Girls that dont look legal but are.

>>675713402
MODS

File: THEGRAVUREIDOLS.COM_.0027-1024x683.jpg (120KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1024x683px

>>675713402

Contributing.

Toro Yu Zhu

http://www.lazygirls.info/Toro_Yu_Zhu

>>675714184
thanks for contributing

File: toro_yu_zhu_toro_yu_zhu_020814_ByY6blWf.sized.jpg (72KB, 445x640px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 445x640px

>>675714184

File: toro_yu_zhu_toro_yu_zhu_020814_dCv7RHY6.sized.jpg (95KB, 445x640px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 445x640px

>>675714712

>>675714055
What the fuck do you want? What rules are broken?

File: 1458871023332.jpg (105KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 480x640px

>>675714880
here you go

>>675715034
MODS COME QUICK!!! THESE PEOPLE ARE PEDOPHILES!!!

it's crazy how age dictates whether or not you can have sex with them
Like, why is a year 365 days? You have to wait 18 x 365 days to penetrate a human.
Gets you thinking "why?"

>>675713402
never understood why people like this nasty ass hair

>>675715188
OI chill out m8

>>675715238
dont like her hair just her body and that innocent smile

>>675715188
please,
my fathers name is pedophile.
call me uncle bad touch

>>675715544
HHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>>675715655
got any nude ones?

File: 13785153925781203948935.jpg (59KB, 565x802px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 565x802px

>>675714880

File: 1358653706498.jpg (28KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 768x768px

>>675715680

File: 13785154020849343664224.jpg (84KB, 565x799px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 565x799px

>>675715818

File: j6oyfk5k.jpg (13KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 240x240px

>>675715224
sucks to be american? in my country it´s legal to fuck 16 year olds

>>675715818
I don't wanna fap to some stupid ass chink. Get me a real white girl.

>>675715877
cutie

File: 232036q6zozqpkpuq68fzq.jpg (89KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 683x1024px

>>675715818
One of my favorite pics from her. Am I alone to contribute ?

>>675715034
Trolls trolling trolls.

>>675715944
britfag?

>>675715944
What country?

>>675715944
In thirty states in America it's legal to fuck 16 year olds.

>>675715818
>>675715877
How many pounds of makeup is she under

>>675715953
Try Piper Perri.

Is it still cp if it's legal to fuck 16 yr olds in your country?

File: cutie.jpg (69KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 480x640px

>>675716024

>>675716106
Yes and in France you have the right to fuck a 15 yo.

>>675716209
Also would like to know, I'm assuming yes but that doesn't entirely make sense.

>>675716209
legal to fuck doesnt mean you can make porn of them dumbass

Stop posting chinks

>>675716209
Yea can't take pictures of it, Scotland here, 16 age of consent but pictures (internationally) have to be 18+

>>675716430
I agree

File: mayu watanabe.jpg (63KB, 398x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 398x600px

>>675716430
no

File: 2.png (289KB, 538x576px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 538x576px

>>675713402

File: it's ok she is 19.jpg (48KB, 835x473px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 835x473px

>>675716430
ok

>>675716430
Ok I stop posting. Now you post something.

File: 1442791765870.jpg (39KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 480x640px

Also what constitutes cp does it have to be nudity, a sexual act, or underwear, or provocative poses

>>675713402
So, basically Asians?

>>675716730
mmm i like this one

>>675715944
But do you?

File: picture-00080.jpg (963KB, 1080x1440px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 1080x1440px

>>675716430
but all chicks look underage when they arent
>pic related

>>675716766
Look up the Miller Test, afaik that's what's used. Any material (that lacks 'artistic' nature) pointed toward a sexual nature (organs, intended to 'excite' or acts).

>>675713402

who is that?

>>675716860
no im ok with whatever race

>>675717101
Chinks are disgusting and need to be eradicated or isolated

>>675716730
source?

File: 1458855781837.png (266KB, 308x364px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 308x364px

Am I underage?

>>675713402
Who is this?

>>675717213
is this why naked baby pictures are perfectly legal? because there's no sexual motive or intent to sexualize?

How many posts do you think it will take before some pedo comes in to fuck shit up?

>>675717221
idk i found her a while ago but if anyone has the sauce, i'd be very happy

I wonder if mods are monitoring this thread

>>675717213
So that means stupid teenage girls are basically always creating cp of themselves?

>>675716239
Sauce or name pls?

>>675717523
theres a thread onhere all bout her, but idk what her name is lol

>>675717658
this is good, m8

>>675717781
Sauce plz I'm diamonds.

>>675717498
The assumption is always that the pose was not to excite someone else sexually. If we assumed otherwise, it would be actual cp.

>>675717952
Got it off 4chan m8 srry

>>675717394
some i've seen like, of a child, naked with a black&white filter on some canvas and that are allowed, same with like ones of htem in the bath. no sexual intent like you said

>>675717498

yep, this. when i was younger someone i knew got charged with creation and distribution for sending a dick pic of themselves to their gf. idk how it works in other countries or if it has changed with time.

Does anyone else think it's kind of weird how he mods are perfectly ok with people posting pics and vids of actual gore or murder, but freak the fuck out as soon as cp comes into question? I feel like watching a man die is just as scarring as naked children, but that's just me.

File: 1402523545117.jpg (134KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 640x640px

>>675717806
thanks, here are some of the girls from the pic

>>675718043
Noooooo :(

>>675717992

forgot to mention this. if it's just a generic pose or something silly it's not considered.

>>675716138
MODS

>>675718089
nice

>>675717973
Wtf?

>>675718178
What if they were taking a selfie in the mirror with their ass facing the mirror in their underwear

>>675718292
shut up cyka

>>675718364
You're good. No nudity

>>675716730
Anyone got sauce for this?

>>675718361
>>675717973
Sexist thing I've ever seen

>>675718364
It's very situational as to what qualifies. It's best just to avoid situations that seem iffy all together

Naked kids having a day out at a nudist beach isn't seen as cp, but kids posing is? I don't understand.

>>675715188
What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>675718704
That definitely is considered. I don't know where you get your legal advice from

>>675718613
What if it's shopped

>>675718364
basically this
>>675718613

don't take "no nudity" as meaning it isn't considered porn. legal definition of pornography doesn't mean all out, water gushing and bean flicking.

>>675718704
nudism can be argued as having a "redeeming social important" and interpreted as artistic.

>>675718823
Bruh, Google it, it's fine. Even in cuckhole America

>>675718845
oi lets keep postin photos pls

>>675716138
I almost cant believe this one is over age

Almost

>>675718962
Ya but it's iffy if it qualifies as cp or not

File: saggytits.jpg (78KB, 400x598px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 400x598px

shes legal, no need to contact mods

>>675719115
Ew wtf

>>675718977
then you are a moron

>>675717344
Yes you fucking pedophile. Kill yourself

>>675718088
>being this new

>>675714055
Lol moralfags

>>675719115
Wow, good thing you said that she was legal, otherwise, I never would have believed you!

File: KEK.jpg (138KB, 992x720px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 992x720px

>>675719115
whats with the pancake tits bruh?

>>675717973
sauce

>>675717344
Fuck you pedo fag