amount of damage as red sword in the same amount of time
>>716570079
Practality, Balance, not being a bitch.
>>716570224
Exactly. Green gives you more control for the same amount of dps
>>716570249
Blue sword isnt significantly powerful and wouldnt feel badass, which is the only thing red sword has going for it. Total waste.
>>716570249
>>716570079
>>716568372
>>716567907
This is all fine and dandy if we're negating defense entirely. If an enemy had even 1 defense point, the green sword wouldn't do anything.
Therefore, blue is best. Red would be effective for a tank to use against a high DEF boss.
Red sword. I assume my strength is super high and I'm bulky, so I can do a shit ton of damage and not get popped instantly for it like some fuckhead Dexterity player would.
Green sword users are squishy fuckheads who need to learn how to be alpha and not die immediately like the cancer they are.
>>716567837
Blue sword is worst sword
>Red
>Deals 50 attack points every 1 speed
>Green
>Deals 1 attack point with 50 speed
>Red and Green sword are equal in damage within the same interval of time of a 1 speed strike
>Blue
>Deals 5 attack points with 10 speed
>5X5 = 25 attack per 1 speed
Green and Red fags need only apply
Take this instead
>>716567837
Lol fuck you guys im a stealth archet
>>716571158
cancer faggot
It depends on whether speed/attack delay are front- or back-loaded. In other words, does your first attack come at time 0, or at time 1/speed? In the first case, red is better (deals 50 damage at the same time green does 1), while in the second case, green is better (deals 49 damage before red deals any).
>>716567837
worst. dildos. ever.
>>716570722
you r retarded
1 interval
Red, one strike 50 dmg = total 50
Blue, ten strikes 5 dmg = total 50
Green, fifty strikes 1 dmg = total 50
output per interval is the same
blue is most balanced
>Red sword
>Round one
>A bunch of mobs with 1hp
>Red sword gets swamped because he can't kill them all fast enough
>Armoured opponents reduce percent of damage
>Loses a fuck ton of damage mean while green loses nothing because it all rounds up to 1 damage.
lol
>not combining red sword with green dagger to make 50 attack at 50 speed
>you arent even trying now
>>716572305
nah, just think about it a bit more, its not 10 times 5
Blue is moving 1/5 the speed as Green, its 5 x 5
>1th strike
5 damage done
>2th strike
10 damage done
>3th strike
15 damage done
>4th strike
20 damage done
>5th strike
>5 strikes equal to the std. 1 interval
25 damage done
c?
>>716567837
>not wanting to die
fuck yourself
>>716572830
So basically OP is mentally handicapped and assumed that this was multiplication straight out and it's not
>>716572830
U fucking retard, speed is how many times you can attack in a second. 10 times at 5 per time is 50. 50 times at 1 per time is 50.
>>716573260
>speed is how many times you can attack in a second
Bitch, it would still be 1/5. Green attacks 50 times a second whilst Blue attacks 10 a second. The ratio holds
>>716573260
>10 times at 5 per time
>time at per time rate
jesus
>>716573408
And each green attack does 1/5 the damage of a blue attack. Idk if were arguing or agreeing
>>716570722
I hope this faggot was trolling otherwise that new math they teach isnt working
>>716567837
Pffft
There is a lot to consider like health, damage blocking etc.
If I have 5 health and the enemy has green sword, before I swing mine I would be dead
If I have the green sword and the enemy has 2 attack blocks, I can't do anything at all
Fkin noobs learn to min/max
>>716573460
5 damage per time, keep up u slow-ass roody-poo
>>716573621
I am heavily intoxicated
>>716567837
They all do 50dps
None have any proc chance like poisons so weapon speed here is irrelevant
None have any 'energy' restrictions so speed and weight are irrelevant to sustained dps
The red sword has the highest downtime if a single attack is parried, dodged or blocked.
>>716573960
You're implying a green sword won't get parried? They attack 50 fucking times and you think they aren't getting parried? Some raggedy ass little dagger that does 1 damage ain't staggering an enemy so the enemy can parry for days.
>>716574067
Imagine 20% parry/dodge chance
>>716567837
Blue sword. Especially for upgrading, you have a few options. I'd choose DPS over Alpha Damage but I would still have more base attack power than Green Sword.
>>716574067
It depends on the rules and the enemy % chance
If dodge is 100% mitigation and parry/block is 30% (Ignoring critical block chance)
Then green is far superior vs dodge (At say 30% dodge chance 100% of red is dodged and only 15% of green per second)
Parry and block should effect all almost evenly, even with critical block
>>716573821
I was a few hours back. Ride that dragon
>>716574487
That last sentience is obviously given a large enough sample size as the red sword has a 70% chance to do full dmg per second, while green will almost always do 70% dmg vs a 30% parry/dodge/block opponent (Roughly)
>>716574487
Those are some good arguments, but I think I'd rather one-shot some faggot with the red sword than get out DPS'd/staggered in the midst of my 50 tiny attacks
>>716574380
I change my mind. Sell Red Sword buy 2 Green Daggers dual wield. 2-100 DPS OP as fuck!
