How smart are you, /b/?

File: too easy.jpg (154KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 937x960px

done

File: shit.jpg (156KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 937x960px

>>715111502

>>715111799
>>715111858
>You have to end up where you started.

>>715111799
> you have to end up where you started

>>715111800
> 5

File: shit.png (656KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 937x960px

meh

>>715112324
>You have to end up where you started.

>>715112324
/thread

File: 1481639490937.jpg (227KB, 1914x1044px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1914x1044px

Easy. could even have made it with 4 lines.

>>715112436
Want to number it for you?

>>715112584
please in the exact order in wich you draw the lines

File: ez.png (10KB, 516x362px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 516x362px

>>715111502

>>715112765
You end up where you begin, how does the order even matter?

Mate i cant draw it rn but it is just two rectangles stacked on top of one another.

File: 230114_908223010.png (133KB, 339x296px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 339x296px

>>715112960
I hope this is bait.

>>715112855
5 straight lines
>straight

If you straighten those out, that's 8.

File: shit.png (502KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 937x960px

>>715112765

>>715113120
So you started in the top left, but you ended in the top right.

File: 1481639490937.jpg (151KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 937x960px

Leave me alone

>>715111502

>>715113200
I do believe that's the first legitimate answer we've had.

File: ez.jpg (136KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 937x960px

Solved using 3 lines easypeasy

>>715113200
First non-retard. Copied from the last time this was posted, but hey.

>>715113169
Not if he redrew over his lines, idiot

>>715113260

See

>>715112524

>>715112524
winnar

>>715113283
xDDdDDDd

>>715113260
No there have been like 3 so far

>>715111502

Smart enough to not take the bait

>>715113350
Not a solution with infinitely small lines and dots. That answer is no better than the retards with 500 width lines.

>>715113350
Yeah I mean I guess it didn't break the rules

>>715112524
Idk guys, this was the first answer that satisfied all criteria.

>>715113450
Don't you talk shit about my lines you fuck.

>>715113260
See
>>715112524

As long as the dots have a non zero size, it's just a matter of how far you need to draw the lines out.

File: solve easy as fuk.jpg (166KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 937x960px

idiots

>>715113322
Then it's more than 5 lines you fucking retard

File: densety.png (438KB, 720x528px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 720x528px

>>715113604
You have to end where you started

File: 6360489455192162291563850737_Trump.jpg (2MB, 2500x1666px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x1666px

>>715113604
WRONG

File: 1481639490937.jpg (145KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1920x1080px

Fucking easy

Retards

>>715113667
No it isnt. I cant draw it rn but just put two rectangles sharing the same side

>>715113528
It's clear enough in the problem that the solution should be applicable for any size dots, including 0.

>>715113890
this

>>715111502
Make a 4 tip crown going past the dots and then draw a straight line to the beginning of your first line.

>>715112524
>>715114178
This

>>715114225
it's the same as
>>715112524

>>715114348
yeah, it was more a troll post than anything

File: 1481639490937.jpg (163KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 937x960px

>>715111502
there u are

>>715114525
fake and gay

>>715114525
congratulation. you are smart

>>715114566
kek, what's so fake bout it?

>>715114614
everthing, you are on 4chan

>>715114525
Holy fuk

>>715114525
Very impressive, turning the solution already posted upside down, lol.

>>715114525
Holy shit finally someone with a fucking brain

>>715114755
mwahahaha I'm smart, ain't I ? kek :^)

File: bingo.jpg (155KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 937x960px

>>715111502

>implying any other answer is correct
this image is retarded because there is no requirement not to cross lines
it isnt even as challenging as the envelope which takes most people three minutes at most.

>>715113283
/thread

File: Screenshot_2016-12-13-17-31-57-1.png (492KB, 899x1112px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 899x1112px

Safe to say you're all retarded

/thread

File: 1481639490937.jpg (149KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 937x960px

>>715112965
Finally drew it. Was literally one of the first ones to solve it and this is way simpler than that jew star thing.

