Are you genius ??
>>714729323
-13
-17
It's obviously 2. You're retarded if you think else wise.
3-3=0
0*6=0
0+2=2
the answer is 2
>>714730578
Do you even operator precedence?
>>714729323
3-3x6+2
3-18+2
-15+2
-13
for any retards who dont understand this, its order of operations
>>714729790
How retarded is it possible to get lol
You people are idiot.
3x6 = 18
18-3 = 15
15+2 = 17
the answer is 17
>>714729323
3x6 = 18
3-18 = -15
-15 + 2 = -13
if you do Order of oerations then you should rewrite it as 3-18+2, if straight through then youll be wrong
2. the answer is 2.
The answer is 0
>>714730790
Subtract left to right, how did you get the 18 in front of the 3
>>714730669
well fuck how would you do it then?
>>714729323
6+2=8
8+2=10
10x3=30
3-6=3
3-30= -27
The answer is -27, simple BEDMAS. I hate threads like these. They're just bait
Why not have computers do it
>>714731259
3-3 = 0
6+2 = 8
0*8 = 0
The answer is 0
its 23 you dumbshits
>>714729323
3×6=18-3=15+2=17
>>714730578
lmao 3-3 but not 6+2
>>714731382
You would do the multiplication before the addition if you were doing BEDMAS.
>>714730573
Yeah. English reads left to right,
3-3 = 0
0x6 =0
+2
=2
Whoever said -17 is a niggerfaggot
-13 masterrace
>>714730578
wtf is wrong with you ever here of pemdas?
>>714731626
Fuck off spic the answer is 2
>>714730788
hahaha yeah rofl
-13
3-3=0
0+2=2
2-6=-4
You're all fucking dumbass fuckin retarded pieces of shit
>>714731786
/thread
Math professor here, anyone who thinks otherwise is one massive cuck
>>714729323
3-3×6+2
>3-18+2
-15+2
>-13
>>714731958
You are wrong.
>>714730672
This.
It's -13.
>>714732029
Prove it
P: Parantheses
E: Exponent
M: Multiply
D: Divide
A: Add
S: Subtract
3 - 3 x 6 + 2
Multiplication comes first
3 - (3 x 6) + 2
3 - (18) + 2
Subtract and add respectively.
3 - (18) + 2
-15 + 2
2.
The answer is 2, and anyone who says -13 is a fucking degenerate
math bait
>>714729323
+3-3x6+2=
+3-18+2
-18+5= -13
>>714732272
Except you can't just ignore negative numbers, you fool.
PEMDAS you fucks.
3-18+2
3-20
17
>>714732272
-15+2=2 ?
You nigger
>>714731284
>multiplying at the end.
God damn youre retarded
>>714729323
In a room, I grabbed an suggest to have a fun the fuck of a horse. For getting the joy of horse fuck, I became full bare. After that, a horse came near. The horse started fucking me. When the horse was fucking me, I got the tremendous joy. It was so fascinating by taking the fuck of horse.
>>714732272
Negative numbers do not exist. You guys were lied to. It was just a prank that has gone too far. So even if you're doing PEMDAS, you'd still get a positive integer value of 2.
/thread
Wait I have one!
Ok so a guy breaks into a store and steals $100 dollars. He leaves and comes back and buys $70 worth of crap the cashier gives him $30 in change.
So how much money did the store lose?
It's almost like people give the wrong answers intentionally in order to annoy others. Whoa!
>>714731626
This
>>714730672
>>714730672
PEMDAS
parenthesis
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
-3*6=-18
-18+2=-16
-16+3=-13
I can't trust the computers anymore
>>714732688
Cash wise 60$, as a whole loss? 130$
>>714733194
What the fuck you have to be baiting they lost $200 in total.
>>714729323
0
(3-3)x(6+2) = 0x8 = 0
>>714729323
Answer is 2
>>714732688
30$
>>714733260
Uhh no first they lost 100$
-100
He gave it back
0
They gave him 70$ worth of stuff
70
Plus 30$ in change
Theyre still out 100$
>>714733417
Plus $70 in merchandise, so $100 overall. The $70 spent isn't profit for the store. It would be the same if the guy stole 4&0 worth of shit and 30 actual dollars.
>>714733846
Man I fucked up the shift key on that one....
>>714733674
No he stole $100
Gained $70 from the item assuming for arguments sake the item is worth $7.
He also gained $30 in change. That's another $100.
100+100=200.
>>714734002
Soñé of a bitch I meant assuming the item is worth $70.
>>714731905
PEMDAS does not apply?
>>714732548
No, you're the one that fucked up
>>714734002
>Read it again retard
He came back and bought 70$ worth of shit with the cash. This means he gave 100$ back to the store and got 30 in change Plus the 70 in shit.
>3-(3x6)+2
>3-18+2
>=-13
>>714731569
Was a bait, for god's sake. And you took it sooo hard.
>>714729323
3 - 3 * 6 + 2
= (3 - 3) * (6 + 2)
= 0 * (8) = 0
3 - 3 * 6 + 2
= 3 - 18 +2
= 17
solve this niggers
Math from 5th grade
"Are you a genius?"
>>714734521
>Adding parenthesis where there are none
Your name quincy?
>>714734601
fucking thumbnail retard
>>714729323
Since when does knowing the order of operations qualify you as a genius? Get this Facebook bullshit off /b/
No really. Is it
>fucking -17
or is it
>fucking -13
If the equation doesn't have parenthesis then it just goes left to right and you ignore addition before subtraction?
I need to know.
I forgot maths.
