Why are Repubs such cucks for the Russians, /b/?

>>715435238
Mildy capitalist, increasingly Christian Russians != Communist, heathen and openly antagonistic of Christianity, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

>>715435238
Downside of democracy is that its leaders tend to work towards short term goals.

republicans will happily jump into bed with the Russians, despite ample historical evidence that doing so would be an extremely bad idea.

Something about Russian culture makes it almost guaranteed to come into conflict with American culture.

also if you've ever actually met any Russians, you'd know that they're some of the biggest white trash pieces of shit around, almost uniformly so.

there's only one r in Pepperidge Farm.

GOD YOU ARE SUCH A FAGGOT OP

>>715435488
oh look, the liberal is being racist
big surprise

>>715435803
>Anon isn't Republicuck so he must be a Demofag
Nice logic there retard.

>>715435238
I'm just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy the Repubs exhibit without remorse. You won't catch Hillary flip-flopping so carelessly. She cheats with class.

>>715435803

>oh look, the liberal is being racist

If you want to think I'm liberal, go for it.

I've spent enough time in Russia and working with Russians to know what a shitty culture it is.

Protip: If your nation's police is readily accepting of bribes on the street, you likely live in a terrible country.

Russia: It's proof that not every third world shithole has to be tropical.

>>715435910
i called you a liberal you stupid piece of socialistic horse shit.
idgaf what you call yourself, you obviously don't like the american system and are racist, ergo you fit the liberal (and yes, you probably are a democrat, most "independents" are closet demfags) profile, almost uniformly so

>>715436072
I'm not even that asshole you originally replied to; you're just frothing at the mouth - careful, you might choke when trying to breath.

>>715436072

you called me a liberal actually, but that's not your fault. moot got rid of the ids and now we're all just anons
>>715436050

>you obviously don't like the american system

I like it fine. there are better ones, but there are infinitely worse ones. The russian system is one of those infinitely worse ones.

Also going after a nationality isn't exactly racist. it'd be more accurate if i was shitting on ethnic russians, who aren't confined to living in Russia. bunch of them scattered all around eastern europe and the former soviet republics. they're probably decent folks.

>>715435238

russia hacked this post

FBI: " new Hillary emails"

"We gotta investigate immediately!"

CIA: "Russia help to sway the election in Trump's favor"

"Oh just stop the election is over."

>>715435238
Russians must be the only thing republicans aren't scared of. What a bunch of terrified pansies.

>>715435238
Why are democrats mcarthyites all of a sudden? Remember when democrats were the party of reasoned but cautious diplomacy?

Dems are fear mongering for power. Republicans are doing the responsible thing -- perhaps the only time they've EVER done so -- and are attempting to negotiate with a foreign power and come to better terms, instead of beating nationalistic wardrums like the "liberal" democrats.

>>715436396
Maybe because its literally meaningless. The claim is this: Russia may have purposefully leaked true information on hillary clinton that convinced voters to voluntarily cast their vote in a direction that may or may not have impacted the election in trumps favour.

Who the fuck cares if it did? The only "election tampering" that occured was that information leaked. I dont care if its a foreign country that does the journalism, at bottom, thats all it was.

File: Antimage.png (352KB, 674x674px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 674x674px

>>715436503
>Asking the russians to rig elections
>reasonable

>>715436615
In what sense was the election rigged?

>>715436396

>completely glosses over the fact that the CIA literally refused to present their findings before congress
>tries to compare something with actual evidence to something where the accusing party refuses to present any evidence

yeah okay keep standing with her

Because Russian women are impossible hot. Especially when they sing. Fuck. Instant boner. Almost worth communism.

File: 1481360069767.jpg (67KB, 521x697px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 521x697px

>>715435238
he is white and hates muzzies.

>>715436603
Except for all the fake news from the leaks. Russia hacked one of our political parties, revealing nothing but yawns. However when combined with fake news factories running 24/7 and an uneducated populace you get Trump... Who Russia can play like a fucking fiddle

>>715435238
why is every single liberal such a complete cuck? what? do you like jerking off to your girlfriends dick?

Two biggest powers of the world each both bigger than many nations and city states I don't know?

>>715436232
This.

I am not a racist. I literally dont care what fucking skin colour o gender you happen to have, only stupid people care about that shit. But i am culturalist.

I can honestly say, fuck Russian culture. Fuck national Russians. they fucking suck.

Genetic Russians on the other hand... some of my best friends.

>>715435238
haha ya dirty nigger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP1pXVcBC58

>>715435238
People are starting to catch on that the Russians aren't our enemies anymore. It's all an elitist conspiracy to stop us from looking what's happening to our own country. Russia is terrified of the chaos in America these days and they want a resolution. A good President could bring our countries together in the next 8 years.

>thank God we have Trump

>>715437051
You drank the kool aid.

Remember when Mitt Romney called Russia our number one geopolitical adversary and President Obama laughed?

