How about some cubs?
Serious question here.
Do you not feel weird about being turned on by this stuff?
Was it hard for you to pass the moral border that you had to cross in order for you to not be disgusted by your own fetish?
I am not hating on your fetish, to each their own, but it just seems virtually impossible for me that somebody could ever be turned on by this without feeling a deep sense of shame or guilt.
>>714441704
There is nothing wrong to get turned on by that
>>714441704
i don't believe in absolute morals, so no, no problems with that. for the feeling: not really. i mean you can't do this in RL (i'm furry not beast)
>>714441898
I think zoophilia and pedophilia are socially frowned upon, and like I said, I am not hating on your fetish.
I just can't imagine a dad walking in on his son fapping to this and then being ok with it.
I am sincerely interested in the way people can just accept something like this as "exciting" whereas the vast majority of people would consider it absolutely horrible.
>>714442242
most people believe in some sky-daddy, so i'm not really surprised that much. most people are just plain stupid and feel warm and good when they can come together with some stupid morals.
i feel warm inside with some cubs. btw: my morals are simple: don't hurt someone. this does not conflict with my morals
Need more for political reasons
>>714441704
I don't find anything wrong with it, so I don't feel guilty. I keep my "immoral" fantasies in my head. There's nothing wrong with fantasies, the only possible time they could be bad is when they enter reality.