Someone please xray this

>>675591222
thats not possible
nice waste of trips faggot

>>675591359
Possible to nudeshop?

>>675591747
No.

>>675591747
The straps make it harder.

>>675591222
Cant xray through that retard.

File: sexy.jpg (95KB, 616x1071px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 616x1071px

>>675591222
easy

first 2 actually possible pics in here, ill xray. im bored.

>>675593462
nice burned in fake nipples

>>675593617
lighten up the rest, leave the nipples as they were.
those are her real nipples, cunt

>>675593703
youd have to be mentally retarded to believe the left nipple was actually where you put it

>>675593801
i am not going to lecture you on how to professionally use photo manipulating software

>>675591222
>i literally have no clue how x-ray works

>>675593801

this

>>675593916
good because i already know how, heres some fake (rushed) pepperoni nipples using the same tool

File: step1.jpg (97KB, 616x1071px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 616x1071px

>>675593801
ok what the hell.
Step 1. Oversaturate, high brightness, add up multiple layers of different saturation levels.
et voila. Nipple located.
Now we know where it is and can work around it.
Got it, cunt?

File: 1458803116179.jpg (269KB, 616x1071px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 616x1071px

>>675594290
forgot pic

>>675594339
lol there is no nipple there and you just admitted you burned in where you thought it was. thats not an xray.

>>675594432
you are litteraly that stupid

>>675594479
thats not a nipple you fucking retard its a lighting change. light bounces off mounds.

File: omg.jpg (97KB, 616x1071px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 616x1071px

you can not fucking see it?
have you ever seen a nipple in your life for comparison?

>>675594601
>100+ hours in photoshop

how does x-raying even work? Just curious

>>675594601
nice x ray

>>675594601
you know what you just keep burning obviously faked nipples into your "xrays" and ill leave you to it. stop feeling like youre good with photoshop for it though.

>>675594672
Taking LIGHT colored clothing, and manipulating saturation, brightness etc.
Go to any x-ray thread and they'll tell you that you need pics with light/thin clothing

>>675594672
you locate details that can be enhanced by oversaturation and usage of strong contrasts.
Once you located that details, you change picture back to normal and work them out with carefully placed brightning effect, burning effects and changing the levels of RGB spectrum.
Brightning around those details works better most of the time, than darkening the details itself. For example make nipple darker to show it more.
Better brighten rest of the tits

File: FB_IMG_1443886160316-1.jpg (41KB, 182x238px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 182x238px

Can you xrqy this please?

>>675594830

Neck yourself, please.

>>675594956
THE SECOND YOU USE BURNING EFFECTS ON ONLY A NIPPLE ITS A FAKE

>>675594979

get a better resolution pic you faggot

>>675594830
thats how unaware you are of the possibilities of photoshop.
Your calling "fake" is the pleasure that fondles my balls

>>675595016
the second i showed you how to locate a nipple.
it is the first step of using x-ray knowledge.
tried to lecture you.
your too stupid to understand

File: 577134_10151234586952578_604586869_n.jpg (223KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 960x960px

how about this one? girl in gray dress

>>675595079
youre not doing anything impressive by drawing on shadow nipples you fucking faggot. learn the difference between a fake and an xray.

>>675595175
disregard my point again, please

File: IMG_23721963165829-1.jpg (2MB, 1403x1880px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1403x1880px

She almost never wears a bra

File: hotslutneedsshoop.png (1024B, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

1024B, 480x640px

>>675595079
x-ray this one please

>>675595175

>lectures about how stupid he is
>your

I want to side with you, but it's getting hard, anon.

File: auth.jpg (241KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 960x960px

>>675595214

>>675595345
not native english here.
i dont fucking care for correct grammar

File: fake.jpg (2MB, 1403x1880px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1403x1880px

>>675595333
i xrayed it and saw a sports bra easily, then i burned on fake nipples like this other anon is telling me to. youre welcome.

>>675595841
you didnt even try to locate them.
noob

>>675595686

looks like a jailbait...

>>675595922
1.
>saw a sports bra easily
2.
whats the fucking point if its fake anyway? i could burn them on her shoulders and it would be just as much of an xray

>>675595962
like i care

>>675596057
you dont place fake nipples, you work on the surrounding are and highlighting the nipples by contrasting and fixing the sorrounding parts

File: Screenshot_20160304-014023~2.png (2MB, 1373x1371px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1373x1371px

Can anyone x-ray this one please?

File: Screenshot_20160322-035118.png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2560px

Possible?