>>716573460
>>716573408
>>716573551
>>716573260
all of you eat my ass
the base is 1 not 50
damage is a relationship between damage and speed
you calculate it by multiplying speed (attacks per base 1) by damage (per attack)
green has 1 damage per attack and 50 attacks per base
while green's speed value is 5 times blue's, the damage output is not. damage output is a function of damage and speed
blue gets ten strikes per red. green gets five strikes per blue
its all fucking 50
its fucking christmas why am i wasting my time on this shit holy god
>>716570028
Enjoy firing 0-3 arrows before your target is cutting a nice whole down your forehead.
Stop watching TV shows and playing video games about bows and arrows. They're effective but not as cool as you think. Slow and can be very hard to aim. And unless you get a real good shot, your target isn't dead either.
It depends on how damage is calculated and on how combat works.
If an enemy with 5 Def subtracts 5 points of damage from every attack that hits it, the green sword is useless against every enemy with any kind of defense investment because it'd do 0 damage all the time.
Conversely, if you'd have to take 50 hits every time you can attack with the red sword, you're probably fucked as well.
>>716568126
/thread
>>716574860
If you can dual wield buy a fucking shield. It already does (roughly) the same damage as the red sword but in tiny increments. If you have a shield you can block anybody trying to interrupt your attacks
>>716570028
This is bullshit because of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEG-ly9tQGk
>>716567837
>/b/ will argue about anything - easy edition
>>716574909
hey man we're all here on christmas u aren't alone we're all fuckin nerds here
>>716567837
Each sword has the same DPS so doesnt matter which you choos faget
Hey guys let's argue about something that isn't clearly defined at all!!!!!!!!!!!1111onetwo
>>716574814
Sure, but if you will be stabbed 50 times for 37.5dps (assuming 30% mitigation) and absolutely preying to land your hit, which will hit for 37.5 or 50 or even miss if dodged. You would need luck of RNG-esus to out burst the consistency of daggers.
>>716575365
Newfag. Fuck out of here or argue with the rest of us retards
>>716567837
It really all depends on the situation, what game you're playing, what the rules are etc.
For example, the red sword would be a bad choice for a lot of little mobs, say, 50 1 hp mobs. But it would be more effective vs something with say, 5 damage reduction each round.
Its a totally nuanced.
>>716575635
I think I'm just too prideful in being a strength-fag in almost every RPG game I play. RNG has treated me well so far
>>716575862
>the dream
When everything lines up and goes your way, A hell of a rush for any Str based class.
>>716576031
And when it doesn't. I suffer a fuck ton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEG-ly9tQGk
eyyyyy, maybe you should stop watching movies ,:^)))))
>>716574987
They are exactly as cool as I think they are being as that is subjective. I'm not amazing or anything, but I'm not too shabby with my recurve. I'd be a whole lot better off with a bow then flailing about with a hunk of metal.
blue sword is best sword.
everything in moderation.
>>716577216
But the fucker swings it at 50 speed too.
>not using the waraxe with 12 attack and 5 speed
l2p
of green blue red, I think the only logical solution is taking blue given we don't know anymore rules about the world (how dodge/parry works, how armor and damage mitigation work, etc). in a world where armor implies flat damage reduction rather than % based, the green dagger is really going to be fucked. in a world where dodge grants complete damage reduction, the red two hander is relying too much on rng and is likely to overkill otherwise anyway, so it's not that efficient. the blue sword is going to give you the best of both worlds and put you in a better spot for whatever the rules of the world/system are.
>>716574987
I have a 78 pound draw longbow and I can accurately shoot about an arrow per second at over 100 yards, stationary (or moving straight at me), and I can easily hit a target at 50-100 yards moving laterally. Doesn't matter how any of the faggots with those weapons are wearing, they'd be dead before they could close the distance. And by historical standards, I'm a fucking pleb of an archer.
>>716567837
the thing is im guessing based off this chart you only have 50 health so the first person to attack will lose to the second person to attack in almost all cases making he second to attack the victor
>>716572481
That's only if you can't hit multiple mobs at a time. Considering the size of the red sword, you could be taking out 10 in one swing
>>716567837
Any armor will absorb more than one damage.
I'm not sure how it works with swords, but in gun games damage > speed, because you start with a loaded gun.
>>716579612
>78 pound bow
>1 arrow/sec
>>716567837
Green sword and ALL OF THE ON HIT EFFECTS
>>716567837
perfect example: danksouls 1 playthrough with smoughs hammer with maxed strength. fucking 1 hit everything.
>>716567837
mathematically they all do the same dps.
however it is reasonable to assume that the 1 attack has a lower range than the other two. i personally would use the red sword, because it counters the shorter ones with an added range.