File: Screenshot_2016-12-02-03-48-48-1.png (119KB, 411x416px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 411x416px

>>715115158
>5 straight lines
> pencil wasn't lifted
> ended up where started

Anon you're a genius

>>715115201
first of all that's more than 5 lines. Second of all, I have no idea where you started but you can't have finished in the same spot.

>>715115201
That takes six lines to draw without lifting your pencil.

>>715115349
should clarify, would take more than 5 lines to draw that. doubling over a line counts as another line. dumbass.

File: 1378128101813.png (327KB, 495x498px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 495x498px

>>715111502

Literally nowhere on that does it say that the lines cant cross eachother.

You could just color entire area with the pen into a solid colour.

>>715115201
Except it's not. With that, you can't end where you started and can't have had any less than 6 actual lines/direction changes.

File: dumbass.jpg (150KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 937x960px

>>715115349
How in the fuck are you counting more than 5 lines? I ended up just drawing back over one of the lines as it is technically allowed.

File: 1481414707936.gif (169KB, 267x199px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 267x199px

>>715115201
>end up where you started

>>715115201
See, you're caught up on the 5 lines at the end, you're forgetting that to make that combination would take at least six strokes of the pencil, and even then doesn't end up in the same spot. You're still wrong.

>>715115401
It does not say that in the rules and if the line is already drawn then how are you drawing another line?

>>715115480
Drawing back over a line is another line. Second, you didn't even end up where you started.

>>715115365
No, that's clearly 5 lines.

>>715115480
No, it's not. You're wrong. And it's already been solved correctly before you. Please stop.

Doubling back over a line is drawing another line, just for reference, and even still you end up in a different spot from where you started.

>>715115457
It's 5 lines, I drew back over lines nigger

>>715115569
One of those 5 lines must have been drawn at least partially twice, making it 6 lines.

>>715115541
because your pencil is physically drawing another fucking line dumbass.

>>715115553
Mathematically, a line over another line, parallel to that line in the same plane is the same line. Bamboozled once again. I did end up where I started, you can't even tell where I started from because it all connects.

File: 1464118883365.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>>715115158

>>715115616
See >>715115673

>>715115651
No it's not, the line is already drawn.

>>715115620
Listen you fucking kike shitstain, drawing back over a line counts as another line. And even if it didn't you're still not where you started.

>>715115673
If you want to use mathematical definitions, then a line is infinitely long and can never be drawn. Also, mark the point where you supposedly started and ended, then.

>>715115720
Is this a math exam? no? then math has nothing to do with it you autistic fucknugget.

>>715115730
Oh my fucking god, you autist. I'm not going to record myself showing how I started in the top left and ended up there. The rules say nothing about drawing over another line and you can't be drawing a new line if it's the same line.

>>715115158
> can't /thread own post
Still wrong. Faggot

>>715115806
Started in top left and ended up there.

>>715115813
Math or not, it's the same line so I'm not drawing another line.

>>715115878
>calls me an autist
>only argument is the literal definition of a line and the rules

yeah, I'M the autist here.

File: 1481639490937.jpg (160KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 937x960px

>>715111502
okay
i did it. it starts on the x.

Autists on /b/ are mad because I found a loophole none of them thought about. Mad cause I drew a simple line rather than some dumbass jew star that goes out of the entire frame.

>>715115938
you didn't and you are.

>>715115964
Exactly, and the rules say I can do that.

>>715115938
Do I understand it correctly that you drew line 4 halfway, then line 5 back and forth, then the final half of line 4?

>>715116054
Yep, still 5 lines, nigger. Although I can think of different ways to draw back over and still end up in the same spot.

>>715116111
That's 7 lines.

File: 1479245835613.jpg (3KB, 125x124px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x124px

youre all dumb fucks who need to pull an hero rn

>>715116048
If everyone else is saying you're wrong, and the actual answer has been posted ( see >>715114525 ) then, yes, you are wrong.

sup

File: 1481639490937.jpg (163KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 937x960px

>>715111502

>>715111502
can do it in 4

>>715116234
>straight lines
pass

>>715116310
tits or gtfo

>>715115620
Oh god just play the damn game and stop being a weasel. You're not being clever. It's quite clear that a straight line in this instance means a single stroke of the pencil. One change of direction, including turning 180 and doubling back, is a new stroke.