File: 1457915651308.jpg (8KB, 192x240px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 192x240px

>>675596074

:^)

File: ne.jpg (271KB, 1373x1371px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1373x1371px

>>675596175

File: 1458806145148s.jpg (691KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 1440x2560px

>>675596199
heres a real one. not much to get.

>>675596739
uses only 2 tools.
Brightness and contrast.
> thinks he can xray
you sir are just weak

>>675597013
mfw i didnt use brightness OR contrast. oh, and definitely not the burn tool. if you think you can see anything without the levels tool youre a bigger idiot than i thought.

File: tumblr_nrkefcGK5L1rzvddao1_1280.jpg (332KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1280x960px

>>675596739
could you do this?

File: done.jpg (215KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1440x2560px

>>675597375
eat this, cunt

File: 05 - 2FY0cw7.jpg (712KB, 1978x2448px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 1978x2448px

>>675595686
nice. thanks anon have some tits

>>675597569
>burn tool
>dodge tool
>over contrast

do you really think i cant do a better version of what you just did

>>675597421
tried, shirts not showing anything through.

>>675593462
Do you think you could nudeshop it comepletely? If not thanks for the xray, but thank you in advance anongod

File: tumblr_niuxpyy7H11rzvddao1_1280.jpg (104KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 640x480px

>>675597757
is this a better pic?

>>675598012
checking in a second, making a better fake to make other anon mad.

File: step1.jpg (227KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1280x960px

>>675598191
step 1, play with brights

>>675598191
step2 locate nipples

File: step2.jpg (242KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1280x960px

>>675598354

>>675598191
kkkooool

File: final.jpg (249KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1280x960px

>>675598390
step3 work out highlights

>>675598429
those are some fucked up titties dude.
or the shirt is way to tight

File: 1458806145148.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>675598390
>>675597569
heres exactly what you just did but with more effort and color correction to match the skin. is this an xray? no. its a fake.

>>675598429
i think the shirt is just too tight kek
i can still jerk it

>>675598621
you fucked up here nipples so badly, you cant even see her right-nipple piercing anymore.
bad work

>>675598810
not like there was any actual areola to go off of anyways. if there was, you would have seen it in my first try.

>>675598012
nothing, find one with a white shirt and natural lighting for best results.

>>675598012
>>675598191
whataboutthisone?

File: image.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

Possible?

File: 12.jpg (149KB, 1365x1365px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1365x1365px

This one is probably impossible, but even an outline would be appreciated.

>>675598918
you just have so seperate the lighter skin breast from the darker aerola.
If you can not distinct those two areas, you dont know how to work filter

>>675599044
>not like there was any actual areola to go off of anyways. if there was, you would have seen it in my first try.

ill just use this comment again

File: bad.jpg (53KB, 457x513px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 457x513px

this one was way too bad quality for good results

File: 1458807983255.jpg (612KB, 1365x1365px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1365x1365px

>>675599036
nothing

>>675599732
try harder

How do, for real?

>>675599788
theres nothing else to try. youre failing to understand that unless you wanna fake everything photoshop isnt a magic tool. you can get out of the picture what was taken with the camera and manipulate it. the camera isnt an xray machine.

File: image.jpg (288KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1600x1200px

Mr. X-ray here is pretty good.

Please do this if possible.

File: 000001.jpg (248KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 960x960px

plox xrayman

File: IMG_20160212_233924.jpg (159KB, 960x719px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 960x719px

>>675591222

File: IMG_20160212_234007.jpg (143KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 960x720px

>>675600148

>>675594830
I could see the very slight nipple In the original photo, god you're a retard.

File: image.jpg (113KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x640px

Possible?

File: xray.jpg (426KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 1600x1200px

>>675600002
xray is underwhelming. if you want a fake ill make you one.

File: step1.jpg (229KB, 1365x1365px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1365x1365px

i will teach you 1 last time, cunt
step1

>>675600204
in op's image? no, you couldnt. and if youre talking about the one on the right thats not a nipple thats how bikinis in that style run and its the stitching of the fabric.

File: final.jpg (218KB, 1365x1365px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1365x1365px

it is not good.
But "not possible" is just not true

File: sdgfdgbfd.jpg (139KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 960x960px

Is this possible?

File: image.jpg (306KB, 1013x1501px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1013x1501px

>>675600442

Well done. I figured it was too thick but I thought the quality would make up for that. No fakes needed. Thanks though.

I got this too if you want to try it.