>>716580629
>Agreed with your post
>Kekked at the filename
>>716580629
jesus, that filename has me in tears
>>716572830
>Typical rogue's mental gymnastics
>>716580629
Sorry, typo, my bow is 68 pounds. Not 78. And my shot is "about" one second, but closer to 1.2 seconds. not that any of this makes a difference when shooting at melee targets coming from a distance... they are dead in any case.
English longbowmen could manage one arrow every 4 seconds on a minimum 130-pound bow, with accuracy, at 200 yards. That's almost twice the distance and draw as my shots on my longbow. I probably would not be accepted as an English longbowman. But it's still more than enough to kill some retard rushing at me with a sword, or to hunt a deer humanely.
>>716570818
Deus Vult Pupper
>>716572830
green sword, dodge you slow niggers and chip you down
>>716581289
fair enough
>>716581444
Trips of truth
>>716570818
Desu Vult pupper
>>716579612
>What is armor
>What is moving side-to-side
>What is a shield or trees or some shit
For that matter, anon, I bet you're also 6'7" with an 13" cock
I like you
>>716567837
I am the Hammer,
I am the edge of His Sword,
I am the tip of His Spear,
I am the mail about His Fist,
I am the flight of His Arrows,
I am the right hand of my Emperor,
I am the instrument of His will,
I am His Sword as He is my Armor,
I am His Wrath and He is my Zeal,
I am the Bane of His Foes and the Woes of the Treacherous,
Let us be His Shield,
Let us speak His Word as He fuels the Fire of Devotion,
Let us fight His Battles, as He fights the Battle at the end of time,
And let us join Him there, for Duty ends not in Death,
In Vengeance be true, In Valor be Strong,
I am the Hammer,
I am the Sword,
I am the Spear,
I am the Shield,
I am the soldier at the End of Time.
>>716581444
Repeating digits confirm green swords/daggers are the master race of blades.
>>716581625
>What is armor
Ineffective against a longbow, that's what. I might not pierce the heaviest of platemail with my lower poundage bow, but I could literally stroll away from that guy and he'd never catch me. And keep firing arrows till I hit a joint.
>What is moving side-to-side
Deer do that, much better than people do. But I still manage to eat plenty of venison.
>What is a shield or trees or some shit
>shield
They don't hold up, unless they're thick metal. And in that case, see the first part of this response.
>trees
See the second part of the response. If I'm not retarded, when hunting deer or shooting melee attackers, I will pick a spot where I have plenty of sight.
>some shit
I can put some shit on the arrows, then if I don't kill them they get dysentery/AIDS/tapeworm/bird flu/whatever and die.
>6'7" with an 13" cock
How'd you know?
>I like you
Aw, Merry Christmas.
>>716570818
allahu ekber pupper
>>716570818
Deus Vult pupper
Swords? No sir, I'm everyone's favourite character, the BARD
>>716571634
are we play ff7
>>716582906
5e bards are pretty badass.
>>716567837
Not enough data to choose an appropriate sword. I'll take blue and deal with the consequences later.
>>716567837
I prefer speed and mobility in games, so I like Green.
However, I hate long drawn out battles. The satisfaction of wiping out an enemy in a single hit is extraordinary. So I like Red.
Blue is the middle ground. You have a reasonable amount of speed and mobility, but things don't take forever to die. I like Blue.
Using Dark Souls as my reference, I almost always go with giant weapons. It's just too dangerous to have a protracted fight, even though I lose mobility. Winning as quickly as possible is the objective.
So my choice is Red.
>>716567837
>It's like you want to die
So before you manage to swing the red sword, someone can stab you 50 times with a dagger?
>>716583862
>someone can stab you 50 times with a dagger?
25, if you figure the red sword hits mid-swing. And if you're in heavy armor, those 25 stabs aren't doing shit.
Mine
>>716584056
Can stab the hand/hands holding the sword.
>>716567837
It's all about that basilard.
>>716584366
Hit chance goes way down for such a small target. And I'm wearing gauntlets.
>>716584518
i dig the ground 50 times with the dagger and make a small moat that makes you trip, impale yourself and then drown
>not using two swords
>>716585041
This is literally just trying to be the old "roll for what knight you are" picture. Down to almost every joke.
>>716582577
*teleports behind you* nothing personnel kid'.
I imaged searched this and Nayzak makes some pretty Aesthetic work actually. Also there're some fine Kek's be had just scrolling through his deviantart account.
>>716583574
Shiggy diggy, this niggy is right
>>716585041
lol roll
>>716568126
In that case you need to SPIN TO WIN
>>716585041
Two swords are bullshit if you aren't jedi.
>>716572481
>what is whirlwimd
>>716570673
>tank
You should be concerned about surviving and not dealing damage fam
>>716570818
deus vult pupper
>>716569368
>working as intended!
>>716567837
I bet you are that kind of autist who heavy rolls in dark soles