>>715435488
>>715436050
>>715436232
It's true, some Russians are trash, but they have the collective will to enact a revolution rivaling of the US colonists, given the proper leadership. Trouble is, Russia has never ever had a good leader that wasn't some fuck up in the end.

>>715435238
Russia is a state that exists only because of power. The US, too, given their bullshit, is a state that exists based on power. They're two peas in a pod, minus the liberty and fairness of the US being absent in Russia.

The US already cannot be defeated by the combination of ALL the other nations(in a defensive war, but the point still stands). If they combine with the Russians, we'll be colonizing Mars under red, white, and blue X2 by 2025. They could literally 4th reich the whole world and nobody could stop them.

>>715437120
If it means I can make glorious Slavic children with sexy Russian woman with good singing voice, in the voice of the Kool Aid man, OHHHHH YEEAAHHH.

>>715435238
why does hillary have a boner to start nuclear war? she has literally said she would have no problem nuking russia YET she bitched about trump having itchy trigger fingers even though she even said she would nuke russia and syria
.so much for dems being the tolerant and peace party.

So imagine if Political correctness is in full swing.
No one is allowed to speak bad of the leaders in charge.
You are banned from anything that encourages free thinking (including schools,the internet, and social gatherings)because you could be arrested for thought crime.
Your gender does not exist you are gender neutral you must sign a form to start a relationship.
You are constantly watched by secret police making sure you behave in public and in your home.
And if you don't repost this you Will die in your sleep.

So imagine if Political correctness is in full swing.
No one is allowed to speak bad of the leaders in charge.
You are banned from anything that encourages free thinking (including schools,the internet, and social gatherings)because you could be arrested for thought crime.
Your gender does not exist you are gender neutral you must sign a form to start a relationship.
You are constantly watched by secret police making sure you behave in public and in your home.
And if you don't repost this you Will die in your sleep.

>>715437548

I'd rather die in my sleep than to know I reposted your shitty paragraph

Conservatives would vote for Adolph Hitler if he was a repub. Conservatives and libertarians are the child raping/birth-obsessed party. Sick fucks all around.

>>715435238
Can you explain why it's a bad thing?
I mean communism am I right?
Everyone is equal,nobody is hungry or poor because we all share our food and wealth, men and women get paid the same and each have a equal chance at custody battles.
But America is best right?
All races constantly fighting and dying to claim land thats theirs to begin with.
Niggers want free money for raping and killing people,
Illegal immigrants want citizenship for raping and killing.
Legal immigrants want illegal immigrants to home and apply for citizenship like they had to.
Mexicans hate every other race and want western America for their race.
Natives just want to live in peace but they are wards of the state and can't get regular services everyone fucking gets Because Niggers and illegals fucked it up for them
Whites want to fuck each other and want every colored skin Nigger gone as well as euro white people.

File: 1481850932431.jpg (21KB, 465x551px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 465x551px

>>715435238
Remember when liberals praised communism?
It's easy, it was right before they lost the election.

>>715438433
>Mexicans hate every other race and want western America for their race.


Mexican here, yes we hate all other races, and no we dont want our stolen land, we can barely keep the states we have lmao, thats illegal inmigrants bullshit, we dont want them back kill them all or something

>>715435238
>ITT OP still thinks the cold war never ended

>>715436072
Fuck off, reddit scum. Only a redditor with just two braincells gives a fuck about racism.

WHY do morons who cant even spell think they must make Memes??
>pepperidge NOT pepperridge (one R you illiterate fuk)

>>715435488
funny. any culture came into conflict with the american culture in the past. must be a coincidance

>mutually beneficial economic relationship with foreign powers
>nuclear war
>liberals think this is a hard choice

>>715438674

here's how to read seemingly contradictory difficult claims. (you're going to have a hard time understanding other supposed paradoxes, counter-intuitive science, difficult to parse logic, etc, btw, so please try to listen so you can git gud in the brain.

exhibit A. the election results are legitimate.

exhibit B. the influence thereof, hacking, in the process of of influencing legitimate voters and therefore votes, are not.

you're welcome.

( you can also figure this out by reading the articles instead of posting meme'ish facebook/4chan propaganda in jpg/gif form.)

read books, kids.

File: a504a74c7f963df20b76fef8f3b80af6.jpg (65KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 736x736px

>>715436050
>not every third world shithole
anon admit it you have read World War Z dindt you?

File: 1479542267186.jpg (13KB, 455x263px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 455x263px

>>715439590
>influencing legitimate voters
Kind of like this?

>>715439590
what does influence has to do with hacking?

File: 1479542123105m.jpg (31KB, 1024x976px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 1024x976px

>>715439590
Or this?

