Can any Mathfags please explain to me what this means? I get

>>714407281
hmm, 1 sec!

>>714407744
awesome, thanks.
I'll wait

Can't help you op other than to bump. Good luck

>>714407281
K 7 describes the complete graph.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_graph

K 5, 3 is the complete bipartite graph.
Wait a sec and I'll draw it for you.

>>714408889
ok, thanks!

>>714408889
oh wait! THAT'S what it is?

I can draw that now, if you don't wanna spend extra time.
I didn't understand the notation was the main issue.

Thanks!

File: complete bipartite graph K 5 3.png (13KB, 523x288px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 523x288px

>>714407281
>>714408993
There you go.
It basically means that you can divide the nodes into 2 groups and each node of one group is connected to every node of the other group.

>not knowing basic graph theory

will hunting is a fucking meme

>>714409161
thanks!
that explains everything

>>714409123
>>714409235
No problem.

File: 3_cocycle-main.jpg (45KB, 900x574px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 900x574px

explain this, mathfags
i don't remember where i got it from

it looks sort of like the categorical analogue of monoid homomorphisms

>>714409291
it will take forever to do so, if it's not important then move on

>>714409291
OP here. I have no fucking clue what that is supposed to be.

But... are those x's in circles supposed to be exclusive ors?
IDK just guessing. They kinda look like XORs from when I took Computer Architecture

>>714410077
not sure what it's for but you probably don't need this until cohomology theory - a very high level graduate course

they're not XORs, anon was probably right in assuming this is some monoidal category wizardry

F seems to be a functor between monoidal categories which "preserves structure" with respect to the tensor product, in the sense that there is what i suspect is an isomorphism between F(XY) to F(X)F(Y)

can't really tell without context


>>714409853
>implying you know jack shit