>>675600743
yeah i thought it would too. ill give it a shot

File: 1545128_10204087436940069_8828790856993802434_n.jpg (342KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 960x720px

>>675600686

File: nice.jpg (202KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 960x960px

>>675600714
very nice

File: image.jpg (391KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 720x478px

One in black, possible?

File: 1458809017528.jpg (594KB, 1013x1501px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 1013x1501px

>>675600743
bearer of bad news.

>>675601236
Thanks heaps always knew i could see something there

>>675595333

Nice trips

File: Screenshot_2016-03-24-08-51-23-1.png (462KB, 540x541px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 540x541px

Someone please x-ray this?

File: 1239029_279555125541332_1187584605_n.jpg (59KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 720x540px

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?
The pants seem like the obvious choice

File: nuttin.jpg (67KB, 540x541px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 540x541px

>>675601587
sry dude, nothing much to see

>>675602055
wait how do you do this shit?

>>675600295
>Possible
Girl on left--would be much appreciated

>>675602055
Ah damn, thanks for having a go anyways man

File: modern_anatomical_skeleton.jpg (514KB, 2217x4356px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 2217x4356px

>>675591222
Here you go fam.
Also, nice trips.

File: FB_IMG_1458430885689.jpg (17KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 640x640px

Can someone try this??

File: notmuch.jpg (72KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 720x540px

>>675601675
bad

File: 8757289b-37de-45f4-abc3-fd800ad19606..jpg (59KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x800px

please xray, I know it's there, I just don't know how to do it correctly

File: FB_IMG_1458225977461.jpg (61KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x960px

Possible?

File: kjasjkajkd.jpg (245KB, 797x747px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 797x747px

anything on this?

File: FB_IMG_1458225751854.jpg (68KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x540px

Heres a better one you can try to x ray

File: 10891960_10152567345840222_7614233543708146228_n.jpg (33KB, 379x569px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 379x569px

>>675602561
She always wears a bra, so I didn't bother to ask for nips
You can try this girl if you want

File: image.jpg (31KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x480px

Possible?

File: FB_IMG_1458225873775.jpg (105KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 960x960px

X ray??

>>675601336

It's better than the original. Looks good though. Your good at the X-ray thing. You give /b/tards hope.

File: 1d45559294af47c3ec35c693c3d17635_166529.jpg (117KB, 750x1125px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 750x1125px

can someone do this?

File: hm.jpg (78KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x800px

>>675602618
sorry, those dark spots you thought were nipples, have just been a bad attempt to "draw" them in there.
There is nothing to see

>>675603047
thanks, i try. cant sleep so if ya find anything else reply to this and ill keep an eye on the thread.

>>675603065
I'd do that everyday of the week

Why don't you xray faggots actually do the ones that are possible? Fucking dumbasses

>>675601761
>>675603065

>>675603530
ill do >>675603065 if you suck my dick about it and ask nicely.

>>675600148
holy shit these girls a ugly

>>675603639
>if you suck my dick about it and ask nicely
I sure as hell will

>>675600148
>>675600202
Can someone try these ones please

>>675603864
>looking at a woman's face
you're doing it wrong

File: 1458810757858.jpg (249KB, 750x1125px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 750x1125px

>>675603903
in that case

>>675603065

>>675604132
wow so badly done

>>675603962
>thinks tits make a girl hot
tits << ass

>>675604175
sorry, i didnt know you wanted me to draw in nipples that werent there in the first place. ask the other guy to do that for you i guess.

>>675604182
I never said that

>>675604132
your supposed to xray, not saturate the shit out of it

>>675604240
there is literally no saturation used in that xray. i dont know what you want. do you think it should look brighter? because with a washed out white image you need to make it darker to see through it.

File: 1416344385668.jpg (206KB, 716x713px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 716x713px

>>675604182
Girl in the back

File: image.jpg (135KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 960x960px

Please could someone X-ray this?

File: 1458810757858.jpg (252KB, 750x1125px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 750x1125px

>>675604240
>>675604175
heres what any other xrayer on b will give you, tell me if that is easier to see through

File: 1416344278987.jpg (193KB, 677x692px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 677x692px

>>675604485

File: g6g78.jpg (32KB, 338x770px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 338x770px

???

File: image.jpg (38KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x500px

X-ray? (Sorry about potato quality)

>>675604485
Would only hit it from the back

nah no more, the people up a couple posts who think they know what theyre talking about finally drove me out. maybe they can do some xrays for ya. later.

>>675604816
I'm sure you fuck way hotter girls