To all straight anons, if you were offered $3000 in cash to have anal sex with a gay man for 15 minutes, would you do it?
>You are the giver in this situation so your anus won't have a cock inside it
Obviously yes, only a retard would say no to $3000. Protip: fucking for money just makes it a job, people clean shit for money, does that make them a scat fetishist? No.
Completing a job like this doesn't make you gay, being sexually attracted to your own gender makes you a homosexual.
if it's a one time thing, probably not worth it
i make pretty good money already
if i could quit my job and fuck faggots all day long for $12000/hr, now that's something worth doing
I think we can all admit we want to be the receiver...
yes I would, but 3,000 isn't enough for even one semester for college, but on the other hand that would give me 2 months worth of rent, or upgrade my PC
Well, consider the other things associated with it. You would hear a man grunt and moan breathe heavily as he fucks you, you would have his cum in and on your body after hes done fucking you, and the smell/texture of his sweat as well. Getting fucked isnt as simplistic as "dick = hot, softer version of a dildo" It also comes with a real live dude attached.
That was not specified at the beginning of the contract. It could be a femenine man with a femenine penis. Soft skin and femenine breath and voice. Webm related.
To all straight anons, if you were offered $3000 in cash to have anal sex with a gay man for 15 minutes, would you do it?"
it's a gay man. You can argue some ridiculous semantic point all you want, but we know what the actual theoretical predicate OP was actually going for, so dont be silly.
Regardless, traps still heavily sound like men, they still sweat, etc etc. All those things I just mentioned are still true. Your still going to have a mans body lie on top of you, fuck your ass until he moans, grunts, and shoots his load inside of you.