I ain't no sophisticated mofo, but I can tell you, nigga, all that shit bout right n wrong is pure horsecrap. Ideas constructing morals vary from mofo to mofo, so the process of categorizing and distinguishing right and wrong can varvary to the point of beeing contradictory. Even if we were to make an spectrum of right and wrongness for our own moral, it would be inapplicable, for right implies wrong and viceversa. Therefore, if you were "to do right" you'd also be doing wrong.
>>675797168 but scientifically proven things 200 years ago were proved to be wrong. maybe the same thing will happen in 200 and so on... do you anons think that in 200 million years people will know the correct truth or is it an endless pit of exploration of false proofs and truths?
>>675797543 What is truth to you? If "truth" means "in accordance to reality" and if you assume what we observe IS reality (as is general in science), then we will constantly be updating our understanding of reality with new observations and ideas about such observations. It is impossible to know if there is a limit to such a system, and knowing if such a limit exists would also most likely be useless.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.