File: 1481289614498.jpg (84KB, 641x626px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 641x626px

this is not even conventionally possible
shitty troll, fuck off OP

>>715111502
You /b/ tards should know these rules only apply to 3x3 set of dots. You can connect them with 5 straight lines as other anons have shown but not show up at the same spot you started.

/thread

>>715116133
That's 5 lines, can't you count?
>>715116216
Maybe I found a new answer. Which, btw, this is a completely acceptable answer based on the rules as I 1. Drew 5 lines 2. Ended up where I started and 3. Connected all the dots.

>>715116480
great, it's already been solved though and your initial post is still wrong you god damn imbecile.

>>715111502
How do I tell if a line is straight or gay?

Posting this because people have a hard time following as to how I drew this.


I went from top left to top right then down to bottom right then to bottom left, up one dot, all the way to the right, draw back over that line to the left and then extend that line I had previously drawn to end back where I started.

>>715116615
NO IT FUCKING ISNT. You /b/tards can't even come up with something that is wrong it.

File: dotko.png (413KB, 868x692px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 868x692px

>>715111502
obligatory

File: crop.png (654KB, 936x1196px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 936x1196px

@715111502


4 liners here

>>715116725
By that interpretation of the rules only 4 lines are needed, and the puzzle is made completely trivial. Excessive literalism when reading rules is a sign of autism, have you been tested?

>>715116725
that's 7 lines though

TL1 - TR1 = 1
TR1 - BR3 = 2
BR3 - BL3 = 3
BL3 - ML2 = 4
ML2 - MR2 = 5
MR2 - ML2 = 6
ML2 - TL1 = 7

>>715116948
The post implies whether or not we have enough intelligence to solve it. Maybe I am just more intelligent that everyone in this thread to come up with that simple of a solution following the rules. It said 5 lines so I went with 5 lines, although I'm not entirely sure how you would do it with 4 lines.

File: 1481639490937.jpg (205KB, 1228x958px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1228x958px

Did it in 4
...it ain't dumb if it works

>>715115913
Not wrong, dickwad. The question provided was intended to make people go in circles. What I did is exactly what they asked for. 5 lines, end up where you started, and not to lift your pencil. They never said anythinf about any curved lines in addition to the straight lines. Jesus, you're retarded. too autistic to think outside the box

>>715117102
you're not more intelligent, you're autistic.

>>715116984
Please look at this >>715115480
picture, how many lines are there? IF you think drawing a single then running your pencil back over that line is drawing 2 lines then you are a special breed of stupid.

>>715114783
>6
fuck outta here faggot

>>715117199
Guarantee I am smarter than everyone in this thread. Stay mad, cuckboy.

>>715117102
The fact that you're unable to think of the solution with 4 lines proves that you are probably the least intelligent person in this thread. All you need to do is remove one of the vertical lines in your "solution".

>>715117283
I see that, but how do you end up back where you started? At least without drawing over another line?

File: 1479991387030.png (409KB, 728x745px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 728x745px

Try this one.

>>715117444
You claim that drawing over another line is not against the rules, why is it suddenly a problem now?

>>715117531
Fill in the 3 boxes on the left part of the 3 and the one box on the right. 20>00

>>715117540
Because you aren't finishing connecting the dots by just seamlessly drawing over all the other lines, I am though because I finished the line. You're right, it would be correct I just didn't want to think about how it would work before. Can't we just accept my answer is perfectly viable based on the rules?

File: Untitled.png (562KB, 729x746px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 729x746px

>>715117531
right, wrong?

>>715117817
By your interpretation of the rules, even the very first reply to the thread is correct, because the requirement to end up where you started is rendered completely meaningless, seeing as you can just draw all the lines in reverse back to where you started.