File: 1479544286283.jpg (120KB, 787x909px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 787x909px

>>715439590

File: johnastin.jpg (17KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 450x338px

>>715435238
>Ronald Reagan became a strong diplomat with Gorbachev
>The two worked together, rebuilding the relationship between America and Russia
>Gorbachev and other soviets be like
>fuckit.jpg
>Soviets dissolve
>no more totalitarianism
>Germany returned to freedom
>yfw a Republican president helped sow the seeds to ending the greatest global threat since WWII
>2016
>Libruls pissed Clinton lost
>blames Russia
>actively trying to undermine a historic relationship cuz feels

>>715439724

yes. i agree. that's a terrible, pro-trump, trumpian hyperbole that definitely backfired.

communicating probabilities/statistics to the general public is already difficult enough, but Bezos is not fucking helping.

>>715435238
When Hillary criticized Putin in 2011, ether that or 2010, Putin put Hillary on his shit list. In doing that, Russia and the GOP formed an unofficial alliance. Now, Putin is laughing his ass off.

File: 1472272735900.jpg (20KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 450x300px

>>715439878
Funny how the fakest news came from the "real" news media.

>>715439757

hacking DNC e-mails. releasing to wikileaks and therefore the world. influence over public opinion.

>>715439989
So providing facts about the DNC's corruption to the public was a bad thing?
Because when wikileaks did it to Bush I didn't see any leftist outrage.

>>715439623
>WWZ
They really blew it with that movie adaptation.

>>715439976

fake implies creation for intent. possibly malicious.

the main stream media was inaccurate. sometimes factually inaccurate. hence, errata pages and monday night quarterbacking from pundits. like all fields, politics requires a certain level of prognostication, and no one, being that we're human, is accurate to 100% 100% of the time.

that does not make it fake.

>>715440063

no, transparency is always good. it is the only reliable vigilance corruption. if you look up the perceived corruption index of certain countries, you'll see a commonality.

but who hacked/leaked/whistleblew about Bush? (if that is true. i don't know anything about it). if some nefarious interloper, some country that wanted to undermine our democracy, or weaken the USA on the global stage, then yes, i have a problem with that. but if merely an American, a la, Edward Snowden, as during the Obama administration, then he is a hero, as Edward Snowden is a hero.

pardon Snowden, mr. Obama.

>>715440427

it is the only reliable vigilance against corruption.*

File: 1480747025299.jpg (62KB, 500x678px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 500x678px

>>715440202
>factually inaccurate
>authentic
Pick one.
Saying the sun is purple because of poor data collection doesn't make my case any more true.
I could post a video saying JFK is still alive using " factually inaccurate" data, and it would still be fake news.
>i don't know anything about it
Then you mihjt want to stop posting.
You do like to use a lot of big words though, so good for you.

>>715440161
yeah the movie was shi but when the biologist blew his own head away it was hilarious

File: dubs.jpg (43KB, 620x537px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 620x537px

>>715441055
>checked, kek'd, and true.

>>715440677

i accept your correction.

let me restate it as inaccurate, or false.

but here's the thing, the hallmark of journalism are facts. (there are editorials for opinions, but that's a subjective realm.) when MSM gets it wrong, they correct themselves. when "fake news" sources gets it wrong, they DGAF or soft-pedal.

>>715441825
>when MSM gets it wrong, they correct themselves
Show me an example of them "correcting" themselves with the same vigor they use to report fallacies (a retraction in an obscure page online doesn't count).
I'll wait.

>>715435238
why are democrats such cucks for saudis, and syrian rebels, and mexicans?

>>715442182

This, actually

>>715435238
Remember when the dems where friends with the russians? Now they are the enemy again, now that it convenient

>>715442182

this

File: member-berry.png (422KB, 1147x1147px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1147x1147px

>>715435238
Member when liberals weren't crybaby SJW faggots?

>Yeah... me either.

because Russians are fucking crazy!!!

>>715435803
We're all racist anon, some of us just believe in science and understand that trickle down is bullshit.

>>715441825

you're veering now.

fallacies are quite different. i assume you mean logical fallacy, in which case, are made regularly, by all media. and when they do, the proponent of such fallacy is wrong, or have syllogistically false argument.

i'm talking about facts.

here we go:

nytimes.com/2016/12/14/technology/yahoo-hack.html

at the bottom of the page:


Correction: December 14, 2016

An earlier version of this article misstated the day Yahoo announced 1 billion user accounts had been compromised. It was Wednesday, not Thursday.


this doesn't happen often, as we expect the vanguard of the liberal left to have high standards in journalism and on accurate reporting.

now if you can reciprocate the same courtesy by providing the same errata with the alt news sources you read, assuming you read them, and are defending them.

damn... i saw this pic on another thread... fuck it

>>715439862
>Gorbachev makes a few not bad choices
>it's because he met Reagan 2 or 3 times

Republican history.

>>715435803
AWWW SHUCKY DUCKY!

Republicans were always complete hypocrites and never statesman. Always cowards, the whole time. Russia says "hey we friends cause of oil" and they yank their pants down as fast as they can. Republicans were never patriots, ever.