>>714735160
Parentheses
Exponents
Mutiply AND divide from left to right
Add AND subtract from left to right
>>714735160
Fuck I'm retarded.
>>714735339
thanks famalam
>>714730790
>>714731520
>>714732383
>>714734521
Hey dipshits, it's not 17
3 - 18 + 2
3 - (-18 + 2)
3 - -16 = -13
The 18 is a negative since its being subtracted, fucka sake
>>714735551
I love you
>>714732688
$100
$70 in goods, $30 in cash
This thread must be full of trolls....
... because I refuse to believe that people are that dumb, but yet again, they are ameridumbs.
>>714735829
Hell no if therea one thing we learn in murrica its pemdas.
>>714735829
U wot m8
42
>>714729323
Op here. You fucking losers, here is the answer;
(3-3)*(6+2) =?
(0)*(8) = ?
The answer is -8
>>714736747
Math Professor here, and i agree with this answer.
>>714736747
(0)*(8) is 0 noob
>>714736848
not in MURICA its not.
>>714729323
-15
>>714729323
((3-3)*6)+2 = 2
(3-3)*(6+2) = 0
(3-(3*6))+2 = -13
3-((3*6)+2) = -17
3-(3*(6+2)) = -21
that's all the ways to solve it
the reason why we can't figure out the real answer, is because it wasn't ordered correctly as a problem
>>714736911
>>714729323
oops, i meant -17
>>714729323
3-3*6+2
let rearrange this shit
3(-3*6)+2
3*-18+2
-54+2= 52 which is the only correct answer faggots
Math expert from Reddit here. I have over 5000 karma on /r/math alone.
The answer is clearly -45, you simply apply advanced ordermetrics to the sub operation of each tuple, morons.
>>714729323
Questions like this are fucking stupid and purposely misleading. It's no wonder why the Khmer Rouge went around executing smartasses that cannot show people things in a simple way.
The correct answer 7.62×25 because you'd get a Tokarev round to the back of the skull for wasting my time.
3x6 = 18
3-18 = -15
-15+2
-13
It's fucking simple you tards
>>714737262
gtfo
17
>>714729323
>BODMAS
>brackets
>orders
>division
>multiplication
>addition
>subtraction
In that order, that is how you basic math
The answer is pi
>>714732564
This
no. the answer is I don't give a shit
>>714729323
any self-respecting mathematician would never write an expression so poorly.
protip: it's not 3 x 6, it's -3 x 6.
-3 x 6 = -18
-18 + 2 = -16
3 - -16 = 19
19 is the answer
>>714735585
FFS You can't make a 3-18 to a 3- -18!! Where did that "-" Came from?! That's retarded
>>714737484
this, the problem is deliberately written in a way to confuse you
it should be written like this
3 - ( 3 x 6 ) + 2
there is no negative 3 in there, however there is a negative ( 3 x 6 )
>>714738462
Yep. So then it makes;
-(3x6) = -18
-18 + 2 = -16
3 - 16 = -13
-13 is the awnser
>>714734002
How are /b/ yards this fucking stupid
>>714738391
Btw
3-18=-15
And
3- -18=-15
But either way you missed my point so suck dick faggot
>>714729323
Wow, I genius!!
>>714729323
BTW did /b/ fail 7th grade math?
>>714729323
adding brackets around each individual number to make things easier for you fucktards
(3)+[(-3)x(6)]+(2)
(-3)x(6)=-18
(3)+(-18)+(2)=(-15)+(2)
(-15)+(2)=-13
I can't believe some /b/tards are this fucking stupid
The answer is that this problem needs some fucking parentheses, nobody writes actual equations like this.
Its -13, anyone that says otherwise is either a troll or a fucking moron.
answer is a function of log(2x-3y)
>>714740547
where y=ix+2/0
>>714730578
Ib4eexceptafterC
The answer has got something to do with Quantum
>>714729323
Ya but the real answer is no. Every faggot answering -13 really should be answering no. They're not genius' because they answer the question are you genius with-13 it's like what are the sums of all the numbers... Uhhh -1/12. Typical retard faggots
>>714732688
>how much money
That has been the question. As poorly worded as it is it is only about the currency.
>pic related the "original" from an older thread.
>>714733417
correct
420
99% of /pol/ can't solve this.
>>714741381
Niggerlover spotted xD
mfw im pol and i solved it xD
it's 17 btw
>>714741438
Obvious troll is obvious
>>714741438
Well you sure showed me
>>714741279
Wrong, the question is worded badly.
The shop keeper lost $30 in cash and $70 worth of stock, so he is still down $100.
>>714735585
Thats wrong. If you have a minus outside the parenthesis it would change all the signs inside parenthesis.
-(-18+2)=18-2=16
BOOBIES
>>714741606
There is no doubt that the wording is shit. Applied in real life it would most likely be a cashier not the owner directly. However the last line is all that is needed to clarify the answer.
You are correct, overall throughout the problem the loss totals to $100.. However of the stolen currency only 30 remains in the pocket of the thief. For further reading please see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money
>>714741872
8008135
As with all of these questions, anyone who ends up with this type of problem to solve is retarded.
>>714729323
not sure if ppl are just trolling or retarded
>>714729323
The answer is still -13
It's 2, you guys are fucking retarded. Negative numbers do not exist, so it can't possibly be -13 or any other numbers with a minus sign attached to it. You can't eat a negative amount of apples, common fucking sense. Shame on you /b/
3-3 = 0*6 = 0 + 2 = 2
2 is final answer
*please note: I'm a math teacher (Ph.D in mathematics; have been teaching for 15 years) in Namibia, South Africa