Safe to say that the real winner here is OP

>>715117207
Yes, there are five lines there, but to make those lines with a SINGLE UNINTERRUPTED MOVEMENT OF A PENCIL requires 7 strokes or 6 changes in direction, making a total of 7 lines.

>>715117936
But his shows that he stopped drawing the lines when they didn't connect. My answer actually did finish DRAWING the lines back where I started. I'm going to go eat lunch now and chances are thread will be dead by the time I get back.

>>715117817
no, because it isn't

>>715118029
There are how many lines, anon? That's right, 5. I drew 5 lines.

>>715117845
I mean that 8 doesn't really look right but you can just look at my answer >>715117715

>>715118070
enjoy your meal that's exactly the same as yesterday's meal, and will be the same as tomorrow's... or are you not THAT autistic?

>>715113507
kek

>>715118070
How does his solution 'show' that he stopped drawing the lines when they didn't connect? His drawing is completely indistinguishable from one in which he retraced his lines back to start.

>>715118119
which you achieved with 6 changes of direction, yes. And by the mathematical definition, a STRAIGHT line cannot change direction or else it ceases to be straight.

File: 3 lines.png (649KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 937x960px

>>715111502
only needed 3 lines

>>715117540
it COUNTS as a second line drawn retard.

>>715118361
beautiful. But by what definition is this a line

File: Untitled.png (592KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 937x960px

>>715111502

>>715116216
Fuckin nigger

File: no black boxes.png (567KB, 728x745px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 728x745px

>>715117531
didnt need to use any black boxes

>>715118336
Or did you neglect that part of the rule? You can't just say "I doubled back so it doesn't count but the net result does"

it doesn't work like that.

either the middle line isn't straight and is just a single line that doubles back on itself (making you wrong), or you used 7 lines, still making you wrong.

>>715118402
Obviously, but not according to the guy I was arguing against. You didn't bother reading the full conversation, did you?

File: 1479991387030-correct.png (487KB, 728x745px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 728x745px

>>715117715
>>715117845
>>715118158
>>715118515
Fucking retards.

>>715118482
off by one

>>715118500
White actually. whatever helps you sleep at night though man.

>>715118586
judging by her flat chest, I'm sure that ugly bitch thinks it is true....

File: b friendly.png (648KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 937x960px

Try this /b/

>>715116772
kys

>>715118838
one item is inherently connected to itself.

checkmate. 0 lines.

File: 1480945698395.png (54KB, 500x534px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x534px

>>715116772

>>715118361
That's 7 lines, retard

>>715114718
sick bro

File: 1481646049245.png (492KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 937x960px

>>715118838
solved it

File: tommy.jpg (28KB, 339x296px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 339x296px

>>715115144
>>715115427
The only correct solution requires lines that cross each other. Why the fuck would there be a rule against it?

>>715115158
Am I retarded? Does this break one of the rules? I feel like this anon's solution answers it, but I'm probably wrong.

File: point less.png (574KB, 726x818px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 726x818px

>>715117531
change it to a not greather than sign

File: tjena banano.png (508KB, 1146x678px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1146x678px

>>715119650

> not even close to a not greater than sign

File: 1481645106864.png (471KB, 728x745px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 728x745px

>>715117531

File: Unbenannt.png (55KB, 814x528px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 814x528px

>>715117531
Meh, not sure if my 2 answers count.

>>715120243
nice touch on the 8.0 fam

File: 1481645106864.png (457KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 937x960px

>>715119183

File: 1481644649794.png (517KB, 936x1196px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 936x1196px

>>715116885
this says it all

File: pencil.jpg (15KB, 230x164px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 230x164px

>>715121529
Faggot

File: 1479920708101.gif (981KB, 300x192px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 300x192px

>>715121737
yes but their is no paper anon
their is no paper!

File: 1481639490937.jpg (148KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 937x960px

idk

File: 1481639490937.jpg (149KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 937x960px

>>715122512
uhh

>>715118611
Don't lie nigger

>>715111502
i dont have a pencil

File: 1481639490937_solved.jpg (171KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 937x960px

>>715111502
are you retarded

File: 1481639490937.jpg (150KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 937x960px

EZ